Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 5/2015

01.05.2015 | Original Scientific Report

Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Posterosuperior Liver Segments

verfasst von: Lunjian Xiang, Le Xiao, Jianwei Li, Jian Chen, Yudong Fan, Shuguo Zheng

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 5/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) is mostly performed to treat solitary tumors in the anterolateral liver segments (II, III, IVb, V, and VI). Few reports are available on LH for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the posterosuperior liver segments (I, IVa, VII, and VIII), especially in association with cirrhosis. The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and feasibility of LH in this clinical setting.

Methods

From January 2008 to January 2011, LH was conducted in 56 patients with HCC in the posterosuperior liver segments (PS group) and 70 patients with HCC in the anterolateral liver segments (AL group) who were admitted to Southwest Hospital of the Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China. The clinical data and follow-up results in the two groups of patients were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

No patient in either group died during the perioperative period. Statistically significant differences were found between the PS and AL groups in terms of the operation time (217.5 ± 63.7 vs 176.8 ± 48.4 min, P = 0.000), volume of blood loss (295.5 ± 186.8 vs 220.4 ± 164.2 ml, P = 0.001), conversion rate from laparoscopy to laparotomy (17.9 vs 7.1 %, P = 0.031), transfusion rate (16.1 vs 4.3 %, P = 0.025), cases of hepatic inflow occlusion (38/18 vs 28/42, P = 0.002), and duration of inflow occlusion (41.3 ± 16.3 vs 31.3 ± 12.2 min, P = 0.005). Parameters with no significant differences between the two groups of patients included tumor size (4.0 ± 1.5 vs 3.9 ± 1.7 cm, P = 0.894), resection margin (1.7 ± 0.7 vs 1.8 ± 0.6 cm, P = 0.102), postoperative complication rate (16.1 vs 17.1 %, P = 0.873), postoperative anal exhaust time (3.2 ± 0.6 vs 3.0 ± 0.6 days, P = 0.361), and postoperative hospital stay (10.5 ± 2.7 vs 10.0 ± 0.6 days, P = 0.102). The serum alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels on postoperative days 1 and 3 were significantly higher in the PS group than in the AL group. There were no significant differences in the postoperative levels of the serum total bilirubin, albumin, ALT, or AST levels on postoperative days 5 and 7. After 2–48 months of follow-up, no significant differences in the 1- and 3-year overall survival rates (92.9 vs 95.7 %, P = 0.487 and 76.0 vs 76.8 %, P = 0.878, respectively) or 1- and 3-year disease-free survival rates (85.7 vs 87.1 %, P = 0.797 and 57.6 vs 56.4 %, P = 0.806, respectively) were noted between the two groups.

