Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics 11/2014

01.11.2014 | Original Paper

Outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing at ten years: role of routine whole blood metal ion measurements in screening for pseudotumours

verfasst von: Aleksi Reito, Timo Puolakka, Petra Elo, Jorma Pajamäki, Antti Eskelinen

Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics | Ausgabe 11/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Emerging concern has arisen because of recent papers reporting a high prevalence of pseudotumours (PTs), even in patients with surface arthroplasties with a good clinical track record. The aim of our study was to establish the ten year survivorship of Birmingham hip resurfacing (BHR), to investigate whole blood (WB) metal ion levels and prevalence of adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMeD) and to determine the association of blood metal ion levels and symptoms with ARMeD in patients operated on with BHR at our institution.

Methods

Between May 2001 and May 2004, 261 consecutive BHRs were implanted in 219 patients. All living, nonrevised patients underwent a systematic screening programme consisting of clinical examination, WB cobalt and chromium measurements and targeted cross-sectional imaging.

Results

The ten year survival for the entire cohort was 91 % (89–93 %), with any revision as the endpoint. Prevalence of ARMeD was 6.9 % in male and 8.8 % in female patients. Symptomatic patients with elevated metal ion levels evinced highest prevalence (63 %) of PTs compared with asymptomatic patients with elevated metal ion levels (42 %) and symptomatic patients with nonelevated metal ions (11 %).

