Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 1/2016

01.01.2016 | Scientific Review

A Systematic Review of the Factors that Patients Use to Choose their Surgeon

verfasst von: Alexander T. Yahanda, Kelly J. Lafaro, Gaya Spolverato, Timothy M. Pawlik

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Given surgery’s inherent risks, a patient should be able to make the most informed decisions possible in selecting surgical treatment. However, there is little information on what factors patients deem important when choosing a surgeon. We performed a systematic review of the literature focused on how patients select surgical care, focusing on identification of factors that influence patient choice as well as important sources of information used by patients.

Methods

A search of all available literature on factors associated with choice of surgeon/surgical care, as well as sources of information used by patients before undergoing surgery, was conducted using the MEDLINE/PubMed electronic database.

Results

Of the 2315 publications identified, 86 studies met inclusion criteria. Overall, patients draw upon a wide range of factors when choosing surgical care. Surgeon reputation and competency stood out as the most valued professional attributes. Patients also often selected surgeons based on their interpersonal skills. Many patients chose surgical care using hospital, rather than surgeon, characteristics. For these patients, hospital reputation and hospital distance were factors of primary importance. Importantly, most patients relied on word-of-mouth and physician referrals when choosing a surgeon. Patients also expressed interest in quality information on surgeons, indicating that these data would be useful in decision-making.

Conclusions

Patients draw upon a myriad of factors when choosing a surgeon and the circumstances surrounding patients’ decisions maybe differ based on sociodemographic, cultural, as well as other factors. Additional information on how patients choose surgeons or hospitals will help providers assist patients in finding their preferred caregivers.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bornstein BH, Marcus D, Cassidy W (2000) Choosing a doctor: an exploratory study of factors influencing patients’ choice of a primary care doctor. J Eval Clin Pract 6(3):255–262PubMedCrossRef Bornstein BH, Marcus D, Cassidy W (2000) Choosing a doctor: an exploratory study of factors influencing patients’ choice of a primary care doctor. J Eval Clin Pract 6(3):255–262PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Lubalin JS, Harris-Kojetin LD (1999) What do consumers want and need to know in making health care choices? Med Care Res Rev 56(Suppl 1):67–6102PubMedCrossRef Lubalin JS, Harris-Kojetin LD (1999) What do consumers want and need to know in making health care choices? Med Care Res Rev 56(Suppl 1):67–6102PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Harris KM (2002) Can high quality overcome consumer resistance to restricted provider access? Evidence from a health plan choice experiment. Health Serv Res 37(3):551–571PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Harris KM (2002) Can high quality overcome consumer resistance to restricted provider access? Evidence from a health plan choice experiment. Health Serv Res 37(3):551–571PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Harris KM (2003) How do patients choose physicians? Evidence from a national survey of enrollees in employment-related health plans. Health Serv Res 38(2):711–732PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Harris KM (2003) How do patients choose physicians? Evidence from a national survey of enrollees in employment-related health plans. Health Serv Res 38(2):711–732PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat McGlone TA, Butler ES, McGlone VL (2002) Factors influencing consumers’ selection of a primary care physician. Health Mark Q 19(3):21–37PubMedCrossRef McGlone TA, Butler ES, McGlone VL (2002) Factors influencing consumers’ selection of a primary care physician. Health Mark Q 19(3):21–37PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Tu HT, Lauer JR (2008) Word of mouth and physician referrals still drive health care provider choice. Res Brief 9:1–8PubMed Tu HT, Lauer JR (2008) Word of mouth and physician referrals still drive health care provider choice. Res Brief 9:1–8PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Vonberg R-P, Sander C, Gastmeier P (2008) Consumer attitudes about health care acquired infections: a German survey on factors considered important in the choice of a hospital. Am J Med Qual 23(1):56–59PubMedCrossRef Vonberg R-P, Sander C, Gastmeier P (2008) Consumer attitudes about health care acquired infections: a German survey on factors considered important in the choice of a hospital. Am J Med Qual 23(1):56–59PubMedCrossRef
9.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Conner-Spady BL et al (2014) Patient factors in referral choice for total joint replacement surgery. Med Care 52(4):300–306PubMedCrossRef Conner-Spady BL et al (2014) Patient factors in referral choice for total joint replacement surgery. Med Care 52(4):300–306PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Galanis C et al (2013) Factors influencing patient interest in plastic surgery and the process of selecting a surgeon. Aesthet Surg J 33(4):585–590PubMedCrossRef Galanis C et al (2013) Factors influencing patient interest in plastic surgery and the process of selecting a surgeon. Aesthet Surg J 33(4):585–590PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Katz SJ et al (2007) Patterns and correlates of patient referral to surgeons for treatment of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 25(3):271–276PubMedCrossRef Katz SJ et al (2007) Patterns and correlates of patient referral to surgeons for treatment of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 25(3):271–276PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Thrumurthy SG et al (2011) Discrete-choice preference comparison between patients and doctors for the surgical management of oesophagogastric cancer. Br J Surg 98(8):1124–1131PubMedCrossRef Thrumurthy SG et al (2011) Discrete-choice preference comparison between patients and doctors for the surgical management of oesophagogastric cancer. Br J Surg 98(8):1124–1131PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Birkmeyer JD (2005) How do elderly patients decide where to go for major surgery? Telephone interview survey. BMJ 331(7520):821–821PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Birkmeyer JD (2005) How do elderly patients decide where to go for major surgery? Telephone interview survey. BMJ 331(7520):821–821PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Losina E et al (2005) Offering patients the opportunity to choose their hospital for total knee replacement: impact on satisfaction with the surgery. Arthritis Rheum 53(5):646–652PubMedCrossRef Losina E et al (2005) Offering patients the opportunity to choose their hospital for total knee replacement: impact on satisfaction with the surgery. Arthritis Rheum 53(5):646–652PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Mavis B et al (2005) Female patients’ preferences related to interpersonal communications, clinical competence, and gender when selecting a physician. Acad Med 80(12):1159–1165PubMedCrossRef Mavis B et al (2005) Female patients’ preferences related to interpersonal communications, clinical competence, and gender when selecting a physician. Acad Med 80(12):1159–1165PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Moser A et al (2010) Patient’s decision making in selecting a hospital for elective orthopaedic surgery. J Eval Clin Pract 16(6):1262–1268PubMedCrossRef Moser A et al (2010) Patient’s decision making in selecting a hospital for elective orthopaedic surgery. J Eval Clin Pract 16(6):1262–1268PubMedCrossRef
18.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Salkeld G et al (2005) Discrete-choice experiment to measure patient preferences for the surgical management of colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 92(6):742–747PubMedCrossRef Salkeld G et al (2005) Discrete-choice experiment to measure patient preferences for the surgical management of colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 92(6):742–747PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Waltzman JT, Scholz T, Evans GRD (2011) What patients look for when choosing a plastic surgeon: an assessment of patient preference by conjoint analysis. Ann Plast Surg 66(6):643–647PubMedCrossRef Waltzman JT, Scholz T, Evans GRD (2011) What patients look for when choosing a plastic surgeon: an assessment of patient preference by conjoint analysis. Ann Plast Surg 66(6):643–647PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Abghari MS et al (2014) Patient perceptions and preferences when choosing an orthopaedic surgeon. Iowa Orthop J 34:204–208PubMedPubMedCentral Abghari MS et al (2014) Patient perceptions and preferences when choosing an orthopaedic surgeon. Iowa Orthop J 34:204–208PubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Ejaz A et al (2014) Choosing a cancer surgeon: analyzing factors in patient decision making using a best-worst scaling methodology. Ann Surg Oncol 21(12):3732–3738PubMedCrossRef Ejaz A et al (2014) Choosing a cancer surgeon: analyzing factors in patient decision making using a best-worst scaling methodology. Ann Surg Oncol 21(12):3732–3738PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Fiala TG (2012) What do patients want? Technical quality versus functional quality: a literature review for plastic surgeons. Aesthet Surg J 32(6):751–759PubMedCrossRef Fiala TG (2012) What do patients want? Technical quality versus functional quality: a literature review for plastic surgeons. Aesthet Surg J 32(6):751–759PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Aitken SA et al (2014) The importance of the orthopaedic doctors’ appearance: a cross-regional questionnaire based study. Surgeon 12(1):40–46PubMedCrossRef Aitken SA et al (2014) The importance of the orthopaedic doctors’ appearance: a cross-regional questionnaire based study. Surgeon 12(1):40–46PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Zaidi R et al (2013) How do patients with end-stage ankle arthritis decide between two surgical treatments? A qualitative study. BMJ Open 3(7):e002782PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Zaidi R et al (2013) How do patients with end-stage ankle arthritis decide between two surgical treatments? A qualitative study. BMJ Open 3(7):e002782PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Dusch MN, O’Sullivan PS, Ascher NL (2014) Patient perceptions of female surgeons: how surgeon demeanor and type of surgery affect patient preference. J Surg Res 187(1):59–64PubMedCrossRef Dusch MN, O’Sullivan PS, Ascher NL (2014) Patient perceptions of female surgeons: how surgeon demeanor and type of surgery affect patient preference. J Surg Res 187(1):59–64PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Bucknall V, Pynsent PB (2009) Sex and the orthopaedic surgeon: a survey of patient, medical student and male orthopaedic surgeon attitudes towards female orthopaedic surgeons. Surgeon 7(2):89–95PubMedCrossRef Bucknall V, Pynsent PB (2009) Sex and the orthopaedic surgeon: a survey of patient, medical student and male orthopaedic surgeon attitudes towards female orthopaedic surgeons. Surgeon 7(2):89–95PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Childs AJ et al (2005) Female patients’ sex preferences in selection of gynecologists and surgeons. South Med J 98(4):405–408PubMedCrossRef Childs AJ et al (2005) Female patients’ sex preferences in selection of gynecologists and surgeons. South Med J 98(4):405–408PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Shah JD, Dickinson CL (2009) Establishing which factors patients value when selecting urology outpatient care. Br J Med Surg Urol 3:25–29CrossRef Shah JD, Dickinson CL (2009) Establishing which factors patients value when selecting urology outpatient care. Br J Med Surg Urol 3:25–29CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Dijs-Elsinga J et al (2010) Choosing a hospital for surgery: the importance of information on quality of care. Med Decis Making 30(5):544–555PubMedCrossRef Dijs-Elsinga J et al (2010) Choosing a hospital for surgery: the importance of information on quality of care. Med Decis Making 30(5):544–555PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Marang-van de Mheen PJ et al (2010) The importance of experienced adverse outcomes on patients’ future choice of a hospital for surgery. Qual Saf Health Care 19(6):e16PubMed Marang-van de Mheen PJ et al (2010) The importance of experienced adverse outcomes on patients’ future choice of a hospital for surgery. Qual Saf Health Care 19(6):e16PubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Bliss LA et al (2014) Patient selection and the volume effect in pancreatic surgery: unequal benefits? HPB (Oxford) 16(10):899–906CrossRef Bliss LA et al (2014) Patient selection and the volume effect in pancreatic surgery: unequal benefits? HPB (Oxford) 16(10):899–906CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Finks JF, Osborne NH, Birkmeyer JD (2011) Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery. N Engl J Med 364(22):2128–2137PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Finks JF, Osborne NH, Birkmeyer JD (2011) Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery. N Engl J Med 364(22):2128–2137PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Luft HS, Hunt SS, Maerki SC (1987) The volume-outcome relationship: practice-makes-perfect or selective-referral patterns? Health Serv Res 22(2):157–182PubMedPubMedCentral Luft HS, Hunt SS, Maerki SC (1987) The volume-outcome relationship: practice-makes-perfect or selective-referral patterns? Health Serv Res 22(2):157–182PubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu JH et al (2006) Disparities in the utilization of high-volume hospitals for complex surgery. JAMA 296(16):1973–1980PubMedCrossRef