Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 10/2014

01.10.2014

Applicability of Enhanced Recovery Program for Advanced Liver Surgery

verfasst von: Takeshi Takamoto, Takuya Hashimoto, Kazuto Inoue, Daisuke Nagashima, Yoshikazu Maruyama, Yusuke Mitsuka, Osamu Aramaki, Masatoshi Makuuchi

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 10/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Enhanced recovery programs (ERPs) have been developed in various surgical fields and have been shown to accelerate postoperative recovery without increasing the incidence of adverse events. Whether ERP can be safely applied to patients undergoing complex liver surgery with a risk of liver failure remains unclear.

Methods

We created an ERP by rearranging our conventional postoperative treatments and applied this program to patients undergoing major hepatectomy between 2008 and 2013. The ERP elements included greater perioperative education, individualized postoperative fluid therapy, and early mobilization. The success of the ERP was evaluated on postoperative day (POD) 6 based on the criterion of independence from continuous medical intervention with the exception of an abdominal drainage tube. Adherence to each item in the ERP was evaluated, and risk factors for delayed accomplishment were analyzed.

Results

Altogether, 200 patients were included, and 165 patients (82.5 %) completed the ERP. Multivariate analyses showed that (1) an age of 65 years or older and (2) a red blood cell transfusion were independent risk factors for delayed accomplishment. The performance of thoracotomy or choledocojejunostomy did not significantly affect accomplishment of the ERP. Oral intake starting on POD 1 was achieved in 179 patients (89.5 %), and termination of intravenous drip infusions on POD 5 was feasible in 72.5 %.

