nach oben

International Orthopaedics

Erschienen in:

01.12.2009 | Original Paper

Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review

verfasst von: T. Cheng, J. G. Feng, T. Liu, X. L. Zhang

Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics | Ausgabe 6/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the operative outcome between mini and standard incisions in total hip arthroplasty (THA). We identified 12 randomised or quasi-randomised control trials (RCT or qRCT) published between 1996 and 2008. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the differences in results for surgical approach, trial quality, and follow-up duration. Operative time and blood loss were significantly reduced in the mini-incision group for studies with the posterior or posterolateral approach. Concerning postoperative complications, there were no significant differences between the two groups with no significant heterogeneity. No differences were observed between the two groups for Harris hip score and radiographic results except for cup anterversion. Although mini-incision appeared to have similar outcomes compared to standard incision, the follow-up is short-term according to current standards in THA. High-quality studies are required to compare the outcomes of these two procedures.

Archibeck MJ, White RE Jr (2004) Learning curve for the two-incision total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 429:232–238CrossRefPubMed

Aziz O, Rao C, Panesar SS, Jones C, Morris S, Darzi A (2007) Meta-analysis of minimally invasive internal thoracic artery bypass versus percutaneous revascularisation for isolated lesions of the left anterior descending artery. BMJ 334:617CrossRefPubMed

Berger RA, Jacobs JJ, Meneghini RM, Della Valle C, Paprosky W, Rosenberg AG (2004) Rapid rehabilitation and recovery with minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 429:239–247CrossRefPubMed

Bottner F, Delgado S, Sculco TP (2006) Minimally invasive total hip replacement: the posterolateral approach. Am J Orthop 35:218–224PubMed

Callaghan J (2006) Skeptical perspectives on minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:2242–2243

Cameron HU (2002) Mini-incisions: visualization is key. Orthopedics 25:473PubMed

Chan AW, Hróbjartsson A, Haahr MT, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG (2004) Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA 291:2457–2465CrossRefPubMed

Chimento GF, Pavone V, Sharrock N, Kahn B, Cahill J, Sculco TP (2005) Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty 20:139–144CrossRefPubMed

Chung WK, Liu D, Foo LS (2004) Mini-incision total hip replacement-surgical technique and early results. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 12:19–24

10.

de Beer J, Petruccelli D, Zalzal P, Winemaker MJ (2004) Single-incision, minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: length doesn't matter. J Arthroplasty 19:945–950PubMed

11.

DiGioia AM 3rd, Plakseychuk AY, Levison TJ, Jaramaz B (2003) Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty with navigation. J Arthroplasty 18:123–128CrossRefPubMed

12.

Dorr LD, Maheshwari AV, Long WT, Wan Z, Sirianni LE (2007) Early pain relief and function after posterior minimally invasive and conventional total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, blinded study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1153–1160CrossRefPubMed

13.

Dutka J, Sosin P, Libura M, Skowronek P (2007) Total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive lateral approach-our experience and early results. Orthop Traumatol Rehabil 9:39–45

14.

Flören M, Lester DK (2006) Durability of implant fixation after less-invasive total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21:783–790CrossRefPubMed

15.

Hart R, Stipcák V, Janecek M, Visna P (2005) Component position following total hip arthroplasty through a miniinvasive posterolateral approach. Acta Orthop Belg 71:60–64PubMed

16.

Higgins JPT, Green S (2008) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.0. The Cochrane Collaboration

17.

Howell JR, Garbuz DS, Duncan CP (2004) Minimally invasive hip replacement: rationale, applied anatomy, and instrumentation. Orthop Clin North Am 35:107–118CrossRefPubMed

18.

Howell JR, Masri BA, Duncan CP (2004) Minimally invasive versus standard incision anterolateral hip replacement: a comparative study. Orthop Clin North Am 3:153–162CrossRef

19.

Ilizaliturri VM Jr, Chaidez PA, Valero FS, Aguilera JM (2004) Small incision total hip replacement by the lateral approach using standard instruments. Orthopedics 27:377–381PubMed

20.

Jacobs WC, Clement DJ, Wymenga AB (2005) Retention versus removal of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement: a systematic literature review within the Cochrane framework. Acta Orthop 76:757–768CrossRefPubMed

21.

Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary. Control Clin Trials 17:1–12CrossRefPubMed

22.

Keener JD, Callaghan JJ, Goetz DD, Pederson D, Sullivan P, Johnston RC (2003) Long-term function after Charnley total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417:148–156PubMed

23.

Kim YH (2006) Comparison of primary total hip arthroplasties performed with a minimally invasive technique or a standard technique: a prospective and randomized study. J Arthroplasty 21:1092–1098CrossRefPubMed

24.

Kiyama T, Naito M, Shitama H, Shinoda T, Maeyama A (2008) Comparison of skin blood flow between mini-and standard-incision approaches during total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 23:1045–1049CrossRef

25.

Klein GR, Parvizi J, Sharkey PF, Rothman RH, Hozack WJ (2005) Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: internet claims made by members of the Hip Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res 441:68–70CrossRefPubMed

26.

Labovitch RS, Bozic KJ, Hansen E (2006) An evaluation of information available on the internet regarding minimally invasive hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21:1–5CrossRefPubMed

27.

Laffosse JM, Chiron P, Molinier F, Bensafi H, Puget J (2007) Prospective and comparative study of the anterolateral mini-invasive approach versus minimally invasive posterior approach for primary total hip replacement—early results. Int Orthop 31:597–603CrossRefPubMed

28.