Liu JH et al (2006) Disparities in the utilization of high-volume hospitals for complex surgery. JAMA 296(16):1973–1980PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB (2004) Potential benefits of the new Leapfrog standards: effect of process and outcomes measures. Surgery 135(6):569–575PubMedCrossRef Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB (2004) Potential benefits of the new Leapfrog standards: effect of process and outcomes measures. Surgery 135(6):569–575PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Bouche G et al (2008) Breast cancer surgery: do all patients want to go to high-volume hospitals? Surgery 143(6):699–705PubMedCrossRef Bouche G et al (2008) Breast cancer surgery: do all patients want to go to high-volume hospitals? Surgery 143(6):699–705PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Birkmeyer JD et al (2003) Regionalization of high-risk surgery and implications for patient travel times. JAMA 290(20):2703–2708PubMedCrossRef Birkmeyer JD et al (2003) Regionalization of high-risk surgery and implications for patient travel times. JAMA 290(20):2703–2708PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Stewart GD, Long G, Tulloh BR (2006) Surgical service centralisation in Australia versus choice and quality of life for rural patients. Med J Aust 185(3):162–163PubMed Stewart GD, Long G, Tulloh BR (2006) Surgical service centralisation in Australia versus choice and quality of life for rural patients. Med J Aust 185(3):162–163PubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Finlayson SR et al (1999) Patient preferences for location of care: implications for regionalization. Med Care 37(2):204–209PubMedCrossRef Finlayson SR et al (1999) Patient preferences for location of care: implications for regionalization. Med Care 37(2):204–209PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Holt PJE et al (2010) Screened individuals’ preferences in the delivery of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg 97(4):504–510PubMedCrossRef Holt PJE et al (2010) Screened individuals’ preferences in the delivery of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg 97(4):504–510PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Varkevisser M, van der Geest SA (2007) Why do patients bypass the nearest hospital? An empirical analysis for orthopaedic care and neurosurgery in the Netherlands. Eur J Health Econ 8(3):287–295PubMedCrossRef Varkevisser M, van der Geest SA (2007) Why do patients bypass the nearest hospital? An empirical analysis for orthopaedic care and neurosurgery in the Netherlands. Eur J Health Econ 8(3):287–295PubMedCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Landau JH et al (2013) Determination of patient preference for location of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. Vasc Endovasc Surg 47(4):288–293CrossRef Landau JH et al (2013) Determination of patient preference for location of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. Vasc Endovasc Surg 47(4):288–293CrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Shackley P, Slack R, Michaels J (2001) Vascular patients’ preferences for local treatment: an application of conjoint analysis. J Health Serv Res Policy 6(3):151–157PubMedCrossRef Shackley P, Slack R, Michaels J (2001) Vascular patients’ preferences for local treatment: an application of conjoint analysis. J Health Serv Res Policy 6(3):151–157PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Hansrani VC et al (2015) Surgical waiting times and patient choice: how much delay do patients really want? Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 25(1):77–81PubMedCrossRef Hansrani VC et al (2015) Surgical waiting times and patient choice: how much delay do patients really want? Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 25(1):77–81PubMedCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Llewellyn-Thomas HA et al (1998) In the queue for total joint replacement: patients’ perspectives on waiting times. Ontario Hip and Knee Replacement Project Team. J Eval Clin Pract 4(1):63–74PubMedCrossRef Llewellyn-Thomas HA et al (1998) In the queue for total joint replacement: patients’ perspectives on waiting times. Ontario Hip and Knee Replacement Project Team. J Eval Clin Pract 4(1):63–74PubMedCrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Damman OC et al (2012) Creating compact comparative health care information: what are the key quality attributes to present for cataract and total hip or knee replacement surgery? Med Decis Making 32(2):287–300PubMedCrossRef Damman OC et al (2012) Creating compact comparative health care information: what are the key quality attributes to present for cataract and total hip