At present, there is insufficient evidence that surgical treatment is more effective than conservative treatment in displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACFs) [
1‐
3]. If decisive improvements have occurred since the 1990s in knowledge and operative techniques that result in better outcomes, postoperative complications remain matter of debate. With the extensile lateral approach, overall wound complication rate was 33 % in a retrospective study [
4], while in a prospective randomised trial, a 16 % wound complication rate and a 5 % deep infection rate have been reported [
2]. Nevertheless, as with all other articular fractures, DIACFs should be treated by anatomic reduction, internal fixation and early mobilisation; moreover, the global shape of the calcaneal body, i.e. height, width and length, should be restored to provide the best possible walking capacities. So, alternative procedures have been proposed, including two-stage procedures [
5,
6], minimally invasive techniques [
7‐
10], balloon reduction and cement fixation [
11,
12] and even a tailor-made treatment strategy [
13]. Indeed, most minimally invasive techniques achieve reduced primary stability and reduction accuracy is difficult to verify even with arthroscopy or 3D fluoroscopy.
For these reasons, we developed a technique five years ago to perform an intrafocal reduction through a channel created in the calcaneal tuberosity and—more recently—the use of an intramedullary locking nail to provide stable fixation of the reduced fracture [
14]. An additional advantage of this procedure is that it allows primary subtalar fusion in cases in which articular surfaces are too damaged for reconstruction using the same approach and the same instrumentation [
15]. The aims of this prospective study were to determine whether intrafocal reduction of thalamic fractures is effective and reliable, to evaluate whether a locking nail can maintain articular surface reduction and whether to analyse functional results of this original method.