Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 10/2009

01.10.2009

Impact of the Standardized Medial-to-Lateral Approach on Outcome of Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection

verfasst von: Jensen T. C. Poon, Wai-Lun Law, Joe K. M. Fan, Oswen S. H. Lo

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 10/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Beginning in 2004, a standardized medial-to-lateral approach was adopted in laparoscopic colorectal resection (LapCR) in our institution. The present study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients operated on by this approach with those who were operated on prior to the adoption of this technique.

Methods

Data were retrieved from a prospectively collected database on LapCR. The control group included 196 patients operated on from January 2002 to December 2003 and the medial approach group included 224 patients who underwent operations from January 2005 to December 2007. The patient characteristics, operative details, pathology, and surgical outcomes of the two groups were compared.

Results

The patient demographics, types of operation and pathology did not show any statistically significant difference. The medial approach group was associated with significantly less median blood loss [100 (interquartile range [IQR]: 50–174) ml versus 150 (IQR:100–300) ml; p < 0.001], shorter hospital stay [4 (IQR: (4–7) versus 7 (5–9) days; p < 0.001], and more lymph nodes harvested [12 (7–17.5) versus 10 (6–15); p = 0.001]. Significantly earlier bowel function recovery was observed in the medial approach group. The mortality and complications did not show any difference.

Conclusions

A standardized medial-to-lateral approach for LapCR is associated with less blood loss, earlier return of bowel function, shorter hospital stay, and increased number of lymph nodes harvested. This should be the preferred approach in LapCR.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S et al (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229PubMedCrossRef Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S et al (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC et al (2005) COlon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR). Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484PubMedCrossRef Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC et al (2005) COlon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR). Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRef Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Milsom JW, Böhm B, Decanini C et al (1994) Laparoscopic oncologic proctosigmoidectomy with low colorectal anastomosis in a cadaver model. Surg Endosc 8:1117–1123PubMedCrossRef Milsom JW, Böhm B, Decanini C et al (1994) Laparoscopic oncologic proctosigmoidectomy with low colorectal anastomosis in a cadaver model. Surg Endosc 8:1117–1123PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Veldkamp R, Gholghesaei M, Bonjer HJ et al (2004) European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Laparoscopic resection of colon cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 18:1163–1185PubMedCrossRef Veldkamp R, Gholghesaei M, Bonjer HJ et al (2004) European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Laparoscopic resection of colon cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 18:1163–1185PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Liang JT, Lai HS, Huang KC et al (2003) Comparison of medial-to-lateral versus traditional lateral-to-medial laparoscopic dissection sequences for resection of rectosigmoid cancers: randomized controlled clinical trial. World J Surg 27:190–196PubMedCrossRef Liang JT, Lai HS, Huang KC et al (2003) Comparison of medial-to-lateral versus traditional lateral-to-medial laparoscopic dissection sequences for resection of rectosigmoid cancers: randomized controlled clinical trial. World J Surg 27:190–196PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Franklin ME Jr, Ramos R, Rosenthal D et al (1993) Laparoscopic colonic procedures. World J Surg 17:51–56PubMedCrossRef Franklin ME Jr, Ramos R, Rosenthal D et al (1993) Laparoscopic colonic procedures. World J Surg 17:51–56PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:144–150PubMed Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:144–150PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Milsom JW, Bohm B, Nakajima K (2006) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery, 2nd edn. Springer, New York Milsom JW, Bohm B, Nakajima K (2006) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Law WL, Chu KW, Ho JW et al (2000) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. Am J Surg 179:92–96PubMedCrossRef Law WL, Chu KW, Ho JW et al (2000) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. Am J Surg 179:92–96PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Poon RT, Chu KW, Ho JW et al (1999) Prospective evaluation of selective defunctioning stoma for low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. World J Surg 23:463–467PubMedCrossRef Poon RT, Chu KW, Ho JW et al (1999) Prospective evaluation of selective defunctioning stoma for low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. World J Surg 23:463–467PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoffman GC, Baker JW, Fitchett CW et al (1994) Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy. Initial experience. Ann Surg 219:732–740PubMedCrossRef Hoffman GC, Baker JW, Fitchett CW et al (1994) Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy. Initial experience. Ann Surg 219:732–740PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hasegawa S, Kawamura J, Nagayama S et al (2007) Medially approached radical lymph node dissection along the surgical trunk for advanced right-sided colon cancers. Surg Endosc 21:1657PubMedCrossRef Hasegawa S, Kawamura J, Nagayama S et al (2007) Medially approached radical lymph node dissection along the surgical trunk for advanced right-sided colon cancers. Surg Endosc 21:1657PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Liang JT, Lai HS, Lee PH (2007) Laparoscopic medial-to-lateral approach for the curative resection of right-sided colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14:1878–1879PubMedCrossRef Liang JT, Lai HS, Lee PH (2007) Laparoscopic medial-to-lateral approach for the curative resection of right-sided colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14:1878–1879PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Pigazzi A, Hellan M, Ewing DR et al (2007) Laparoscopic medial-to-lateral colon dissection: how and why. J Gastrointest Surg 11:778–782PubMedCrossRef Pigazzi A, Hellan M, Ewing DR et al (2007) Laparoscopic medial-to-lateral colon dissection: how and why. J Gastrointest Surg 11:778–782PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim J, Edwards E, Bowne W et al (2007) Medial-to-lateral laparoscopic colon resection: a view beyond the learning curve. Surg Endosc 21:1503–1507PubMedCrossRef Kim J, Edwards E, Bowne W et al (2007) Medial-to-lateral laparoscopic colon resection: a view beyond the learning curve. Surg Endosc 21:1503–1507PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Senagore AJ, Duepree HJ, Delaney CP et al (2003) Results of a standardized technique and postoperative care plan for laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: a 30-month experience. Dis Colon Rectum 46:503–509PubMedCrossRef Senagore AJ, Duepree HJ, Delaney CP et al (2003) Results of a standardized technique and postoperative care plan for laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: a 30-month experience. Dis Colon Rectum 46:503–509PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Impact of the Standardized Medial-to-Lateral Approach on Outcome of Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection
verfasst von
Jensen T. C. Poon
Wai-Lun Law
Joe K. M. Fan
Oswen S. H. Lo
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 10/2009
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0173-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2009

World Journal of Surgery 10/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.