Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Autologous Cartilage Graft Rhinoplasties

  • Retrospective Analysis
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background:

The authors report their experience with autologous graft rhinoplasties.

Methods:

Data were collected retrospectively, with selection of only autologous grafts from 2,000 rhinoplasties performed at the Plastic and Reconstructive Department of the University of Rome Tor Vergata.

Results:

A total of 62 patients from January 1995 to January 2005 were selected. Most of the patients were treated with the “open tip” technique, whereas 9.7% had a classic endonasal approach. Follow-up evaluation was performed with outpatient visits at 2 and 6 weeks, then at 3, 6, and 12 months. Good aesthetic results were obtained for 93.5% of the patients, and 83.7% had complete satisfaction.

Conclusion:

Autologuos cartilage graft rhinoplasty is an affordable technique easy to learn that widens possibilities of interventions for nasal pyramid reconstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bateman N, Jones NS: Retrospective review of augmentation rhinoplasties using autologous cartilage grafts. J Laryngol Otol 114:514–518, 2000

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Beekhius GJ: Saddle nose deformity: Etiology, prevention, and treatment: Augmentation rhinoplasty with polyamide. Laryngoscope 84:2–42, 1974

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Berman WE: Synthetic materials in facial contours. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 68:876–880, 1964

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Byrne P, Hilger P: Augmentation rhinoplasty. In: eMedicine: Instant access to the minds of medicine. Accessed August 27, 2005 at: http://www.emedicine.com/ent/topic736.htm

  5. Chapnik JS: Current thoughts on implants in rhinoplasty. J Otolaryngol 7:67–74, 1978

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Emery BE, Stucker FJ: The use of grafts in nasal reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg 10:358–73, 1994

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Holt GR, Garner ET, McLarey D: Postoperative sequelae and complications of rhinoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 20:853–876, 1987

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Juri J: Secondary rhinoplasties for men. Clin Plast Surg 18:763–773, 1991

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Krause CJ: Augmentation rhinoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 8:743–752, 1975

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lohuis PJ, Watts SJ, Vuyk HD: Augmentation of the nasal dorsum using Gore-Tex: Intermediate results of a retrospective analysis of experience in 66 patients. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 26:214–217, 2001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG: The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 357:1191–1194, 2001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Owsley TG. Taylor CO: The use of Gore-Tex for nasal augmentation: A retrospective analysis of 106 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 94:241–248, 1994

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rethi A: Operation to shorten an excessively long nose. Rev Chir Plast 2:85, 1934

    Google Scholar 

  14. Romo T III, Sclafani AP, Sabini P: Use of porous high-density polyethylene in revision rhinoplasty and in the platyrrhine nose. Aesth Plast Surg 22:211–221, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schuller DE, Bardach J, Krause JC: Irradiated homologous costal cartilage for facial contour restoration. Arch Otolaryngol 103:12–15, 1977

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sheen JH: The ideal dorsal graft: A continuing quest. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:2490–2493, 1998

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tardy ME: Cartilage graft reconstruction of the nose. In: Tardy ME (ed) Rhinoplasty: The Art and the Science. Vol. 2, 1st ed. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp. 648–723, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  18. Welling DB, Maves MD, Schuller DE, et al. Irradiated homologous cartilage grafts: Long-term results. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 114:291–295, 1988

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Gravante M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Araco, A., Gravante, G., Araco, F. et al. Autologous Cartilage Graft Rhinoplasties. Aesth Plast Surg 30, 169–174 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-005-0184-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-005-0184-z

Keywords

Navigation