Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics 9/2018

12.04.2018 | Original Paper

Periprosthetic femoral fracture as cause of early revision after short stem hip arthroplasty—a multicentric analysis

verfasst von: Sang-Min Kim, Seung-Beom Han, Kee Hyung Rhyu, Jeong Joon Yoo, Kwang-Jun Oh, Je Hyun Yoo, Kyung-Jae Lee, Seung-Jae Lim

Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics | Ausgabe 9/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The objective of this study was to analyze the prevalence and causes of early re-operation after hip replacement surgery using short bone-preserving stems in a large multicentre series. Specifically, we evaluated the clinical features of periprosthetic fractures occurring around short stems.

Methods

A total of 897 patients (1089 hips) who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty or bipolar hemiarthroplasty from January 2011 to February 2015 using short bone-preserving femoral stems were recruited. Mean patient age was 57.4 years (range, 18–97 years), with a male ratio of 49.7% (541/1089). Re-operation for any reason within two years was used as an endpoint. The incidence and clinical characteristics of the periprosthetic femoral fractures were also recorded. Mean follow-up period was 5.1 years (range, 2–7.9 years).

Results

Early re-operation for any reason was identified in 16 (1.5%) of 1089 hips. The main reason for re-operation was periprosthetic femoral fracture, which accounted for eight (50%) of the 16 re-operations. The overall incidence of periprosthetic femoral fracture at two years was 1.1% (12/1089). According to the Vancouver classification, two fractures were AG type and the other ten were B1 type. Advanced age, higher American Society of Anesthesiologist grade, femur morphology of Dorr type C, and the use of a calcar-loading stem increased the risk for periprosthetic femoral fracture.

