Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 12/2014

01.12.2014 | Original Scientific Report

Laparoscopic Major Hepatectomies: Clinical Outcomes and Classification

verfasst von: Francesco Di Fabio, Morsal Samim, Paolo Di Gioia, Rosemary Godeseth, Neil W. Pearce, Mohammed Abu Hilal

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 12/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

According to the Louisville Statement, laparoscopic major hepatectomy is a heterogeneous category that includes “traditional” trisectionectomies/hemi-hepatectomies and the technically challenging resection of segments 4a, 7, and 8. The aims of this study were to assess differences in clinical outcomes between laparoscopic “traditional” major hepatectomy and resection of “difficult-to-access” posterosuperior segments and to define whether the current classification is clinically valid or needs revision.

Methods

We reviewed a prospectively collected single-center database of 390 patients undergoing pure laparoscopic liver resection. A total of 156 patients who had undergone laparoscopic major hepatectomy according to the Louisville Statement were divided into two subcategories: laparoscopic “traditional” major hepatectomy (LTMH), including hemi-hepatectomies and trisegmentectomies, and laparoscopic “posterosuperior” major hepatectomy (LPMH), including resection of posterosuperior segments 4a, 7, and 8. LTMH and LPMH subgroups were compared with respect to demographics, intraoperative variables, and postoperative outcomes.

Results

LTMH was performed in 127 patients (81 %) and LPMH in 29 (19 %). Operation time was a median 330 min for LTMH and 210 min for LPMH (p < 0.0001). Blood loss was a median 500 ml for LTMH and 300 ml for LPMH (p = 0.005). Conversion rate was 9 % for LTMH and nil for LPMH (p = 0.219). In all, 28 patients (22 %) developed postoperative complications after LTMH and 5 (17 %) after LPMH (p = 0.801). Mortality rate was 1.6 % after LTMH and nil after LPMH. Hospital stay was a median 5 days after LTMH and 4 days after LPMH (p = 0.026).

