Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 6/2017

17.01.2017 | Original Scientific Report

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI): Operative Findings Correlation in 229 Fistula-in-Ano Patients

verfasst von: Pankaj Garg, Pratiksha Singh, Baljit Kaur

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 6/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

To correlate the operative findings of patients with fistula-in-ano with preoperative MRI and quantify the information added with MRI.

Methods

All consecutive fistula-in-ano patients operated between July 2013 and May 2015 were prospectively enrolled. Preoperative MRI was done in every patient. The details of tracts, internal opening and “complex parameters” (additional tract or additional internal opening, horseshoe tract, associated abscess and supralevator extension) found at surgery were compared to the findings determined by MRI.

Results

A total of 229 patients (424 tracts) with mean age—49.0 ± 11.3 years were included. M/F 198/31. James hospital classification: Type I 58, II 20, III 49, IV 86 and V 16. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI in diagnosing fistula tracts were 98.8 and 99.7%, respectively, and in identifying internal opening were 97.7 and 98.6%, respectively. MRI added significant information in 46.7% (107/229) patients which was presence of additional tracts in 71 (66.3%), horseshoe tract in 63 (58.8%), supralevator extension in 16 (14.9%), unsuspected abscess in 11 (10.3%) and multiple internal openings in one patient (1%). The proportion of simple/complex fistula (based on history and clinical examination alone) was 32.8/67.2% which changed to 21.4/78.6% after the MRI scan. MRI added significant information about unsuspecting complex parameters which were missed on history and clinical examination in more than one-third (26/75: 34.6%) of simple fistulae and more than half (81/154: 52.5%) of already known complex fistulae.

