Abstract
Rising global interest in sustainability has triggered attention in indicators as a means of achieving a more sustainable world. Although the search for indicators has led to the development of criteria for good indicators, it has also been dominated by scientific elites. The consequences of such dominance leads to significant social and policy implications, particularly with regard to how the search for sustainability has become defined primarily as a technical/scientific exploration when it is actually a moral and ethical issue. Our discussion about sustainability and appropriate indicators centers on what constitutes the public interest, a question that requires inclusiveness and centers on the interface of science and policy. The paper reviews the rationale for selecting indicators, the functions they serve, and the implications and consequences involved when one sector—science—dominates the debate. The paper concludes with suggestions about appropriate roles of science, policy and the public in the indicator selection process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Bossel, H. 1999. Indicators for sustainable development: Theory, method, applications. International Institute for Sustainable Development, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, 124 pp.
Brooks, H. 1992. Sustainability and technology. Pages 29–60 in Science and sustainability: Selected papers on IIASA’s 20th anniversary. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.
D. D. Chiras W. H. Corson (1997) ArticleTitleIndicators of sustainability and quality of life: Translating vision into reality Journal of Environmental Science and Health 15 61–.
Clark, R. N., Meidinger, W. W. Miller, G. Rayner, J. Layseca, M. Fernandez, J. and Shannon. M. A. 1998. Integrating science and policy in natural resource management: lessons and opportunities from North America. Portland, Oregon, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 22 pp.
V. H. Dale S. C. Beyeler (2001) ArticleTitleChallenges in the development and use of indicators Ecological Indicators 1 3–10 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1470-160X(01)00003-6
Department of Primary Industries and Energy. 1998. A framework of regional (sub-national) level criteria and indicators of sustainable forest management in Australia. Canberra, ACT, Forests Division.
J. Forester (1989) Planning in the face of power University of California Press Berkeley, California 283 pp
J. Friedmann (1973) Retracking America Anchor Press/Doubleday Garden City, New York 289 pp
Gale, Richard P., What should forests sustain? eight answers. Journal of forestry. 1991; 89(5): 31
Gale, Robert P., and Corday, Shelia M. Making sense of sustainability: Nine answers to “What Should be Sustained”. Rural sociology. 1994; 59(2): 314–332
G. C. Gallopin (1997) Indicators and their use: Information for decision-making: Part One—Introduction B. Moldan S. Billharz R. Matravers (Eds) SCOPE 58 Sustainability indicators: A report on the project on indicators of sustainable development John Wiley & Sons Chichester, UK 13–27
Hardi, P., and Zdan T. 1997. Assessing sustainable development: Principles in practice. International Institute for Sustainable Development, Winnipeg, Saskatchewan. p. 166.
S. Jasanoff (1990) The fifth branch: Science advisers and policymakers Harvard University Press Cambridge, Massachusetts 302 pp
S. Lele R. Norgaard (1996) ArticleTitleSustainability and the scientist’s burden Conservation Biology 10 354–365 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10020354.x
D. M. Livermann M. E. Hanson B.J. Brown J. Merideth (1988) ArticleTitleGlobal sustainability: Toward measurement Environmental Management 12 133–143
V. W. Maclaren (1996) ArticleTitleUrban sustainability reporting Journal of the American Planning Association 62 184–202
S. McCool G. Stankey (2001) Representing the future: A framework for evaluating the utility of indicators in the search for sustainable forest management R. J. Raison A. G. Brown D. W. Flinn (Eds) Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management CAB International Wallingford, UK 93–109
Prescott-Allen, R. 1997. The barometer of sustainability: Measuring and communicating wellbeing and sustainable development. IUCN—The World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland.
J. Rayner (1996) ArticleTitle. Journal of Canadian Studies 31 82–101
E. Roe (1998) Taking complexity seriously: Policy analysis, triangulation and sustainable development Kluwer Academic Boston, Massachusetts 152 pp
van Bueren, E. M. L., and Blom. E. M. 1997. Hierarchal framework for the formulation of sustainable forest management standards. The Tropenbos Foundation, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 82 pp.
J. M. Wondolleck (1988) Public lands conflict and resolution: Managing national forest disputes Plenum Press New York, New York 263 pp
Williams, B.A. and Matheny, A.R. Democracy, dialouge, and environmental disputes: the contested languages of social regulation. Yale university, 1995. 256
World Commission on Environment and Development. Our Common Future. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1987
D. Yankelovich (1991) Coming to public judgment: Making democracy work in a complex world Syracuse University Press Syracuse, New York 290 pp
Zachary, J. 1995. Sustainable community indicators: Guideposts for local planning. Community Environmental Council, Inc., Santa Barbara, California.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mccool, S., Stankey, G. Indicators of Sustainability: Challenges and Opportunities at the Interface of Science and Policy. Environmental Management 33, 294–305 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-0084-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-0084-4