nach oben

International Orthopaedics

Erschienen in:

01.05.2014 | Original Paper

Clinical and radiological outcome of the Total Evolutive Shoulder System (TESS®) reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective comparative non-randomised study

verfasst von: Bakir Kadum, Sebastian Mukka, Erling Englund, Arkan Sayed-Noor, Göran Sjödén

Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics | Ausgabe 5/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The aims of this study were to assess the function and quality of life after the Total Evolutive Shoulder System (TESS) reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), to evaluate the radiological stability of the stemless version and to address the effect of arm lengthening and scapular notching (SN) on the outcome.

Methods

This was a prospective comparative non-randomised study. A total of 37 consecutive patients (40 shoulders) underwent TESS RSA between October 2007 and January 2012; 16 were stemless and 26 were stemmed. At a mean follow-up of 39 months (15–66), we evaluated range of motion (ROM), pain and functional outcome with QuickDASH and quality of life with EQ-5D score. Radiologically, component positioning, signs of loosening, SN and arm length difference were documented.

Results

We found a significant improvement in functional outcome and reduction of pain in both stemmed and stemless groups. No humeral loosening was evident, but there were four glenoid loosenings. In 12 shoulders that developed SN, seven already had scapular bone impression (SBI) evident on initial post-operative radiographs. Glenoid overhang seemed to decrease the risk of SN. Arm lengthening was associated with better EQ-5D but did not influence ROM or functional outcome.

Conclusions

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty markedly improved shoulder function. SN is of concern in RSA, but proper positioning of the glenoid component may prevent its development.

Kadum B, Mafi N, Norberg S, Sayed-Noor AS (2011) Results of the Total Evolutive Shoulder System (TESS): a single-centre study of 56 consecutive patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131(12):1623–1629PubMedCrossRef

Dieckmann R, Liem D, Gosheger G, Henrichs MP, Höll S, Hardes J, Streitbürger A (2013) Evaluation of a reconstruction reverse shoulder for tumour surgery and tribological comparison with an anatomical shoulder arthroplasty. Int Orthop 37(3):451–456PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Ortmaier R, Resch H, Matis N, Blocher M, Auffarth A, Mayer M, Hitzl W, Tauber M (2013) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in revision of failed shoulder arthroplasty-outcome and follow-up. Int Orthop 37(1):67–75PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Flury MP, Frey P, Goldhahn J, Schwyzer HK, Simmen BR (2011) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty as a salvage procedure for failed conventional shoulder replacement due to cuff failure–midterm results. Int Orthop 35(1):53–60PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Molé D, Wein F, Dézaly C, Valenti P, Sirveaux F (2011) Surgical technique: the anterosuperior approach for reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(9):2461–2468PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN et al (2005) Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(5):1038–1046PubMedCrossRef

Sirveaux F (1997) Grammont prosthesis in the treatment of shoulder arthropathies with massive cuff tear. Multicenter series of 42 cases (in French). Medical doctor thesis, Nancy I University, 245 p

Simovitch RW, Zumstein MA, Lohri E, Helmy N, Gerber C (2007) Predictors of scapular notching in patients managed with the Delta III reverse total shoulder replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(3):588–600PubMedCrossRef

Nyffeler RW, Werner CML Gerber C (2005) Biomechanical relevance of glenoid component positioning in the reverse Delta III total shoulder prosthesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14:524–528PubMedCrossRef

10.

Lévigne C, Garret J, Boileau P, Alami G, Favard L, Walch G (2011) Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: is it important to avoid it and how? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(9):2512–2520PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

11.

Scarlat MM (2013) Complications with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and recent evolutions. Int Orthop 37(5):843–851PubMedCrossRef

12.

Mizuno N, Denard PJ, Raiss P, Walch G (2012) The clinical and radiographical results of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with eccentric glenosphere. Int Orthop 36(8):1647–1653PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

13.

