Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Konkret geht es um den Diabetes-Patienten mit kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen oder Risiken, die Herzinsuffizienz sowie die kardiovaskuläre Primär- und Sekundärprävention. Sind Sie hier schon auf dem neuesten Stand? Unsere Experten beleuchten, wo und warum das bisherige Procedere geändert werden soll und was in der Praxis sinnvoll ist. Holen Sie sich Ihr Update und 2 CME-Punkte beim MMW-Webinar am 24. April von 17.30 bis 19 Uhr. 
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2/2013

01.04.2013 | Review

Autologous Fat Transplantation: Volumetric Tools for Estimation of Volume Survival. A Systematic Review

verfasst von: Christian Herold, Klaus Ueberreiter, Marc N. Busche, Peter M. Vogt

Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Autologous fat transplantation has gained great recognition in aesthetic and reconstructive surgery. Two main aspects are of predominant importance for progress control after autologous fat transplantation to the breast: quantitative information about the rate of fat survival in terms of effective volume persistence and qualitative information about the breast tissue to exclude potential complications of autologous fat transplantation. There are several tools available for use in evaluating the rate of volume survival. They are extensively compared in this review. The anthropometric method, thermoplastic casts, and Archimedes’ principle of water displacement are not up to date anymore because of major drawbacks, first and foremost being reduced reproducibility and exactness. They have been replaced by more exact and reproducible tools such as MRI volumetry or 3D body surface scans. For qualitative and quantitative progress control, MRI volumetry offers all the necessary information: evaluation of fat survival and diagnostically valuable imaging to exclude possible complications of autologous fat transplantation. For frequent follow-up, e.g., monthly volume analysis, repeated MRI exams would not be good for the patient and are not cost effective. In these cases, 3D surface imaging is a good tool and especially helpful in a private practice setting where fast data acquisition is needed. This tool also offers the possibility of simulating the results of autologous fat transplantation.

Level of Evidence V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literatur
1.
Pulagam SR, Poulton T, Mamounas EP (2006) Long-term clinical and radiologic results with autologous fat transplantation for breast augmentation: case reports and review of the literature. Breast J 12:63–65PubMedCrossRef
2.
Peer L (1950) Loss of weight and volume in human fat grafts with postulation of a cell survival theory. Plast Reconstr Surg 5:217–230CrossRef
3.
4.
Niechajev I, Sevcuk O (1994) Long-term results of fat transplantation: clinical and histologic studies. Plast Reconstr Surg 94:496–506PubMedCrossRef
5.
Kaufman MR, Bradley JP, Dickinson B et al (2007) Autologous fat transfer national consensus survey: trends in techniques for harvest, preparation, and application, and perception of short- and long-term results. Plast Reconstr Surg 119:323–331PubMedCrossRef
6.
Bulstrode N, Bellamy E, Shrotria S (2001) Breast volume assessment: comparing five different techniques. Breast 10:117–123PubMedCrossRef
7.
Kovacs L, Eder M, Hollweck R et al (2007) Comparison between breast volume measurement using 3D surface imaging and classical techniques. Breast 16:137–145PubMedCrossRef
8.
Eder M, Schneider A, Feussner H et al (2008) Breast volume assessment based on 3D surface geometry: verification of the method using MR imaging. Biomed Tech (Berl) 53:112–121CrossRef
9.
Brown RW, Cheng YC, Kurtay M (2000) A formula for surgical modifications of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:1342–1345PubMedCrossRef
10.
Loughry CW, Sheffer DB, Price TE Jr, Lackney MJ, Bartfai RG, Morek WM (1987) Breast volume measurement of 248 women using biostereometric analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 80:553–558PubMedCrossRef
11.
Qiao Q, Zhou G, Ling Y (1997) Breast volume measurement in young Chinese women and clinical applications. Aesthetic Plast Surg 21:362–368PubMedCrossRef
12.
Loughry CW, Sheffer DB, Price TE et al (1989) Breast volume measurement of 598 women using biostereometric analysis. Ann Plast Surg 22:380–385PubMedCrossRef
13.
Sheffer DB, Price TE, Loughry CW, Bolyard BL, Morek WM, Varga RS (1986) Validity and reliability of biostereometric measurement of the human female breast. Ann Biomed Eng 14:1–14PubMedCrossRef
14.
Kalbhen CL, McGill JJ, Fendley PM, Corrigan KW, Angelats J (1999) Mammographic determination of breast volume: comparing different methods. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:1643–1649PubMedCrossRef
15.
Fung JT, Chan SW, Chiu AN, Cheung PS, Lam SH (2010) Mammographic determination of breast volume by elliptical cone estimation. World J Surg 34:1442–1445PubMedCrossRef
16.
Avsar DK, Aygit AC, Benlier E, Top H, Taskinalp O (2010) Anthropometric breast measurement: a study of 385 Turkish female students. Aesthet Surg J 30:44–50PubMedCrossRef
17.
Ueberreiter K (2010) BEAULI™: eine neue Methode zur einfachen und zuverlässigen Fettzell-transplantation. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 42(6):379–385PubMedCrossRef
18.
Illouz YG, Sterodimas A (2009) Autologous fat transplantation to the breast: a personal technique with 25 years of experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg 33:706–715PubMedCrossRef
19.
Palin WE Jr, von Fraunhofer JA, Smith DJ Jr (1986) Measurement of breast volume: comparison of techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 77:253–255PubMedCrossRef
20.
Caruso MK, Guillot TS, Nguyen T, Greenway FL (2006) The cost effectiveness of three different measures of breast volume. Aesthetic Plast Surg 30:16–20PubMedCrossRef
21.
Westreich M (1997) Anthropomorphic breast measurement: protocol and results in 50 women with aesthetically perfect breasts and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:468–479PubMedCrossRef
22.
Edsander-Nord A, Wickman M, Jurell G (1996) Measurement of breast volume with thermoplastic casts. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 30:129–132PubMedCrossRef
23.
Campaigne BN, Katch VL, Freedson P, Sady S, Katch FI (1979) Measurement of breast volume in females: description of a reliable method. Ann Hum Biol 6:363–367PubMedCrossRef
24.
Schultz RC, Dolezal RF, Nolan J (1986) Further applications of Archimedes’ principle in the correction of asymmetrical breasts. Ann Plast Surg 16:98–101PubMedCrossRef
25.
Yip JM, Mouratova N, Jeffery RM, Veitch DE, Woodman RJ, Dean NR (2012) Accurate assessment of breast volume: a study comparing the volumetric gold standard (direct water displacement measurement of mastectomy specimen) with a 3D laser scanning technique. Ann Plast Surg 68(2):135–141PubMedCrossRef
26.
Sigurdson LJ, Kirkland SA (2006) Breast volume determination in breast hypertrophy: an accurate method using two anthropomorphic measurements. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:313–320PubMedCrossRef
27.
Losken A, Seify H, Denson DD, Paredes AA Jr., Carlson GW (2005) Validating three-dimensional imaging of the breast. Ann Plast Surg 54:471–476; discussion 477–478
28.
Kovacs L, Eder M, Hollweck R et al (2006) New aspects of breast volume measurement using 3-dimensional surface imaging. Ann Plast Surg 57:602–610PubMedCrossRef
29.
Kovacs L, Yassouridis A, Zimmermann A et al (2006) Optimization of 3-dimensional imaging of the breast region with 3-dimensional laser scanners. Ann Plast Surg 56:229–236PubMedCrossRef
30.
Liu C, Luan J, Mu L, Ji K (2010) The role of three-dimensional scanning technique in evaluation of breast asymmetry in breast augmentation: a 100-case study. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:2125–2132PubMedCrossRef
31.
Eder M, Papadopulos NA, Kovacs L (2007) Re: Virtual 3-dimensional modeling as a valuable adjunct to aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Am J Surg 194:563–565; author reply 565–566
32.
Eder M, Papadopulos NA, Kovacs L (2007) Breast volume determination in breast hypertrophy. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:356–357PubMedCrossRef
33.
Losken A, Fishman I, Denson DD, Moyer HR, Carlson GW (2005) An objective evaluation of breast symmetry and shape differences using 3-dimensional images. Ann Plast Surg 55:571–575PubMedCrossRef
34.
Eder M, Kovacs L (2010) Commentary on the article of Herold et al.: the use of mamma MRI volumetry to evaluate the rates of fat survival after autologous lipotransfer. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 42:135–136PubMedCrossRef
35.
Koch MC, Adamietz B, Jud SM et al (2011) Breast volumetry using a three-dimensional surface assessment technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 35(5):847–855PubMedCrossRef
36.
Tepper OM, Small KH, Unger JG et al (2009) 3D analysis of breast augmentation defines operative changes and their relationship to implant dimensions. Ann Plast Surg 62:570–575PubMedCrossRef
37.
Mineyev M, Kramer D, Kaufman L, Carlson J, Frankel S (1995) Measurement of breast implant volume with magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Plast Surg 34:348–351PubMedCrossRef
38.
