Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2/2012

01.04.2012 | Original Article

Transaxillary Muscle-Splitting Breast Augmentation: Experience with 160 Cases

verfasst von: Rubem Lang Stümpfle, Lucas Figueras Pereira-Lima, André Alves Valiati, Guilherme da Silva Mazzini

Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Muscle-splitting breast augmentation, initially described by Baxter and later popularized by Khan, has proved to be an effective technique in terms of implant coverage, bypassing, and even solving of some issues associated with the dual-plane technique. A muscle-splitting breast augmentation technique recently has been used in combination with mastopexy. However, no reports have described muscle-splitting techniques accomplished by the transaxillary route.

Methods

A prospective study was conducted to evaluate the outcomes and complications of a novel approach to a specific breast augmentation technique. A total of 160 patients underwent bilateral transaxillary muscle-splitting breast augmentation between October 2007 and July 2010. All the patients were treated on an outpatient basis and received epidural anesthesia. Soft, round, textured, cohesive gel implants ranging in size from 200 to 350 ml were used.

Results

All the patients recovered quickly. To date, no infection, capsular contracture, rippling, double-bubble deformity, muscle contracture-associated deformities, or implant migration has occurred. Four patients (2.5%) experienced hematomas, all of which resolved before discharge. All the patients were discharged less than 24 h postoperatively and had an aesthetically natural result.

Conclusion

Transaxillary muscle-splitting breast augmentation, a novel approach to a technique that has been described previously, provides consistent, satisfactory results and good reproducibility. This new approach provides an excellent anatomic final appearance with no risk of displacement, rippling, double-bubble deformity, or contracture-associated deformities. Furthermore, this technique avoids any visible scars on the breast and features a low complication rate.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Baxter RA (2005) Subfascial breast augmentation: theme and variations. Aesthet Surg J 25:447–453PubMedCrossRef Baxter RA (2005) Subfascial breast augmentation: theme and variations. Aesthet Surg J 25:447–453PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Baxter RA (2010) Update on the split-muscle technique for breast augmentation: prevention and correction of animation distortion and double-bubble deformity. Aesthet Plast Surg 35(3):426–429CrossRef Baxter RA (2010) Update on the split-muscle technique for breast augmentation: prevention and correction of animation distortion and double-bubble deformity. Aesthet Plast Surg 35(3):426–429CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Berry MG, Davies DM (2010) Breast augmentation: part I: a review of the silicone prosthesis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:1761–1768PubMedCrossRef Berry MG, Davies DM (2010) Breast augmentation: part I: a review of the silicone prosthesis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:1761–1768PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoehler H (1973) Breast augmentation: the axillary approach. Br J Plast Surg 26:373–376PubMed Hoehler H (1973) Breast augmentation: the axillary approach. Br J Plast Surg 26:373–376PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Khan UD (2007) Muscle-splitting breast augmentation: a new pocket in a different plane. Aesthet Plast Surg 31:553–558CrossRef Khan UD (2007) Muscle-splitting breast augmentation: a new pocket in a different plane. Aesthet Plast Surg 31:553–558CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Khan UD (2009) Dynamic breasts: a common complication following partial submuscular augmentation and its correction using the muscle-splitting biplane technique. Aesthet Plast Surg 33:353–360CrossRef Khan UD (2009) Dynamic breasts: a common complication following partial submuscular augmentation and its correction using the muscle-splitting biplane technique. Aesthet Plast Surg 33:353–360CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Khan UD (2010) Augmentation mastopexy in muscle-splitting biplane: outcome of first 44 consecutive cases of mastopexies in a new pocket. Aesthet Plast Surg 34:313–321CrossRef Khan UD (2010) Augmentation mastopexy in muscle-splitting biplane: outcome of first 44 consecutive cases of mastopexies in a new pocket. Aesthet Plast Surg 34:313–321CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Luan J, Mu D, Mu L (2009) Transaxillary dual-plane augmentation mammaplasty: experience with 98 breasts. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62:1459–1463PubMedCrossRef Luan J, Mu D, Mu L (2009) Transaxillary dual-plane augmentation mammaplasty: experience with 98 breasts. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62:1459–1463PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Momeni A, Padron NT, Fohn M, Bannasch H, Borges J, Ryu SM, Stark GB (2005) Safety, complications, and satisfaction of patients undergoing submuscular breast augmentation via the inframammary and endoscopic transaxillary approach. Aesthetic Plast Surg 29:558–564PubMedCrossRef Momeni A, Padron NT, Fohn M, Bannasch H, Borges J, Ryu SM, Stark GB (2005) Safety, complications, and satisfaction of patients undergoing submuscular breast augmentation via the inframammary and endoscopic transaxillary approach. Aesthetic Plast Surg 29:558–564PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Niechajev I (2010) Improvements in transaxillary breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 34:322–329PubMedCrossRef Niechajev I (2010) Improvements in transaxillary breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 34:322–329PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Pacella SJ, Codner MA (2009) The transaxillary approach to breast augmentation. Clin Plast Surg 36:49–61 viPubMedCrossRef Pacella SJ, Codner MA (2009) The transaxillary approach to breast augmentation. Clin Plast Surg 36:49–61 viPubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Pereira LH, Sterodimas A (2009) Transaxillary breast augmentation: a prospective comparison of subglandular, subfascial, and submuscular implant insertion. Aesthet Plast Surg 33:752–759CrossRef Pereira LH, Sterodimas A (2009) Transaxillary breast augmentation: a prospective comparison of subglandular, subfascial, and submuscular implant insertion. Aesthet Plast Surg 33:752–759CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Peterson R (1979) Transaxillary subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty. Paper presented at American Society of Plastic Surgeons Annual Meeting. Toronto, ON, Canada Peterson R (1979) Transaxillary subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty. Paper presented at American Society of Plastic Surgeons Annual Meeting. Toronto, ON, Canada
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramirez OM, Heller MDL, Tebbetts JB (2002) Dual-plane breast augmentation: avoiding pectoralis major displacement. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:1198 Author reply 1198–1199PubMedCrossRef Ramirez OM, Heller MDL, Tebbetts JB (2002) Dual-plane breast augmentation: avoiding pectoralis major displacement. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:1198 Author reply 1198–1199PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Tebbetts JB (2001) Dual-plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant–soft tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1255–1272PubMedCrossRef Tebbetts JB (2001) Dual-plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant–soft tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1255–1272PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Tebbetts JB, Adams WP (2005) Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: the high-five decision support process. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:2005–2016PubMed Tebbetts JB, Adams WP (2005) Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: the high-five decision support process. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:2005–2016PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Transaxillary Muscle-Splitting Breast Augmentation: Experience with 160 Cases
verfasst von
Rubem Lang Stümpfle
Lucas Figueras Pereira-Lima
André Alves Valiati
Guilherme da Silva Mazzini
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2012
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-011-9830-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2012

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.