Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics 3/2012

01.03.2012 | Original Paper

Variability of medial and posterior offset in patients with fourth-generation stemmed shoulder arthroplasty

verfasst von: Ulrich Irlenbusch, Alexander Berth, Georges Blatter, Peter Zenz

Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics | Ausgabe 3/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Most anthropometric data on the proximal humerus has been obtained from deceased healthy individuals with no deformities. Endoprostheses are implanted for primary and secondary osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, humeral-head necrosis, fracture sequelae and other humeral-head deformities. This indicates that pathologicoanatomical variability may be greater than previously assumed. We therefore investigated a group of patients with typical shoulder replacement diagnoses, including posttraumatic and rheumatic deformities.

Material and methods

One hundred and twenty-two patients with a double eccentrically adjustable shaft endoprosthesis served as a specific dimension gauge to determine in vivo the individual humeral-head rotation centres from the position of the adjustable prosthesis taper and the eccentric head.

Results

All prosthesis heads were positioned eccentrically. The entire adjustment range of the prosthesis of 12 mm medial/lateral and 6 mm dorsal/ventral was required. Mean values for effective offset were 5.84 mm mediolaterally [standard deviation (SD) 1.95, minimum +2, maximum +11] and 1.71 mm anteroposteriorly (SD 1.71, minimum −3, maximum 3 mm), averaging 5.16 mm (SD 1.76, minimum +2, maximum + 10). The posterior offset averaged 1.85 mm (SD 1.85, minimum −1, maximum + 6 mm).

