Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 3/2020

28.02.2020 | Innovative Techniques

D-SUN Method to Prevent Double-Bubble Deformity in Broad Base Breasts with High-Rising Inframammary Fold

verfasst von: Sonia Fertsch, Andreas Wolter, Alberto Rancati, Christoph Andree

Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Breast augmentation is the most commonly performed plastic surgery among women worldwide. With time, implant selection shifted from arbitrary implantation to precise planning. Different methods address the dimensional planning process. Many of them are complex to put into practice, focusing mainly on the breast base. Constricted, short lower pole breasts are morphologically predisposed to complication such as double-bubble deformity. Yet, by focusing on the distance between the nipple on stretch and the inframammary fold, the D-SUN method guides the surgeon to find the most appropriate implant volume for anatomical form-stable silicon implants and IMF incision to avoid complications.
Level of evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Zimmerman AL, Tugertimur B, Smith PD, Kumar A, Dayicioglu D (2017) In the age of breast augmentation, breast reconstruction provides an opportunity to augment the breast. Cancer Control J Moffitt Cancer Center 24(4) Zimmerman AL, Tugertimur B, Smith PD, Kumar A, Dayicioglu D (2017) In the age of breast augmentation, breast reconstruction provides an opportunity to augment the breast. Cancer Control J Moffitt Cancer Center 24(4)
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Tebbetts JB, Adams W (2005) Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: the high five decision support process. Plast Reconstr Surg 116(7) Tebbetts JB, Adams W (2005) Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: the high five decision support process. Plast Reconstr Surg 116(7)
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Maxwell GP, Gabriel A (2009) The evolution of breast implants. Clin Plast Surg 36:1–13CrossRef Maxwell GP, Gabriel A (2009) The evolution of breast implants. Clin Plast Surg 36:1–13CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hidalgo DA, Spector JA (2014) Breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 133:567e–583eCrossRef Hidalgo DA, Spector JA (2014) Breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 133:567e–583eCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Heden P (2011) Breast augmentation with anatomic high-cohesiveness silicone gel implants (European experience). In: Spear SL (ed) Surgery of the breast: principles and art, 3rd edn. Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1322–1345 Heden P (2011) Breast augmentation with anatomic high-cohesiveness silicone gel implants (European experience). In: Spear SL (ed) Surgery of the breast: principles and art, 3rd edn. Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1322–1345
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Tebbetts JB (2006) Dual plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant-soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(3):81S–98S (discussion 99S–102S) CrossRef Tebbetts JB (2006) Dual plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant-soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(3):81S–98S (discussion 99S–102S) CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Mallucci P, Branford OA (2016) Design for natural breast augmentation: the ICE principle. Plast Reconstr Surg 137(6):1728–1737CrossRef Mallucci P, Branford OA (2016) Design for natural breast augmentation: the ICE principle. Plast Reconstr Surg 137(6):1728–1737CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Nava MB, Rocco N, Tunesi G, Catanuto G, Rancati A, Dorr J (2017) Decisional pathways in breast augmentation: how to improve outcomes through accurate pre-operative planning. Gland Surg 6(2):203–209CrossRef Nava MB, Rocco N, Tunesi G, Catanuto G, Rancati A, Dorr J (2017) Decisional pathways in breast augmentation: how to improve outcomes through accurate pre-operative planning. Gland Surg 6(2):203–209CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Swanson E (2017) The supra-inframammary fold approach to breast augmentation: avoiding a double bubble. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 5(7):e1411CrossRef Swanson E (2017) The supra-inframammary fold approach to breast augmentation: avoiding a double bubble. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 5(7):e1411CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Jose L, del Yerro M, Vegas MR, Fernandez V, Moreno E, Sanz I, Puga S, Vecino MG, Biggs TM (2013) Selecting the implant height in breast augmentation with anatomical prosthesis: the “number Y”. Plast Reconstr Surg 131(6):1404–1412CrossRef Jose L, del Yerro M, Vegas MR, Fernandez V, Moreno E, Sanz I, Puga S, Vecino MG, Biggs TM (2013) Selecting the implant height in breast augmentation with anatomical prosthesis: the “number Y”. Plast Reconstr Surg 131(6):1404–1412CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Grolleau JL, Lanfrey E, Lavigne B et al (1999) Breast base anomalies: treatment strategy for tuberous breasts, minor deformities, and asymmetry. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:2040–2048CrossRef Grolleau JL, Lanfrey E, Lavigne B et al (1999) Breast base anomalies: treatment strategy for tuberous breasts, minor deformities, and asymmetry. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:2040–2048CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Handel N (2013) The double-bubble deformity: cause, prevention, and treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:1434–1443CrossRef Handel N (2013) The double-bubble deformity: cause, prevention, and treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:1434–1443CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Spear SL, Pittman T (2013) Discussion: the double-bubble deformity: cause, prevention, and treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg 32:1444–1445CrossRef Spear SL, Pittman T (2013) Discussion: the double-bubble deformity: cause, prevention, and treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg 32:1444–1445CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Bayati S, Seckel BR (1995) Inframammary crease ligament. Plast Reconstr Surg 95:501–508CrossRef Bayati S, Seckel BR (1995) Inframammary crease ligament. Plast Reconstr Surg 95:501–508CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Muntan CD, Sundine MJ, Rink RD, Acland RD (2000) Inframammary fold: A histologic reappraisal. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:549–556 (discussion 557) CrossRef Muntan CD, Sundine MJ, Rink RD, Acland RD (2000) Inframammary fold: A histologic reappraisal. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:549–556 (discussion 557) CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Barnett A (1990) Transaxillary subpectoral augmentation in the ptotic breast: Augmentation by disruption of the extended pectoral fascia and parenchymal sweep. Plast Reconstr Surg 86:76–83CrossRef Barnett A (1990) Transaxillary subpectoral augmentation in the ptotic breast: Augmentation by disruption of the extended pectoral fascia and parenchymal sweep. Plast Reconstr Surg 86:76–83CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Brink RR (1990) Evaluating breast parenchymal maldistribution with regard to mastopexy and augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 86:715–719 (discussion 720) CrossRef Brink RR (1990) Evaluating breast parenchymal maldistribution with regard to mastopexy and augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 86:715–719 (discussion 720) CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Handel N, Jensen JA (1992) An improved technique for creation of the inframammary fold in silicone implant breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 89:558–562CrossRef Handel N, Jensen JA (1992) An improved technique for creation of the inframammary fold in silicone implant breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 89:558–562CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Nava M, Quattrone P, Riggio E (1998) Focus on the breast fascial system: A new approach for inframammary fold reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:1034–1045CrossRef Nava M, Quattrone P, Riggio E (1998) Focus on the breast fascial system: A new approach for inframammary fold reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:1034–1045CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Choudry U, Kim N (2011) Pre-operative assessment and reoperation rates in breast augmentation—a survey of ASPS members. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:10–11CrossRef Choudry U, Kim N (2011) Pre-operative assessment and reoperation rates in breast augmentation—a survey of ASPS members. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:10–11CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Montemurro P, Avvedimento S, Hedén P, Quattrini LA (2016) A four-layer wound closure technique with barbed sutures for stable reset of the inframammary fold in breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 36(8):966–971CrossRef Montemurro P, Avvedimento S, Hedén P, Quattrini LA (2016) A four-layer wound closure technique with barbed sutures for stable reset of the inframammary fold in breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 36(8):966–971CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
D-SUN Method to Prevent Double-Bubble Deformity in Broad Base Breasts with High-Rising Inframammary Fold
verfasst von
Sonia Fertsch
Andreas Wolter
Alberto Rancati
Christoph Andree
Publikationsdatum
28.02.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01658-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2020

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 3/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.