Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 9/2013

01.09.2013

Prophylactic Mesh Reinforcement Reduces Stomal Site Incisional Hernia after Ileostomy Closure

verfasst von: David Shi Hao Liu, Elisabeth Banham, Srinivasa Yellapu

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 9/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Stomal site incisional hernia is a common complication following ileostomy closure. The effectiveness of prophylactic mesh placement at the time of stomal closure is unknown because of fear of mesh infection and subsequent wound complications. The present study investigated whether prophylactic mesh placement reduces the rate of incisional hernia after ileostomy closure without increasing wound complications. The study was based on retrospective review of consecutive ileostomy closures undertaken at a tertiary referral center between January 2007 and December 2011. Hernias were identified through clinical examination and computed tomography.

Results

Eighty-three cases of ileostomy closure were reviewed; 47 patients received mesh reinforcement, and 36 underwent non-mesh closure (controls). In total, 16 (19.3 %) patients developed incisional hernia, 13 (36.1 %) of which occurred in the control group; 3 (6.4 %), in the mesh group [odds ratio (OR): 8.29; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 2.14–32.08; p = 0.001]. Incisional hernia repair was performed in 3 (23 %) patients in the control group; no hernias in the mesh group required surgery. There was no significant difference in wound infection rates between mesh (2 patients, 4.3 %) and control (1 patient, 2.8 %) groups. No mesh infection was found. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that malignancy (OR: 21.93, 95 % CI 1.58–303.95; p = 0.021) and diabetes (OR: 20.98, 95 % CI 3.23–136.31; p = 0.001) independently predicted incisional herniation, while mesh reinforcement prevented hernia development (OR: 0.06, 95 % CI 0.01–0.36; p = 0.002).

Conclusions

Mesh placement significantly reduced the incidence of incisional hernia following ileostomy closure, but without increasing complication rates. This technique should be strongly considered in patients at high risk of hernia development.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Cingi A, Cakir T, Sever A et al (2006) Enterostomy site hernias: a clinical and computerized tomographic evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1559–1563PubMedCrossRef Cingi A, Cakir T, Sever A et al (2006) Enterostomy site hernias: a clinical and computerized tomographic evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1559–1563PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Cingi A, Solmaz A, Attaallah W et al (2008) Enterostomy closure site hernias: a clinical and ultrasonographic evaluation. Hernia 12:401–405PubMedCrossRef Cingi A, Solmaz A, Attaallah W et al (2008) Enterostomy closure site hernias: a clinical and ultrasonographic evaluation. Hernia 12:401–405PubMedCrossRef
4.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Schreinemacher MH, Vijgen GH, Dagnelie PC et al (2011) Incisional hernias in temporary stoma wounds: a cohort study. Arch Surg 146:94–99PubMedCrossRef Schreinemacher MH, Vijgen GH, Dagnelie PC et al (2011) Incisional hernias in temporary stoma wounds: a cohort study. Arch Surg 146:94–99PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Haggar FA, Boushey RP (2009) Colorectal cancer epidemiology: incidence, mortality, survival, and risk factors. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 22:191–197PubMedCrossRef Haggar FA, Boushey RP (2009) Colorectal cancer epidemiology: incidence, mortality, survival, and risk factors. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 22:191–197PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamel MB, Henderson WG, Khuri SF et al (2005) Surgical outcomes for patients aged 80 and older: morbidity and mortality from major noncardiac surgery. J Am Geriatr Soc 53:424–429PubMedCrossRef Hamel MB, Henderson WG, Khuri SF et al (2005) Surgical outcomes for patients aged 80 and older: morbidity and mortality from major noncardiac surgery. J Am Geriatr Soc 53:424–429PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat McGugan E, Burton H, Nixon SJ et al (2000) Deaths following hernia surgery: room for improvement. J R Coll Surg Edinb 45:183–186PubMed McGugan E, Burton H, Nixon SJ et al (2000) Deaths following hernia surgery: room for improvement. J R Coll Surg Edinb 45:183–186PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Riou JP, Cohen JR, Johnson H Jr (1992) Factors influencing wound dehiscence. Am J Surg 163:324–330PubMedCrossRef Riou JP, Cohen JR, Johnson H Jr (1992) Factors influencing wound dehiscence. Am J Surg 163:324–330PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Arumugam PJ, Bevan L, Macdonald L et al (2003) A prospective audit of stomas: analysis of risk factors and complications and their management. Colorectal Dis 5:49–52PubMedCrossRef Arumugam PJ, Bevan L, Macdonald L et al (2003) A prospective audit of stomas: analysis of risk factors and complications and their management. Colorectal Dis 5:49–52PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sauerland S, Walgenbach M, Habermalz B et al (2011) Laparoscopic versus open surgical techniques for ventral or incisional hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD007781PubMed Sauerland S, Walgenbach M, Habermalz B et al (2011) Laparoscopic versus open surgical techniques for ventral or incisional hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD007781PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Herbert GS, Tausch TJ, Carter PL (2009) Prophylactic mesh to prevent incisional hernia: a note of caution. Am J Surg 197:595–598 discussion 598PubMedCrossRef Herbert GS, Tausch TJ, Carter PL (2009) Prophylactic mesh to prevent incisional hernia: a note of caution. Am J Surg 197:595–598 discussion 598PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Curro G, Centorrino T, Musolino C et al (2011) Incisional hernia prophylaxis in morbidly obese patients undergoing biliopancreatic diversion. Obes Surg 21:1559–1563PubMedCrossRef Curro G, Centorrino T, Musolino C et al (2011) Incisional hernia prophylaxis in morbidly obese patients undergoing biliopancreatic diversion. Obes Surg 21:1559–1563PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Strzelczyk JM, Szymanski D, Nowicki ME et al (2006) Randomized clinical trial of postoperative hernia prophylaxis in open bariatric surgery. Br J Surg 93:1347–1350PubMedCrossRef Strzelczyk JM, Szymanski D, Nowicki ME et al (2006) Randomized clinical trial of postoperative hernia prophylaxis in open bariatric surgery. Br J Surg 93:1347–1350PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kelly ME, Behrman SW (2002) The safety and efficacy of prosthetic hernia repair in clean-contaminated and contaminated wounds. Am Surg 68:524–528 discussion 528–529PubMed Kelly ME, Behrman SW (2002) The safety and efficacy of prosthetic hernia repair in clean-contaminated and contaminated wounds. Am Surg 68:524–528 discussion 528–529PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Birolini C, Utiyama EM, Rodrigues AJ et al (2000) Elective colonic operation and prosthetic repair of incisional hernia: does contamination contraindicate abdominal wall prosthesis use? J Am Coll Surg 191:366–372PubMedCrossRef Birolini C, Utiyama EM, Rodrigues AJ et al (2000) Elective colonic operation and prosthetic repair of incisional hernia: does contamination contraindicate abdominal wall prosthesis use? J Am Coll Surg 191:366–372PubMedCrossRef
18.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Bevis PM, Windhaber RA, Lear PA et al (2010) Randomized clinical trial of mesh versus sutured wound closure after open abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. Br J Surg 97:1497–1502PubMedCrossRef Bevis PM, Windhaber RA, Lear PA et al (2010) Randomized clinical trial of mesh versus sutured wound closure after open abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. Br J Surg 97:1497–1502PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Janes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA (2004) Randomized clinical trial of the use of a prosthetic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia. Br J Surg 91:280–282PubMedCrossRef Janes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA (2004) Randomized clinical trial of the use of a prosthetic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia. Br J Surg 91:280–282PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat El-Khadrawy OH, Moussa G, Mansour O et al (2009) Prophylactic prosthetic reinforcement of midline abdominal incisions in high-risk patients. Hernia 13:267–274PubMedCrossRef El-Khadrawy OH, Moussa G, Mansour O et al (2009) Prophylactic prosthetic reinforcement of midline abdominal incisions in high-risk patients. Hernia 13:267–274PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhangu A, Fletcher L, Kingdon S et al (2012) A clinical and radiological assessment of incisional hernias following closure of temporary stomas. Surgeon 10:321–325PubMedCrossRef Bhangu A, Fletcher L, Kingdon S et al (2012) A clinical and radiological assessment of incisional hernias following closure of temporary stomas. Surgeon 10:321–325PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Pokorny H, Herkner H, Jakesz R et al (2005) Mortality and complications after stoma closure. Arch Surg 140:956–960 discussion 960PubMedCrossRef Pokorny H, Herkner H, Jakesz R et al (2005) Mortality and complications after stoma closure. Arch Surg 140:956–960 discussion 960PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat van de Pavoordt HD, Fazio VW, Jagelman DG et al (1987) The outcome of loop ileostomy closure in 293 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 2:214–217PubMedCrossRef van de Pavoordt HD, Fazio VW, Jagelman DG et al (1987) The outcome of loop ileostomy closure in 293 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 2:214–217PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanchez-Manuel FJ, Lozano-Garcia J, Seco-Gil JL (2012) Antibiotic prophylaxis for hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD003769PubMed Sanchez-Manuel FJ, Lozano-Garcia J, Seco-Gil JL (2012) Antibiotic prophylaxis for hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD003769PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat den Hartog D, Dur AH, Tuinebreijer WE et al (2008) Open surgical procedures for incisional hernias. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD006438 den Hartog D, Dur AH, Tuinebreijer WE et al (2008) Open surgical procedures for incisional hernias. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD006438
Metadaten
Titel
Prophylactic Mesh Reinforcement Reduces Stomal Site Incisional Hernia after Ileostomy Closure
verfasst von
David Shi Hao Liu
Elisabeth Banham
Srinivasa Yellapu
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2013
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 9/2013
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2109-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2013

World Journal of Surgery 9/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.