or knee replacement surgery? Med Decis Making 32(2):287–300PubMedCrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Bederman SS et al (2010) In the eye of the beholder: preferences of patients, family physicians, and surgeons for lumbar spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(1):108–115CrossRef Bederman SS et al (2010) In the eye of the beholder: preferences of patients, family physicians, and surgeons for lumbar spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(1):108–115CrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Collins LK et al (2013) Patient reasoning in palliative surgical oncology. J Surg Oncol 107(4):372–375PubMedCrossRef Collins LK et al (2013) Patient reasoning in palliative surgical oncology. J Surg Oncol 107(4):372–375PubMedCrossRef
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Gu NY et al (2009) A comparison of physician and patient time trade-offs for postoperative hip outcomes. Value Health 12(4):618–620PubMedCrossRef Gu NY et al (2009) A comparison of physician and patient time trade-offs for postoperative hip outcomes. Value Health 12(4):618–620PubMedCrossRef
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Modi CS et al (2014) Factors that influence the choice to undergo surgery for shoulder and elbow conditions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(3):883–891PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Modi CS et al (2014) Factors that influence the choice to undergo surgery for shoulder and elbow conditions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(3):883–891PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
53.
Zurück zum Zitat van de Marang Mheen PJ et al (2011) The relative importance of quality of care information when choosing a hospital for surgical treatment: a hospital choice experiment. Med Decis Making 31(6):816–827CrossRef van de Marang Mheen PJ et al (2011) The relative importance of quality of care information when choosing a hospital for surgical treatment: a hospital choice experiment. Med Decis Making 31(6):816–827CrossRef
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Schneider EC, Epstein AM (1998) Use of public performance reports: a survey of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. JAMA 279(20):1638–1642PubMedCrossRef Schneider EC, Epstein AM (1998) Use of public performance reports: a survey of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. JAMA 279(20):1638–1642PubMedCrossRef
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Mukamel DB, Mushlin AI (1998) Quality of care information makes a difference: an analysis of market share and price changes after publication of the New York State Cardiac Surgery Mortality Reports. Med Care 36(7):945–954PubMedCrossRef Mukamel DB, Mushlin AI (1998) Quality of care information makes a difference: an analysis of market share and price changes after publication of the New York State Cardiac Surgery Mortality Reports. Med Care 36(7):945–954PubMedCrossRef
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Romano PS, Zhou H (2004) Do well-publicized risk-adjusted outcomes reports affect hospital volume? Med Care 42(4):367–377PubMedCrossRef Romano PS, Zhou H (2004) Do well-publicized risk-adjusted outcomes reports affect hospital volume? Med Care 42(4):367–377PubMedCrossRef
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Edgman-Levitan S, Cleary PD (1996) What information do consumers want and need? Health Aff (Millwood) 15(4):42–56CrossRef Edgman-Levitan S, Cleary PD (1996) What information do consumers want and need? Health Aff (Millwood) 15(4):42–56CrossRef
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Moser A et al (2010) Themes affecting health-care consumers’ choice of a hospital for elective surgery when receiving web-based comparative consumer information. Patient Educ Couns 78(3):365–371PubMedCrossRef Moser A et al (2010) Themes affecting health-care consumers’ choice of a hospital for elective surgery when receiving web-based comparative consumer information. Patient Educ Couns 78(3):365–371PubMedCrossRef
59.
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Carlin CS, Kralewski J, Savage M (2013) Sources of information used in selection of surgeons. Am J Manag Care 19(8):293–300 Carlin CS, Kralewski J, Savage M (2013) Sources of information used in selection of surgeons. Am J Manag Care 19(8):293–300
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson CT, Woloshin S, Schwartz LM (2007) Choosing where to have major surgery: who makes the decision? Arch Surg 142(3):242–246PubMedCrossRef Wilson CT, Woloshin S, Schwartz LM (2007) Choosing where to have major surgery: who makes the decision? Arch Surg 142(3):242–246PubMedCrossRef
62.
