nach oben

Erschienen in:

14.12.2015 | Original Paper

Causes for revision of dual-mobility and standard primary total hip arthroplasty

Matched case–control study based on a prospective multicenter study of two thousand and forty four implants

verfasst von: Jean-Louis Prudhon, Romain Desmarchelier, Moussa Hamadouche, Christian Delaunay, Régis Verdier, The SoFCOT

Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics | Ausgabe 3/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

The causes for revision of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) are various and quite well known. The developing use of dual-mobility THA (DM-THA) seems a relevant option to decrease the risk of instability. Due to lack of long-term follow-up, this innovative retentive concept is suspected to increase the risk of polyethylene (PE) wear. the aim of the study was to analyse the causes for DM-THA revision and assess whether or not its occurrence is different from that of fixed-standard (FS) THA , particularly for aseptic loosening or wear and/or osteolysis.

Materials and methods

The SoFCOT group conducted an observational prospective multicentre study from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2011. Inclusion criteria comprised an exhaustive collection of 2044 first-revision THAs with 251 DM-THAs and 1793 FS-THAs. After excluding complications linked to patient factors (infection and periprosthetic fractures), we performed a matched case–control study (matching ratio 1:1) comparing two groups of 133 THAs.

Results

Revisions for aseptic loosening or osteolysis/wear were as frequent in DM-THA (58.7 %) as in FS-THA (57.1 %) (p 0.32); 7.5 % of DM-THA were revised for dislocation versus 19.5 % of FS-THA (p 0.007).

Discussion

Revision for osteolysis/wear and aseptic loosening were as frequent in DM-THA as in FS-THA; revision for dislocation was less frequent in DM-THA. This confirms the efficiency of the DM concept regarding the risk of dislocation. Causes for revision were different between groups, and revisions for dislocation were less frequent in DM-THA. Only prospective comparative studies could provide reliable information that may support broader use of the DM concept.

(2013) National Joint Registry for England and Wales. 10th Report

(2013) Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual Report 2013

(2012) Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Annual Report 2012

Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Vail TP, Berry DJ (2009) The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(1):128–133CrossRefPubMed

Boyer B, Philippot R, Geringer J, Farizon F (2012) Primary total hip arthroplasty with dual mobility socket to prevent dislocation: a 22-year follow-up of 240 hips. Int Orthop 36(3):511–518CrossRefPubMed

Prudhon JL, Ferreira A, Verdier R (2013) Dual mobility cup: dislocation rate and survivorship at ten years of follow-up. Int Orthop 37(12):2345–2350CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Philippot R, Camilleri JP, Boyer B, Adam P, Farizon F (2009) The use of a dual-articulation acetabular cup system to prevent dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: analysis of 384 cases at a mean follow-up of 15 years. Int Orthop 33(4):927–932CrossRefPubMed

Caton JH, Prudhon JL, Ferreira A, Aslanian T, Verdier R (2014) A comparative and retrospective study of three hundred and twenty primary Charnley type hip replacements with a minimum follow up of ten years to assess wether a dual mobility cup has a decreased dislocation risk. Int Orthop 38(6):1125–1129CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Guyen O, Pibarot V, Vaz G, Chevillotte C, Carret JP, Bejui-Hugues J (2007) Unconstrained tripolar implants for primary total hip arthroplasty in patients at risk for dislocation. J Arthroplasty 22(6):849–858CrossRefPubMed

10.

Lachiewicz PF, Watters TS (2012) The use of dual-mobility components in total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 20(8):481–486CrossRefPubMed

11.

Plummer DR, Haughom BD, la Valle CJ (2014) Dual mobility in total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin N Am 45(1):1–8CrossRef

12.

De Martino I, Triantafyllopoulos GK, Sculco PK, Sculco TP (2014) Dual mobility cups in total hip arthroplasty. World J Orthop 5(3):180–187CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Grazioli A, Ek ET, Rudiger HA (2012) Biomechanical concept and clinical outcome of dual mobility cups. Int Orthop 36(12):2411–2418CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Hamadouche M, Arnould H, Bouxin B (2012) Is a cementless dual mobility socket in primary THA a reasonable option? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(11):3048–3053CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Vielpeau C, Lebel B, Ardouin L, Burdin G, Lautridou C (2011) The dual mobility socket concept: experience with 668 cases. Int Orthop 35(2):225–230CrossRefPubMed

16.

