Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 1/2012

01.02.2012 | Original Article

Breast Sensitivity Before and After the L Short-Scar Mammaplasty

verfasst von: Armando Chiari Jr., Tarcizo A. Nunes, James C. Grotting, Fernando B. Cotta, Rafael C. B. Gomes

Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Breast sensitivity preservation is among the aims of modern breast surgery. Large-volume resection, extensive undermining, and resections at the breast base have been associated with breast sensitivity alterations. The L short-scar mammaplasty technique is designed to preserve breast sensitivity by resection of tissue in the middle and inferior portions of the breast, but specifically dissection and preservation of the breast lateral neurovascular pedicle. Using this technique, a prospective study was designed for measurement of breast sensitivity quantitatively and subjectively to determine whether different resection volumes of the breast correlate with alteration of sensitivity postoperatively.

Methods

This study compared the sensitivity of 125 breasts of 64 consecutive patients who underwent mastopexy or breast reduction with the L short-scar mammaplasty technique. Nine points were tested with Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments: the nipple and cardinal points on the areola and skin. The tests were performed by the same examiner 1 day before surgery and then 6 and 12 months after surgery. The breasts were divided into three groups according to the resected volume as follows: group A (≤200 g), group B (201–400 g), and group C (>400 g). The patients also were asked to complete written surveys 12 months postoperatively, and the response rate was 100%.

Results

Before surgery, larger breasts were observed to have less sensitivity in the areola (groups B and C, P < 0.001) and skin (group C, P < 0.001). After 12 months, no correlation was found between larger resected volumes and less breast sensitivity. The sensitivity of the nipple–areola complex in all the groups reached levels equal to the preoperative measurement within 12 months after surgery. After 6 and 12 months, significant improvement in skin breast sensitivity with resections greater than 200 g (group B, P = 0.002; group C, P < 0.001) was observed. After 12 months, 66.4% of the patients and 94.4% of the group C patients (average resection, 499 g) reported equal or better nipple–areolar sensitivity compared with preoperative sensibility. No patient reported areas of areola or nipple insensitivity.

