Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 12/2008

01.12.2008

Resection Line Involvement After Gastric Cancer Surgery: Clinical Outcome in Nonsurgically Retreated Patients

verfasst von: P. Morgagni, D. Garcea, D. Marrelli, G. De Manzoni, G. Natalini, H. Kurihara, A. Marchet, L. Saragoni, E. Scarpi, C. Pedrazzani, A. Di Leo, F. De Santis, V. Panizzo, D. Nitti, F. Roviello

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 12/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Resection line infiltration (RLI) after surgical treatment represents an unfavorable prognostic factor in advanced gastric cancer. We performed a retrospective analysis of 89 patients with resection line involvement who did not undergo reoperation.

Methods

On behalf of the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer, we present the characteristics and outcome of 89 patients who were submitted to surgical resection for gastric cancer from 1988 to 2001 and did not undergo reoperation because of disease extension or associated pathologies.

Results

RLI was significantly higher in patients with T4 tumors and diffuse histological type. Anastomotic leakages were observed in 4.8% of infiltrated esophageal resection margins, whereas 1.9% of infiltrated duodenal resection lines showed duodenal fistulas. Five-year overall survival of patients with RLI was 29%. Prognosis was not affected by RLI in early forms (100% 5-year survival); however, 5-year survival in T2 and T3 stages was significantly lower with respect to the same stages without residual tumor. The influence of RLI on prognosis was confirmed in N0 as well as in N1 and N2 patients. RLI also was an independent prognostic at multivariate analysis (odds ratio = 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.08–2.08; P = 0.0144).

