Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 8/2009

01.08.2009 | Original Paper

Value of MELD and MELD-Based Indices in Surgical Risk Evaluation of Cirrhotic Patients: Retrospective Analysis of 190 Cases

verfasst von: Beatriz P. Costa, F. Castro Sousa, Marco Serôdio, César Carvalho

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 8/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Recent studies have suggested that the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) may represent a promising alternative to the Child-Turcotte-Pugh classification as a predictive factor of operative mortality and morbidity. This study was designed to evaluate the value of MELD and four MELD-based indices (iMELD: integrated MELD; MESO: MELD to sodium ratio; MELD-Na: MELD with incorporation of sodium; MELD-XI: MELD excluding the International Normalized Ratio) in the quantification of surgical risk for patients with cirrhosis and compare its prognostic value with the Child-Turcotte-Pugh classification and two derived scores (proposed by Huo and Giannini, respectively).

Methods

A retrospective study of 190 patients with cirrhosis, operated on in our department between 1993 and 2008, was undertaken.

Results

Forty-three percent of patients were included in Child-Turcotte-Pugh A class, and their mean MELD score was 12.2 ± 4.9 (range, 6.4–35.2). Mortality and morbidity rates were 13% and 24%, respectively. In global analysis of mortality, MELD-based indices presented an acceptable prognostic performance (auROC = 71–77%), similar to the three analyzed Child-Turcotte-Pugh-derived scores. iMELD demonstrated the highest prognostic capacity (auROC = 77%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 66–88; p = 0.0001); operative death probability was 4% (95% CI, 3.6–4.4) when the score was inferior to 35, 16.1% (95% CI, 14.4–17.9) between 35 and 45, and 50.1% (95% CI, 42.2–58.1) when superior to 45. In elective surgical procedures, iMELD represented a useful prognostic factor of operative mortality (auROC = 80%; 95% CI, 63–97; p = 0.044) with significant correlation and better accuracy then MELD and Child-Turcotte-Pugh-derived indices.