Conclusions

Contradicting the current international guidelines, our results suggest that it seems beneficial to combine routine metal ion measurement with clinical assessment, even in patients with well-functioning BHRs. Further follow-up will reveal whether new PTs will develop in these patients and BHR survivorship in the longer term.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Schuh R, Neumann D, Rauf R, Hofstaetter J, Boehler N, Labek G (2012) Revision rate of birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: Comparison of published literature and arthroplasty register data. Int Orthop 36:1349–1354PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Schuh R, Neumann D, Rauf R, Hofstaetter J, Boehler N, Labek G (2012) Revision rate of birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: Comparison of published literature and arthroplasty register data. Int Orthop 36:1349–1354PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Holland JP, Langton DJ, Hashmi M (2012) Ten-year clinical, radiological and metal ion analysis of the birmingham hip resurfacing: From a single, non-designer surgeon. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:471–476PubMedCrossRef Holland JP, Langton DJ, Hashmi M (2012) Ten-year clinical, radiological and metal ion analysis of the birmingham hip resurfacing: From a single, non-designer surgeon. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:471–476PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Coulter G, Young DA, Dalziel RE, Shimmin AJ (2012) Birmingham hip resurfacing at a mean of ten years: Results from an independent centre. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:315–321PubMedCrossRef Coulter G, Young DA, Dalziel RE, Shimmin AJ (2012) Birmingham hip resurfacing at a mean of ten years: Results from an independent centre. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:315–321PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Murray DW, Grammatopoulos G, Pandit H, Gundle R, Gill HS, McLardy-Smith P (2012) The ten-year survival of the birmingham hip resurfacing: An independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:1180–1186PubMedCrossRef Murray DW, Grammatopoulos G, Pandit H, Gundle R, Gill HS, McLardy-Smith P (2012) The ten-year survival of the birmingham hip resurfacing: An independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:1180–1186PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bisschop R, Boomsma MF, Van Raay JJ, Tiebosch AT, Maas M, Gerritsma CL (2013) High prevalence of pseudotumors in patients with a birmingham hip resurfacing prosthesis: A prospective cohort study of one hundred and twenty-nine patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:1554–1560PubMedCrossRef Bisschop R, Boomsma MF, Van Raay JJ, Tiebosch AT, Maas M, Gerritsma CL (2013) High prevalence of pseudotumors in patients with a birmingham hip resurfacing prosthesis: A prospective cohort study of one hundred and twenty-nine patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:1554–1560PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hart AJ, Satchithananda K, Liddle AD, Sabah SA, McRobbie D, Henckel J, Cobb JP, Skinner JA, Mitchell AW (2012) Pseudotumors in association with well-functioning metal-on-metal hip prostheses: A case–control study using three-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:317–325PubMed Hart AJ, Satchithananda K, Liddle AD, Sabah SA, McRobbie D, Henckel J, Cobb JP, Skinner JA, Mitchell AW (2012) Pseudotumors in association with well-functioning metal-on-metal hip prostheses: A case–control study using three-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:317–325PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Sabah SA, Mitchell AW, Henckel J, Sandison A, Skinner JA, Hart AJ (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging findings in painful metal-on-metal hips: A prospective study. Arthroplasty 26:71–6, 76.e1-2CrossRef Sabah SA, Mitchell AW, Henckel J, Sandison A, Skinner JA, Hart AJ (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging findings in painful metal-on-metal hips: A prospective study. Arthroplasty 26:71–6, 76.e1-2CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Siddiqui IA, Sabah SA, Satchithananda K, Lim AK, Henckel J, Skinner JA, Hart AJ (2013) Cross-sectional imaging of the metal-on-metal hip prosthesis: The london ultrasound protocol. Clin Radiol 68:e472–8PubMedCrossRef Siddiqui IA, Sabah SA, Satchithananda K, Lim AK, Henckel J, Skinner JA, Hart AJ (2013) Cross-sectional imaging of the metal-on-metal hip prosthesis: The london ultrasound protocol. Clin Radiol 68:e472–8PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Pollard TC, Baker RP, Eastaugh-Waring SJ, Bannister GC (2006) Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:592–600PubMedCrossRef Pollard TC, Baker RP, Eastaugh-Waring SJ, Bannister GC (2006) Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:592–600PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Amstutz HC, Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, Le Duff MJ, Campbell PA, Gruen TA (2004) Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: Two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:28–39PubMed Amstutz HC, Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, Le Duff MJ, Campbell PA, Gruen TA (2004) Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: Two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:28–39PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Reito A, Puolakka T, Paakkala A, Pajamaki J (2011) Assessment of inter- and intra-observer reliability in the determination of radiographic version and inclination of the cup in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. Int Orthop 36:519–25PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Reito A, Puolakka T, Paakkala A, Pajamaki J (2011) Assessment of inter- and intra-observer reliability in the determination of radiographic version and inclination of the cup in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. Int Orthop 36:519–25PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Willert HG, Buchhorn GH, Fayyazi A, Flury R, Windler M, Koster G, Lohmann CH (2005) Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:28–36PubMedCrossRef Willert HG, Buchhorn GH, Fayyazi A, Flury R, Windler M, Koster G, Lohmann CH (2005) Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:28–36PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Dorey FJ (2004) Survivorship analysis of surgical treatment of the hip in young patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 418:23–28PubMedCrossRef Dorey FJ (2004) Survivorship analysis of surgical treatment of the hip in young patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 418:23–28PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Reito A, Puolakka T, Elo P, Pajamaki J, Eskelinen A (2013) High prevalence of adverse reactions to metal debris in small-headed ASR hips. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:2954–2961PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Reito A, Puolakka T, Elo P, Pajamaki J, Eskelinen A (2013) High prevalence of adverse reactions to metal debris in small-headed ASR hips. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:2954–2961PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Grammatopolous G, Pandit H, Kwon YM, Gundle R, McLardy-Smith P, Beard DJ, Murray DW, Gill HS (2009) Hip resurfacings revised for inflammatory pseudotumour have a poor outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:1019–1024PubMedCrossRef Grammatopolous G, Pandit H, Kwon YM, Gundle R, McLardy-Smith P, Beard DJ, Murray DW, Gill HS (2009) Hip resurfacings revised for inflammatory pseudotumour have a poor outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:1019–1024PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Malek IA, Hashmi M, Holland JP (2011) Socio-economic impact of birmingham hip resurfacing on patient employment after ten years. Int Orthop 35:1467–70PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Malek IA, Hashmi M, Holland JP (2011) Socio-economic impact of birmingham hip resurfacing on patient employment after ten years. Int Orthop 35:1467–70PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Pailhe R, Sharma A, Reina N, Cavaignac E, Chiron P, Laffosse JM (2012) Hip resurfacing: A systematic review of literature. Int Orthop 36:2399–2410PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Pailhe R, Sharma A, Reina N, Cavaignac E, Chiron P, Laffosse JM (2012) Hip resurfacing: A systematic review of literature. Int Orthop 36:2399–2410PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Underwood R, Matthies A, Cann P, Skinner JA, Hart AJ (2011) A comparison of explanted articular surface replacement and birmingham hip resurfacing components. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:1169–1177PubMedCrossRef Underwood R, Matthies A, Cann P, Skinner JA, Hart AJ (2011) A comparison of explanted articular surface replacement and birmingham hip resurfacing components. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:1169–1177PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Hart AJ, Sabah SA, Bandi AS, Maggiore P, Tarassoli P, Sampson BA Skinner J (2011) Sensitivity and specificity of blood cobalt and chromium metal ions for predicting failure of metal-on-metal hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:1308–1313PubMedCrossRef Hart AJ, Sabah SA, Bandi AS, Maggiore P, Tarassoli P, Sampson BA Skinner J (2011) Sensitivity and specificity of blood cobalt and chromium metal ions for predicting failure of metal-on-metal hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:1308–1313PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Der Straeten C, Grammatopoulos G, Gill HS, Calistri A, Campbell P, De Smet KA (2013) The 2012 otto aufranc award: The interpretation of metal ion levels in unilateral and bilateral hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:377–85CrossRef Van Der Straeten C, Grammatopoulos G, Gill HS, Calistri A, Campbell P, De Smet KA (2013) The 2012 otto aufranc award: The interpretation of metal ion levels in unilateral and bilateral hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:377–85CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing at ten years: role of routine whole blood metal ion measurements in screening for pseudotumours
verfasst von
Aleksi Reito
Timo Puolakka
Petra Elo
Jorma Pajamäki
Antti Eskelinen
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
International Orthopaedics / Ausgabe 11/2014
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2429-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2014

International Orthopaedics 11/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.