Conclusion

After the L short-scar mammaplasty, breast sensitivity to pressure in most cases returns to preoperative levels or improves primarily in those with larger breasts. The data of this prospective study contradict the misconception that mammaplasty techniques with resections at the breast base leave the patient with reduced breast sensitivity because the fundamental neural pathways, such as the lateral neurovascular pedicle, are preserved.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Courtiss EH, Goldwyn RM (1976) Breast sensation before and after plastic surgery. Plast Reconst Surg 58:1–12PubMedCrossRef Courtiss EH, Goldwyn RM (1976) Breast sensation before and after plastic surgery. Plast Reconst Surg 58:1–12PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Gonzalez F, Brown FE, Gold ME, Walton RL, Shafer B (1993) Preoperative and postoperative nipple–areola sensibility in patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconst Surg 92:809–814PubMedCrossRef Gonzalez F, Brown FE, Gold ME, Walton RL, Shafer B (1993) Preoperative and postoperative nipple–areola sensibility in patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconst Surg 92:809–814PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Greuse M, Hamdi M, De Mey A (2001) Breast sensitivity after vertical mammaplasty. Plast Reconst Surg 107:970–976PubMedCrossRef Greuse M, Hamdi M, De Mey A (2001) Breast sensitivity after vertical mammaplasty. Plast Reconst Surg 107:970–976PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Pitanguy I, Vaena M, Radwanski HN, Nunes D, Vargas AF (2007) Relative implant volume and sensibility alterations after breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 31:238–243PubMedCrossRef Pitanguy I, Vaena M, Radwanski HN, Nunes D, Vargas AF (2007) Relative implant volume and sensibility alterations after breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 31:238–243PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Temple CLF, Hurst LN (1999) Reduction mammaplasty improves breast sensibility. Plast Reconst Surg 104:72–76PubMedCrossRef Temple CLF, Hurst LN (1999) Reduction mammaplasty improves breast sensibility. Plast Reconst Surg 104:72–76PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Schlenz I, Rigel S, Schemper M, Kuzbari R (2005) Alteration of nipple and areola sensitivity by reduction mammaplasty: a prospective comparison of five techniques. Plast Reconst Surg 115:743–751PubMedCrossRef Schlenz I, Rigel S, Schemper M, Kuzbari R (2005) Alteration of nipple and areola sensitivity by reduction mammaplasty: a prospective comparison of five techniques. Plast Reconst Surg 115:743–751PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamdi M, Greuse M, De Mey A, Webster MHC (2001) A prospective quantitative comparison of breast sensation after superior and inferior pedicle mammaplasty. Br J Plast Surg 54:39–42PubMedCrossRef Hamdi M, Greuse M, De Mey A, Webster MHC (2001) A prospective quantitative comparison of breast sensation after superior and inferior pedicle mammaplasty. Br J Plast Surg 54:39–42PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Chiari A Jr (1992) The L short-scar mammaplasty: a new approach. Plast Reconst Surg 90:233–246 Chiari A Jr (1992) The L short-scar mammaplasty: a new approach. Plast Reconst Surg 90:233–246
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Würinger E, Mader N, Posch E, Holle J (1998) Nerve and vessel supplying ligamentous suspension of the mammary gland. Plast Reconst Surg 101:1486–1493PubMedCrossRef Würinger E, Mader N, Posch E, Holle J (1998) Nerve and vessel supplying ligamentous suspension of the mammary gland. Plast Reconst Surg 101:1486–1493PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Regnault P (1976) Breast ptosis definition and treatment. Clin Plast Surg 3:193–203PubMed Regnault P (1976) Breast ptosis definition and treatment. Clin Plast Surg 3:193–203PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bell-Krotoski J, Tomancik E (1987) The repeatability of testing with Semmes–Weinstein monofilaments. J Hand Surg 12A:155–161 Bell-Krotoski J, Tomancik E (1987) The repeatability of testing with Semmes–Weinstein monofilaments. J Hand Surg 12A:155–161
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lehman LF, Orsini MB, Nicholl AR (1993) The development and adaptation of the Semmes–Weinstein monofilaments in Brazil. J Hand Ther 6:290–297PubMed Lehman LF, Orsini MB, Nicholl AR (1993) The development and adaptation of the Semmes–Weinstein monofilaments in Brazil. J Hand Ther 6:290–297PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Weinstein S (1993) Fifty years of somatosensory research: from the Semmes–Weinstein monofilaments to the Weinstein Enhanced Sensory Test. J Hand Ther 6:11–22PubMed Weinstein S (1993) Fifty years of somatosensory research: from the Semmes–Weinstein monofilaments to the Weinstein Enhanced Sensory Test. J Hand Ther 6:11–22PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Levin S, Pearsall G, Ruderman RJ (1978) von Frey’s method of measuring pressure sensibility in the hand: an engineering analysis of the Weinstein–Semmes pressure aesthesiometer. J Hand Surg 3:211–216 Levin S, Pearsall G, Ruderman RJ (1978) von Frey’s method of measuring pressure sensibility in the hand: an engineering analysis of the Weinstein–Semmes pressure aesthesiometer. J Hand Surg 3:211–216
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahmed OA, Kolhe PS (2000) Comparison of nipple and areolar sensation after breast reduction by free nipple graft and inferior pedicle techniques. Br J Plast Surg 53:126–129PubMedCrossRef Ahmed OA, Kolhe PS (2000) Comparison of nipple and areolar sensation after breast reduction by free nipple graft and inferior pedicle techniques. Br J Plast Surg 53:126–129PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Godwin Y, Valassiadou K, Lewis S, Denley H (2004) Investigation into the possible cause of subjective decreased sensory perception in the nipple–areola complex of women with macromastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:1598–1606PubMedCrossRef Godwin Y, Valassiadou K, Lewis S, Denley H (2004) Investigation into the possible cause of subjective decreased sensory perception in the nipple–areola complex of women with macromastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:1598–1606PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Harbo SO, Jorum E, Roald HE (2003) Reduction mammaplasty: a prospective study of symptom relief and alterations of skin sensibility. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:103–110PubMedCrossRef Harbo SO, Jorum E, Roald HE (2003) Reduction mammaplasty: a prospective study of symptom relief and alterations of skin sensibility. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:103–110PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Hefter W, Elvenes OP, Lindholm PA (2003) Retrospective quantitative assessment of breast sensation after lateral pedicle mammaplasty. Br J Plast Surg 56:667–673PubMedCrossRef Hefter W, Elvenes OP, Lindholm PA (2003) Retrospective quantitative assessment of breast sensation after lateral pedicle mammaplasty. Br J Plast Surg 56:667–673PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Mitrofanoff M, Dalassera M, Boukriss T, Baruch J (1997) Clinical study of breast sensitivity before and after reduction. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 42:314–323PubMed Mitrofanoff M, Dalassera M, Boukriss T, Baruch J (1997) Clinical study of breast sensitivity before and after reduction. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 42:314–323PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Slezak S, Dellon AL (1993) Quantitation of sensibility in gigantomastia and alteration following reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconst Surg 91:1265–1269PubMedCrossRef Slezak S, Dellon AL (1993) Quantitation of sensibility in gigantomastia and alteration following reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconst Surg 91:1265–1269PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Tairych G, Kuzbari R, Rigel S, Todoroff BP, Schneider B, Deutinger M (1998) Normal cutaneous sensibility of the breast. Plast Reconst Surg 102:701–704PubMedCrossRef Tairych G, Kuzbari R, Rigel S, Todoroff BP, Schneider B, Deutinger M (1998) Normal cutaneous sensibility of the breast. Plast Reconst Surg 102:701–704PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Terzis JK, Vincent MP, Wilkins LM, Rutledge K, Deane LM (1987) Breast sensibility: a neurophysiological appraisal in the normal breast. Ann Plast Surg 19:318–322PubMedCrossRef Terzis JK, Vincent MP, Wilkins LM, Rutledge K, Deane LM (1987) Breast sensibility: a neurophysiological appraisal in the normal breast. Ann Plast Surg 19:318–322PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Wechselberger G, Stob S, Schoeller T, Oehlbauer M, Piza-Katzer H (2001) An analysis of breast sensation following inferior pedicle mammaplasty and the effect of the volume of resected tissue. Aesthetic Plast Surg 25:443–446PubMedCrossRef Wechselberger G, Stob S, Schoeller T, Oehlbauer M, Piza-Katzer H (2001) An analysis of breast sensation following inferior pedicle mammaplasty and the effect of the volume of resected tissue. Aesthetic Plast Surg 25:443–446PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamdi M, Blondeel PN, Van de Sijpe K, Van Landuyt K, Monstrey S (2003) Evaluation of nipple–areola complex sensitivity after the latero-central glandular pedicle technique in breast reduction. Br J Plast Surg 56:360–364PubMedCrossRef Hamdi M, Blondeel PN, Van de Sijpe K, Van Landuyt K, Monstrey S (2003) Evaluation of nipple–areola complex sensitivity after the latero-central glandular pedicle technique in breast reduction. Br J Plast Surg 56:360–364PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Franco T, Silva CC (1994) Sensibilidad areolomamilar. In: Coiffman F (ed) Cirugia Plastica: Reconstructiva y Estetica, 2nd edn. Masson-Salvat Medicina, Barcelona, pp 3428–3432 Franco T, Silva CC (1994) Sensibilidad areolomamilar. In: Coiffman F (ed) Cirugia Plastica: Reconstructiva y Estetica, 2nd edn. Masson-Salvat Medicina, Barcelona, pp 3428–3432