Conclusions

In summary, variability of the combined medial and dorsal offset of the humeral-head rotational centre determined in patients with typical underlying diagnoses in shoulder replacement was not greater than that recorded in the literature for healthy deceased patients. The range of deviation is substantial and shows the need for an adjustable prosthetic system.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Boileau P, Walch G (1999) Anatomical study of the proximal humerus: surgical technique considerations and prosthetic design rationale. In: Walch G, Boileau P (eds) Shoulder arthroplasty. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp 69–82CrossRef Boileau P, Walch G (1999) Anatomical study of the proximal humerus: surgical technique considerations and prosthetic design rationale. In: Walch G, Boileau P (eds) Shoulder arthroplasty. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp 69–82CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchler P, Farron A (2004) Benefits of an anatomical reconstruction of the humeral head during shoulder arthroplasty: a finite element analysis. Clin Biomech 19:16–23CrossRef Buchler P, Farron A (2004) Benefits of an anatomical reconstruction of the humeral head during shoulder arthroplasty: a finite element analysis. Clin Biomech 19:16–23CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Favre P, Moor B, Snedeker JG, Gerber C (2008) Influence of component positioning on impingement in conventional total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Biomech 23:175–183CrossRef Favre P, Moor B, Snedeker JG, Gerber C (2008) Influence of component positioning on impingement in conventional total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Biomech 23:175–183CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Gerber A, Ghalambor N, Warner JJ (2001) Instability of shoulder arthroplasty: balancing mobility and stability. Orthop Clin North Am 32-A:661–670CrossRef Gerber A, Ghalambor N, Warner JJ (2001) Instability of shoulder arthroplasty: balancing mobility and stability. Orthop Clin North Am 32-A:661–670CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hertel R, Knothe U, Ballmer FT (2002) Geometry of the proximal humerus and implications for prosthetic design. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:331–338PubMedCrossRef Hertel R, Knothe U, Ballmer FT (2002) Geometry of the proximal humerus and implications for prosthetic design. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:331–338PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ianotti JP, Gabriel JP, Schneck SL, Evans BG, Misra S (1992) The normal glenohumeral relationships. J Bone Joint Surg 74-A:491–500 Ianotti JP, Gabriel JP, Schneck SL, Evans BG, Misra S (1992) The normal glenohumeral relationships. J Bone Joint Surg 74-A:491–500
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Irlenbusch U, Blatter G, Gebhardt K, Pap G, Zenz P (2011) Prospective study of double eccentric hemi shoulder arthroplasty in different etiologies–Midterm results. Int Orthop 35(7):1015–1023PubMedCrossRef Irlenbusch U, Blatter G, Gebhardt K, Pap G, Zenz P (2011) Prospective study of double eccentric hemi shoulder arthroplasty in different etiologies–Midterm results. Int Orthop 35(7):1015–1023PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Irlenbusch U, End S, Kilic M (2011) Differences in reconstruction of the anatomy with modern adjustable compared to second-generation shoulder prosthesis. Int Orthop 35(5):705–711PubMedCrossRef Irlenbusch U, End S, Kilic M (2011) Differences in reconstruction of the anatomy with modern adjustable compared to second-generation shoulder prosthesis. Int Orthop 35(5):705–711PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Irlenbusch U, Irlenbusch L (2007) Update in shoulder endoprosthetics (in German). Z Orthop Unfall up2date 4:289–309 Irlenbusch U, Irlenbusch L (2007) Update in shoulder endoprosthetics (in German). Z Orthop Unfall up2date 4:289–309
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeong J, Bryan J, Ianotti JP (2009) Effect of variable prosthetic neck-shaft angle and the surgical technique on replication of normal humeral anatomy. J Bone Joint Surg 91-A:1932–1941CrossRef Jeong J, Bryan J, Ianotti JP (2009) Effect of variable prosthetic neck-shaft angle and the surgical technique on replication of normal humeral anatomy. J Bone Joint Surg 91-A:1932–1941CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat McPherson EJ, Friedman RJ, An YH, Chokesi R, Dooley RL (1997) Anthropometric study of normal glenohumeral relationships. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 6:105–112PubMedCrossRef McPherson EJ, Friedman RJ, An YH, Chokesi R, Dooley RL (1997) Anthropometric study of normal glenohumeral relationships. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 6:105–112PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Nyffeler WR, Sheikh R, Jacob HAC, Gerber C (2004) Influence of humeral prosthesis height on biomechanics of glenohumeral abduction. J Bone Joint Surg 86-A:575–580PubMed Nyffeler WR, Sheikh R, Jacob HAC, Gerber C (2004) Influence of humeral prosthesis height on biomechanics of glenohumeral abduction. J Bone Joint Surg 86-A:575–580PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Nyffeler WR, Gerber C (2004) The relevance of anatomical reconstruction. In: Nice shoulder course: shoulder arthroscopy and arthroplasty. Current concepts. Sauramps Medical, Montpellier, pp 315–316 Nyffeler WR, Gerber C (2004) The relevance of anatomical reconstruction. In: Nice shoulder course: shoulder arthroscopy and arthroplasty. Current concepts. Sauramps Medical, Montpellier, pp 315–316
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Pearl ML, Kurutz S, Postachini R (2009) Geometric variables in anatomic replacement of the proximal humerus: how much prosthetic geometry is necessary? J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18:366–370PubMedCrossRef Pearl ML, Kurutz S, Postachini R (2009) Geometric variables in anatomic replacement of the proximal humerus: how much prosthetic geometry is necessary? J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18:366–370PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Pearl ML (2005) Proximal humeral anatomy in shoulder arthroplasty: implications for prosthetic design and surgical technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14:99S–104SPubMedCrossRef Pearl ML (2005) Proximal humeral anatomy in shoulder arthroplasty: implications for prosthetic design and surgical technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14:99S–104SPubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Pearl MI, Kurutz S (1999) Geometric analysis of commonly used prosthetic systems for proximal humeral replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 81(5):660–671 Pearl MI, Kurutz S (1999) Geometric analysis of commonly used prosthetic systems for proximal humeral replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 81(5):660–671
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Roberts SNJ, Foley APJ, Swallow HM, Wallace WA, Coughlan DP (1991) The geometry of the humeral head and the design of the prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg 73B:647–650 Roberts SNJ, Foley APJ, Swallow HM, Wallace WA, Coughlan DP (1991) The geometry of the humeral head and the design of the prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg 73B:647–650
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomas SR, Sforza G, Levy O, Copeland SA (2005) Geometrical analysis of Copeland surface replacement shoulder arthroplasty in relation to normal anatomy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14:186–192PubMedCrossRef Thomas SR, Sforza G, Levy O, Copeland SA (2005) Geometrical analysis of Copeland surface replacement shoulder arthroplasty in relation to normal anatomy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14:186–192PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Walch G, Boileau P (1999) Prosthetic adaptability: a new concept for shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 8:443–451PubMedCrossRef Walch G, Boileau P (1999) Prosthetic adaptability: a new concept for shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 8:443–451PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams GR, Wong KL, Pepe MD, Tan V, Silverberg D, Ramsey ML, Karduna A, Ianotti JP (2001) The effect of articular malposition after total shoulder arthroplasty on Glenohumeral translations, range of motion and subacromial impingement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10:399–409PubMedCrossRef Williams GR, Wong KL, Pepe MD, Tan V, Silverberg D, Ramsey ML, Karduna A, Ianotti JP (2001) The effect of articular malposition after total shoulder arthroplasty on Glenohumeral translations, range of motion and subacromial impingement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10:399–409PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Wirth MA, Ondrla J, Southworth C, Kaar K, Anderson BC, Rockwood CA (2007) Replicating proximal humeral articular geometry with a third-generation implant: a radiographic study in cadaveric shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16:111S–116SCrossRef Wirth MA, Ondrla J, Southworth C, Kaar K, Anderson BC, Rockwood CA (2007) Replicating proximal humeral articular geometry with a third-generation implant: a radiographic study in cadaveric shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16:111S–116SCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Variability of medial and posterior offset in patients with fourth-generation stemmed shoulder arthroplasty
verfasst von
Ulrich Irlenbusch
Alexander Berth
Georges Blatter
Peter Zenz
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
International Orthopaedics / Ausgabe 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1365-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2012

International Orthopaedics 3/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.