Conclusions

RLI significantly affects long-term survival of advanced gastric cancer. The impact on prognosis is independent of lymph node involvement. Patients in good general condition for whom radical surgery is possible should be considered for reoperation.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Songun I, Bonekamp JJ, Hermans J et al (1996) Prognostic value of resection line involvement in patients undergoing curative resection for gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer 32A:433–437PubMedCrossRef Songun I, Bonekamp JJ, Hermans J et al (1996) Prognostic value of resection line involvement in patients undergoing curative resection for gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer 32A:433–437PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hallissey MT, Jewkes AJ, Dunn JA et al (1993) Resection-line involvement in gastric cancer: a continuing problem. Br J Surg 80:1418–1420PubMedCrossRef Hallissey MT, Jewkes AJ, Dunn JA et al (1993) Resection-line involvement in gastric cancer: a continuing problem. Br J Surg 80:1418–1420PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakamura K, Ueyama T, Yao T et al (1992) Pathology and prognosis of gastric carcinoma. Findings in 10,000 patients who underwent primary gastrectomy. Cancer 70:1030–1037PubMedCrossRef Nakamura K, Ueyama T, Yao T et al (1992) Pathology and prognosis of gastric carcinoma. Findings in 10,000 patients who underwent primary gastrectomy. Cancer 70:1030–1037PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Morgagni P, Garcea D, Marrelli D et al (2006) Does resection line involvement affect prognosis in early gastric cancer patients? An Italian multicentric study. World J Surg 30:585–589PubMedCrossRef Morgagni P, Garcea D, Marrelli D et al (2006) Does resection line involvement affect prognosis in early gastric cancer patients? An Italian multicentric study. World J Surg 30:585–589PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Papachristou DN, Agnanti N, D’Agostino H et al (1980) Histologically positive esophageal margin in the treatment of gastric cancer. Am J Surg 139:711–713PubMedCrossRef Papachristou DN, Agnanti N, D’Agostino H et al (1980) Histologically positive esophageal margin in the treatment of gastric cancer. Am J Surg 139:711–713PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer (1995) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma. Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer. Kanehara, Tokyo, pp 15–16 Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer (1995) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma. Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer. Kanehara, Tokyo, pp 15–16
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Lauren P (1965) The two histological main types of gastric carcinoma: diffuse and so-called intestinal type carcinoma. An attempt at a histo-clinical classification. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 64:31–49PubMed Lauren P (1965) The two histological main types of gastric carcinoma: diffuse and so-called intestinal type carcinoma. An attempt at a histo-clinical classification. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 64:31–49PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Sobin LH, Wittekind C (1997) TNM classification of malignant tumors, 5th edn. Wiley, New York Sobin LH, Wittekind C (1997) TNM classification of malignant tumors, 5th edn. Wiley, New York
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Roviello F, Marrelli D, Morgagni P et al (2002) Survival benefit of extended D2 lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer with involvement of second level lymph nodes: a longitudinal multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol 9:894–900PubMedCrossRef Roviello F, Marrelli D, Morgagni P et al (2002) Survival benefit of extended D2 lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer with involvement of second level lymph nodes: a longitudinal multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol 9:894–900PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Non parametric estimation from incomplete observation. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481CrossRef Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Non parametric estimation from incomplete observation. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Mantel N (1966) Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep 50:163–170PubMed Mantel N (1966) Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep 50:163–170PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life tables. J Royal Stat Soc 34:187–220 Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life tables. J Royal Stat Soc 34:187–220
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Institute Inc SAS (1989) SAS/STAT user’s guide version 8.02, vol 1. SAS Institute, Cary, NC Institute Inc SAS (1989) SAS/STAT user’s guide version 8.02, vol 1. SAS Institute, Cary, NC
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsujitani S, Okuyama T, Orita H et al (1995) Margins of resection of the esophagus for gastric cancer with esophageal invasion. Hepatogastroenterology 42:873–877PubMed Tsujitani S, Okuyama T, Orita H et al (1995) Margins of resection of the esophagus for gastric cancer with esophageal invasion. Hepatogastroenterology 42:873–877PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Yokota T, Kunii Y, Teshima S et al (1999) Clinicopathologic prognostic features in patients with gastric cancer associated with esophageal or duodenal invasion. Ups J Med Sci 104:217–230PubMedCrossRef Yokota T, Kunii Y, Teshima S et al (1999) Clinicopathologic prognostic features in patients with gastric cancer associated with esophageal or duodenal invasion. Ups J Med Sci 104:217–230PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bozzetti F, Bonfanti G, Bufalino R et al (1982) Adequacy of margins of resection in gastrectomy for cancer. Ann Surg 196:685–690PubMedCrossRef Bozzetti F, Bonfanti G, Bufalino R et al (1982) Adequacy of margins of resection in gastrectomy for cancer. Ann Surg 196:685–690PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kakeji Y, Tsujitani S, Baba H et al (1991) Clinicopathologic features and prognostic significance of duodenal invasion in patients with distal gastric carcinoma. Cancer 68:380–384PubMedCrossRef Kakeji Y, Tsujitani S, Baba H et al (1991) Clinicopathologic features and prognostic significance of duodenal invasion in patients with distal gastric carcinoma. Cancer 68:380–384PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujimoto S, Takahashi M, Mutou T et al (1997) Clinicopathologic characteristics of gastric cancer patients with cancer infiltration at surgical margin at gastrectomy. Anticancer Res 17:689–694PubMed Fujimoto S, Takahashi M, Mutou T et al (1997) Clinicopathologic characteristics of gastric cancer patients with cancer infiltration at surgical margin at gastrectomy. Anticancer Res 17:689–694PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Keighley MR, Moore J, Lee JR et al (1981) Perioperative frozen section and cytology to assess proximal invasion in gastro-esophageal carcinoma. Br J Surg 68:73–74PubMedCrossRef Keighley MR, Moore J, Lee JR et al (1981) Perioperative frozen section and cytology to assess proximal invasion in gastro-esophageal carcinoma. Br J Surg 68:73–74PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan WH, Wong WK, Khin LW et al (2000) Significance of a positive oesophageal margin in stomach cancer. Aust N Z J Surg 70:700–703PubMedCrossRef Chan WH, Wong WK, Khin LW et al (2000) Significance of a positive oesophageal margin in stomach cancer. Aust N Z J Surg 70:700–703PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Sano T, Mudan SS (1999) No advantage of reoperation for positive resection margin in node positive gastric cancer patients? Jpn J Clin Oncol 29:283–284PubMedCrossRef Sano T, Mudan SS (1999) No advantage of reoperation for positive resection margin in node positive gastric cancer patients? Jpn J Clin Oncol 29:283–284PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Cascinu S, Giordani P, Catalano V et al (1999) Resection-line involvement in gastric cancer patients undergoing curative resections: implications for clinical management. Jpn J Clin Oncol 29:291–293PubMedCrossRef Cascinu S, Giordani P, Catalano V et al (1999) Resection-line involvement in gastric cancer patients undergoing curative resections: implications for clinical management. Jpn J Clin Oncol 29:291–293PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim SH, Karpeh MS, Klimstra DS et al (1999) Effect of microscopic resection line disease on gastric cancer survival. J Gastrointest Surg 3:24–33PubMedCrossRef Kim SH, Karpeh MS, Klimstra DS et al (1999) Effect of microscopic resection line disease on gastric cancer survival. J Gastrointest Surg 3:24–33PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagano H, Ohyama S, Fukunaga T et al (2005) Indications for gastrectomy after incomplete EMR for early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 8:149–154PubMedCrossRef Nagano H, Ohyama S, Fukunaga T et al (2005) Indications for gastrectomy after incomplete EMR for early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 8:149–154PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Marrelli D, De Stefano A, de Manzoni G et al (2005) Prediction of recurrence after radical surgery for gastric cancer: a scoring system obtained from a prospective multicentric study. Ann Surg 241:247–255PubMedCrossRef Marrelli D, De Stefano A, de Manzoni G et al (2005) Prediction of recurrence after radical surgery for gastric cancer: a scoring system obtained from a prospective multicentric study. Ann Surg 241:247–255PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Roviello F, Marrelli D, de Manzoni G et al (2003) Prospective study of peritoneal recurrence after curative surgery for gastric cancer. Br J Surg 90:1113–1119PubMedCrossRef Roviello F, Marrelli D, de Manzoni G et al (2003) Prospective study of peritoneal recurrence after curative surgery for gastric cancer. Br J Surg 90:1113–1119PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Saka M, Mudan SS, Katai H et al (2005) Pancreaticoduodenectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 8:1–5PubMedCrossRef Saka M, Mudan SS, Katai H et al (2005) Pancreaticoduodenectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 8:1–5PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Resection Line Involvement After Gastric Cancer Surgery: Clinical Outcome in Nonsurgically Retreated Patients
verfasst von
P. Morgagni
D. Garcea
D. Marrelli
G. De Manzoni
G. Natalini
H. Kurihara
A. Marchet
L. Saragoni
E. Scarpi
C. Pedrazzani
A. Di Leo
F. De Santis
V. Panizzo
D. Nitti
F. Roviello
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2008
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 12/2008
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9747-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2008

World Journal of Surgery 12/2008 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.