Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 5/2016

15.12.2015 | Original Scientific Report

Severity of Acute Cholecystitis and Risk of Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injury During Cholecystectomy, a Population-Based Case–Control Study

verfasst von: Björn Törnqvist, Anne Waage, Zongli Zheng, Weimin Ye, Magnus Nilsson

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 5/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Acute cholecystitis is a common complication to gallstone disease. The relation between the severity of acute cholecystitis and risk of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy has not yet been addressed and is the main focus of this study.

Methods

All cases with iatrogenic bile duct injury during cholecystectomy, within the Lake Mälaren region, Sweden, were identified through ICD procedure codes for biliary reconstruction within the Swedish Inpatient Register and matched to non-injured cholecystectomized controls. Information regarding perioperative variables was collected through medical record review.

Results

After review, 158 cases and 623 controls remained for analyses. Adjusted risk of bile duct injury was doubled among patients with acute cholecystitis (OR 1.97 95 % CI 1.05–3.72), whereas a mild acute cholecystitis (Tokyo grade I) did not affect the risk of bile duct injury (OR 0.96 95 % CI 0.41–2.25), a moderate (Tokyo grade II) more than doubled the risk (OR 2.41 95 % CI 1.21–4.80). Severe cholecystitis (Tokyo grade III) had a close to significant eightfold increase in risk (OR 8.43 95 % CI 0.97–72.9). The intention to use intraoperative cholangiography reduced injury risk by 52 % (OR 0.48, 95 % CI 0.29–0.81).

