Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 9/2016

20.05.2016 | Surgical Symposium Contribution

A Positive Node on Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Predicts Higher Nodal Burden Than a Positive Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Carcinoma

verfasst von: M. R. Boland, R. Ni Cearbhaill, K. Fitzpatrick, S. M. Walsh, D. Evoy, J. Geraghty, J. Rothwell, S. McNally, A. O’Doherty, C. M. Quinn, E. W. McDermott, R. S. Prichard

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 9/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Axillary status remains an important prognostic indicator in breast cancer. Certain patients with a positive sentinel node (SLNB) may not benefit from axillary clearance (AC). Uncertainty remains if this approach could be applied to patients diagnosed with axillary metastases on ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (USFNAC). The aim of this study was to compare nodal burden in patients with positive USFNAC and a positive SLNB.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed involving all BC patients between 2007 and 2014 who had either pre-operative USFNAC or a SLNB. Patient/tumour characteristics and nodal burden were examined in all patients proceeding to AC.

Results

974 patients were eligible for analysis. 439 patients (45 %) had positive USFNAC and 535 (55 %) had a positive SLNB. USFNAC-positive patients were more likely to undergo mastectomy (Chi-square test; p < 0.001), have extra-nodal extension (p < 0.001), be oestrogen receptor negative (p < 0.001) and be HER2 positive (p < 0.001). The median total number of lymph nodes (LNs) excised during AC was higher in the USFNAC group (Mann–Whitney test; 23 vs. 21; p < 0.001). The median total number of involved LNs was 3 (range 1–47) in FNAC-positive patients versus 1 (range 1–37) in SLNB-positive patients (p < 0.001). The median number of involved LNs in level 1 was 3 in FNAC-positive patients versus 1 in SLNB-positive patients (p < 0.001). Within the SLN-positive group, 49 % of the patients had only one involved LN, 28 % had two nodes involved and 23 % had ≥3. In comparison, within the FNAC-positive group only 13 % of the patients had one involved LN, 12 % had two nodes involved and 74 % had ≥3.