Huguet D, DeClercq G, Rio B, Teissier J, Zipoli B, TESS Group (2010) Results of a new stemless shoulder prosthesis: radiographic proof of maintained fixation and stability after a minimum of three years’ follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19:847–852PubMedCrossRef

14.

Ballas R, Béguin L (2013) Results of a stemless reverse shoulder prosthesis at more than 58 months mean without loosening. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22(9):e1–e6

15.

Farshad M, Gerber C (2010) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty-from the most to the least common complication. Int Orthop 34(8):1075–1082PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

16.

de Wilde LF, Poncet D, Middernacht B, Ekelund A (2010) Prosthetic overhang is the most effective way to prevent scapular conflict in a reverse total shoulder prosthesis. Acta Orthop 81(6):719–726PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

17.

Gutiérrez S, Greiwe RM, Frankle MA, Siegal S, Lee WE III (2007) Biomechanical comparison of component position and hardware failure in the reverse shoulder prosthesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16(3 Suppl):S9–S12PubMedCrossRef

18.

De Biase CF, Ziveri G, Delcogliano M, de Caro F, Gumina S, Borroni M, Castagna A, Postacchini R (2013) The use of an eccentric glenosphere compared with a concentric glenosphere in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: two-year minimum follow-up results. Int Orthop 37(10):1949–1955PubMedCrossRef

19.

Kempton LB, Balasubramaniam M, Ankerson E, Wiater JM (2011) A radiographic analysis of the effects of glenosphere position on scapular notching following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20(6):968–974

20.

Edwards TB, Trappey GJ, Riley C, O’Connor DP, Elkousy HA, Gartsman GM (2012) Inferior tilt of the glenoid component does not decrease scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: results of a prospective randomized study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21(5):641–646PubMedCrossRef

21.

Gutiérrez S, Walker M, Willis M, Pupello DR, Frankle MA (2011) Effects of tilt and glenosphere eccentricity on baseplate/bone interface forces in a computational model, validated by a mechanical model, of reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20:732–739PubMedCrossRef

22.

Lädermann A, Williams MD, Melis B, Hoffmeyer P, Walch G (2009) Objective evaluation of lengthening in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18(4):588–595PubMedCrossRef

23.

Lädermann A, Walch G, Lubbeke A, Drake GN, Melis B, Bacle G, Collin P, Edwards TB, Sirveaux F (2012) Influence of arm lengthening in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21(3):336–341PubMedCrossRef

24.

Lädermann A, Edwards TB, Walch G (2013) Arm lengthening after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a review. Int Orthop [Epub ahead of print] PMID: 24271331.

Titel: Clinical and radiological outcome of the Total Evolutive Shoulder System (TESS®) reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective comparative non-randomised study
verfasst von: Bakir Kadum
Sebastian Mukka
Erling Englund
Arkan Sayed-Noor
Göran Sjödén
Publikationsdatum: 01.05.2014
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics / Ausgabe 5/2014
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2277-7

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

18.04.2024 | Wirbelsäulenmetastase | Nachrichten

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Clinical and radiological outcome of the Total Evolutive Shoulder System (TESS®) reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective comparative non-randomised study

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

Zwei neue Alternativen zu TNF-Inhibitoren bei axSpA

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2014

Total hip arthroplasty with acetabular reconstruction using a bulk autograft for patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip results in high loosening rates at mid-term follow-up

Titanium particles up-regulate the activity of matrix metalloproteinase-2 in human synovial cells

Relationship of plasma and synovial fluid vascular endothelial growth factor with radiographic severity in primary knee osteoarthritis

Are the claims made in orthopaedic print advertisements valid?

An in vitro comparison of tibial tray cementation using gun pressurization or pulsed lavage

Effect of tibial drill-guide angle on the mechanical environment at bone tunnel aperture after anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

Zwei neue Alternativen zu TNF-Inhibitoren bei axSpA

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie