Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 8/2014

01.08.2014

Outcome of Tumor-Specific Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: The Impact of Laparoscopic Resection

verfasst von: Zakir K. Mohamed, Wai Lun Law

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 8/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

The study aimed to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic and open resection for rectal cancer in 1,063 consecutive cases in a single center.

Methods

We performed an analysis of 11 years of experience in rectal cancer surgery and compared the outcome of laparoscopic and open surgery. Multivariate and subgroup analysis was performed to look at the effect of the level of tumor and stage of disease on short-term outcomes like conversion rate, anastomotic leak rate, length of stay, complication rate, 30-day mortality, and long-term outcomes like local recurrence and survival.

Results

A total of 1,063 patients underwent rectal resection with 470 (44.2 %) patients undergoing the laparoscopic approach. Groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, or co-morbidities, and the operating time was longer in the laparoscopic group (210 vs. 150 min; p value < 0.001). A conversion rate of 6.8 % was noted, with an anastomotic leak rate of 3.87 % in the open group and 2.97 % in the laparoscopic group. The laparoscopic group had a lower blood loss (100 vs. 350 ml; p < 0.001), lower complication rates, and shorter length of stay (6 vs. 9 days). The local recurrence rate was comparable, and the laparoscopic approach had better overall and cancer-specific survival, even after adjusting for stages. The laparoscopic approach was an independent factor associated with better overall and cancer-specific survival on multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