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Refaie WB et al (2012) Who receives their complex cancer surgery at low-volume hospitals? J Am Coll Surg 214(1):81–87PubMedCrossRef Al-Refaie WB et al (2012) Who receives their complex cancer surgery at low-volume hospitals? J Am Coll Surg 214(1):81–87PubMedCrossRef
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Canto JG (2007) Selecting the ideal cardiovascular surgeon: is it possible with public dissemination of clinical outcomes? Med Care 45(7):585–586PubMedCrossRef Canto JG (2007) Selecting the ideal cardiovascular surgeon: is it possible with public dissemination of clinical outcomes? Med Care 45(7):585–586PubMedCrossRef
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Donelan K et al (2011) Consumer comprehension of surgeon performance data for coronary bypass procedures. Ann Thorac Surg 91(5):1400–1405PubMedCrossRef Donelan K et al (2011) Consumer comprehension of surgeon performance data for coronary bypass procedures. Ann Thorac Surg 91(5):1400–1405PubMedCrossRef
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Epstein AM (2000) Public release of performance data: a progress report from the front. JAMA 283(14):1884–1886PubMedCrossRef Epstein AM (2000) Public release of performance data: a progress report from the front. JAMA 283(14):1884–1886PubMedCrossRef
67.
Zurück zum Zitat Faber M et al (2009) Public reporting in health care: how do consumers use quality-of-care information? A systematic review. Med Care 47(1):1–8PubMedCrossRef Faber M et al (2009) Public reporting in health care: how do consumers use quality-of-care information? A systematic review. Med Care 47(1):1–8PubMedCrossRef
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Hibbard JH, Sofaer S, Jewett JJ (1996) Condition-specific performance information: assessing salience, comprehension, and approaches for communicating quality. Health Care Financ Rev 18(1):95–9109PubMedPubMedCentral Hibbard JH, Sofaer S, Jewett JJ (1996) Condition-specific performance information: assessing salience, comprehension, and approaches for communicating quality. Health Care Financ Rev 18(1):95–9109PubMedPubMedCentral
69.
Zurück zum Zitat Mennemeyer ST, Morrisey MA, Howard LZ (1997) Death and reputation: how consumers acted upon HCFA mortality information. Inquiry 34(2):117–128PubMed Mennemeyer ST, Morrisey MA, Howard LZ (1997) Death and reputation: how consumers acted upon HCFA mortality information. Inquiry 34(2):117–128PubMed
70.
Zurück zum Zitat Schneider EC, Lieberman T (2001) Publicly disclosed information about the quality of health care: response of the US public. Qual Health Care 10(2):96–9103PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Schneider EC, Lieberman T (2001) Publicly disclosed information about the quality of health care: response of the US public. Qual Health Care 10(2):96–9103PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
71.
Zurück zum Zitat Marshall MN et al (2000) The public release of performance data: what do we expect to gain? A review of the evidence. JAMA 283(14):1866–1874PubMedCrossRef Marshall MN et al (2000) The public release of performance data: what do we expect to gain? A review of the evidence. JAMA 283(14):1866–1874PubMedCrossRef
72.
Zurück zum Zitat Schneider EC, Epstein AM (1996) Influence of cardiac-surgery performance reports on referral practices and access to care. A survey of cardiovascular specialists. N Engl J Med 335(4):251–256PubMedCrossRef Schneider EC, Epstein AM (1996) Influence of cardiac-surgery performance reports on referral practices and access to care. A survey of cardiovascular specialists. N Engl J Med 335(4):251–256PubMedCrossRef
73.