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Mofid MM, Dellon AL, Elias JJ, Nahabedian MY (2002) Quantitation of breast sensibility following reduction mammaplasty: a comparison of inferior and medial pedicle techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:2283–2288PubMedCrossRef Mofid MM, Dellon AL, Elias JJ, Nahabedian MY (2002) Quantitation of breast sensibility following reduction mammaplasty: a comparison of inferior and medial pedicle techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:2283–2288PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferreira MC, Costa MP, Cunha MS, Sakae E, Fels KW (2003) Sensibility of the breast after reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg 51:1–5PubMedCrossRef Ferreira MC, Costa MP, Cunha MS, Sakae E, Fels KW (2003) Sensibility of the breast after reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg 51:1–5PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Dellon AL (2003) Invited discussion: sensibility of the breast following reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg 51:6–9PubMedCrossRef Dellon AL (2003) Invited discussion: sensibility of the breast following reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg 51:6–9PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Nahabedian MY, Mofid MM (2002) Viability and sensation of the nipple–areolar complex after reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg 49:24–31PubMedCrossRef Nahabedian MY, Mofid MM (2002) Viability and sensation of the nipple–areolar complex after reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg 49:24–31PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat McCulley SJ, Rousseau TE (1999) A modified Chiari L short-scar mammaplasty: the technique and results. Br J Plast Surg 52:112–117PubMedCrossRef McCulley SJ, Rousseau TE (1999) A modified Chiari L short-scar mammaplasty: the technique and results. Br J Plast Surg 52:112–117PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Würinger E (1999) Refinement of the central pedicle breast reduction by application of the ligamentous suspension. Plast Reconst Surg 103:1400–1410PubMedCrossRef Würinger E (1999) Refinement of the central pedicle breast reduction by application of the ligamentous suspension. Plast Reconst Surg 103:1400–1410PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Cárdenas-Camarena L, Vergara R (2001) Reduction mammaplasty with superior-lateral dermoglandular pedicle: another alternative. Plast Reconst Surg 107:693–699PubMedCrossRef Cárdenas-Camarena L, Vergara R (2001) Reduction mammaplasty with superior-lateral dermoglandular pedicle: another alternative. Plast Reconst Surg 107:693–699PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Blondeel PN, Hamdi M, Van de Sijpe KA, Van Landuyt KHI, Thiessen FEF, Monstrey SJM (2003) The latero-central glandular pedicle technique for breast reduction. Br J Plast Surg 56:348–359PubMedCrossRef Blondeel PN, Hamdi M, Van de Sijpe KA, Van Landuyt KHI, Thiessen FEF, Monstrey SJM (2003) The latero-central glandular pedicle technique for breast reduction. Br J Plast Surg 56:348–359PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Nahabedian MY (2005) Invited discussion: alteration of nipple and areola sensitivity by reduction mammaplasty: a prospective comparison of five techniques. Plast Reconst Surg 115:752–754CrossRef Nahabedian MY (2005) Invited discussion: alteration of nipple and areola sensitivity by reduction mammaplasty: a prospective comparison of five techniques. Plast Reconst Surg 115:752–754CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamdi M, Greuse M, Nemec E, Deprez C, De Mey A (2001) Breast sensation after superior pedicle versus inferior pedicle mammaplasty: anatomical and histological evaluation. Br J Plast Surg 54:43–46PubMedCrossRef Hamdi M, Greuse M, Nemec E, Deprez C, De Mey A (2001) Breast sensation after superior pedicle versus inferior pedicle mammaplasty: anatomical and histological evaluation. Br J Plast Surg 54:43–46PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Breast Sensitivity Before and After the L Short-Scar Mammaplasty
verfasst von
Armando Chiari Jr.
Tarcizo A. Nunes
James C. Grotting
Fernando B. Cotta
Rafael C. B. Gomes
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2012
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-011-9756-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2012

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 1/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.