Conclusion

Periprosthetic femoral fracture was the major reason for re-operation after hip replacement surgery using short bone-preserving stems accounting for 50% (8/16) of re-operations two years post-operatively, but did not seem to deteriorate survivorship of implanted prostheses.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat McCalden RW, Korczak A, Somerville L, Yuan X, Naudie DD (2015) A randomised trial comparing a short and a standard-length metaphyseal engaging cementless femoral stem using radiostereometric analysis. Bone Joint J 97-B:595–602CrossRefPubMed McCalden RW, Korczak A, Somerville L, Yuan X, Naudie DD (2015) A randomised trial comparing a short and a standard-length metaphyseal engaging cementless femoral stem using radiostereometric analysis. Bone Joint J 97-B:595–602CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat van Oldenrijk J, Molleman J, Klaver M, Poolman RW, Haverkamp D (2014) Revision rate after short-stem total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of 49 studies. Acta Orthop 85:250–258CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van Oldenrijk J, Molleman J, Klaver M, Poolman RW, Haverkamp D (2014) Revision rate after short-stem total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of 49 studies. Acta Orthop 85:250–258CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, Bennett D, Delanois RE, Saleh KJ, Thongtrangan I, Kuskowski M, Cheng EY, Sharkey PF, Parvizi J, Stiehl JB, Mont MA (2008) Total hip arthroplasties: what are the reasons for revision? Int Orthop 32:597–604CrossRefPubMed Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, Bennett D, Delanois RE, Saleh KJ, Thongtrangan I, Kuskowski M, Cheng EY, Sharkey PF, Parvizi J, Stiehl JB, Mont MA (2008) Total hip arthroplasties: what are the reasons for revision? Int Orthop 32:597–604CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Streit MR, Merle C, Clarius M, Aldinger PR (2011) Late peri-prosthetic femoral fracture as a major mode of failure in uncemented primary hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:178–183CrossRefPubMed Streit MR, Merle C, Clarius M, Aldinger PR (2011) Late peri-prosthetic femoral fracture as a major mode of failure in uncemented primary hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:178–183CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Leonardsson O, Karrholm J, Akesson K, Garellick G, Rogmark C (2012) Higher risk of reoperation for bipolar and uncemented hemiarthroplasty. Acta Orthop 83:459–466CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Leonardsson O, Karrholm J, Akesson K, Garellick G, Rogmark C (2012) Higher risk of reoperation for bipolar and uncemented hemiarthroplasty. Acta Orthop 83:459–466CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Jakubowitz E, Seeger JB, Lee C, Heisel C, Kretzer JP, Thomsen MN (2009) Do short-stemmed-prostheses induce periprosthetic fractures earlier than standard hip stems? A biomechanical ex-vivo study of two different stem designs. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129:849–855CrossRefPubMed Jakubowitz E, Seeger JB, Lee C, Heisel C, Kretzer JP, Thomsen MN (2009) Do short-stemmed-prostheses induce periprosthetic fractures earlier than standard hip stems? A biomechanical ex-vivo study of two different stem designs. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129:849–855CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bishop NE, Burton A, Maheson M, Morlock MM (2010) Biomechanics of short hip endoprostheses—the risk of bone failure increases with decreasing implant size. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 25:666–674CrossRef Bishop NE, Burton A, Maheson M, Morlock MM (2010) Biomechanics of short hip endoprostheses—the risk of bone failure increases with decreasing implant size. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 25:666–674CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Thien TM, Chatziagorou G, Garellick G, Furnes O, Havelin LI, Makela K, Overgaard S, Pedersen A, Eskelinen A, Pulkkinen P, Karrholm J (2014) Periprosthetic femoral fracture within two years after total hip replacement: analysis of 437,629 operations in the Nordic Arthroplasty Register association database. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:e167CrossRefPubMed Thien TM, Chatziagorou G, Garellick G, Furnes O, Havelin LI, Makela K, Overgaard S, Pedersen A, Eskelinen A, Pulkkinen P, Karrholm J (2014) Periprosthetic femoral fracture within two years after total hip replacement: analysis of 437,629 operations in the Nordic Arthroplasty Register association database. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:e167CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Khanuja HS, Banerjee S, Jain D, Pivec R, Mont MA (2014) Short bone-conserving stems in cementless hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:1742–1752CrossRefPubMed Khanuja HS, Banerjee S, Jain D, Pivec R, Mont MA (2014) Short bone-conserving stems in cementless hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:1742–1752CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, Hoke R, Le Duff M, Amstutz HC (2006) The value of patient activity level in the outcome of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 21:547–552CrossRef Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, Hoke R, Le Duff M, Amstutz HC (2006) The value of patient activity level in the outcome of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 21:547–552CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Dorr LD, Absatz M, Gruen TA, Saberi MT, Doerzbacher JF (1990) Anatomic porous replacement hip arthroplasty: first 100 consecutive cases. Semin Arthroplast 1:77–86 Dorr LD, Absatz M, Gruen TA, Saberi MT, Doerzbacher JF (1990) Anatomic porous replacement hip arthroplasty: first 100 consecutive cases. Semin Arthroplast 1:77–86