Conclusions

Patients with on-going acute cholecystitis had twice the risk of sustaining a biliary lesion compared to patients without acute cholecystitis. There was a relation between the Tokyo guidelines severity grading of acute cholecystitis and injury risk and the intention to use intraoperative cholangiography halved the risk of reconstructed bile duct injury during cholecystectomy.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Halldestam I et al (2004) Development of symptoms and complications in individuals with asymptomatic gallstones. Br J Surg 91(6):734–738CrossRefPubMed Halldestam I et al (2004) Development of symptoms and complications in individuals with asymptomatic gallstones. Br J Surg 91(6):734–738CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Papi C et al (2004) Timing of cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 99(1):147–155CrossRefPubMed Papi C et al (2004) Timing of cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 99(1):147–155CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Shikata S, Noguchi Y, Fukui T (2005) Early versus delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Today 35(7):553–560CrossRefPubMed Shikata S, Noguchi Y, Fukui T (2005) Early versus delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Today 35(7):553–560CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Lau H et al (2006) Early versus delayed-interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a metaanalysis. Surg Endosc 20(1):82–87CrossRefPubMed Lau H et al (2006) Early versus delayed-interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a metaanalysis. Surg Endosc 20(1):82–87CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Yokoe M et al (2012) New diagnostic criteria and severity assessment of acute cholecystitis in revised Tokyo guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 19(5):578–585CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yokoe M et al (2012) New diagnostic criteria and severity assessment of acute cholecystitis in revised Tokyo guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 19(5):578–585CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Flum DR et al (2003) Bile duct injury during cholecystectomy and survival in medicare beneficiaries. JAMA 290(16):2168–2173CrossRefPubMed Flum DR et al (2003) Bile duct injury during cholecystectomy and survival in medicare beneficiaries. JAMA 290(16):2168–2173CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Tornqvist B et al (2009) Long-term effects of iatrogenic bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 7(9):1013–1018 quiz 915 CrossRefPubMed Tornqvist B et al (2009) Long-term effects of iatrogenic bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 7(9):1013–1018 quiz 915 CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Waage A, Nilsson M (2006) Iatrogenic bile duct injury: a population-based study of 152 776 cholecystectomies in the Swedish Inpatient Registry. Arch Surg 141(12):1207–1213CrossRefPubMed Waage A, Nilsson M (2006) Iatrogenic bile duct injury: a population-based study of 152 776 cholecystectomies in the Swedish Inpatient Registry. Arch Surg 141(12):1207–1213CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA (1992) Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 45(6):613–619CrossRefPubMed Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA (1992) Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 45(6):613–619CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bektas H et al (2007) Surgical treatment and outcome of iatrogenic bile duct lesions after cholecystectomy and the impact of different clinical classification systems. Br J Surg 94(9):1119–1127CrossRefPubMed Bektas H et al (2007) Surgical treatment and outcome of iatrogenic bile duct lesions after cholecystectomy and the impact of different clinical classification systems. Br J Surg 94(9):1119–1127CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamashita Y et al (2013) TG13 surgical management of acute cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20(1):89–96CrossRefPubMed Yamashita Y et al (2013) TG13 surgical management of acute cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20(1):89–96CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat McGillicuddy EA et al (2012) Non-operative management of acute cholecystitis in the elderly. Br J Surg 99(9):1254–1261CrossRefPubMed McGillicuddy EA et al (2012) Non-operative management of acute cholecystitis in the elderly. Br J Surg 99(9):1254–1261CrossRefPubMed
14.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamalapurkar D et al. (2015) Index cholecystectomy in grade II and III acute calculous cholecystitis is feasible and safe. ANZ J Surg Kamalapurkar D et al. (2015) Index cholecystectomy in grade II and III acute calculous cholecystitis is feasible and safe. ANZ J Surg
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Borzellino G et al (2008) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for severe acute cholecystitis. A meta-analysis of results. Surg Endosc 22(1):8–15CrossRefPubMed Borzellino G et al (2008) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for severe acute cholecystitis. A meta-analysis of results. Surg Endosc 22(1):8–15CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Törnqvist B. et al. (2015) Selective intraoperative cholangiography and risk of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. Br J Surg Forthcoming Törnqvist B. et al. (2015) Selective intraoperative cholangiography and risk of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. Br J Surg Forthcoming
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Teckchandani N et al (2010) Predictive factors for successful early laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: a prospective study. Int J Surg 8(8):623–627CrossRefPubMed Teckchandani N et al (2010) Predictive factors for successful early laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: a prospective study. Int J Surg 8(8):623–627CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Massarweh NN, Flum DR (2007) Role of intraoperative cholangiography in avoiding bile duct injury. J Am Coll Surg 204(4):656–664CrossRefPubMed Massarweh NN, Flum DR (2007) Role of intraoperative cholangiography in avoiding bile duct injury. J Am Coll Surg 204(4):656–664CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Flum DR et al (2003) Intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. JAMA 289(13):1639–1644CrossRefPubMed Flum DR et al (2003) Intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. JAMA 289(13):1639–1644CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Ludwig K et al (2002) Contribution of intraoperative cholangiography to incidence and outcome of common bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 16(7):1098–1104CrossRefPubMed Ludwig K et al (2002) Contribution of intraoperative cholangiography to incidence and outcome of common bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 16(7):1098–1104CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Tornqvist B et al (2012) Effect of intended intraoperative cholangiography and early detection of bile duct injury on survival after cholecystectomy: population based cohort study. BMJ 345:e6457CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tornqvist B et al (2012) Effect of intended intraoperative cholangiography and early detection of bile duct injury on survival after cholecystectomy: population based cohort study. BMJ 345:e6457CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Fletcher DR et al (1999) Complications of cholecystectomy: risks of the laparoscopic approach and protective effects of operative cholangiography: a population-based study. Ann Surg 229(4):449–457CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fletcher DR et al (1999) Complications of cholecystectomy: risks of the laparoscopic approach and protective effects of operative cholangiography: a population-based study. Ann Surg 229(4):449–457CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Sheffield KM et al (2013) Association between cholecystectomy with vs without intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common duct injury. JAMA 310(8):812–820CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sheffield KM et al (2013) Association between cholecystectomy with vs without intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common duct injury. JAMA 310(8):812–820CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Severity of Acute Cholecystitis and Risk of Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injury During Cholecystectomy, a Population-Based Case–Control Study
verfasst von
Björn Törnqvist
Anne Waage
Zongli Zheng
Weimin Ye
Magnus Nilsson
Publikationsdatum
15.12.2015
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 5/2016
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3365-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2016

World Journal of Surgery 5/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.