Conclusion

Patients with positive USFNAC have more aggressive clinico-pathological characteristics and higher nodal burden compared to SLNB-positive patients. Currently, the authors advocate that patients not receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with a positive USFNAC, should proceed directly to an axillary ALND.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Quan ML, McCready D (2009) The evolution of lymph node assessment in breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 99(4):194–198CrossRefPubMed Quan ML, McCready D (2009) The evolution of lymph node assessment in breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 99(4):194–198CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hatoum HA, Jamali FR, El-Saghir NS, Musallam KM, Seoud M, Dimassi H et al (2009) Ratio between positive lymph nodes and total excised axillary lymph nodes as an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in patients with nonmetastatic lymph node-positive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 16(12):3388–3395CrossRefPubMed Hatoum HA, Jamali FR, El-Saghir NS, Musallam KM, Seoud M, Dimassi H et al (2009) Ratio between positive lymph nodes and total excised axillary lymph nodes as an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in patients with nonmetastatic lymph node-positive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 16(12):3388–3395CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Saadatmand S, Bretveld R, Siesling S, Tilanus-Linthorst MM (2015) Influence of tumour stage at breast cancer detection on survival in modern times: population based study in 173 797 patients. BMJ 351:h4901CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Saadatmand S, Bretveld R, Siesling S, Tilanus-Linthorst MM (2015) Influence of tumour stage at breast cancer detection on survival in modern times: population based study in 173 797 patients. BMJ 351:h4901CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat van Wely BJ, de Wilt JH, Francissen C, Teerenstra S, Strobbe LJ (2015) Meta-analysis of ultrasound-guided biopsy of suspicious axillary lymph nodes in the selection of patients with extensive axillary tumour burden in breast cancer. Br J Surg 102(3):159–168CrossRefPubMed van Wely BJ, de Wilt JH, Francissen C, Teerenstra S, Strobbe LJ (2015) Meta-analysis of ultrasound-guided biopsy of suspicious axillary lymph nodes in the selection of patients with extensive axillary tumour burden in breast cancer. Br J Surg 102(3):159–168CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat van Wely BJ, de Wilt JH, Schout PJ, Kooistra B, Wauters CA, Venderinck D et al (2013) Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of suspicious nodes in breast cancer patients; selecting patients with extensive nodal involvement. Breast Cancer Res Treat 140(1):113–118CrossRefPubMed van Wely BJ, de Wilt JH, Schout PJ, Kooistra B, Wauters CA, Venderinck D et al (2013) Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of suspicious nodes in breast cancer patients; selecting patients with extensive nodal involvement. Breast Cancer Res Treat 140(1):113–118CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Houssami N, Ciatto S, Turner RM, Cody HS 3rd, Macaskill P (2011) Preoperative ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of axillary nodes in invasive breast cancer: meta-analysis of its accuracy and utility in staging the axilla. Ann Surg 254(2):243–251CrossRefPubMed Houssami N, Ciatto S, Turner RM, Cody HS 3rd, Macaskill P (2011) Preoperative ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of axillary nodes in invasive breast cancer: meta-analysis of its accuracy and utility in staging the axilla. Ann Surg 254(2):243–251CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Baruah BP, Goyal A, Young P, Douglas-Jones AG, Mansel RE (2010) Axillary node staging by ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration cytology in patients with breast cancer. Br J Surg 97(5):680–683CrossRefPubMed Baruah BP, Goyal A, Young P, Douglas-Jones AG, Mansel RE (2010) Axillary node staging by ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration cytology in patients with breast cancer. Br J Surg 97(5):680–683CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Senkus E, Kyriakides S, Penault-Llorca F, Poortmans P, Thompson A, Zackrisson S et al (2013) Primary breast cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 24(Suppl 6):vi7–vi23CrossRefPubMed Senkus E, Kyriakides S, Penault-Llorca F, Poortmans P, Thompson A, Zackrisson S et al (2013) Primary breast cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 24(Suppl 6):vi7–vi23CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Harnett A, Smallwood J, Titshall V, Champion A (2009) Diagnosis and treatment of early breast cancer, including locally advanced disease—summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 338:b438CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Harnett A, Smallwood J, Titshall V, Champion A (2009) Diagnosis and treatment of early breast cancer, including locally advanced disease—summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 338:b438CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Veronesi U, Viale G, Paganelli G, Zurrida S, Luini A, Galimberti V et al (2010) Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: 10-year results of a randomized controlled study. Ann Surg 251(4):595–600CrossRefPubMed Veronesi U, Viale G, Paganelli G, Zurrida S, Luini A, Galimberti V et al (2010) Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: 10-year results of a randomized controlled study. Ann Surg 251(4):595–600CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, Brown AM, Harlow SP, Costantino JP et al (2010) Sentinel-lymph-node resection compared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer: overall survival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 11(10):927–933CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, Brown AM, Harlow SP, Costantino JP et al (2010) Sentinel-lymph-node resection compared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer: overall survival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 11(10):927–933CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV, Beitsch PD, Whitworth PW, Blumencranz PW et al (2011) Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 305(6):569–575CrossRefPubMed Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV, Beitsch PD, Whitworth PW, Blumencranz PW et al (2011) Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 305(6):569–575CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Giuliano AE, McCall L, Beitsch P, Whitworth PW, Blumencranz P, Leitch AM et al (2010) Locoregional recurrence after sentinel lymph node dissection with or without axillary dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 randomized trial. Ann Surg 