Conclusions

The creation of two subcategories of laparoscopic major hepatectomy seems appropriate to reflect differences in intraoperative and postoperative outcomes between LTMH and LPMH.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250:825–830PubMedCrossRef Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250:825–830PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Tzanis D, Shivathirthan N, Laurent A et al (2013) European experience of laparoscopic major hepatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20:120–124PubMedCrossRef Tzanis D, Shivathirthan N, Laurent A et al (2013) European experience of laparoscopic major hepatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20:120–124PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Croome KP, Yamashita MH (2010) Laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection for benign and malignant tumors: an updated meta-analysis. Arch Surg 145:1109–1118PubMedCrossRef Croome KP, Yamashita MH (2010) Laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection for benign and malignant tumors: an updated meta-analysis. Arch Surg 145:1109–1118PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen KT, Marsh JW, Tsung A et al (2011) Comparative benefits of laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection: a critical appraisal. Arch Surg 146:348–356PubMedCrossRef Nguyen KT, Marsh JW, Tsung A et al (2011) Comparative benefits of laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection: a critical appraisal. Arch Surg 146:348–356PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Abu Hilal M, Di Fabio F, Abu Salameh M et al (2012) Oncological efficiency analysis of laparoscopic liver resection for primary and metastatic cancer: a single-center UK experience. Arch Surg 147:42–48PubMedCrossRef Abu Hilal M, Di Fabio F, Abu Salameh M et al (2012) Oncological efficiency analysis of laparoscopic liver resection for primary and metastatic cancer: a single-center UK experience. Arch Surg 147:42–48PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Abu Hilal M, Di Fabio F, Syed S et al (2013) Assessment of the financial implications for laparoscopic liver surgery: a single-center UK cost analysis for minor and major hepatectomy. Surg Endosc 27:2542–2550PubMedCrossRef Abu Hilal M, Di Fabio F, Syed S et al (2013) Assessment of the financial implications for laparoscopic liver surgery: a single-center UK cost analysis for minor and major hepatectomy. Surg Endosc 27:2542–2550PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Vanounou T, Steel JL, Nguyen KT et al (2010) Comparing the clinical and economic impact of laparoscopic versus open liver resection. Ann Surg Oncol 17:998–1009PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Vanounou T, Steel JL, Nguyen KT et al (2010) Comparing the clinical and economic impact of laparoscopic versus open liver resection. Ann Surg Oncol 17:998–1009PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Polignano FM, Quyn AJ, de Figueiredo RS et al (2008) Laparoscopic versus open liver segmentectomy: prospective, case-matched, intention-to-treat analysis of clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness. Surg Endosc 22:2564–2570PubMedCrossRef Polignano FM, Quyn AJ, de Figueiredo RS et al (2008) Laparoscopic versus open liver segmentectomy: prospective, case-matched, intention-to-treat analysis of clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness. Surg Endosc 22:2564–2570PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhojani FD, Fox A, Pitzul K et al (2012) Clinical and economic comparison of laparoscopic to open liver resections using a 2-to-1 matched pair analysis: an institutional experience. J Am Coll Surg 214:184–195PubMedCrossRef Bhojani FD, Fox A, Pitzul K et al (2012) Clinical and economic comparison of laparoscopic to open liver resections using a 2-to-1 matched pair analysis: an institutional experience. J Am Coll Surg 214:184–195PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Dagher I, O’Rourke N, Geller DA et al (2009) Laparoscopic major hepatectomy: an evolution in standard of care. Ann Surg 250:856–860PubMedCrossRef Dagher I, O’Rourke N, Geller DA et al (2009) Laparoscopic major hepatectomy: an evolution in standard of care. Ann Surg 250:856–860PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Balzan S, Belghiti J, Farges O et al (2005) The “50-50 criteria” on postoperative day 5: an accurate predictor of liver failure and death after hepatectomy. Ann Surg 242:824–828PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Balzan S, Belghiti J, Farges O et al (2005) The “50-50 criteria” on postoperative day 5: an accurate predictor of liver failure and death after hepatectomy. Ann Surg 242:824–828PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Strasberg SM (2005) Nomenclature of hepatic anatomy and resections: a review of the Brisbane 2000 system. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 12:351–355PubMedCrossRef Strasberg SM (2005) Nomenclature of hepatic anatomy and resections: a review of the Brisbane 2000 system. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 12:351–355PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Pearce NW, Di Fabio F, Teng MJ et al (2011) Laparoscopic right hepatectomy: a challenging, but feasible, safe and efficient procedure. Am J Surg 202:e52–e58PubMedCrossRef Pearce NW, Di Fabio F, Teng MJ et al (2011) Laparoscopic right hepatectomy: a challenging, but feasible, safe and efficient procedure. Am J Surg 202:e52–e58PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Pearce NW, Di Fabio F, Abu Hilal M (2011) Laparoscopic left hepatectomy with extraparenchymal inflow control. J Am Coll Surg 213:e23–e27PubMedCrossRef Pearce NW, Di Fabio F, Abu Hilal M (2011) Laparoscopic left hepatectomy with extraparenchymal inflow control. J Am Coll Surg 213:e23–e27PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Abu Hilal M, Underwood T, Zuccaro M et al (2010) Short- and medium-term results of totally laparoscopic resection for colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg 97:927–933PubMedCrossRef Abu Hilal M, Underwood T, Zuccaro M et al (2010) Short- and medium-term results of totally laparoscopic resection for colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg 97:927–933PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin NC, Nitta H, Wakabayashi G (2013) Laparoscopic major hepatectomy: a systematic literature review and comparison of 3 techniques. Ann Surg 257:205–213PubMedCrossRef Lin NC, Nitta H, Wakabayashi G (2013) Laparoscopic major hepatectomy: a systematic literature review and comparison of 3 techniques. Ann Surg 257:205–213PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Costi R, Capelluto E, Sperduto N et al (2003) Laparoscopic right posterior hepatic bisegmentectomy (segments VII–VIII). Surg Endosc 17:162PubMed Costi R, Capelluto E, Sperduto N et al (2003) Laparoscopic right posterior hepatic bisegmentectomy (segments VII–VIII). Surg Endosc 17:162PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Cho JY, Han HS, Yoon YS et al (2008) Feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection for tumors located in the posterosuperior segments of the liver, with a special reference to overcoming current limitations on tumor location. Surgery 144:32–38PubMedCrossRef Cho JY, Han HS, Yoon YS et al (2008) Feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection for tumors located in the posterosuperior segments of the liver, with a special reference to overcoming current limitations on tumor location. Surgery 144:32–38PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng KC, Yeung YP, Hui J et al (2011) Multimedia manuscript: laparoscopic resection of hepatocellular carcinoma at segment 7: the posterior approach to anatomic resection. Surg Endosc 25:3437PubMedCrossRef Cheng KC, Yeung YP, Hui J et al (2011) Multimedia manuscript: laparoscopic resection of hepatocellular carcinoma at segment 7: the posterior approach to anatomic resection. Surg Endosc 25:3437PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kazaryan AM, Røsok BI, Marangos IP et al (2011) Comparative evaluation of laparoscopic liver resection for posterosuperior and anterolateral segments. Surg Endosc 25:3881–3889PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Kazaryan AM, Røsok BI, Marangos IP et al (2011) Comparative evaluation of laparoscopic liver resection for posterosuperior and anterolateral segments. Surg Endosc 25:3881–3889PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Ishizawa T, Gumbs AA, Kokudo N et al (2012) Laparoscopic segmentectomy of the liver: from segment I to VIII. Ann Surg 256:959–964PubMedCrossRef Ishizawa T, Gumbs AA, Kokudo N et al (2012) Laparoscopic segmentectomy of the liver: from segment I to VIII. Ann Surg 256:959–964PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Troisi RI, Montalti R, Van Limmen JG et al (2014) Risk factors and management of conversions to an open approach in laparoscopic liver resection: analysis of 265 consecutive cases. HPB (Oxford) 16:75–82CrossRef Troisi RI, Montalti R, Van Limmen JG et al (2014) Risk factors and management of conversions to an open approach in laparoscopic liver resection: analysis of 265 consecutive cases. HPB (Oxford) 16:75–82CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Herman P, Krüger JA, Perini MV et al (2013) Laparoscopic hepatic posterior sectionectomy: a hand-assisted approach. Ann Surg Oncol 20:1266PubMedCrossRef Herman P, Krüger JA, Perini MV et al (2013) Laparoscopic hepatic posterior sectionectomy: a hand-assisted approach. Ann Surg Oncol 20:1266PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Cardinal JS, Reddy SK, Tsung A et al (2013) Laparoscopic major hepatectomy: pure laparoscopic approach versus hand-assisted technique. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20:114–119PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Cardinal JS, Reddy SK, Tsung A et al (2013) Laparoscopic major hepatectomy: pure laparoscopic approach versus hand-assisted technique. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20:114–119PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Troisi RI, Patriti A, Montalti R et al (2013) Robot assistance in liver surgery: a real advantage over a fully laparoscopic approach? Results of a comparative bi-institutional analysis. Int J Med Robot 9:160–166PubMedCrossRef Troisi RI, Patriti A, Montalti R et al (2013) Robot assistance in liver surgery: a real advantage over a fully laparoscopic approach? Results of a comparative bi-institutional analysis. Int J Med Robot 9:160–166PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Casciola L, Patriti A, Ceccarelli G et al (2011) Robot-assisted parenchymal-sparing liver surgery including lesions located in the posterosuperior segments. Surg Endosc 25:3815–3824PubMedCrossRef Casciola L, Patriti A, Ceccarelli G et al (2011) Robot-assisted parenchymal-sparing liver surgery including lesions located in the posterosuperior segments. Surg Endosc 25:3815–3824PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Laparoscopic Major Hepatectomies: Clinical Outcomes and Classification
verfasst von
Francesco Di Fabio
Morsal Samim
Paolo Di Gioia
Rosemary Godeseth
Neil W. Pearce
Mohammed Abu Hilal
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 12/2014
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2724-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2014

World Journal of Surgery 12/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.