Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 2/2016

01.02.2016 | Original Scientific Report

The Learning Curve of Robotic-Assisted Low Rectal Resection of a Novice Rectal Surgeon

verfasst von: Chi Chung Foo, Wai Lun Law

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

With the increasing availability of the surgical robotic system, the young generation colorectal surgeons may learn robotic-assisted rectal surgery upfront. There are currently very limited studies evaluating the learning curve of novice rectal surgeons.

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the learning curve of a surgeon who had limited experience in open and laparoscopic rectal surgery.

Methods

Thirty-nine consecutive robotic-assisted total mesorectal excisions were performed from March 2013 to October 2014. All cases were performed by a single surgeon whose prior experience in open or laparoscopic low rectal cancer resections was <5 cases. The learning curve was analyzed using the cumulative sum method.

Results

Thirty-four low anterior resections, four abdomino-perineal resections, and one Hartmann’s operation were performed. The mean total operating time was 397.2 ± 184.3 min. There was no conversion. The major complication rate was 10.3 %. When total operating time was analyzed with the CUSUM method, three phases could be identified. They are the initial eight cases, middle 17 cases, and the final 14 cases. The first phase consisted of more proximal tumors (86.3 ± 20.7 vs. 58.0 ± 34.9 mm from anal verge, p = 0.04) and was associated with a shorter total operating time (243.5 ± 38.0 vs. 540.9 ± 133.4 min, p = 0.000) and less estimated blood loss (81.3 ± 25.9 vs. 168.8 ± 99.5 ml, p = 0.02) compared to the second phase. When the third phase is compared with the first and second phase, it has shorter total operating time (310.6 ± 164.5 vs. 44 5.7 ± 179.8 min, p = 0.03). Complications rate were 12.5, 17.6, and 0 % for phase one, two, and three respectively.

