Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 9/2011

01.09.2011

Teamwork and Team Decision-making at Multidisciplinary Cancer Conferences: Barriers, Facilitators, and Opportunities for Improvement

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 9/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Anecdotally, multidisciplinary cancer conferences (MCCs) do not always function optimally. MCC members’ experiences with and attitudes toward MCCs are explored, and barriers to and facilitators of effective team-working are identified.

Methods

A total of 19 semistructured interviews were conducted with surgeons, oncologists, nurses, and administrators. Interviews explored participants’ opinions on MCC attendance, information presentation, case discussion, leadership, team decision-making, and possible improvements to MCC meetings.

Results

Nonattendance was associated with not having protected time to attend the MCC. Contributions to MCC discussions were unequal among the participants, and patient-centered information was ignored. Good leadership was necessary to foster inclusive case discussion. Members were positive about MCCs, but protected time, improved case selection, and working in a more structured way were possible improvements.

Conclusions

Results are consistent with previous research: Members of the MCC are positive about the benefits of MCCs, although improving the way MCCs work is a goal.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleissig A, Jenkins V, Catt S et al (2006) Multidisciplinary teams in cancer care: are they effective in the UK? Lancet Oncol 7:935–943PubMedCrossRef Fleissig A, Jenkins V, Catt S et al (2006) Multidisciplinary teams in cancer care: are they effective in the UK? Lancet Oncol 7:935–943PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Anonymous (2004) Manual for cancer services. Department of Health, London Anonymous (2004) Manual for cancer services. Department of Health, London
4.
Zurück zum Zitat McAvoy B (2003) Optimising cancer care in Australia. Aust Fam Physician 32:369–372PubMed McAvoy B (2003) Optimising cancer care in Australia. Aust Fam Physician 32:369–372PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Anonymous (1998) Relative a l’organisation des soins en cancérologie dans les établissements d’hospitalisation publics et privés. Circulaire DGS/DH/AFS no. 98-213. Paris. 98[17], pp 177–191 Anonymous (1998) Relative a l’organisation des soins en cancérologie dans les établissements d’hospitalisation publics et privés. Circulaire DGS/DH/AFS no. 98-213. Paris. 98[17], pp 177–191
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Wright FC, Lookhong N, Urbach D et al (2009) Multidisciplinary cancer conferences: identifying opportunities to promote implementation. Ann Surg Oncol 16:2731–2737PubMedCrossRef Wright FC, Lookhong N, Urbach D et al (2009) Multidisciplinary cancer conferences: identifying opportunities to promote implementation. Ann Surg Oncol 16:2731–2737PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan WF, Cheung PS, Epstein RJ et al (2006) Multidisciplinary approach to the management of breast cancer in Hong Kong. World J Surg 30:2095–2100PubMedCrossRef Chan WF, Cheung PS, Epstein RJ et al (2006) Multidisciplinary approach to the management of breast cancer in Hong Kong. World J Surg 30:2095–2100PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Houssami N, Sainsbury R (2006) Breast cancer: multidisciplinary care and clinical outcomes. Eur J Cancer 42:2480–2491PubMedCrossRef Houssami N, Sainsbury R (2006) Breast cancer: multidisciplinary care and clinical outcomes. Eur J Cancer 42:2480–2491PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hong NJ, Wright FC, Gagliardi AR et al (2010) Examining the potential relationship between multidisciplinary cancer care and patient survival: an international literature review. J Surg Oncol 102:125–134PubMedCrossRef Hong NJ, Wright FC, Gagliardi AR et al (2010) Examining the potential relationship between multidisciplinary cancer care and patient survival: an international literature review. J Surg Oncol 102:125–134PubMedCrossRef
11.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Haward R, Amir Z, Borrill C et al (2003) Breast cancer teams: the impact of constitution, new cancer workload, and methods of operation on their effectiveness. Br J Cancer 89:15–22PubMedCrossRef Haward R, Amir Z, Borrill C et al (2003) Breast cancer teams: the impact of constitution, new cancer workload, and methods of operation on their effectiveness. Br J Cancer 89:15–22PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Stalfors J, Lundberg C, Westin T (2007) Quality assessment of a multidisciplinary tumour meeting for patients with head and neck cancer. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 127:82–87CrossRef Stalfors J, Lundberg C, Westin T (2007) Quality assessment of a multidisciplinary tumour meeting for patients with head and neck cancer. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 127:82–87CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kidger J, Murdoch J, Donovan JL et al (2009) Clinical decision-making in a multidisciplinary gynaecological cancer team: a qualitative study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 116:511–517CrossRef Kidger J, Murdoch J, Donovan JL et al (2009) Clinical decision-making in a multidisciplinary gynaecological cancer team: a qualitative study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 116:511–517CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Lanceley A, Savage J, Menon U et al (2008) Influences on multidisciplinary team decision-making. Int J Gynecol Cancer 18:215–222PubMedCrossRef Lanceley A, Savage J, Menon U et al (2008) Influences on multidisciplinary team decision-making. Int J Gynecol Cancer 18:215–222PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang JH, Vines E, Bertsch H et al (2001) The impact of a multidisciplinary breast cancer center on recommendations for patient management: the University of Pennsylvania experience. Cancer 91:1231–1237PubMedCrossRef Chang JH, Vines E, Bertsch H et al (2001) The impact of a multidisciplinary breast cancer center on recommendations for patient management: the University of Pennsylvania experience. Cancer 91:1231–1237PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Newman E, Guest A, Helvie M et al (2006) Changes in surgical management resulting from case review at a breast cancer multldisciplinary tumor board. Cancer 107:2343–2351CrossRef Newman E, Guest A, Helvie M et al (2006) Changes in surgical management resulting from case review at a breast cancer multldisciplinary tumor board. Cancer 107:2343–2351CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kee FO, Owen T, Leathem R (2004) Decision making in a multidisciplinary cancer team: does team discussion result in better quality decisions? Med Decis Making 24:602–613PubMedCrossRef Kee FO, Owen T, Leathem R (2004) Decision making in a multidisciplinary cancer team: does team discussion result in better quality decisions? Med Decis Making 24:602–613PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Augestad KM, Lindsetmo RO, Stulberg J et al (2010) International preoperative rectal cancer management: staging, neoadjuvant treatment, and impact of multidisciplinary teams. World J Surg 34:2689–2700PubMedCrossRef Augestad KM, Lindsetmo RO, Stulberg J et al (2010) International preoperative rectal cancer management: staging, neoadjuvant treatment, and impact of multidisciplinary teams. World J Surg 34:2689–2700PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N (2000) Qualitative research in health care: analysing qualitative data. BMJ 320:114–116PubMedCrossRef Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N (2000) Qualitative research in health care: analysing qualitative data. BMJ 320:114–116PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Undre S, Sevdalis N, Healey AN et al (2006) Teamwork in the operating theatre: cohesion or confusion? J Eval Clin Pract 12:182–189PubMedCrossRef Undre S, Sevdalis N, Healey AN et al (2006) Teamwork in the operating theatre: cohesion or confusion? J Eval Clin Pract 12:182–189PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacklin R, Sevdalis N, Darzi A et al (2008) Mapping surgical practice decision-making: an interview study to evaluate decisions in surgical care. Am J Surg 195:689–695PubMedCrossRef Jacklin R, Sevdalis N, Darzi A et al (2008) Mapping surgical practice decision-making: an interview study to evaluate decisions in surgical care. Am J Surg 195:689–695PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Arora S, Sevdalis N, Nestel D et al (2009) Managing intra-operative stress: what do surgeons want from a crisis training program? Am J Surg 197:537–543PubMedCrossRef Arora S, Sevdalis N, Nestel D et al (2009) Managing intra-operative stress: what do surgeons want from a crisis training program? Am J Surg 197:537–543PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Kneebone R, Fry H (2010) Principles and methods in qualitative research. In: Athanasiou T, Darzi A, Debas H (eds) Key topics in surgical research and methodology, vol 1. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 243–254 Kneebone R, Fry H (2010) Principles and methods in qualitative research. In: Athanasiou T, Darzi A, Debas H (eds) Key topics in surgical research and methodology, vol 1. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 243–254
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Borrill C, West M, Shapiro D et al (2000) Team working and effectiveness in health care. Br J Health Care Manage 6:364–371 Borrill C, West M, Shapiro D et al (2000) Team working and effectiveness in health care. Br J Health Care Manage 6:364–371
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Macaskill EJ, Thrush S, Walker EM et al (2006) Surgeons’ views on multi-disciplinary breast meetings. Eur J Cancer 42:905–908PubMedCrossRef Macaskill EJ, Thrush S, Walker EM et al (2006) Surgeons’ views on multi-disciplinary breast meetings. Eur J Cancer 42:905–908PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Delaney G, Jacob S, Iedema R et al (2004) Comparison of face-to-face and video-conferenced multidisciplinary clinical meetings. Australas Radiol 48:487–492PubMedCrossRef Delaney G, Jacob S, Iedema R et al (2004) Comparison of face-to-face and video-conferenced multidisciplinary clinical meetings. Australas Radiol 48:487–492PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Lamb B, Wong H, Vincent C, et al (2011) Teamwork and team performance in urological multidisciplinary cancer teams: development and evaluation of an observational assessment tool. Qual Saf Health Care (in press) Lamb B, Wong H, Vincent C, et al (2011) Teamwork and team performance in urological multidisciplinary cancer teams: development and evaluation of an observational assessment tool. Qual Saf Health Care (in press)
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Amir Z, Scully J, Borrill C (2004) The professional role of breast cancer nurses in multi-disciplinary breast cancer care teams. Eur J Oncol Nurs 8:306–314PubMedCrossRef Amir Z, Scully J, Borrill C (2004) The professional role of breast cancer nurses in multi-disciplinary breast cancer care teams. Eur J Oncol Nurs 8:306–314PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat National Cancer Action Team (2009) Multidisciplinary team members’ views about MDT working: results from a survey commissioned by the National Cancer Action Team. NCAT, London National Cancer Action Team (2009) Multidisciplinary team members’ views about MDT working: results from a survey commissioned by the National Cancer Action Team. NCAT, London
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Devitt B, Philip J, McLachlan SA et al (2010) Team dynamics, decision making, and attitudes toward multidisciplinary cancer meetings: health professionals’ perspectives. J Oncol Pract 6:e17–e20PubMedCrossRef Devitt B, Philip J, McLachlan SA et al (2010) Team dynamics, decision making, and attitudes toward multidisciplinary cancer meetings: health professionals’ perspectives. J Oncol Pract 6:e17–e20PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Fletcher G, Flin R, McGeorge P et al (2003) Anaesthetists’ non-technical skills (ANTS): evaluation of a behavioural marker system. Br J Anaesth 90:580–588PubMedCrossRef Fletcher G, Flin R, McGeorge P et al (2003) Anaesthetists’ non-technical skills (ANTS): evaluation of a behavioural marker system. Br J Anaesth 90:580–588PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Undre S, Sevdalis N, Healey AN et al (2007) Observational teamwork assessment for surgery (OTAS): refinement and application in urological surgery. World J Surg 31:1373–1381PubMedCrossRef Undre S, Sevdalis N, Healey AN et al (2007) Observational teamwork assessment for surgery (OTAS): refinement and application in urological surgery. World J Surg 31:1373–1381PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Sevdalis N, Lyons M, Healey AN et al (2009) Observational teamwork assessment for surgery: construct validation with expert versus novice raters. Ann Surg 249:1047–1051PubMedCrossRef Sevdalis N, Lyons M, Healey AN et al (2009) Observational teamwork assessment for surgery: construct validation with expert versus novice raters. Ann Surg 249:1047–1051PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Teamwork and Team Decision-making at Multidisciplinary Cancer Conferences: Barriers, Facilitators, and Opportunities for Improvement
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2011
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 9/2011
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1152-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2011

World Journal of Surgery 9/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.