Leclercq S, Benoit JY, de Rosa JP, Tallier E, Leteurtre C, Girardin PH (2013) Evora chromium-cobalt dual mobility socket: results at a minimum 10 years’ follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99(8):758–764CrossRef

17.

Delaunay C, Hamadouche M, Girard J, Duhamel A (2013) What are the causes for failures of primary hip arthroplasties in france? Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(12):3863–3869CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Dripps RD (1963) New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology 24:111

19.

D’Aubigne RM, Postel M (1954) Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 36-A(3):451–475CrossRefPubMed

20.

Charnley J (1979) Numerical grading of clinical results. In Low friction arthroplasty of the hip. Berlin, pp 20–4

21.

Devane PA, Horne JG, Martin K, Coldham G, Krause B (1997) Three-dimensional polyethylene wear of a press-fit titanium prosthesis. Factors influencing generation of polyethylene debris. J Arthroplasty 12(3):256–266CrossRefPubMed

22.

Wu C, Qu X, Liu F, Li H, Mao Y, Zhu Z (2014) Risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty in Chinese patients. PLoS One 9, e95300CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Zhu Y, Zhang F, Chen W, Liu S, Zhang Q, Zhang Y (2015) Risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection after total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hosp Infect 89(2):82–89CrossRefPubMed

24.

Ehlinger M, Delaunay C, Karoubi M, Bonnomet F, Ramdane N, Hamadouche M, Societe francaise de chirurgie orthopedique et al (2014) Revision of primary total hip arthroplasty for peri-prosthetic fracture: a prospective epidemiological study of 249 consecutive cases in France. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 100(6):657–662CrossRefPubMed

25.

Maisongrosse P, Lepage B, Cavaignac E, Pailhe R, Reina N, Chiron P, Laffosse JM (2015) Obesity is no longer a risk factor for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty with a double-mobility cup. Int Orthop 39(7):1251–1258CrossRefPubMed

26.

Aram P, Kadirkamanathan V, Wilkinson JM (2013) Use of kernel-based Bayesian models to predict late osteolysis after hip replacement. J R Soc Interface 10:20130678CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Fessy MH (2010) La double mobilité. Rev Chir Orthop 96(10):891–898

28.

Philippot R, Boyer B, Farizon F (2013) Intraprosthetic dislocation: a specific complication of the dual-mobility system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(3):965–970CrossRefPubMed

29.

Lecuire F, Benareau I, Rubini J, Basso M (2004) Intra-prosthetic dislocation of the Bousquet dual mobility socket. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 90(3):249–255CrossRefPubMed

30.

Prudhon JL (2011) Dual-mobility cup and cemented femoral component: 6 year follow-up results. Hip Int 21(6):713–717CrossRefPubMed

31.

Epinette JA (2014) Clinical outcomes, survivorship and adverse events with mobile-bearings versus fixed-bearings in hip arthroplasty-a prospective comparative Cohort study of 143 ADM versus 130 trident cups at 2 to 6-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 30(2):241–248CrossRefPubMed

32.

Epinette JA, Beracassat R, Tracol P, Pagazani G, Vandenbussche E (2014) Are modern dual mobility cups a valuable option in reducing instability after primary hip arthroplasty, even in younger patients? J Arthroplasty 29(6):1323–1328CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Causes for revision of dual-mobility and standard primary total hip arthroplasty
Matched case–control study based on a prospective multicenter study of two thousand and forty four implants
verfasst von: Jean-Louis Prudhon
Romain Desmarchelier
Moussa Hamadouche
Christian Delaunay
Régis Verdier
The SoFCOT
Publikationsdatum: 14.12.2015
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics / Ausgabe 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-3064-4

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

25.04.2024 | Hypertonie | Nachrichten

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Causes for revision of dual-mobility and standard primary total hip arthroplasty

Matched case–control study based on a prospective multicenter study of two thousand and forty four implants

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Results

Discussion

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Results

Discussion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2017

Total hip arthroplasty instability in Italy

Total hip arthroplasty instability treatment without dual mobility cups: brief overview and experience of other options

Highly crosslinked polyethylene: a safe alternative to conventional polyethylene for dual mobility cup mobile component. A biomechanical validation

Five to thirteen year results of a cemented dual mobility socket to treat recurrent dislocation

In total hip arthroplasty via the direct anterior approach, a dual-mobility cup prevents dislocation as effectively in hip fracture as in osteoarthritis

Dual mobility cups in revision total hip arthroplasty

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie