Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 2/2014

01.02.2014

Clinical Utility of a Novel Hybrid Position Combining the Left Lateral Decubitus and Prone Positions During Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy

verfasst von: Takuji Kaburagi, Hiroya Takeuchi, Hirofumi Kawakubo, Tai Omori, Soji Ozawa, Yuko Kitagawa

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

We developed a hybrid of the prone and left lateral decubitus positions for thoracoscopic esophagectomy (TE) in 2009. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of applying this novel TE position.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 78 patients who underwent TE at our institution between 2005 and 2010. Altogether, 33 patients underwent TE in the left lateral decubitus position (LD-TE) from 2005 to 2008, and 45 underwent TE in the hybrid position (hybrid-TE) from 2009 to 2010. Radical lymphadenectomy along the bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerves was performed in both groups. The thoracic duct was preserved in the LD-TE group and resected in the hybrid-TE group. In the LD-TE group, all thoracic procedures were performed with the patient in the left lateral decubitus position. In the hybrid-TE group, the upper mediastinal procedure was performed with the patient in the left lateral decubitus position, and procedures at the middle and lower mediastinum were performed with the patient in the prone position under CO2 pneumothorax.

Results

Hybrid-TE was associated with increased operating time. The number of harvested mediastinal nodes and the PaO2/FiO2 ratio on postoperative day 1 were both greater in this position. Although vocal cord palsy was observed more frequently in the hybrid-TE group, there was no significant difference in the rate of other complications or in-hospital mortality between the two groups.

Conclusions

The novel hybrid position is believed feasible for use during TE. We believe that this position facilitates a more radical mediastinal lymphadenectomy with minimal intraoperative pulmonary damage.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S (1992) Endoscopic oesophagectomy through a right thoracoscopic approach. J R Coll Surg Edinb 37:7–11PubMed Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S (1992) Endoscopic oesophagectomy through a right thoracoscopic approach. J R Coll Surg Edinb 37:7–11PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Akaishi T, Kaneda I, Higuchi N et al (1996) Thoracoscopic en bloc total esophagectomy with radical mediastinal lymphadenectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 112:1533–1540 (discussion 1540–1531)PubMedCrossRef Akaishi T, Kaneda I, Higuchi N et al (1996) Thoracoscopic en bloc total esophagectomy with radical mediastinal lymphadenectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 112:1533–1540 (discussion 1540–1531)PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kawahara K, Maekawa T, Okabayashi K et al (1999) Video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 13:218–223PubMedCrossRef Kawahara K, Maekawa T, Okabayashi K et al (1999) Video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 13:218–223PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Smithers BM, Gotley DC, McEwan D et al (2001) Thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus: a 6-year experience. Surg Endosc 15:176–182PubMedCrossRef Smithers BM, Gotley DC, McEwan D et al (2001) Thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus: a 6-year experience. Surg Endosc 15:176–182PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO et al (2003) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 238:486–494 (discussion 494–485)PubMed Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO et al (2003) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 238:486–494 (discussion 494–485)PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M et al (2003) A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation. Br J Surg 90:108–113PubMedCrossRef Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M et al (2003) A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation. Br J Surg 90:108–113PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthilkumar R et al (2006) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position—experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg 203:7–16PubMedCrossRef Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthilkumar R et al (2006) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position—experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg 203:7–16PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Takeuchi H, Oyama T, Saikawa Y et al (2012) Novel thoracoscopic intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis technique for patients with esophageal cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22:88–92PubMedCrossRef Takeuchi H, Oyama T, Saikawa Y et al (2012) Novel thoracoscopic intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis technique for patients with esophageal cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22:88–92PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C (2009) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 7th edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C (2009) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 7th edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Cuschieri A (1994) Thoracoscopic subtotal oesophagectomy. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 2:21–25PubMed Cuschieri A (1994) Thoracoscopic subtotal oesophagectomy. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 2:21–25PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Leibman S, Smithers BM, Gotley DC et al (2006) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: short- and long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 20:428–433PubMedCrossRef Leibman S, Smithers BM, Gotley DC et al (2006) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: short- and long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 20:428–433PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW et al (2012) Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 379:1887–1892PubMedCrossRef Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW et al (2012) Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 379:1887–1892PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ozawa S, Ito E, Kazuno A et al (2013) Thoracoscopic esophagectomy while in a prone position for esophageal cancer: a preceding anterior approach method. Surg Endosc 27:40–47PubMedCrossRef Ozawa S, Ito E, Kazuno A et al (2013) Thoracoscopic esophagectomy while in a prone position for esophageal cancer: a preceding anterior approach method. Surg Endosc 27:40–47PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Isono K, Sato H, Nakayama K (1991) Results of a nationwide study on the three-field lymph node dissection of esophageal cancer. Oncology 48:411–420PubMedCrossRef Isono K, Sato H, Nakayama K (1991) Results of a nationwide study on the three-field lymph node dissection of esophageal cancer. Oncology 48:411–420PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Akiyama H, Tsurumaru M, Udagawa H et al (1994) Radical lymph node dissection for cancer of the thoracic esophagus. Ann Surg 220:364–372 (discussion 372–363)PubMedCrossRef Akiyama H, Tsurumaru M, Udagawa H et al (1994) Radical lymph node dissection for cancer of the thoracic esophagus. Ann Surg 220:364–372 (discussion 372–363)PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Igaki H, Kato H, Ando N et al (2008) A randomized trial of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for clinical stage II/III squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG 9907). J Clin Oncol 26:4510 Igaki H, Kato H, Ando N et al (2008) A randomized trial of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for clinical stage II/III squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG 9907). J Clin Oncol 26:4510
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H et al (2012) A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG9907). Ann Surg Oncol 19:68–74PubMedCrossRef Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H et al (2012) A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG9907). Ann Surg Oncol 19:68–74PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Martin I et al (2007) Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Surg 245:232–240PubMedCrossRef Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Martin I et al (2007) Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Surg 245:232–240PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Luketich J, Pennathur A, Catalano PJ et al (2009) Results of a phase II multicenter study of minimally invasive esophagectomy (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E2202). J Clin Oncol 27:4516 Luketich J, Pennathur A, Catalano PJ et al (2009) Results of a phase II multicenter study of minimally invasive esophagectomy (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E2202). J Clin Oncol 27:4516
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen NT, Hinojosa MW, Smith BR et al (2008) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: lessons learned from 104 operations. Ann Surg 248:1081–1091PubMedCrossRef Nguyen NT, Hinojosa MW, Smith BR et al (2008) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: lessons learned from 104 operations. Ann Surg 248:1081–1091PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M et al (2002) Video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer: a series of 75 cases. Surg Endosc 16:1588–1593PubMedCrossRef Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M et al (2002) Video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer: a series of 75 cases. Surg Endosc 16:1588–1593PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamamoto S, Kawahara K, Maekawa T et al (2005) Minimally invasive esophagectomy for stage I and II esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 80:2070–2075PubMedCrossRef Yamamoto S, Kawahara K, Maekawa T et al (2005) Minimally invasive esophagectomy for stage I and II esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 80:2070–2075PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Kunisaki C, Kosaka T, Ono HA et al (2011) Significance of thoracoscopy-assisted surgery with a minithoracotomy and hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer: the experience of a single surgeon. J Gastrointest Surg 15:1939–1951PubMedCrossRef Kunisaki C, Kosaka T, Ono HA et al (2011) Significance of thoracoscopy-assisted surgery with a minithoracotomy and hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer: the experience of a single surgeon. J Gastrointest Surg 15:1939–1951PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Gockel I, Kneist W, Keilmann A et al (2005) Recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis (RLNP) following esophagectomy for carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 31:277–281PubMedCrossRef Gockel I, Kneist W, Keilmann A et al (2005) Recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis (RLNP) following esophagectomy for carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 31:277–281PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Decker G, Coosemans W, De Leyn P et al (2009) Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 35:13–20 (discussion 20–11)PubMedCrossRef Decker G, Coosemans W, De Leyn P et al (2009) Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 35:13–20 (discussion 20–11)PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Clinical Utility of a Novel Hybrid Position Combining the Left Lateral Decubitus and Prone Positions During Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy
verfasst von
Takuji Kaburagi
Hiroya Takeuchi
Hirofumi Kawakubo
Tai Omori
Soji Ozawa
Yuko Kitagawa
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2258-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2014

World Journal of Surgery 2/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.