Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 11/2009

01.11.2009

Trainee Surgeons Do Not Cause More Conversions in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery if They Are Well Supervised

verfasst von: Takafumi Maeda, Kok-Yang Tan, Fumio Konishi, Shingo Tsujinaka, Ken Mizokami, Junichi Sasaki, Yutaka J. Kawamura

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 11/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

This study was designed to look at the conversion rates and morbidity associated with laparoscopic operations performed by trainee surgeons ascending the learning curve when they are well supervised by staff surgeons.

Methods

A review of 204 consecutive cases was performed. We defined experienced staff surgeons as those who have performed more than 300 laparoscopic resection cases. The trainee surgeons had less than 50 cases of experience during the study period. All operations were performed by the experienced staff surgeon or by the trainee surgeon with the staff surgeon as the first assistant and supervisor.

Results

A total of 204 laparoscopic resections for colorectal cancer were studied. The dissection was D3 in 73% (n = 149) of cases with a mean lymph node harvest of 19.4 nodes (range 1–56). The staff surgeons performed 90 cases and trainees performed 114 cases. Twenty-one cases (10.3%) required conversion. The overall morbidity rate was 17.6% and perioperative mortality rate was 1.5%. On bivariate analysis, trainee surgeons were not found to be significantly associated with a higher conversion risk. Multivariate analysis revealed that only the factor of T3 and above was an independent predictor of conversion (odds ratio (OR) 4.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09–15.48). Multivariate analysis of risk factors for morbidity revealed that it was not conversion (OR 2.37; 95% CI, 0.86–6.76) but rectal surgery (OR 4.09; 95% CI 2.04–9.9) that was the independent risk factor of morbidity.

Conclusions

Inexperienced surgeons do not cause more conversions or postoperative morbidity in laparoscopic colorectal surgery if they are well supervised. Conversion is not independently associated with increased postoperative morbidity.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:144–150PubMed Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:144–150PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Sekimoto M (2007) Laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer in Japan. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1708–1714PubMedCrossRef Sekimoto M (2007) Laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer in Japan. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1708–1714PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Konishi F, Okada M, Nagai H et al (1996) Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy with lymph node dissection for invasive carcinoma of the colon. Surg Today 26:882–889PubMedCrossRef Konishi F, Okada M, Nagai H et al (1996) Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy with lymph node dissection for invasive carcinoma of the colon. Surg Today 26:882–889PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Larson DW, Marcello PW, Larach SW et al (2008) Surgeon volume does not predict outcomes in the setting of technical credentialing: results from a randomized trial in colon cancer. Ann Surg 248:746–750PubMedCrossRef Larson DW, Marcello PW, Larach SW et al (2008) Surgeon volume does not predict outcomes in the setting of technical credentialing: results from a randomized trial in colon cancer. Ann Surg 248:746–750PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA et al (2001) Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections. Dis Colon Rectum 44:217–222PubMedCrossRef Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA et al (2001) Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections. Dis Colon Rectum 44:217–222PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Reissman P, Cohen S, Weiss EG, Wexner SD (1996) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: ascending the learning curve. World J Surg 20:277–282PubMedCrossRef Reissman P, Cohen S, Weiss EG, Wexner SD (1996) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: ascending the learning curve. World J Surg 20:277–282PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat CR JSC (2009) Japanese classification of colorectal carcinoma by Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Kanehara & Co Ltd., Tokyo CR JSC (2009) Japanese classification of colorectal carcinoma by Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Kanehara & Co Ltd., Tokyo
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP (2005) Conversion rates in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a predictive model with, 1253 patients. Surg Endosc 19:47–54PubMedCrossRef Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP (2005) Conversion rates in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a predictive model with, 1253 patients. Surg Endosc 19:47–54PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Abraham NS, Byrne CM, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2007) Meta-analysis of non-randomized comparative studies of the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. ANZ J Surg 77:508–516PubMedCrossRef Abraham NS, Byrne CM, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2007) Meta-analysis of non-randomized comparative studies of the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. ANZ J Surg 77:508–516PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Gonzalez R, Smith CD, Mason E et al (2006) Consequences of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 49:197–204PubMedCrossRef Gonzalez R, Smith CD, Mason E et al (2006) Consequences of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 49:197–204PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365(9472):1718–1726PubMedCrossRef Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365(9472):1718–1726PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Tjandra JJ, Chan MK (2006) Systematic review on the short-term outcome of laparoscopic resection for colon and rectosigmoid cancer. Colorectal Dis 8:375–388PubMedCrossRef Tjandra JJ, Chan MK (2006) Systematic review on the short-term outcome of laparoscopic resection for colon and rectosigmoid cancer. Colorectal Dis 8:375–388PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242:83–91PubMedCrossRef Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242:83–91PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA et al (2000) Predicting conversion to open surgery in laparoscopic colorectal resections. A simple clinical model. Surg Endosc 14:1114–1117PubMedCrossRef Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA et al (2000) Predicting conversion to open surgery in laparoscopic colorectal resections. A simple clinical model. Surg Endosc 14:1114–1117PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Thorpe H, Jayne DG, Guillou PJ et al (2008) Patient factors influencing conversion from laparoscopically assisted to open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 95:199–205PubMedCrossRef Thorpe H, Jayne DG, Guillou PJ et al (2008) Patient factors influencing conversion from laparoscopically assisted to open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 95:199–205PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Rotholtz NA, Laporte M, Zanoni G et al (2008) Predictive factors for conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Tech Coloproctol 12:27–31PubMedCrossRef Rotholtz NA, Laporte M, Zanoni G et al (2008) Predictive factors for conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Tech Coloproctol 12:27–31PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamamoto S, Yoshimura K, Konishi F, Watanabe M (2008) Phase II trial to evaluate laparoscopic surgery for Stage 0/I rectal carcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol 38:497–500PubMedCrossRef Yamamoto S, Yoshimura K, Konishi F, Watanabe M (2008) Phase II trial to evaluate laparoscopic surgery for Stage 0/I rectal carcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol 38:497–500PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Trainee Surgeons Do Not Cause More Conversions in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery if They Are Well Supervised
verfasst von
Takafumi Maeda
Kok-Yang Tan
Fumio Konishi
Shingo Tsujinaka
Ken Mizokami
Junichi Sasaki
Yutaka J. Kawamura
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 11/2009
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0188-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2009

World Journal of Surgery 11/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.