We confirmed the oncological safety of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Laparoscopic surgery also showed superiority in the short-term and long-term outcomes of rectal cancer.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY et al (2010) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 11:637–645PubMedCrossRef Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY et al (2010) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 11:637–645PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Buunen M, Bonjer HJ, Hop WC et al (2009) COLOR II. A randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer. Dan Med Bull 56:89–91PubMed Buunen M, Bonjer HJ, Hop WC et al (2009) COLOR II. A randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer. Dan Med Bull 56:89–91PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kitano S, Inomata M, Sato A et al (2005) Randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG 0404. Jpn J Clin Oncol 35:475–477PubMedCrossRef Kitano S, Inomata M, Sato A et al (2005) Randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG 0404. Jpn J Clin Oncol 35:475–477PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Soop M, Nelson H (2008) Laparoscopic-assisted proctectomy for rectal cancer: on trial. Ann Surg Oncol 15:2357–2359PubMedCrossRef Soop M, Nelson H (2008) Laparoscopic-assisted proctectomy for rectal cancer: on trial. Ann Surg Oncol 15:2357–2359PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kockerling F, Gastinger I, Schneider B et al (1993) Laparoscopic abdominoperineal excision of the rectum with high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in the management of rectal carcinoma. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 1:16–19PubMed Kockerling F, Gastinger I, Schneider B et al (1993) Laparoscopic abdominoperineal excision of the rectum with high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in the management of rectal carcinoma. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 1:16–19PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Poon JT, Law WL (2009) Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: a review. Ann Surg Oncol 16:3038–3047PubMedCrossRef Poon JT, Law WL (2009) Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: a review. Ann Surg Oncol 16:3038–3047PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Senagore AJ, Duepree HJ, Delaney CP et al (2002) Cost structure of laparoscopic and open sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: similarities and differences. Dis Colon Rectum 45:485–490PubMedCrossRef Senagore AJ, Duepree HJ, Delaney CP et al (2002) Cost structure of laparoscopic and open sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: similarities and differences. Dis Colon Rectum 45:485–490PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Delaney CP, Kiran RP, Senagore AJ et al (2003) Case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 238:67–72PubMedCentralPubMed Delaney CP, Kiran RP, Senagore AJ et al (2003) Case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 238:67–72PubMedCentralPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ohtani H, Tamamori Y, Arimoto Y et al (2012) A meta-analysis of the short- and long-term results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopy-assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. J Cancer 3:49–57PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Ohtani H, Tamamori Y, Arimoto Y et al (2012) A meta-analysis of the short- and long-term results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopy-assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. J Cancer 3:49–57PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kiran RP, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ et al (2004) Operative blood loss and use of blood products after laparoscopic and conventional open colorectal operations. Arch Surg 139:39–42PubMedCrossRef Kiran RP, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ et al (2004) Operative blood loss and use of blood products after laparoscopic and conventional open colorectal operations. Arch Surg 139:39–42PubMedCrossRef
11.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, Listorti C et al (2012) Laparoscopic vs open resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Colorectal Dis 14:e277–e296PubMedCrossRef Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, Listorti C et al (2012) Laparoscopic vs open resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Colorectal Dis 14:e277–e296PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726PubMedCrossRef Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kennedy RH, Francis A, Dutton S et al (2012) EnROL: a multicentre randomised trial of conventional versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme. BMC Cancer 12:181PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Kennedy RH, Francis A, Dutton S et al (2012) EnROL: a multicentre randomised trial of conventional versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme. BMC Cancer 12:181PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
15.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Lunardi AC, DdeM Paisani, Tanaka C et al (2013) Impact of laparoscopic surgery on thoracoabdominal mechanics and inspiratory muscular activity. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 186(1):40–44PubMedCrossRef Lunardi AC, DdeM Paisani, Tanaka C et al (2013) Impact of laparoscopic surgery on thoracoabdominal mechanics and inspiratory muscular activity. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 186(1):40–44PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Milsom JW, Bohm B, Hammerhofer KA et al (1998) A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg 187:46–54 (discussion 54–45)PubMedCrossRef Milsom JW, Bohm B, Hammerhofer KA et al (1998) A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg 187:46–54 (discussion 54–45)PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Law WL, Lee YM, Choi HK et al (2006) Laparoscopic and open anterior resection for upper and mid rectal cancer: an evaluation of outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1108–1115PubMedCrossRef Law WL, Lee YM, Choi HK et al (2006) Laparoscopic and open anterior resection for upper and mid rectal cancer: an evaluation of outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1108–1115PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee JK, Delaney CP, Lipman JM (2012) Current state of the art in laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer: update on the multi-centric international trials. Ann Surg Innov Res 6(1):5PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Lee JK, Delaney CP, Lipman JM (2012) Current state of the art in laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer: update on the multi-centric international trials. Ann Surg Innov Res 6(1):5PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Laurent C, Leblanc F, Wutrich P et al (2009) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: long-term oncologic results. Ann Surg 250:54–61PubMedCrossRef Laurent C, Leblanc F, Wutrich P et al (2009) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: long-term oncologic results. Ann Surg 250:54–61PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Morino M, Allaix ME, Giraudo G et al (2005) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for extraperitoneal rectal cancer: a prospective comparative study. Surg Endosc 19:1460–1467PubMedCrossRef Morino M, Allaix ME, Giraudo G et al (2005) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for extraperitoneal rectal cancer: a prospective comparative study. Surg Endosc 19:1460–1467PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanakala V, Borowski DW, Agarwal AK et al (2012) Comparative study of safety and outcomes of single-port access versus conventional laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Tech Coloproctol 16:423–428PubMedCrossRef Kanakala V, Borowski DW, Agarwal AK et al (2012) Comparative study of safety and outcomes of single-port access versus conventional laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Tech Coloproctol 16:423–428PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim SH, Kwak JM (2013) Robotic total mesorectal excision: operative technique and review of the literature. Tech Coloproctol 17(Suppl 1):S47–S53PubMedCrossRef Kim SH, Kwak JM (2013) Robotic total mesorectal excision: operative technique and review of the literature. Tech Coloproctol 17(Suppl 1):S47–S53PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Poon JT, Cheung CW, Fan JK et al (2012) Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic colectomy for colonic neoplasm: a randomized, controlled trial. Surg Endosc 26:2729–2734PubMedCrossRef Poon JT, Cheung CW, Fan JK et al (2012) Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic colectomy for colonic neoplasm: a randomized, controlled trial. Surg Endosc 26:2729–2734PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Leroy J, Barry BD, Melani A et al (2013) No-scar transanal total mesorectal excision: the last step to pure NOTES for colorectal surgery. Arch Surg 148(3):226–230 Leroy J, Barry BD, Melani A et al (2013) No-scar transanal total mesorectal excision: the last step to pure NOTES for colorectal surgery. Arch Surg 148(3):226–230
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Sylla P, Rattner DW, Delgado S et al (2010) NOTES transanal rectal cancer resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery and laparoscopic assistance. Surg Endosc 24(5):1205–1210PubMedCrossRef Sylla P, Rattner DW, Delgado S et al (2010) NOTES transanal rectal cancer resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery and laparoscopic assistance. Surg Endosc 24(5):1205–1210PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Outcome of Tumor-Specific Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: The Impact of Laparoscopic Resection
verfasst von
Zakir K. Mohamed
Wai Lun Law
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 8/2014
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2533-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2014

World Journal of Surgery 8/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.