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Khalily C, Lester DK (2002) Results of a tapered cementless femoral stem implanted in varus. J Arthroplast 17:463–466CrossRef Khalily C, Lester DK (2002) Results of a tapered cementless femoral stem implanted in varus. J Arthroplast 17:463–466CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res:17–27 Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res:17–27
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim SM, Lim SJ, Moon YW, Kim YT, Ko KR, Park YS (2013) Cementless modular total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than fifty with femoral head osteonecrosis: minimum fifteen-year follow-up. J Arthroplast 28:504–509CrossRef Kim SM, Lim SJ, Moon YW, Kim YT, Ko KR, Park YS (2013) Cementless modular total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than fifty with femoral head osteonecrosis: minimum fifteen-year follow-up. J Arthroplast 28:504–509CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Masri BA, Meek RM, Duncan CP (2004) Periprosthetic fractures evaluation and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res:80–95 Masri BA, Meek RM, Duncan CP (2004) Periprosthetic fractures evaluation and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res:80–95
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kavanagh BF (1992) Femoral fractures associated with total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 23:249–257PubMed Kavanagh BF (1992) Femoral fractures associated with total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 23:249–257PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Lindahl H (2007) Epidemiology of periprosthetic femur fracture around a total hip arthroplasty. Injury 38:651–654CrossRefPubMed Lindahl H (2007) Epidemiology of periprosthetic femur fracture around a total hip arthroplasty. Injury 38:651–654CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Lowenhielm G, Hansson LI, Karrholm J (1989) Fracture of the lower extremity after total hip replacement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 108:141–143CrossRefPubMed Lowenhielm G, Hansson LI, Karrholm J (1989) Fracture of the lower extremity after total hip replacement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 108:141–143CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Daniel J, Pradhan C, Ziaee H, McMinn DJ (2008) A clinicoradiologic study of the Birmingham mid-head resection device. Orthopedics 31 Daniel J, Pradhan C, Ziaee H, McMinn DJ (2008) A clinicoradiologic study of the Birmingham mid-head resection device. Orthopedics 31
22.
Zurück zum Zitat McMinn DJ, Pradhan C, Ziaee H, Daniel J (2011) Is mid-head resection a durable conservative option in the presence of poor femoral bone quality and distorted anatomy? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:1589–1597CrossRefPubMed McMinn DJ, Pradhan C, Ziaee H, Daniel J (2011) Is mid-head resection a durable conservative option in the presence of poor femoral bone quality and distorted anatomy? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:1589–1597CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Rahman L, Muirhead-Allwood SK (2011) The Birmingham mid-head resection arthroplasty—minimum two year clinical and radiological follow-up: an independent single surgeon series. Hip Int 21:356–360CrossRefPubMed Rahman L, Muirhead-Allwood SK (2011) The Birmingham mid-head resection arthroplasty—minimum two year clinical and radiological follow-up: an independent single surgeon series. Hip Int 21:356–360CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Dorr LD, Faugere MC, Mackel AM, Gruen TA, Bognar B, Malluche HH (1993) Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. Bone 14:231–242CrossRefPubMed Dorr LD, Faugere MC, Mackel AM, Gruen TA, Bognar B, Malluche HH (1993) Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. Bone 14:231–242CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Patel RM, Smith MC, Woodward CC, Stulberg SD (2012) Stable fixation of short-stem femoral implants in patients 70 years and older. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:442–449CrossRefPubMed Patel RM, Smith MC, Woodward CC, Stulberg SD (2012) Stable fixation of short-stem femoral implants in patients 70 years and older. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:442–449CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Stulberg SD, Dolan M (2008) The short stem: a thinking man’s alternative to surface replacement. Orthopedics 31:885–886CrossRefPubMed Stulberg SD, Dolan M (2008) The short stem: a thinking man’s alternative to surface replacement. Orthopedics 31:885–886CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Berry DJ (2003) Periprosthetic fractures associated with osteolysis: a problem on the rise. J Arthroplast 18:107–111CrossRef Berry DJ (2003) Periprosthetic fractures associated with osteolysis: a problem on the rise. J Arthroplast 18:107–111CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Lindahl H, Garellick G, Regner H, Herberts P, Malchau H (2006) Three hundred and twenty-one periprosthetic femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1215–1222CrossRefPubMed Lindahl H, Garellick G, Regner H, Herberts P, Malchau H (2006) Three hundred and twenty-one periprosthetic femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1215–1222CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Abdel MP, Houdek MT, Watts CD, Lewallen DG, Berry DJ (2016) Epidemiology of periprosthetic femoral fractures in 5417 revision total hip arthroplasties: a 40-year experience. Bone Joint J 