Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 2/2014

01.02.2014

Preparing for Prospective Clinical Trials: A National Initiative of an Excellence Registry for Consecutive Pancreatic Cancer Resections

verfasst von: Odo Gangl, Klaus Sahora, Peter Kornprat, Christian Margreiter, Florian Primavesi, Evelyne Bareck, Martin Schindl, Friedrich Längle, Dietmar Öfner, Hans-Jörg Mischinger, Johann Pratschke, Michael Gnant, Reinhold Függer

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Despite significant improvements in perioperative mortality as well as response rates to multimodality treatment, results after surgical resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with respect to long-term outcomes remain disappointing. Patient recruitment for prospective international trials on adjuvant and neoadjuvant regimens is challenging for various reasons. We set out to assess the preconditions and potential to perform perioperative trials for pancreatic cancer within a well-established Austrian nationwide network of surgical and medical oncologists (Austrian Breast & Colorectal Cancer Study Group).

Methods

From 2005 to 2010 five high-volume centers and one medium-volume center completed standardized data entry forms with 33 parameters (history and patient related data, preoperative clinical staging and work-up, surgical details and intraoperative findings, postoperative complications, reinterventions, reoperations, 30-day mortality, histology, and timing of multimodality treatment). Outside of the study group, in Austria pancreatic resections are performed in three “high-volume” centers (>10 pancreatic resections per year), three “medium-volume” centers (5–10 pancreatic resections per year), and the rest in various low-volume centers (<5 pancreatic resections per year) in Austria. Nationwide data for prevalence of and surgical resections for pancreatic adenocarcinoma were contributed by the National Cancer Registry of Statistics of Austria and the Austrian Health Institute.

Results

In total, 492 consecutive patients underwent pancreatic resection for ductal adenocarcinoma. All postoperative complications leading to hospital readmission were treated at the primary surgical department and documented in the database. Overall morbidity and pancreatic fistula rate were 45.5 % and 10.1 %, respectively. Within the entire cohort there were 9.8 % radiological reinterventions and 10.4 % reoperations. Length of stay was 16 days in median (0–209); 12 of 492 patients died within 30 days after operation, resulting in a 30-day mortality rate of 2.4 %. Seven of the total 19 deaths (36.8 %) occurred after 30 days, during hospitalization at the surgical department, resulting in a hospital mortality rate of 3.9 % (19/492). With a standardized histopathological protocol, there were 70 % (21/30) R0 resections, 30 % (9/30) R1 resections, and no R2 resections in Vienna and 62.7 % (32/51) R0 resections, 35.3 % (18/51) R1 resections, and 2 % (1/51) R2 resections in Salzburg. Resection margin status with nonstandardized protocols was classified as R0 in 82 % (339/411), R1 in 16 % (16/411), and R2 in 1.2 % (5/411). Perioperative chemotherapy was administered in 81.1 % of patients (8.3 % neoadjuvant; 68.5 % adjuvant; 4.3 % palliative); chemoradiotherapy (1.6 % neoadjuvant; 3 % adjuvant; 0.2 % palliative), in 4.9 % of patients. The six centers that contributed to this registry initiative provided surgical treatment to 40 % of all Austrian patients, resulting in a median annual recruitment of 85 (51–104) patients for the entire ABCSG-group and a median of 11.8 (0–38) surgeries for each individual department.

Conclusions

Surgical quality data of the ABCSG core pancreatic group are in line with international standards. With continuing centralization the essential potential to perform prospective clinical trials for pancreatic adenocarcinoma is given in Austria. Several protocol proposals aiming at surgical and multimodality research questions are currently being discussed.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA et al (2006) 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg 10:1199–1210 discussion 1210–1191CrossRefPubMed Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA et al (2006) 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg 10:1199–1210 discussion 1210–1191CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat McPhee JT, Hill JS, Whalen GF et al (2007) Perioperative mortality for pancreatectomy: a national perspective. Ann Surg 246:246–253CrossRefPubMed McPhee JT, Hill JS, Whalen GF et al (2007) Perioperative mortality for pancreatectomy: a national perspective. Ann Surg 246:246–253CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Lemmens VE, Bosscha K, van der Schelling G et al (2011) Improving outcome for patients with pancreatic cancer through centralization. Br J Surg 98:1455–1462CrossRefPubMed Lemmens VE, Bosscha K, van der Schelling G et al (2011) Improving outcome for patients with pancreatic cancer through centralization. Br J Surg 98:1455–1462CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV et al (2002) Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 346:1128–1137CrossRefPubMed Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV et al (2002) Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 346:1128–1137CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Allareddy V, Ward MM, Konety BR (2010) Effect of meeting Leapfrog volume thresholds on complication rates following complex surgical procedures. Ann Surg 251:377–383CrossRefPubMed Allareddy V, Ward MM, Konety BR (2010) Effect of meeting Leapfrog volume thresholds on complication rates following complex surgical procedures. Ann Surg 251:377–383CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat de Wilde RF, Besselink MG, van der Tweel I et al (2012) Impact of nationwide centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on hospital mortality. Br J Surg 99:404–410CrossRefPubMed de Wilde RF, Besselink MG, van der Tweel I et al (2012) Impact of nationwide centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on hospital mortality. Br J Surg 99:404–410CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Friess H et al (2004) A randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 350:1200–1210CrossRefPubMed Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Friess H et al (2004) A randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 350:1200–1210CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Neoptolemos JP, Moore MJ, Cox TF et al (2012) Effect of adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid or gemcitabine vs observation on survival in patients with resected periampullary adenocarcinoma: the ESPAC-3 periampullary cancer randomized trial. JAMA 308:147–156CrossRefPubMed Neoptolemos JP, Moore MJ, Cox TF et al (2012) Effect of adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid or gemcitabine vs observation on survival in patients with resected periampullary adenocarcinoma: the ESPAC-3 periampullary cancer randomized trial. JAMA 308:147–156CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Suc B, Msika S, Piccinini M et al (2004) Octreotide in the prevention of intra-abdominal complications following elective pancreatic resection: a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg 139:288–294 discussion 295CrossRefPubMed Suc B, Msika S, Piccinini M et al (2004) Octreotide in the prevention of intra-abdominal complications following elective pancreatic resection: a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg 139:288–294 discussion 295CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Jakesz R, Greil R, Gnant M et al (2007) Extended adjuvant therapy with anastrozole among postmenopausal breast cancer patients: results from the randomized Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group Trial 6a. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:1845–1853CrossRefPubMed Jakesz R, Greil R, Gnant M et al (2007) Extended adjuvant therapy with anastrozole among postmenopausal breast cancer patients: results from the randomized Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group Trial 6a. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:1845–1853CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Gnant M, Mlineritsch B, Schippinger W et al (2009) Endocrine therapy plus zoledronic acid in premenopausal breast cancer. N Engl J Med 360:679–691CrossRefPubMed Gnant M, Mlineritsch B, Schippinger W et al (2009) Endocrine therapy plus zoledronic acid in premenopausal breast cancer. N Engl J Med 360:679–691CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Tausch C, Taucher S, Dubsky P et al (2012) Prognostic value of number of removed lymph nodes, number of involved lymph nodes, and lymph node ratio in 7502 breast cancer patients enrolled onto trials of the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG). Ann Surg Oncol 19:1808–1817CrossRefPubMed Tausch C, Taucher S, Dubsky P et al (2012) Prognostic value of number of removed lymph nodes, number of involved lymph nodes, and lymph node ratio in 7502 breast cancer patients enrolled onto trials of the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG). Ann Surg Oncol 19:1808–1817CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat van Heek NT, Kuhlmann KF, Scholten RJ et al (2005) Hospital volume and mortality after pancreatic resection: a systematic review and an evaluation of intervention in the Netherlands. Ann Surg 242:781–788 discussion 788–790CrossRefPubMed van Heek NT, Kuhlmann KF, Scholten RJ et al (2005) Hospital volume and mortality after pancreatic resection: a systematic review and an evaluation of intervention in the Netherlands. Ann Surg 242:781–788 discussion 788–790CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMed Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat DeOliveira ML, Winter JM, Schafer M et al (2006) Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: a novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 244:931–937 discussion 937–939CrossRefPubMed DeOliveira ML, Winter JM, Schafer M et al (2006) Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: a novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 244:931–937 discussion 937–939CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13CrossRefPubMed Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Sarr MG (2003) The potent somatostatin analogue vapreotide does not decrease pancreas-specific complications after elective pancreatectomy: a prospective, multicenter, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Am Coll Surg 196:556–564 discussion 564–555; author reply 565CrossRefPubMed Sarr MG (2003) The potent somatostatin analogue vapreotide does not decrease pancreas-specific complications after elective pancreatectomy: a prospective, multicenter, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Am Coll Surg 196:556–564 discussion 564–555; author reply 565CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C et al (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142:20–25CrossRefPubMed Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C et al (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142:20–25CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Verbeke CS, Leitch D, Menon KV et al (2006) Redefining the R1 resection in pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 93:1232–1237CrossRefPubMed Verbeke CS, Leitch D, Menon KV et al (2006) Redefining the R1 resection in pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 93:1232–1237CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Esposito I, Kleeff J, Bergmann F et al (2008) Most pancreatic cancer resections are R1 resections. Ann Surg Oncol 15:1651–1660CrossRefPubMed Esposito I, Kleeff J, Bergmann F et al (2008) Most pancreatic cancer resections are R1 resections. Ann Surg Oncol 15:1651–1660CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Fernandez-del Castillo C, Morales-Oyarvide V, McGrath D et al (2012) Evolution of the Whipple procedure at the Massachusetts General Hospital. Surgery 152:S56–S63CrossRefPubMed Fernandez-del Castillo C, Morales-Oyarvide V, McGrath D et al (2012) Evolution of the Whipple procedure at the Massachusetts General Hospital. Surgery 152:S56–S63CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Riall TS, Nealon WH, Goodwin JS et al (2008) Outcomes following pancreatic resection: variability among high-volume providers. Surgery 144:133–140CrossRefPubMed Riall TS, Nealon WH, Goodwin JS et al (2008) Outcomes following pancreatic resection: variability among high-volume providers. Surgery 144:133–140CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Gillen S, Schuster T, Meyer Zum Buschenfelde C et al (2010) Preoperative/neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of response and resection percentages. PLoS Med 2010(7):e1000267CrossRef Gillen S, Schuster T, Meyer Zum Buschenfelde C et al (2010) Preoperative/neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of response and resection percentages. PLoS Med 2010(7):e1000267CrossRef
25.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown KM, Siripurapu V, Davidson M et al (2008) Chemoradiation followed by chemotherapy before resection for borderline pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg 195:318–321CrossRefPubMed Brown KM, Siripurapu V, Davidson M et al (2008) Chemoradiation followed by chemotherapy before resection for borderline pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg 195:318–321CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Strobel O, Berens V, Hinz U et al (2012) Resection after neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced, “unresectable” pancreatic cancer. Surgery 152:S33–S42CrossRefPubMed Strobel O, Berens V, Hinz U et al (2012) Resection after neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced, “unresectable” pancreatic cancer. Surgery 152:S33–S42CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Stokes JB, Nolan NJ, Stelow EB et al (2011) Preoperative capecitabine and concurrent radiation for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 18:619–627CrossRefPubMed Stokes JB, Nolan NJ, Stelow EB et al (2011) Preoperative capecitabine and concurrent radiation for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 18:619–627CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Sahora K, Kuehrer I, Eisenhut A et al (2011) NeoGemOx: gemcitabine and oxaliplatin as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced, nonmetastasized pancreatic cancer. Surgery 149:311–320CrossRefPubMed Sahora K, Kuehrer I, Eisenhut A et al (2011) NeoGemOx: gemcitabine and oxaliplatin as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced, nonmetastasized pancreatic cancer. Surgery 149:311–320CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Walters DM, Lapar DJ, de Lange EE et al (2011) Pancreas-protocol imaging at a high-volume center leads to improved preoperative staging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 18:2764–2771PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Walters DM, Lapar DJ, de Lange EE et al (2011) Pancreas-protocol imaging at a high-volume center leads to improved preoperative staging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 18:2764–2771PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Glant JA, Waters JA, House MG et al (2011) Does the interval from imaging to operation affect the rate of unanticipated metastasis encountered during operation for pancreatic adenocarcinoma? Surgery 150:607–616CrossRefPubMed Glant JA, Waters JA, House MG et al (2011) Does the interval from imaging to operation affect the rate of unanticipated metastasis encountered during operation for pancreatic adenocarcinoma? Surgery 150:607–616CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Preparing for Prospective Clinical Trials: A National Initiative of an Excellence Registry for Consecutive Pancreatic Cancer Resections
verfasst von
Odo Gangl
Klaus Sahora
Peter Kornprat
Christian Margreiter
Florian Primavesi
Evelyne Bareck
Martin Schindl
Friedrich Längle
Dietmar Öfner
Hans-Jörg Mischinger
Johann Pratschke
Michael Gnant
Reinhold Függer
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2283-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2014

World Journal of Surgery 2/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.