Zurück zum Zitat Hibbard JH et al (2012) An experiment shows that a well-designed report on costs and quality can help consumers choose high-value health care. Health Aff (Millwood) 31(3):560–568CrossRef Hibbard JH et al (2012) An experiment shows that a well-designed report on costs and quality can help consumers choose high-value health care. Health Aff (Millwood) 31(3):560–568CrossRef
74.
Zurück zum Zitat Marshall M, McLoughlin V (2010) How do patients use information on health providers? BMJ 341:c5272PubMedCrossRef Marshall M, McLoughlin V (2010) How do patients use information on health providers? BMJ 341:c5272PubMedCrossRef
75.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanauer DA et al (2014) Public awareness, perception, and use of online physician rating sites. JAMA 311(7):734–735PubMedCrossRef Hanauer DA et al (2014) Public awareness, perception, and use of online physician rating sites. JAMA 311(7):734–735PubMedCrossRef
76.
Zurück zum Zitat Sick B, Abraham JM (2011) Seek and ye shall find: consumer search for objective health care cost and quality information. Am J Med Qual 26(6):433–440PubMedCrossRef Sick B, Abraham JM (2011) Seek and ye shall find: consumer search for objective health care cost and quality information. Am J Med Qual 26(6):433–440PubMedCrossRef
78.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurup V et al (2013) Role of the Internet as an information resource for surgical patients: a survey of 877 patients. Br J Anaesth 110(1):54–58PubMedCrossRef Kurup V et al (2013) Role of the Internet as an information resource for surgical patients: a survey of 877 patients. Br J Anaesth 110(1):54–58PubMedCrossRef
79.
Zurück zum Zitat Fast AM et al (2013) Evaluating the quality of Internet health resources in pediatric urology. J Pediatr Urol 9(2):151–156PubMedCrossRef Fast AM et al (2013) Evaluating the quality of Internet health resources in pediatric urology. J Pediatr Urol 9(2):151–156PubMedCrossRef
80.
Zurück zum Zitat Goslin RA, Elhassan HA (2013) Evaluating internet health resources in ear, nose, and throat surgery. Laryngoscope 123(7):1626–1631PubMedCrossRef Goslin RA, Elhassan HA (2013) Evaluating internet health resources in ear, nose, and throat surgery. Laryngoscope 123(7):1626–1631PubMedCrossRef
81.
Zurück zum Zitat Wasserman M et al (2014) Systematic review of internet patient information on colorectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 57(1):64–69PubMedCrossRef Wasserman M et al (2014) Systematic review of internet patient information on colorectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 57(1):64–69PubMedCrossRef
82.
Zurück zum Zitat Weil AG et al (2014) Evaluation of the quality of information on the Internet available to patients undergoing cervical spine surgery. World Neurosurg 82(1–2):31–39CrossRef Weil AG et al (2014) Evaluation of the quality of information on the Internet available to patients undergoing cervical spine surgery. World Neurosurg 82(1–2):31–39CrossRef
83.
Zurück zum Zitat Yeung TM, Mortensen NJ (2012) Assessment of the quality of patient-orientated Internet information on surgery for diverticular disease. Dis Colon Rectum 55(1):85–89PubMedCrossRef Yeung TM, Mortensen NJ (2012) Assessment of the quality of patient-orientated Internet information on surgery for diverticular disease. Dis Colon Rectum 55(1):85–89PubMedCrossRef
84.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown DL, Clarke S, Oakley J (2012) Cardiac surgeon report cards, referral for cardiac surgery, and the ethical responsibilities of cardiologists. J Am Coll Cardiol 59(25):2378–2382PubMedCrossRef Brown DL, Clarke S, Oakley J (2012) Cardiac surgeon report cards, referral for cardiac surgery, and the ethical responsibilities of cardiologists. J Am Coll Cardiol 59(25):2378–2382PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A Systematic Review of the Factors that Patients Use to Choose their Surgeon
verfasst von
Alexander T. Yahanda
Kelly J. Lafaro
Gaya Spolverato
Timothy M. Pawlik
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2016
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3246-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2016

World Journal of Surgery 1/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.