98-B:468–474CrossRefPubMed Abdel MP, Houdek MT, Watts CD, Lewallen DG, Berry DJ (2016) Epidemiology of periprosthetic femoral fractures in 5417 revision total hip arthroplasties: a 40-year experience. Bone Joint J 98-B:468–474CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Berend ME, Smith A, Meding JB, Ritter MA, Lynch T, Davis K (2006) Long-term outcome and risk factors of proximal femoral fracture in uncemented and cemented total hip arthroplasty in 2551 hips. J Arthroplast 21:53–59CrossRef Berend ME, Smith A, Meding JB, Ritter MA, Lynch T, Davis K (2006) Long-term outcome and risk factors of proximal femoral fracture in uncemented and cemented total hip arthroplasty in 2551 hips. J Arthroplast 21:53–59CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Carli AV, Negus JJ, Haddad FS (2017) Periprosthetic femoral fractures and trying to avoid them: what is the contribution of femoral component design to the increased risk of periprosthetic femoral fracture? Bone Joint J 99-B:50–59CrossRefPubMed Carli AV, Negus JJ, Haddad FS (2017) Periprosthetic femoral fractures and trying to avoid them: what is the contribution of femoral component design to the increased risk of periprosthetic femoral fracture? Bone Joint J 99-B:50–59CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones C, Aqil A, Clarke S, Cobb JP (2015) Short uncemented stems allow greater femoral flexibility and may reduce peri-prosthetic fracture risk: a dry bone and cadaveric study. J Orthop Traumatol 16:229–235CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jones C, Aqil A, Clarke S, Cobb JP (2015) Short uncemented stems allow greater femoral flexibility and may reduce peri-prosthetic fracture risk: a dry bone and cadaveric study. J Orthop Traumatol 16:229–235CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Franklin J, Malchau H (2007) Risk factors for periprosthetic femoral fracture. Injury 38:655–660CrossRefPubMed Franklin J, Malchau H (2007) Risk factors for periprosthetic femoral fracture. Injury 38:655–660CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Meek RM, Norwood T, Smith R, Brenkel IJ, Howie CR (2011) The risk of peri-prosthetic fracture after primary and revision total hip and knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:96–101CrossRefPubMed Meek RM, Norwood T, Smith R, Brenkel IJ, Howie CR (2011) The risk of peri-prosthetic fracture after primary and revision total hip and knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:96–101CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Cook RE, Jenkins PJ, Walmsley PJ, Patton JT, Robinson CM (2008) Risk factors for periprosthetic fractures of the hip: a survivorship analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:1652–1656CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cook RE, Jenkins PJ, Walmsley PJ, Patton JT, Robinson CM (2008) Risk factors for periprosthetic fractures of the hip: a survivorship analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:1652–1656CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Gromov K, Bersang A, Nielsen CS, Kallemose T, Husted H, Troelsen A (2017) Risk factors for postoperative periprosthetic fractures following primary total hip arthroplasty with a proximally coated double-tapered cementless femoral component. Bone Joint J 99-B:451–457CrossRefPubMed Gromov K, Bersang A, Nielsen CS, Kallemose T, Husted H, Troelsen A (2017) Risk factors for postoperative periprosthetic fractures following primary total hip arthroplasty with a proximally coated double-tapered cementless femoral component. Bone Joint J 99-B:451–457CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim YH, Oh JH (2012) A comparison of a conventional versus a short, anatomical metaphyseal-fitting cementless femoral stem in the treatment of patients with a fracture of the femoral neck. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:774–781CrossRefPubMed Kim YH, Oh JH (2012) A comparison of a conventional versus a short, anatomical metaphyseal-fitting cementless femoral stem in the treatment of patients with a fracture of the femoral neck. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:774–781CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Feyen H, Shimmin AJ (2014) Is the length of the femoral component important in primary total hip replacement? Bone Joint J 96-B:442–448CrossRefPubMed Feyen H, Shimmin AJ (2014) Is the length of the femoral component important in primary total hip replacement? Bone Joint J 96-B:442–448CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Nieuwenhuijse MJ, Valstar ER, Kaptein BL, Nelissen RG (2012) The Exeter femoral stem continues to migrate during its first decade after implantation: 10–12 years of follow-up with radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Acta Orthop 83:129–134CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nieuwenhuijse MJ, Valstar ER, Kaptein BL, Nelissen RG (2012) The Exeter femoral stem continues to migrate during its first decade after implantation: 10–12 years of follow-up with radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Acta Orthop 83:129–134CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Periprosthetic femoral fracture as cause of early revision after short stem hip arthroplasty—a multicentric analysis
verfasst von
Sang-Min Kim
Seung-Beom Han
Kee Hyung Rhyu
Jeong Joon Yoo
Kwang-Jun Oh
Je Hyun Yoo
Kyung-Jae Lee
Seung-Jae Lim
Publikationsdatum
12.04.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
International Orthopaedics / Ausgabe 9/2018
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3930-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2018

International Orthopaedics 9/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.