Conclusions

In this study, iMELD was a useful predictive parameter of operative mortality for patients with cirrhosis submitted to elective procedures. Further studies are necessary to define the relevance of MELD-based indices in the individual surgical risk evaluation.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat del Olmo JA, Flor-Lorente B, Flor-Civera B et al (2003) Risk factors for nonhepatic surgery in patients with cirrhosis. World J Surg 27:647–652PubMedCrossRef del Olmo JA, Flor-Lorente B, Flor-Civera B et al (2003) Risk factors for nonhepatic surgery in patients with cirrhosis. World J Surg 27:647–652PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Pugh RN, Murray-Lyon IM, Dawson JL et al (1973) Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br J Surg 60:646–649PubMedCrossRef Pugh RN, Murray-Lyon IM, Dawson JL et al (1973) Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br J Surg 60:646–649PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Mansour A, Watson W, Shayani V et al (1997) Abdominal operations in patients with cirrhosis: still a major surgical challenge. Surgery 122:730–736PubMedCrossRef Mansour A, Watson W, Shayani V et al (1997) Abdominal operations in patients with cirrhosis: still a major surgical challenge. Surgery 122:730–736PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Leary JG, Friedman LS (2007) Predicting surgical risk in patients with cirrhosis: from art to science. Gastroenterology 132:1609–1610PubMedCrossRef O’Leary JG, Friedman LS (2007) Predicting surgical risk in patients with cirrhosis: from art to science. Gastroenterology 132:1609–1610PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Durand F, Valla D (2005) Assessment of the prognosis of cirrhosis: Child-Pugh versus MELD. J Hepatol 42:S100–S107PubMedCrossRef Durand F, Valla D (2005) Assessment of the prognosis of cirrhosis: Child-Pugh versus MELD. J Hepatol 42:S100–S107PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Malinchoc M, Kamath PS, Gordon FD et al (2000) A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Hepatology 31:864–871PubMedCrossRef Malinchoc M, Kamath PS, Gordon FD et al (2000) A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Hepatology 31:864–871PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Teh SH, Nagorney DM, Stevens SR et al (2007) Risk factors for mortality after surgery in patients with cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 132:1261–1269PubMedCrossRef Teh SH, Nagorney DM, Stevens SR et al (2007) Risk factors for mortality after surgery in patients with cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 132:1261–1269PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Northup PG, Wanomaker RC, Lee VD et al (2005) Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) predicts nontransplant surgical mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Ann Surg 242:244–251PubMedCrossRef Northup PG, Wanomaker RC, Lee VD et al (2005) Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) predicts nontransplant surgical mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Ann Surg 242:244–251PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Cucchetti A, Ercolani G, Vivarelli M et al (2006) Impact of model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score on prognosis after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma on cirrhosis. Liver Transpl 12:966–971PubMedCrossRef Cucchetti A, Ercolani G, Vivarelli M et al (2006) Impact of model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score on prognosis after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma on cirrhosis. Liver Transpl 12:966–971PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Befeler AS, Palmer DE, Hoffman M et al (2005) The safety of intra-abdominal surgery in patients with cirrhosis: model for end-stage liver disease is superior to Child-Turcotte-Pugh classification in predicting outcome. Arch Surg 140:650–654PubMedCrossRef Befeler AS, Palmer DE, Hoffman M et al (2005) The safety of intra-abdominal surgery in patients with cirrhosis: model for end-stage liver disease is superior to Child-Turcotte-Pugh classification in predicting outcome. Arch Surg 140:650–654PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Farnsworth N, Fagan SP, Berger DH et al (2004) Child-Turcotte-Pugh versus MELD score as a predictor of outcome after elective and emergent surgery in cirrhotic patients. Am J Surg 188:580–583PubMedCrossRef Farnsworth N, Fagan SP, Berger DH et al (2004) Child-Turcotte-Pugh versus MELD score as a predictor of outcome after elective and emergent surgery in cirrhotic patients. Am J Surg 188:580–583PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Perkins L, Jeffries M, Patel T (2004) Utility of preoperative scores for predicting morbidity after cholecystectomy in patients with cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2:1123–1128PubMedCrossRef Perkins L, Jeffries M, Patel T (2004) Utility of preoperative scores for predicting morbidity after cholecystectomy in patients with cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2:1123–1128PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Huo TI, Lee SD, Lin HC (2008) Selecting an optimal prognostic system for liver cirrhosis: the model for end-stage liver disease and beyond. Liver Int 28:606–613PubMed Huo TI, Lee SD, Lin HC (2008) Selecting an optimal prognostic system for liver cirrhosis: the model for end-stage liver disease and beyond. Liver Int 28:606–613PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamath PS, Kim WR, Advanced liver disease study group (2007) The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD). Hepatology 45:797–805PubMedCrossRef Kamath PS, Kim WR, Advanced liver disease study group (2007) The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD). Hepatology 45:797–805PubMedCrossRef