Conclusions

LH is safe and feasible for selected patients with HCC in the posterosuperior segments of the liver.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Koffron AJ, Auffenberg G, Kung R et al (2007) Evaluation of 300 minimally invasive liver resections at a single institution: less is more. Ann Surg 246:385–394CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Koffron AJ, Auffenberg G, Kung R et al (2007) Evaluation of 300 minimally invasive liver resections at a single institution: less is more. Ann Surg 246:385–394CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Edwin B, Nordin A, Kazaryan AM (2011) Laparoscopic liver surgery: new frontiers. Scand J Surg 100:54–65PubMed Edwin B, Nordin A, Kazaryan AM (2011) Laparoscopic liver surgery: new frontiers. Scand J Surg 100:54–65PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2009) World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients. Review 10:831–840 Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2009) World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients. Review 10:831–840
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Joseph FB, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2009) The International Position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250:825–830CrossRef Joseph FB, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2009) The International Position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250:825–830CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Cho JY, Han HS, Yoon YS et al (2008) Experiences of laparoscopic liver resection including lesions in the posterosuperior segments of the liver. Surg Endosc 22:2344–2349CrossRefPubMed Cho JY, Han HS, Yoon YS et al (2008) Experiences of laparoscopic liver resection including lesions in the posterosuperior segments of the liver. Surg Endosc 22:2344–2349CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Airazat M, Kazaryan BI, Marangos RP et al (2011) Comparative evaluation of laparoscopic liver resection for posterosuperior and anterolateral segments. Surg Endosc 25:3881–3889CrossRef Airazat M, Kazaryan BI, Marangos RP et al (2011) Comparative evaluation of laparoscopic liver resection for posterosuperior and anterolateral segments. Surg Endosc 25:3881–3889CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen H, Jeng KS, Huang SH et al (2013) Laparoscopic caudate hepatectomy for cancer—an innovative approach to the no-man’s land. J Gastrointest Surg 17:522–526CrossRefPubMed Chen H, Jeng KS, Huang SH et al (2013) Laparoscopic caudate hepatectomy for cancer—an innovative approach to the no-man’s land. J Gastrointest Surg 17:522–526CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoon YS, Han HS, Cho JY et al (2010) Total laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma located in all segments of the liver. Surg Endosc 24:1630–1637CrossRefPubMed Yoon YS, Han HS, Cho JY et al (2010) Total laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma located in all segments of the liver. Surg Endosc 24:1630–1637CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ishizawa T, Andrew A, Kokudo N et al (2012) Laparoscopic segmentectomy of the liver from segment I to VIII. Ann Surg 256:959–964CrossRefPubMed Ishizawa T, Andrew A, Kokudo N et al (2012) Laparoscopic segmentectomy of the liver from segment I to VIII. Ann Surg 256:959–964CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Fuchs BC, Hoshida Y, Fujii T et al (2014) Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition attenuates liver fibrosis and development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 59:1577–1590CrossRefPubMed Fuchs BC, Hoshida Y, Fujii T et al (2014) Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition attenuates liver fibrosis and development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 59:1577–1590CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Gagner M (2010) Small incision, big surgeon: laparoscopic liver resection for tumors without a doubt: comment on “laparoscopic liver resection for malignant and benign lesions: ten-year norwegian single-center experience”. Arch Surg 145:40–41CrossRefPubMed Gagner M (2010) Small incision, big surgeon: laparoscopic liver resection for tumors without a doubt: comment on “laparoscopic liver resection for malignant and benign lesions: ten-year norwegian single-center experience”. Arch Surg 145:40–41CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Imamura H, Sano K, Sugawara Y et al (2005) Assessment of hepatic reserve for indication of hepatic resection:decision tree incorporating indocyanine green test. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 12:16–22CrossRefPubMed Imamura H, Sano K, Sugawara Y et al (2005) Assessment of hepatic reserve for indication of hepatic resection:decision tree incorporating indocyanine green test. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 12:16–22CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Clavien PA, Petrowsky H, DeOliveira ML et al (2007) Strategies for safer liver surgery and partial liver transplantation. N Engl J Med 356(15):1545–1559CrossRefPubMed Clavien PA, Petrowsky H, DeOliveira ML et al (2007) Strategies for safer liver surgery and partial liver transplantation. N Engl J Med 356(15):1545–1559CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Si Y, Lau WY, Li GG et al (2011) A prospective randomized controlled trial to compare Pringle maneuver, hemihepatic vascular inflow occlusion, and main portal vein inflow occlusion in partial hepatectomy. Am J Surg 201:62–69CrossRef Si Y, Lau WY, Li GG et al (2011) A prospective randomized controlled trial to compare Pringle maneuver, hemihepatic vascular inflow occlusion, and main portal vein inflow occlusion in partial hepatectomy. Am J Surg 201:62–69CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Stabilini C et al (2006) Isolated laparoscopic resection of the hepatic caudate lobe: surgical technique and a report of 2 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 16:32–35CrossRefPubMed Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Stabilini C et al (2006) Isolated laparoscopic resection of the hepatic caudate lobe: surgical technique and a report of 2 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 16:32–35CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Posterosuperior Liver Segments
verfasst von
Lunjian Xiang
Le Xiao
Jianwei Li
Jian Chen
Yudong Fan
Shuguo Zheng
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2015
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 5/2015
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-2946-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2015

World Journal of Surgery 5/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.