252(3):426–432 discussion 32–3 PubMed Giuliano AE, McCall L, Beitsch P, Whitworth PW, Blumencranz P, Leitch AM et al (2010) Locoregional recurrence after sentinel lymph node dissection with or without axillary dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 randomized trial. Ann Surg 252(3):426–432 discussion 32–3 PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Francissen CM, Dings PJ, van Dalen T, Strobbe LJ, van Laarhoven HW, de Wilt JH (2012) Axillary recurrence after a tumor-positive sentinel lymph node biopsy without axillary treatment: a review of the literature. Ann Surg Oncol 19(13):4140–4149CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Francissen CM, Dings PJ, van Dalen T, Strobbe LJ, van Laarhoven HW, de Wilt JH (2012) Axillary recurrence after a tumor-positive sentinel lymph node biopsy without axillary treatment: a review of the literature. Ann Surg Oncol 19(13):4140–4149CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Galimberti V, Cole BF, Zurrida S, Viale G, Luini A, Veronesi P et al (2013) Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with sentinel-node micrometastases (IBCSG 23-01): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 14(4):297–305CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Galimberti V, Cole BF, Zurrida S, Viale G, Luini A, Veronesi P et al (2013) Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with sentinel-node micrometastases (IBCSG 23-01): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 14(4):297–305CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Boland MR, Prichard RS, Daskalova I, Lowery AJ, Evoy D, Geraghty J et al (2015) Axillary nodal burden in primary breast cancer patients with positive pre-operative ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration cytology: management in the era of ACOSOG Z011. Eur J Surg Oncol 41(4):559–565CrossRefPubMed Boland MR, Prichard RS, Daskalova I, Lowery AJ, Evoy D, Geraghty J et al (2015) Axillary nodal burden in primary breast cancer patients with positive pre-operative ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration cytology: management in the era of ACOSOG Z011. Eur J Surg Oncol 41(4):559–565CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Cools-Lartigue J, Sinclair A, Trabulsi N, Meguerditchian A, Mesurolle B, Fuhrer R et al (2013) Preoperative axillary ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of axillary metastases in patients with breast cancer: predictors of accuracy and future implications. Ann Surg Oncol 20(3):819–827CrossRefPubMed Cools-Lartigue J, Sinclair A, Trabulsi N, Meguerditchian A, Mesurolle B, Fuhrer R et al (2013) Preoperative axillary ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of axillary metastases in patients with breast cancer: predictors of accuracy and future implications. Ann Surg Oncol 20(3):819–827CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Verheuvel NC, van den Hoven I, Ooms HW, Voogd AC, Roumen RM (2015) The role of ultrasound-guided lymph node biopsy in axillary staging of invasive breast cancer in the post-ACOSOG Z0011 trial era. Ann Surg Oncol 22(2):409–415CrossRefPubMed Verheuvel NC, van den Hoven I, Ooms HW, Voogd AC, Roumen RM (2015) The role of ultrasound-guided lymph node biopsy in axillary staging of invasive breast cancer in the post-ACOSOG Z0011 trial era. Ann Surg Oncol 22(2):409–415CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Boughey JC, Suman VJ, Mittendorf EA, Ahrendt GM, Wilke LG, Taback B et al (2013) Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer: the ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) clinical trial. JAMA 310(14):1455–1461CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Boughey JC, Suman VJ, Mittendorf EA, Ahrendt GM, Wilke LG, Taback B et al (2013) Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer: the ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) clinical trial. JAMA 310(14):1455–1461CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C (2011) TNM classification of malignant tumours. Wiley, Newyork Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C (2011) TNM classification of malignant tumours. Wiley, Newyork
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Ivens D, Hoe AL, Podd TJ, Hamilton CR, Taylor I, Royle GT (1992) Assessment of morbidity from complete axillary dissection. Br J Cancer 66(1):136–138CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ivens D, Hoe AL, Podd TJ, Hamilton CR, Taylor I, Royle GT (1992) Assessment of morbidity from complete axillary dissection. Br J Cancer 66(1):136–138CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Lotze MT, Duncan MA, Gerber LH, Woltering EA, Rosenberg SA (1981) Early versus delayed shoulder motion following axillary dissection: a randomized prospective study. Ann Surg 193(3):288–295CrossRefPubMed Lotze MT, Duncan MA, Gerber LH, Woltering EA, Rosenberg SA (1981) Early versus delayed shoulder motion following axillary dissection: a randomized prospective study. Ann Surg 193(3):288–295CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Cools-Lartigue J, Meterissian S (2012) Accuracy of axillary ultrasound in the diagnosis of nodal metastasis in invasive breast cancer: a review. World J Surg 36(1):46–54CrossRefPubMed Cools-Lartigue J, Meterissian S (2012) Accuracy of axillary ultrasound in the diagnosis of nodal metastasis in invasive breast cancer: a review. World J Surg 36(1):46–54CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Pesce C, Morrow M (2013) The need for lymph node dissection in nonmetastatic breast cancer. Annu Rev Med 64:119–129CrossRefPubMed Pesce C, Morrow M (2013) The need for lymph node dissection in nonmetastatic breast cancer. Annu Rev Med 64:119–129CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Dillon MF, Advani V, Masterson C, O’Loughlin C, Quinn CM, O’Higgins N et al (2009) The value of level III clearance in patients with axillary and sentinel node positive breast cancer. Ann Surg 249(5):834–839CrossRefPubMed Dillon MF, Advani V, Masterson C, O’Loughlin C, Quinn CM, O’Higgins N et al (2009) The value of level III clearance in patients with axillary and sentinel node positive breast cancer. Ann Surg 249(5):834–839CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
A Positive Node on Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Predicts Higher Nodal Burden Than a Positive Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Carcinoma
verfasst von
M. R. Boland
R. Ni Cearbhaill
K. Fitzpatrick
S. M. Walsh
D. Evoy
J. Geraghty
J. Rothwell
S. McNally
A. O’Doherty
C. M. Quinn
E. W. McDermott
R. S. Prichard
Publikationsdatum
20.05.2016
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 9/2016
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3557-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2016

World Journal of Surgery 9/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.