16.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Cholongitas E, Papatheodoridis GV, Vangeli M et al (2005) Systematic review: the model for end-stage liver disease–should it replace Child-Pugh’s classification for assessing prognosis in cirrhosis? Aliment Pharmacol Ther 22:1079–1089PubMedCrossRef Cholongitas E, Papatheodoridis GV, Vangeli M et al (2005) Systematic review: the model for end-stage liver disease–should it replace Child-Pugh’s classification for assessing prognosis in cirrhosis? Aliment Pharmacol Ther 22:1079–1089PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Luca A, Angermayr B, Bertolini G et al (2007) An integrated MELD model including serum sodium and age improves the prediction of early mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Liver Transp 13:1174–1180CrossRef Luca A, Angermayr B, Bertolini G et al (2007) An integrated MELD model including serum sodium and age improves the prediction of early mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Liver Transp 13:1174–1180CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Biggins SW, Kim WR, Terrault NA et al (2006) Evidence-based incorporation of serum sodium concentration into MELD. Gastroenterology 130:1652–1660PubMedCrossRef Biggins SW, Kim WR, Terrault NA et al (2006) Evidence-based incorporation of serum sodium concentration into MELD. Gastroenterology 130:1652–1660PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Huo TI, Wang YW, Yang YY et al (2007) Model for end-stage liver disease score to serum sodium ratio index as a prognostic predictor and its correlation with portal pressure in patients with liver cirrhosis. Liver Int 27:498–506PubMedCrossRef Huo TI, Wang YW, Yang YY et al (2007) Model for end-stage liver disease score to serum sodium ratio index as a prognostic predictor and its correlation with portal pressure in patients with liver cirrhosis. Liver Int 27:498–506PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Huo T, Lin H, Huo SC et al (2008) Comparison of four model for end-stage liver disease-based prognostic systems for cirrhosis. Liver Transpl 14:837–844PubMedCrossRef Huo T, Lin H, Huo SC et al (2008) Comparison of four model for end-stage liver disease-based prognostic systems for cirrhosis. Liver Transpl 14:837–844PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Heuman DM, Habib A, Abou-Assi S et al (2005) Rationally derived Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) subclasses permit accurate stratification of near-term risk in cirrhotic patients referred for liver transplantation. Gastroenterology 128:A-734 Heuman DM, Habib A, Abou-Assi S et al (2005) Rationally derived Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) subclasses permit accurate stratification of near-term risk in cirrhotic patients referred for liver transplantation. Gastroenterology 128:A-734
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Huo TI, Lin HC, Wu JC et al (2006) Proposal of a modified Child-Turcotte-Pugh scoring system and comparison with the model for end-stage liver disease for outcome prediction in patients with cirrhosis. Liver Transpl 12:65–71PubMedCrossRef Huo TI, Lin HC, Wu JC et al (2006) Proposal of a modified Child-Turcotte-Pugh scoring system and comparison with the model for end-stage liver disease for outcome prediction in patients with cirrhosis. Liver Transpl 12:65–71PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Giannini E, Botta F, Fumagalli A et al (2004) Can inclusion of serum creatinine values improve the Child-Turcotte-Pugh score and challenge the prognostic yield of the model for end-stage liver disease score in the short-term prognostic assessment of cirrhotic patients? Liver Int 24:465–470PubMedCrossRef Giannini E, Botta F, Fumagalli A et al (2004) Can inclusion of serum creatinine values improve the Child-Turcotte-Pugh score and challenge the prognostic yield of the model for end-stage liver disease score in the short-term prognostic assessment of cirrhotic patients? Liver Int 24:465–470PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Papatheodoridis GV, Cholongitas E, Dimitriadou E et al (2005) MELD vs. Child-Pugh and creatinine-modified Child-Pugh score for predicting survival in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. World J Gastroenterol 11:3099–3104PubMed Papatheodoridis GV, Cholongitas E, Dimitriadou E et al (2005) MELD vs. Child-Pugh and creatinine-modified Child-Pugh score for predicting survival in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. World J Gastroenterol 11:3099–3104PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Angermayer B, Koening F, Cejna M et al (2002) Creatinine-modified Child-Pugh score (CPSC) compared with MELD-score to predict survival in patients undergoing TIPS. Hepatology 36:860ACrossRef Angermayer B, Koening F, Cejna M et al (2002) Creatinine-modified Child-Pugh score (CPSC) compared with MELD-score to predict survival in patients undergoing TIPS. Hepatology 36:860ACrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferenci P, Lockwood A, Mullen K et al (2002) Hepatic encephalopathy: definition, nomenclature, diagnosis, and quantification: final report of the working party at the 11th world congress of gastroenterology, Vienna, 1998. Hepatology 35:716–721 Ferenci P, Lockwood A, Mullen K et al (2002) Hepatic encephalopathy: definition, nomenclature, diagnosis, and quantification: final report of the working party at the 11th world congress of gastroenterology, Vienna, 1998. Hepatology 35:716–721