Levine BR, Klein GR, Di Cesare PE (2007) Surgical approaches in total hip arthroplasty: a review of the mini-incision and MIS literature. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 65:5–18PubMed

29.

Malik A, Dorr LD (2007) The science of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 463:74–84PubMed

30.

McAuley JP, Szuszczewicz ES, Young A, Engh CA Sr (2004) Total hip arthroplasty in patients 50 years and younger. Clin Orthop Relat Res 418:119–125CrossRefPubMed

31.

Mow CS, Woolson ST, Ngarmukos SG, Park EH, Lorenz HP (2005) Comparison of scars from total hip replacements done with a standard or a mini-incision. Clin Orthop Relat Res 441:80–85CrossRefPubMed

32.

Murphy SB, Ecker TM, Tannast M (2006) THA performed using conventional and navigated tissue-preserving techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453:160–167CrossRefPubMed

33.

Musil D, Stehlík J, Verner M (2008) A comparison of operative invasiveness in minimally invasive anterolateral hip replacement (MIS-AL) and standard hip procedure, using biochemical markers. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 75:16–20PubMed

34.

Nakamura S, Matsuda K, Arai N, Wakimoto N, Matsushita T (2004) Mini-incision posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 28:214–217CrossRefPubMed

35.

Ogonda L, Wilson R, Archbold P, Lawlor M, Humphreys P, O’Brien S, Beverland D (2005) A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve postoperative outcomes. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(4):701–710CrossRefPubMed

36.

Petitti DB (2001) Approaches to heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Stat Med 20:3625–3633CrossRefPubMed

37.

Prescott RJ, Counsell CE, Gillespie WJ, Grant AM, Russell IT, Kiauka S, Colthart IR, Ross S, Shepherd SM, Russell D (1999) Factors that limit the quality, number and progress of randomized controlled trials. Health Technol Assess 3:1–143PubMed

38.

Procyk S (2007) Initial results with a mini-posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 31(Suppl 1):S17–S20CrossRefPubMed

39.

Purkayastha S, Tilney HS, Georgiou P, Athanasiou T, Tekkis PP, Darzi AW (2007) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomised control trials. Surg Endosc 21:1294–1300CrossRefPubMed

40.

Reininga IH, Wagenmakers R, van den Akker-Scheek I, Stant AD, Groothoff JW, Bulstra SK, Zijlstra W, Stevens M (2007) Effectiveness of computer-navigated minimally invasive total hip surgery compared to conventional total hip arthroplasty: design of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:4CrossRef

41.

Sculco TP, Jordan LC, Walter WL (2004) Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: The Hospital for Special Surgery experience. Orthop Clin North Am 35(2):137–142CrossRefPubMed

42.

Sherry E, Egan M, Henderson A, Warnke PH (2002) Minimally invasive techniques for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:1481PubMed

43.

Speranza A, Iorio R, Ferretti M, Arrigo CD, Ferretti A (2007) A lateral minimal-incision technique in total hip replacement: a prospective, randomizes, controlled trial. Hip Int 17:4–8PubMed

44.

Swanson TV (2007) Posterior single-incision approach to minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 31(Suppl 1):S1–S5CrossRefPubMed

45.

Szendrõi M, Sztrinkai G, Vass R, Kiss J (2006) The impact of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty on the standard procedure. Int Orthop 30:167–171CrossRefPubMed

46.

Teet JS, Skinner HB, Khoury L (2006) The effect of the “mini” incision in total hip arthroplasty on component position. J Arthroplasty 21:503–507CrossRefPubMed

47.

Vavken P, Kotz R, Dorotka R (2007) Minimally invasive hip replacement—a meta-analysis. Z Orthop Unfall 145:152–156CrossRefPubMed

48.

Wenz JF, Gurkan I, Jibodh SR (2002) Mini-incision total hip arthroplasty: a comparative assessment of perioperative outcomes. Orthopedics 25:1031–1043PubMed

49.

Wright JM, Crockett HC, Delgado S, Lyman S, Madsen M, Sculco TP (2004) Mini-incision for total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, controlled investigation with 5-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 19:538–545CrossRefPubMed

50.

Yan ZQ, Chen YS, Yang Y, Li WJ, Chen ZR, Zhang GJ (2005) Two-incision minimal invasive approach for total hip replacement. Fudan Univ J Med Sci 32:557–560

51.

Zhang XL, He YH, Wang Q, Jiang Y, Sui SP, Zeng BF (2004) Minimally invasive incision in total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly. Chin J Orthop Trauma 6:506–508

52.

Zhang XL, Wang Q, Jiang Y, Zeng BF (2006) Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty with anterior incision. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 44:512–515PubMed

Titel: Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review
verfasst von: T. Cheng
J. G. Feng
T. Liu
X. L. Zhang
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2009
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics / Ausgabe 6/2009
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0743-z

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

23.04.2024 | Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen | Nachrichten

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review

Abstract

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2009

Functional outcome after excision of heterotopic ossification about the knee in ICU patients

Recombined bone xenografts enhance tendon graft osteointegration of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Irreducible dislocation of the hip in cerebral palsy patients treated by Schanz proximal femoral valgus osteotomy

Five-year DEXA study of 88 hips with cemented femoral stem

Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experience

Total knee replacement in the fixed valgus deformity using a lateral approach: role of the automatic iliotibial band release for a successful balancing

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie