Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 8/2014

01.08.2014

An Efficient Risk Adjustment Model to Predict Inpatient Adverse Events after Surgery

verfasst von: Jamie E. Anderson, John Rose, Abraham Noorbakhsh, Mark A. Talamini, Samuel R. G. Finlayson, Stephen W. Bickler, David C. Chang

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 8/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Risk adjustment is an important component of surgical outcomes and quality analyses. Current models include numerous preoperative variables; however, the relative contribution of these variables may be limited. This research seeks to identify a model with the fewest number of variables necessary to perform an adequate risk adjustment to predict any inpatient adverse event for use in resource-limited settings.

Methods

All patients from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from 2005 to 2010 were included. Outcomes were inpatient mortality or any surgical complication captured by NSQIP. Models were built by sequential addition of preoperative risk variables selected by their area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC).

Results

Among 863,349 patients, the single variable with the highest AUC was American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification (AUC = 0.7127). AUC values reached 0.7923 with five variables (ASA classification, wound classification, functional status prior to surgery, albumin, and age) and 0.7945 with six variables. The sixth variable was one of the following: alkaline phosphatase, weight loss, principal anesthesia technique, gender, or emergency status. The model with the highest discrimination that did not require laboratories included ASA classification, functional status prior to surgery, wound classification, and age (AUC = 0.7810). Including all 66 preoperative variables produced little additional gain (AUC = 0.8006).

Conclusions

Six variables are sufficient to develop a risk adjustment tool for inpatient surgical mortality and morbidity. This research has important implications for the field of surgical outcomes research by improving efficiency of data collection. This limited model can aid the expansion of risk-adjusted analyses to resource-limited settings worldwide.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2012) User guide for the 2010 participant use data file. October 2012 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2012) User guide for the 2010 participant use data file. October 2012
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Dimick JB, Osborne NH, Hall BL et al (2010) Risk adjustment for comparing hospital quality with surgery: how many variables are needed? J Am Coll Surg 210:503–508PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Dimick JB, Osborne NH, Hall BL et al (2010) Risk adjustment for comparing hospital quality with surgery: how many variables are needed? J Am Coll Surg 210:503–508PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson JE, Lassiter R, Bickler SW et al (2012) Brief tool to measure risk adjusted surgical outcomes in resource-limited hospitals. Arch Surg 147:798–803PubMedCrossRef Anderson JE, Lassiter R, Bickler SW et al (2012) Brief tool to measure risk adjusted surgical outcomes in resource-limited hospitals. Arch Surg 147:798–803PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Dimick JB, Welch HG, Birkmeyer JD (2004) Surgical mortality as an indicator of hospital quality: the problem with small sample size. JAMA 292:847–851PubMedCrossRef Dimick JB, Welch HG, Birkmeyer JD (2004) Surgical mortality as an indicator of hospital quality: the problem with small sample size. JAMA 292:847–851PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Healey C, Osler TM, Rogers FB et al (2003) Improving the Glasgow Coma Scale score model: motor score alone is a better predictor. J Trauma 54(4):671–680PubMedCrossRef Healey C, Osler TM, Rogers FB et al (2003) Improving the Glasgow Coma Scale score model: motor score alone is a better predictor. J Trauma 54(4):671–680PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Beckwick V, Cheek L, Ball J (2004) Statistics review 13: receiver operator characteristic curves. Crit Care 8:508–512CrossRef Beckwick V, Cheek L, Ball J (2004) Statistics review 13: receiver operator characteristic curves. Crit Care 8:508–512CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Meredith JW, Evans G, Kilgo PD et al (2002) A comparison of the abilities of nine scoring algorithms in predicting mortality. J Trauma 53:621–629PubMedCrossRef Meredith JW, Evans G, Kilgo PD et al (2002) A comparison of the abilities of nine scoring algorithms in predicting mortality. J Trauma 53:621–629PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Connell FA, Koepsell TD (1985) Measures of gain in certainty from a diagnostic test. Am J Epidemiol 121:744–753PubMedCrossRef Connell FA, Koepsell TD (1985) Measures of gain in certainty from a diagnostic test. Am J Epidemiol 121:744–753PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Weiser TG, Regenbogen SE, Thompson KD et al (2008) An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modeling strategy based on available data. Lancet 372:139–144PubMedCrossRef Weiser TG, Regenbogen SE, Thompson KD et al (2008) An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modeling strategy based on available data. Lancet 372:139–144PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubinfeld I, Farooq M, Velanovich V et al (2010) Predicting surgical risk: how much data is enough? AMIA Annu Symp Proc 3010:777–781 Rubinfeld I, Farooq M, Velanovich V et al (2010) Predicting surgical risk: how much data is enough? AMIA Annu Symp Proc 3010:777–781
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Birkmeyer JD, Shahian DM, Dimick JB et al (2008) Blueprint for a new American College of Surgeons: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 207:777–782PubMedCrossRef Birkmeyer JD, Shahian DM, Dimick JB et al (2008) Blueprint for a new American College of Surgeons: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 207:777–782PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications. Ann Surg 250:187–196PubMedCrossRef Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications. Ann Surg 250:187–196PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY, Ko CY et al (2009) Effect of subjective preoperative variables on risk adjusted assessment of hospital morbidity and mortality. Ann Surg 249:682–689PubMedCrossRef Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY, Ko CY et al (2009) Effect of subjective preoperative variables on risk adjusted assessment of hospital morbidity and mortality. Ann Surg 249:682–689PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Shiloach M, Frencher SK, Steeger JE et al (2010) Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 210:6–16PubMedCrossRef Shiloach M, Frencher SK, Steeger JE et al (2010) Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 210:6–16PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Daley J, Khuri SF, Henderson W et al (1997) Risk adjustment of the postoperative morbidity rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the national veteran’s affairs surgical risk study. J Am Coll Surg 185:328–340PubMed Daley J, Khuri SF, Henderson W et al (1997) Risk adjustment of the postoperative morbidity rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the national veteran’s affairs surgical risk study. J Am Coll Surg 185:328–340PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Crawford RS, Cambria RP, Abularrage CJ et al (2010) Preoperative functional status predicts perioperative outcomes after infrainguinal bypass surgery. J Vasc Surg 51:351–359PubMedCrossRef Crawford RS, Cambria RP, Abularrage CJ et al (2010) Preoperative functional status predicts perioperative outcomes after infrainguinal bypass surgery. J Vasc Surg 51:351–359PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Davenport DL, Ferraris VA, Hosokawa P et al (2007) Multivariate predictors of postoperative cardiac adverse events after general and vascular surgery: results from the patient safety in surgery study. J Am Coll Sug 204:1199–1210CrossRef Davenport DL, Ferraris VA, Hosokawa P et al (2007) Multivariate predictors of postoperative cardiac adverse events after general and vascular surgery: results from the patient safety in surgery study. J Am Coll Sug 204:1199–1210CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
An Efficient Risk Adjustment Model to Predict Inpatient Adverse Events after Surgery
verfasst von
Jamie E. Anderson
John Rose
Abraham Noorbakhsh
Mark A. Talamini
Samuel R. G. Finlayson
Stephen W. Bickler
David C. Chang
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 8/2014
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2490-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2014

World Journal of Surgery 8/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.