Conclusions

An ERP for major hepatectomy was completed in more than 80 % of the patients. Earlier bowel movement can be challenged. The liquid in–out balance should be adjusted on an individual basis, rather than uniformly, especially for patients over 65 years of age or who required a red blood cell transfusion.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Belghiti J, Hiramatsu K, Benoist S et al (2000) Seven hundred forty-seven hepatectomies in the 1990s: an update to evaluate the actual risk of liver resection. J Am Coll Surg 191:38–46PubMedCrossRef Belghiti J, Hiramatsu K, Benoist S et al (2000) Seven hundred forty-seven hepatectomies in the 1990s: an update to evaluate the actual risk of liver resection. J Am Coll Surg 191:38–46PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Imamura H, Seyama Y, Kokudo N et al (2003) One thousand fifty-six hepatectomies without mortality in 8 years. Arch Surg 138:1198–1206 discussion 1206PubMedCrossRef Imamura H, Seyama Y, Kokudo N et al (2003) One thousand fifty-six hepatectomies without mortality in 8 years. Arch Surg 138:1198–1206 discussion 1206PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Van den Broek MA, van Dam RM, Malago M et al (2009) Feasibility of randomized controlled trials in liver surgery using surgery-related mortality or morbidity as endpoint. Br J Surg 96:1005–1014PubMedCrossRef Van den Broek MA, van Dam RM, Malago M et al (2009) Feasibility of randomized controlled trials in liver surgery using surgery-related mortality or morbidity as endpoint. Br J Surg 96:1005–1014PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Reissman P, Teoh TA, Cohen SM et al (1995) Is early oral feeding safe after elective colorectal surgery? A prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 222:73–77PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Reissman P, Teoh TA, Cohen SM et al (1995) Is early oral feeding safe after elective colorectal surgery? A prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 222:73–77PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
5.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Maessen J, Dejong CH, Hausel J et al (2007) A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection. Br J Surg 94:224–231PubMedCrossRef Maessen J, Dejong CH, Hausel J et al (2007) A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection. Br J Surg 94:224–231PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Podore PC, Throop EB (1999) Infrarenal aortic surgery with a 3-day hospital stay: a report on success with a clinical pathway. J Vasc Surg 29:787–792PubMedCrossRef Podore PC, Throop EB (1999) Infrarenal aortic surgery with a 3-day hospital stay: a report on success with a clinical pathway. J Vasc Surg 29:787–792PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Dam RM, Hendry PO, Coolsen MM et al (2008) Initial experience with a multimodal enhanced recovery programme in patients undergoing liver resection. Br J Surg 95:969–975PubMedCrossRef Van Dam RM, Hendry PO, Coolsen MM et al (2008) Initial experience with a multimodal enhanced recovery programme in patients undergoing liver resection. Br J Surg 95:969–975PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Bass CS et al (2004) Fast tracking after Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy. Chest 126:1187–1194PubMedCrossRef Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Bass CS et al (2004) Fast tracking after Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy. Chest 126:1187–1194PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Koea JB, Young Y, Gunn K (2009) Fast track liver resection: the effect of a comprehensive care package and analgesia with single dose intrathecal morphine with gabapentin or continuous epidural analgesia. HPB Surg 2009:271986PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Koea JB, Young Y, Gunn K (2009) Fast track liver resection: the effect of a comprehensive care package and analgesia with single dose intrathecal morphine with gabapentin or continuous epidural analgesia. HPB Surg 2009:271986PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hendry PO, van Dam RM, Bukkems SF et al (2010) Randomized clinical trial of laxatives and oral nutritional supplements within an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol following liver resection. Br J Surg 97:1198–1206PubMedCrossRef Hendry PO, van Dam RM, Bukkems SF et al (2010) Randomized clinical trial of laxatives and oral nutritional supplements within an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol following liver resection. Br J Surg 97:1198–1206PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin DX, Li X, Ye QW et al (2011) Implementation of a fast-track clinical pathway decreases postoperative length of stay and hospital charges for liver resection. Cell Biochem Biophys 61:413–419PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Lin DX, Li X, Ye QW et al (2011) Implementation of a fast-track clinical pathway decreases postoperative length of stay and hospital charges for liver resection. Cell Biochem Biophys 61:413–419PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones C, Kelliher L, Dickinson M et al (2013) Randomized clinical trial on enhanced recovery versus standard care following open liver resection. Br J Surg 100:1015–1024PubMedCrossRef Jones C, Kelliher L, Dickinson M et al (2013) Randomized clinical trial on enhanced recovery versus standard care following open liver resection. Br J Surg 100:1015–1024PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J et al (2009) Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations. Arch Surg 144:961–969PubMedCrossRef Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J et al (2009) Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations. Arch Surg 144:961–969PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Pringle JHV (1908) Notes on the arrest of hepatic hemorrhage due to trauma. Ann Surg 148:541–549CrossRef Pringle JHV (1908) Notes on the arrest of hepatic hemorrhage due to trauma. Ann Surg 148:541–549CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hasegawa K, Takayama T, Orii R et al (2002) Effect of hypoventilation on bleeding during hepatic resection: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg 137:311–315PubMedCrossRef Hasegawa K, Takayama T, Orii R et al (2002) Effect of hypoventilation on bleeding during hepatic resection: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg 137:311–315PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Fong Y, Brennan MF, Brown K et al (1996) Drainage is unnecessary after elective liver resection. Am J Surg 171:158–162PubMedCrossRef Fong Y, Brennan MF, Brown K et al (1996) Drainage is unnecessary after elective liver resection. Am J Surg 171:158–162PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Petrowsky H, Demartines N, Rousson V et al (2004) Evidence-based value of prophylactic drainage in gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Ann Surg 240:1074–1084 discussion 1084–1075PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Petrowsky H, Demartines N, Rousson V et al (2004) Evidence-based value of prophylactic drainage in gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Ann Surg 240:1074–1084 discussion 1084–1075PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Burt BM, Brown K, Jarnagin W et al (2002) An audit of results of a no-drainage practice policy after hepatectomy. Am J Surg 84:441–445CrossRef Burt BM, Brown K, Jarnagin W et al (2002) An audit of results of a no-drainage practice policy after hepatectomy. Am J Surg 84:441–445CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu CL, Fan ST, Lo CM et al (2004) Abdominal drainage after hepatic resection is contraindicated in patients with chronic liver diseases. Ann Surg 239:194–201PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Liu CL, Fan ST, Lo CM et al (2004) Abdominal drainage after hepatic resection is contraindicated in patients with chronic liver diseases. Ann Surg 239:194–201PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Pessaux P, Regimbeau JM, Dondero F et al (2007) Randomized clinical trial evaluating the need for routine nasogastric decompression after elective hepatic resection. Br J Surg 94:297–303PubMedCrossRef Pessaux P, Regimbeau JM, Dondero F et al (2007) Randomized clinical trial evaluating the need for routine nasogastric decompression after elective hepatic resection. Br J Surg 94:297–303PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Applicability of Enhanced Recovery Program for Advanced Liver Surgery
verfasst von
Takeshi Takamoto
Takuya Hashimoto
Kazuto Inoue
Daisuke Nagashima
Yoshikazu Maruyama
Yusuke Mitsuka
Osamu Aramaki
Masatoshi Makuuchi
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 10/2014
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2613-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2014

World Journal of Surgery 10/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.