Skip to main content
Log in

Combining different rotational alignment axes with navigation may reduce the need for lateral retinacular release in total knee arthroplasty

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the study was to compare femoropatellar alignment and the incidence of lateral retinacular release (LRR) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in which the rotational alignment of the femoral component was determined using a combination of different rotational alignment axes and navigation or a single reference axis in the standard procedure.

Methods

We assessed 66 patients undergoing TKA in whom the rotation of the femoral component was determined on the posterior condylar axis in standard procedures (group A) and 65 patients in whom it was determined by combining the posterior condylar axis, anteroposterior axis and epicondylar axis in navigated procedures (group B). The mean age was 68 and 69 years in groups A and B, respectively. Patellar tracking was assessed after deflation of the tourniquet and LRR performed in the presence of maltracking. Visual analogue scale (VAS), Knee Society Score (KSS), Lonner patellar score and patellar tilt were recorded.

Results

LRR was carried out in 18 cases (27 %) in group A and in four (6 %) in group B (p = 0.003). The KSS and VAS were improved significantly compared to the preoperative status, but with no significant differences between the two groups. The patellar score showed a greater improvement in the navigated compared to the standard group at the four week follow-up. Patella tilt improved significantly in both groups. The complication rate was similar in the two groups.

Conclusions

Combining different rotational alignment axes with navigation significantly reduces patellar maltracking and the need for LRR compared to the standard procedure in which the posterior condylar axis is used as single anatomical reference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miller MC, Berger RA, Petrella AJ, Karmas A, Rubash HE (2001) Optimizing femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:38–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lachiewicz PF, Soileau ES (2006) Patellar maltracking in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:155–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Anouchi YS, Whiteside LA, Kaiser AD, Milliano MT (1993) The effects of axial rotational alignment of the femoral component on knee stability and patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty demonstrated on autopsy specimens. Clin Orthop Relat Res 287:170–177

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rhoads DD, Noble PC, Reuben JD, Mahoney OM, Tullos HS (1990) The effect of femoral component position on patellar tracking after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 260:43–51

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Whiteside LA, Arima J (1995) The anteroposterior axis for femoral rotational alignment in valgus total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 321:168–172

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Laskin RS (1995) Flexion space configuration in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 10:657–660

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Insall JN, Binazzi R, Soudry M, Mestriner LA (1985) Total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 192:13–22

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kusuma SK, Puri N, Lotke PA (2009) Lateral retinacular release during primary total knee arthroplasty: effect on outcomes and complications. J Arthroplasty 24:383–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Siston RA, Patel JJ, Goodman SB, Delp SL, Giori NJ (2005) The variability of femoral rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:2276–2280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brin YS, Nikolaou VS, Joseph L, Zukor DJ, Antoniou J (2011) Imageless computer assisted versus conventional total knee replacement. A Bayesian meta-analysis of 23 comparative studies. Int Orthop 35(3):331–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C (2007) A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:236–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. van der Linden-van der Zwaag HM, Bos J, van der Heide HJ, Nelissen RG (2011) A computed tomography based study on rotational alignment accuracy of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery. Int Orthop 35(6):845–850

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lützner J, Krummenauer F, Wolf C, Günther KP, Kirschner S (2008) Computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement: a comparative, prospective, randomised study with radiological and CT evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:1039–1044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ritter M, Herbst S, Keating EM, Faris PM, Meding JB (1996) Patellofemoral complications following total knee arthroplasty. Effect of a lateral release and sacrifice of the superior lateral geniculate artery. J Arthroplasty 11:368–372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Scuderi G, Schar SC, Meltzer LP et al (1987) The relationship of lateral releases to patella viability in the total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2:209–214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lonner JH (2006) Patellofemoral arthroplasty. In: Scott NW (ed) Insall and Scott surgery of the knee. Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 1455–1520

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gomes LSM, Bechtold JE, Gustilo RB (1988) Patellar prosthesis positioning in total knee arthroplasty. A roentgenographic study. Clin Orthop 236:72–81

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Laskin RS (2001) Lateral release rates after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 392:88–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chan KC, Gill GS (1999) Postoperative patellar tilt in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 14:300–304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ogata KO, Ishinishi T, Hara M (1997) Evaluation of patellar retinacular tension during total knee arthroplasty. Special emphasis on lateral retinacular release. J Arthroplasty 12:651–656

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Engh GA, Parks NL, Ammeen DJ (1996) Influence of surgical approach on lateral retinacular releases in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 331:56–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kainz H, Reng W, Augat P et al (2012) Influence of total knee arthroplasty on patellar kinematics and contact characteristics. Int Orthop 36(1):73–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Indelli PF, Marcucci M, Cariello D et al (2011) Contemporary femoral designs in total knee arthroplasty: effects on the patello-femoral congruence. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-011-1454-9

  24. Mantas JP, Bloebaum RD, Skedros JG et al (1992) Implications of reference axes used for rotational alignment of the femoral component in primary and revision knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 7:531–535

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Churchill DL, Incavo SJ, Johnson CC et al (1998) The transepicondylar axis approximates the optimal flexion axis of the knee. Clin Orthop 356:111–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jenny JY, Boeri C (2004) Low reproducibility of intra-operative measurement of transepicondylar axis during total knee replacement. Acta Orthop Scand 75:74–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Polivache PL, Insall JN, Scuderi GR, Font-Rodriguez DE (1996) Rotational landmarks and sizing of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 331:35–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Newbern DG, Faris PM, Ritter MA, Keating EM, Meding JB, Berend ME (2006) A clinical comparison of patellar tracking using the transepicondylar axis and the posterior condylar axis. J Arthroplasty 21:1141–1146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Siston RA, Cromie MJ, Gold GE, Goodman SB, Delp SC, Maloney WJ, Giori NJ (2008) Averaging different alignment axes improves femoral rotational alignment in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:2098–2104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kaper BP, Woolfrey M, Bourne RB (2000) The effect of built-in external femoral rotation on patellofemoral tracking in the Genesis II total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 15:964–969

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kawano T, Miura H, Nagamine R et al (2002) Factors affecting patellar tracking after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17:942–947

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gianluca Cinotti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cinotti, G., Ripani, F.R., Sessa, P. et al. Combining different rotational alignment axes with navigation may reduce the need for lateral retinacular release in total knee arthroplasty. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 36, 1595–1600 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1523-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1523-8

Keywords

Navigation