Rudolph R, Forcier N (2009) Calculation of silicone breast implant volumes using breast magnetic resonance imaging. Aesthet Surg J 29:310–313PubMedCrossRef
39.
Catanuto G, Patete P, Spano A, Pennati A, Baroni G, Nava MB (2009) New technologies for the assessment of breast surgical outcomes. Aesthet Surg J 29:505–508PubMedCrossRef
40.
Creasman CN, Mordaunt D, Liolios T, Chiu C, Gabriel A, Maxwell GP (2011) Four-dimensional breast imaging, part I: introduction of a technology-driven, evidence-based approach to breast augmentation planning. Aesthet Surg J 31:914–924PubMedCrossRef
41.
Creasman CN, Mordaunt D, Liolios T, Chiu C, Gabriel A, Maxwell GP (2011) Four-dimensional breast imaging, part II: clinical implementation and validation of a computer imaging system for breast augmentation planning. Aesthet Surg J 31:925–938PubMedCrossRef
42.
Yoshimura K, Asano Y, Aoi N et al (2009) Progenitor-enriched adipose tissue transplantation as rescue for breast implant complications. Breast J 16:169–175PubMedCrossRef
43.
Giunta RE, Eder M, Machens HG, Muller DF, Kovacs L (2010) Structural fat grafting for rejuvenation of the dorsum of the hand. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 42:143–147PubMedCrossRef
44.
Hoehnke C, Eder M, Papadopulos NA et al (2007) Minimal invasive reconstruction of posttraumatic hemi facial atrophy by 3-D computer-assisted lipofilling. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 60:1138–1144PubMedCrossRef
45.
Tepper OM, Choi M, Small K et al (2008) An innovative three-dimensional approach to defining the anatomical changes occurring after short scar-medial pedicle reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 121:1875–1885PubMedCrossRef
46.
Garson S, Delay E, Sinna R, Carton S, Delaporte T, Chekaroua K (2005) 3 D evaluation and breast plastic surgery: preliminary study. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 50:296–308PubMedCrossRef
47.
Malini S, Smith EO, Goldzieher JW (1985) Measurement of breast volume by ultrasound during normal menstrual cycles and with oral contraceptive use. Obstet Gynecol 66:538–541PubMed
48.
Wang H, Jiang Y, Meng H, Yu Y, Qi K (2008) Sonographic assessment on breast augmentation after autologous fat graft. Plast Reconstr Surg 122:36e–38ePubMedCrossRef
49.
Fontdevila J, Serra-Renom JM, Raigosa M et al (2008) Assessing the long-term viability of facial fat grafts: an objective measure using computed tomography. Aesthet Surg J 28:380–386PubMedCrossRef
50.
Hyakusoku H, Ogawa R, Ono S, Ishii N, Hirakawa K (2009) Complications after autologous fat injection to the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 123:360–370; discussion 371–372
51.
Zheng DN, Li QF, Lei H et al (2008) Autologous fat grafting to the breast for cosmetic enhancement: experience in 66 patients with long-term follow up. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61:792–798PubMedCrossRef
52.
Gorczyca DP, Gorczyca SM, Gorczyca KL (2007) The diagnosis of silicone breast implant rupture. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:49S–61SPubMed
53.
Bartella L, Smith CS, Dershaw DD, Liberman L (2007) Imaging breast cancer. Radiol Clin North Am 45:45–67PubMedCrossRef
54.
DeMartini W, Lehman C, Partridge S (2008) Breast MRI for cancer detection and characterization: a review of evidence-based clinical applications. Acad Radiol 15:408–416PubMedCrossRef
55.
Willems PW, van der Sprenkel JW, Tulleken CA, Viergever MA, Taphoorn MJ (2006) Neuronavigation and surgery of intracerebral tumours. J Neurol 253:1123–1136PubMedCrossRef
56.
Herold C, Knobloch K, Stieglitz LH, Samii A, Vogt PM (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging-based breast volumetry in breast surgery: a transfer from neurosurgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:17e–19ePubMedCrossRef
57.
Horl HW, Feller AM, Biemer E (1991) Technique for liposuction fat reimplantation and long-term volume evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Plast Surg 26:248–258PubMedCrossRef
58.
Oysu C, Semiz-Oysu A, Ekinci G, Uslu C (2004) Evaluation of autologous fat volume with magnetic resonance imaging following vocal cord injection. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg 13:67–71PubMed
59.
Wolf GA, Gallego S, Patron AS et al (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of gluteal fat grafts. Aesthetic Plast Surg 30:460–468PubMedCrossRef
60.
Herold C, Ueberreiter K, Cromme F, Busche MN, Vogt PM (2010) The use of mamma MRI volumetry to evaluate the rate of fat survival after autologous lipotransfer. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 42:129–134PubMedCrossRef
61.
Herold C, Knobloch K, Grimme M, Vogt PM (2010) Does the injection plane matter in autologous fat transplantation? Aesthetic Plast Surg 34(5):678–679PubMedCrossRef
62.
Herold C, Reichelt A, Stieglitz LH et al (2010) MRI-based breast volumetry-evaluation of three different software solutions. J Digit Imaging 23(5):603–610PubMedCrossRef
63.
Herold C, Ueberreiter K, Cromme F, Grimme M, Vogt PM (2011) Is there a need for intrapectoral injection in autologous fat transplantation to the breast?: an MRI volumetric study. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 43(2):119–124PubMedCrossRef
64.
Rosset A, Spadola L, Ratib O (2004) OsiriX: an open-source software for navigating in multidimensional DICOM images. J Digit Imaging 17:205–216PubMedCrossRef
65.
Fowler PA, Casey CE, Cameron GG, Foster MA, Knight CH (1990) Cyclic changes in composition and volume of the breast during the menstrual cycle, measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 97:595–602PubMedCrossRef
66.
Alexander Del Vecchio D, Bucky LP (2011) Breast augmentation using pre-expansion and autologous fat transplantation: a clinical radiological study. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(6):2441–2450CrossRef
67.
Khouri RK, Eisenmann-Klein M, Cardoso E et al (2012) Brava and autologous fat transfer is a safe and effective breast augmentation alternative: results of a 6-year, 81-patient, prospective multicenter study. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(5):1173–1187PubMedCrossRef
68.
Delay E, Garson S, Tousson G, Sinna R (2009) Fat injection to the breast: technique, results, and indications based on 880 procedures over 10 years. Aesthet Surg J 29:360–376PubMedCrossRef
69.
Herold C, Knobloch K, Rennekampff HO, Ueberreiter K, Vogt PM (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging-based progress control after autologous fat transplantation. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:260e–261ePubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Autologous Fat Transplantation: Volumetric Tools for Estimation of Volume Survival. A Systematic Review
verfasst von
Christian Herold
Klaus Ueberreiter
Marc N. Busche
Peter M. Vogt
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2013
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-012-0046-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2013