Conclusions

In this study, the learning curve for a novice rectal surgeon was 25 cases. This is comparable to those who have already mastered the technique with laparoscopic or open approach. Surgical robotic system may have a role in shortening the learning curve for low rectal resection.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Wexner SD, Bergamaschi R, Lacy A et al (2009) The current status of robotic pelvic surgery: results of a multinational interdisciplinary consensus conference. Surg Endosc 23(438–44):3 Wexner SD, Bergamaschi R, Lacy A et al (2009) The current status of robotic pelvic surgery: results of a multinational interdisciplinary consensus conference. Surg Endosc 23(438–44):3
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Aziz O, Constantinides V, Tekkis PP et al (2006) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 13(413–42):4 Aziz O, Constantinides V, Tekkis PP et al (2006) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 13(413–42):4
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Barlehner E, Benhidjeb T, Anders S et al (2005) Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: outcomes in 194 patients and review of the literature. Surg Endosc 19:757–766PubMedCrossRef Barlehner E, Benhidjeb T, Anders S et al (2005) Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: outcomes in 194 patients and review of the literature. Surg Endosc 19:757–766PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bretagnol F, Lelong B, Laurent C et al (2005) The oncological safety of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with sphincter preservation for rectal carcinoma. Surg Endosc 19(892–89):6 Bretagnol F, Lelong B, Laurent C et al (2005) The oncological safety of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with sphincter preservation for rectal carcinoma. Surg Endosc 19(892–89):6
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Stabilini C et al (2005) Laparoscopic rectal resection with anal sphincter preservation for rectal cancer: long-term outcome. Surg Endosc 19(1468–147):4 Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Stabilini C et al (2005) Laparoscopic rectal resection with anal sphincter preservation for rectal cancer: long-term outcome. Surg Endosc 19(1468–147):4
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hartley JE, Mehigan BJ, Qureshi AE et al (2001) Total mesorectal excision: assessment of the laparoscopic approach. Dis Colon Rectum 44(315–32):1 Hartley JE, Mehigan BJ, Qureshi AE et al (2001) Total mesorectal excision: assessment of the laparoscopic approach. Dis Colon Rectum 44(315–32):1
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Leroy J, Jamali F, Forbes L et al (2004) Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer surgery: long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 18:281–289PubMedCrossRef Leroy J, Jamali F, Forbes L et al (2004) Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer surgery: long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 18:281–289PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Morino M, Allaix ME, Giraudo G et al (2005) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for extraperitoneal rectal cancer: a prospective comparative study. Surg Endosc 19(1460–146):7 Morino M, Allaix ME, Giraudo G et al (2005) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for extraperitoneal rectal cancer: a prospective comparative study. Surg Endosc 19(1460–146):7
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Baek SK, Carmichael JC, Pigazzi A (2013) Robotic surgery: colon and rectum. Cancer J 19:140–146PubMedCrossRef Baek SK, Carmichael JC, Pigazzi A (2013) Robotic surgery: colon and rectum. Cancer J 19:140–146PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Memon S, Heriot AG, Murphy DG et al (2012) Robotic versus laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 19(2095–210):1 Memon S, Heriot AG, Murphy DG et al (2012) Robotic versus laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 19(2095–210):1
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bokhari MB, Patel CB, Ramos-Valadez DI et al (2011) Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 25:855–860PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Bokhari MB, Patel CB, Ramos-Valadez DI et al (2011) Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 25:855–860PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Jiménez-Rodríguez RM, Díaz-Pavón JM, de la Portilla de Juan F et al (2013) Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:815–821PubMedCrossRef Jiménez-Rodríguez RM, Díaz-Pavón JM, de la Portilla de Juan F et al (2013) Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:815–821PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Akmal Y, Baek JH, McKenzie S et al (2012) Robot-assisted total mesorectal excision: is there a learning curve? Surg Endosc 26:2471–2476PubMedCrossRef Akmal Y, Baek JH, McKenzie S et al (2012) Robot-assisted total mesorectal excision: is there a learning curve? Surg Endosc 26:2471–2476PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Bianchi PP, Ceriani C, Locatelli A et al (2010) Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 24:2888–2894PubMedCrossRef Bianchi PP, Ceriani C, Locatelli A et al (2010) Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 24:2888–2894PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim YW, Lee HM, Kim NK et al (2012) The learning curve for robot-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 22:400–405CrossRef Kim YW, Lee HM, Kim NK et al (2012) The learning curve for robot-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 22:400–405CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kwak JM, Kim SH, Kim J et al (2011) Robotic versus laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcomes of a case-control study. Dis Colon Rectum 54(151–15):6 Kwak JM, Kim SH, Kim J et al (2011) Robotic versus laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcomes of a case-control study. Dis Colon Rectum 54(151–15):6
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH et al (2010) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer: case-matched analysis of short-term outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 17(3195–320):2 Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH et al (2010) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer: case-matched analysis of short-term outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 17(3195–320):2
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Pigazzi A, Ellenhorn JD, Ballantyne GH et al (2006) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 20(1521–152):5 Pigazzi A, Ellenhorn JD, Ballantyne GH et al (2006) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 20(1521–152):5
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Pigazzi A, Luca F, Patriti A et al (2010) Multicentric study on robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 17:1614–1620PubMedCrossRef Pigazzi A, Luca F, Patriti A et al (2010) Multicentric study on robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 17:1614–1620PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat deSouza AL, Prasad LM, Marecik SJ et al (2010) Total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: the potential advantage of robotic assistance. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1611–1617PubMedCrossRef deSouza AL, Prasad LM, Marecik SJ et al (2010) Total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: the potential advantage of robotic assistance. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1611–1617PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim JY, Kim NK, Lee KY et al (2012) A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 19(2485–249):3 Kim JY, Kim NK, Lee KY et al (2012) A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 19(2485–249):3
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahlering TE, Skarecky D, Lee D et al (2003) Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 170(1738–174):1 Ahlering TE, Skarecky D, Lee D et al (2003) Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 170(1738–174):1
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A et al (2002) Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J Urol 168(945–94):9 Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A et al (2002) Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J Urol 168(945–94):9
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP et al (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242(83–9):1 Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP et al (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242(83–9):1
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Son GM, Kim JG, Lee JC et al (2010) Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech Part A 20:609–617CrossRef Son GM, Kim JG, Lee JC et al (2010) Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech Part A 20:609–617CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim HJ, Choi GS, Park JS et al (2014) Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: lessons from a single surgeon’s experience. Dis Colon Rectum 57(1066–107):4 Kim HJ, Choi GS, Park JS et al (2014) Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: lessons from a single surgeon’s experience. Dis Colon Rectum 57(1066–107):4
Metadaten
Titel
The Learning Curve of Robotic-Assisted Low Rectal Resection of a Novice Rectal Surgeon
verfasst von
Chi Chung Foo
Wai Lun Law
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2016
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3251-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2016

World Journal of Surgery 2/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.