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Lorimer JW, Doumit G (2007) Comorbidity is a major determinant of severity in acute diverticulitis. Am J Surg 193:681–685PubMedCrossRef Lorimer JW, Doumit G (2007) Comorbidity is a major determinant of severity in acute diverticulitis. Am J Surg 193:681–685PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Charlson ME, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J et al (1994) Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol 47:1245–1251PubMedCrossRef Charlson ME, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J et al (1994) Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol 47:1245–1251PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Sutton R, Bann S, Brooks M et al (2002) The surgical risk scale as an improved tool for risk-adjusted analysis in comparative surgical audit. Br J Surg 89:763–768PubMedCrossRef Sutton R, Bann S, Brooks M et al (2002) The surgical risk scale as an improved tool for risk-adjusted analysis in comparative surgical audit. Br J Surg 89:763–768PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Neary WD, Prytherch D, Foy C et al (2007) Comparison of different methods of risk stratification in urgent and emergency surgery. Br J Surg 94:1300–1305PubMedCrossRef Neary WD, Prytherch D, Foy C et al (2007) Comparison of different methods of risk stratification in urgent and emergency surgery. Br J Surg 94:1300–1305PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Heuman DM, Mihas AA, Habib A et al (2007) MELD-XI: a rational approach to “sickest first” liver transplantation in cirrhotic patients requiring anticoagulant therapy. Liver Transpl 13:30–37PubMedCrossRef Heuman DM, Mihas AA, Habib A et al (2007) MELD-XI: a rational approach to “sickest first” liver transplantation in cirrhotic patients requiring anticoagulant therapy. Liver Transpl 13:30–37PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Teh SH, Sheppard BC, Schwartz J et al (2008) Model for end-stage liver disease score fails to predict perioperative outcome after hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients without cirrhosis. Am J Surg 195:697–701PubMedCrossRef Teh SH, Sheppard BC, Schwartz J et al (2008) Model for end-stage liver disease score fails to predict perioperative outcome after hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients without cirrhosis. Am J Surg 195:697–701PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Durand F (2006) Risk scores in cirrhotic patients: from non-transplant surgery to transplantation and back. J Hepatol 44:620–621PubMedCrossRef Durand F (2006) Risk scores in cirrhotic patients: from non-transplant surgery to transplantation and back. J Hepatol 44:620–621PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoteit MA, Ghazale AH, Bain AJ et al (2008) Model for end-stage liver disease score versus child score in predicting the outcome of surgical procedures in patients with cirrhosis. World J Gastrenterol 14:1774–1780CrossRef Hoteit MA, Ghazale AH, Bain AJ et al (2008) Model for end-stage liver disease score versus child score in predicting the outcome of surgical procedures in patients with cirrhosis. World J Gastrenterol 14:1774–1780CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Schroeder RA, Marroquin CE, Bute BP et al (2006) Predictive indices of morbidity and mortality after liver resection. Ann Surg 243:373–379PubMedCrossRef Schroeder RA, Marroquin CE, Bute BP et al (2006) Predictive indices of morbidity and mortality after liver resection. Ann Surg 243:373–379PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Bingener J, Cox D, Michalek J et al (2008) Can the MELD score predict perioperative morbidity for patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Am Surg 74:156–159PubMed Bingener J, Cox D, Michalek J et al (2008) Can the MELD score predict perioperative morbidity for patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Am Surg 74:156–159PubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Filsoufi F, Salzberg SP, Rahmanian PB et al (2007) Early and late outcome of cardiac surgery in patients with liver cirrhosis. Liver Transp 13:990–995CrossRef Filsoufi F, Salzberg SP, Rahmanian PB et al (2007) Early and late outcome of cardiac surgery in patients with liver cirrhosis. Liver Transp 13:990–995CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Londoño M, Cárdenas A, Guevara M et al (2007) MELD score and serum sodium in the prediction of survival of patients with cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation. Gut 56:1283–1290PubMedCrossRef Londoño M, Cárdenas A, Guevara M et al (2007) MELD score and serum sodium in the prediction of survival of patients with cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation. Gut 56:1283–1290PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Lisman T, van Leeuwen Y, Adelmeijer J et al (2008) Interlaboratory variability in assessment of the model of end-stage liver disease score. Liver Int 28:1344–1351PubMedCrossRef Lisman T, van Leeuwen Y, Adelmeijer J et al (2008) Interlaboratory variability in assessment of the model of end-stage liver disease score. Liver Int 28:1344–1351PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Huo TI, Wu JC, Lin HC et al (2005) Evaluation of the increase in model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score overtime as a prognostic predictor in patients with advanced cirrhosis: risk factor analysis and comparison with initial MELD and Child-Turcotte-Pugh score. J Hepatol 42:826–832PubMedCrossRef Huo TI, Wu JC, Lin HC et al (2005) Evaluation of the increase in model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score overtime as a prognostic predictor in patients with advanced cirrhosis: risk factor analysis and comparison with initial MELD and Child-Turcotte-Pugh score. J Hepatol 42:826–832PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Value of MELD and MELD-Based Indices in Surgical Risk Evaluation of Cirrhotic Patients: Retrospective Analysis of 190 Cases
verfasst von
Beatriz P. Costa
F. Castro Sousa
Marco Serôdio
César Carvalho
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 8/2009
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0093-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2009

World Journal of Surgery 8/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Letter

Reply

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.