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Original Article

A Stacked Technique of Mastopexy: Volume Redistribution Mastopexy With Inferior Flap and Superomedially Based Pedicle

Original Article

Madelung’s Disease: Comorbidities, Fatty Mass Distribution, and Response to Treatment of 22 Patients

Original Article

Correction of True Hanging Columella Using Medial Crural Tuck-Up Technique

Case Report

Oculoplastic Approach to Congenital Cutis Laxa Syndrome

Editor's Invited Commentary

Minimizing Surgical Skin Incision Scars with a Latex Surgical Glove

Letter To the Editor

Melanoma of the Umbilicus: An Incidental Diagnosis During Fat-Harvesting Donor-Site Selection

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

17.04.2024 | Postoperative nausea and vomiting | Nachrichten

Hochrisiko-Eingriffe für postoperative Übelkeit

16.04.2024 | HNO-Chirurgie | Nachrichten

HNO-Op. auch mit über 90?

16.04.2024 | Infektiologie | Nachrichten

Kein Abstrich bei chronischen Wunden ohne Entzündungszeichen!

10.04.2024 | Postoperative Schmerztherapie | Nachrichten

Chronische Schmerzen nach Op. oft mit neuropathischer Komponente
weitere anzeigen

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom CME-Kurs
CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur CME-Kurs
CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis CME-Kurs
CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.