Conclusions

MRI is highly accurate in diagnosing fistula-in-ano and added significant information about unsuspected complex parameters in over one-third (34.6%) of simple and in half (52.5%) of complex fistula-in-ano.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuijpers HC, Schulpen T (1985) Fistulography for fistula-in-ano. Is it useful? Dis Colon Rectum 28:103–104CrossRefPubMed Kuijpers HC, Schulpen T (1985) Fistulography for fistula-in-ano. Is it useful? Dis Colon Rectum 28:103–104CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hussain SM, Stoker J, Schouten WR et al (1996) Fistula in ano: endoanal sonography versus endoanal MR imaging in classification. Radiology 200:475–481CrossRefPubMed Hussain SM, Stoker J, Schouten WR et al (1996) Fistula in ano: endoanal sonography versus endoanal MR imaging in classification. Radiology 200:475–481CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Maier AG, Funovics MA, Kreuzer SH et al (2001) Evaluation of perianal sepsis: comparison of anal endosonography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 14:254–260CrossRefPubMed Maier AG, Funovics MA, Kreuzer SH et al (2001) Evaluation of perianal sepsis: comparison of anal endosonography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 14:254–260CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchanan GN, Halligan S, Bartram CI et al (2004) Clinical examination, endosonography, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of fistula in ano: comparison with outcome-based reference standard. Radiology 233:674–681CrossRefPubMed Buchanan GN, Halligan S, Bartram CI et al (2004) Clinical examination, endosonography, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of fistula in ano: comparison with outcome-based reference standard. Radiology 233:674–681CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Siddiqui MR, Ashrafian H, Tozer P et al (2012) A diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis of endoanal ultrasound and MRI for perianal fistula assessment. Dis Colon Rectum 55:576–585CrossRefPubMed Siddiqui MR, Ashrafian H, Tozer P et al (2012) A diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis of endoanal ultrasound and MRI for perianal fistula assessment. Dis Colon Rectum 55:576–585CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat de Miguel Criado J, del Salto LG, Rivas PF et al (2012) MR imaging evaluation of perianal fistulas: spectrum of imaging features. Radiographics 32:175–194CrossRefPubMed de Miguel Criado J, del Salto LG, Rivas PF et al (2012) MR imaging evaluation of perianal fistulas: spectrum of imaging features. Radiographics 32:175–194CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchanan GN, Halligan S, Williams AB et al (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging for primary fistula in ano. Br J Surg 90:877–881CrossRefPubMed Buchanan GN, Halligan S, Williams AB et al (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging for primary fistula in ano. Br J Surg 90:877–881CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL, van der Hoop AG et al (2001) Preoperative MR imaging of anal fistulas: does it really help the surgeon? Radiology 218:75–84CrossRefPubMed Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL, van der Hoop AG et al (2001) Preoperative MR imaging of anal fistulas: does it really help the surgeon? Radiology 218:75–84CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchanan G, Halligan S, Williams A et al (2002) Effect of MRI on clinical outcome of recurrent fistula-in-ano. Lancet 360:1661–1662CrossRefPubMed Buchanan G, Halligan S, Williams A et al (2002) Effect of MRI on clinical outcome of recurrent fistula-in-ano. Lancet 360:1661–1662CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Morris J, Spencer JA, Ambrose NS (2000) MR imaging classification of perianal fistulas and its implications for patient management. Radiographics 20:623–635 discussion 635–637 CrossRefPubMed Morris J, Spencer JA, Ambrose NS (2000) MR imaging classification of perianal fistulas and its implications for patient management. Radiographics 20:623–635 discussion 635–637 CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD (1976) A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg 63:1–12CrossRefPubMed Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD (1976) A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg 63:1–12CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Whiteford MH, Kilkenny J 3rd, Hyman N et al (2005) Practice parameters for the treatment of perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano (revised). Dis Colon Rectum 48:1337–1342CrossRefPubMed Whiteford MH, Kilkenny J 3rd, Hyman N et al (2005) Practice parameters for the treatment of perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano (revised). Dis Colon Rectum 48:1337–1342CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Beckingham IJ, Spencer JA, Ward J et al (1996) Prospective evaluation of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of fistula in ano. Br J Surg 83:1396–1398CrossRefPubMed Beckingham IJ, Spencer JA, Ward J et al (1996) Prospective evaluation of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of fistula in ano. Br J Surg 83:1396–1398CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Mullen R, Deveraj S, Suttie SA et al (2011) MR imaging of fistula in ano: indications and contribution to surgical assessment. Acta Chir Belg 111:393–397CrossRefPubMed Mullen R, Deveraj S, Suttie SA et al (2011) MR imaging of fistula in ano: indications and contribution to surgical assessment. Acta Chir Belg 111:393–397CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwartz DA, Wiersema MJ, Dudiak KM et al (2001) A comparison of endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and exam under anesthesia for evaluation of Crohn’s perianal fistulas. Gastroenterology 121:1064–1072CrossRefPubMed Schwartz DA, Wiersema MJ, Dudiak KM et al (2001) A comparison of endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and exam under anesthesia for evaluation of Crohn’s perianal fistulas. Gastroenterology 121:1064–1072CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Orsoni P, Barthet M, Portier F et al (1999) Prospective comparison of endosonography, magnetic resonance imaging and surgical findings in anorectal fistula and abscess complicating Crohn’s disease. Br J Surg 86:360–364CrossRefPubMed Orsoni P, Barthet M, Portier F et al (1999) Prospective comparison of endosonography, magnetic resonance imaging and surgical findings in anorectal fistula and abscess complicating Crohn’s disease. Br J Surg 86:360–364CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat (1996) Practice parameters for treatment of fistula-in-ano. The standards practice task force. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum 39:1361–1362 (1996) Practice parameters for treatment of fistula-in-ano. The standards practice task force. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum 39:1361–1362
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Chapple KS, Spencer JA, Windsor AC et al (2000) Prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 43:511–516CrossRefPubMed Chapple KS, Spencer JA, Windsor AC et al (2000) Prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 43:511–516CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Lunniss PJ, Barker PG, Sultan AH et al (1994) Magnetic resonance imaging of fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 37:708–718CrossRefPubMed Lunniss PJ, Barker PG, Sultan AH et al (1994) Magnetic resonance imaging of fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 37:708–718CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Spencer JA, Chapple K, Wilson D et al (1998) Outcome after surgery for perianal fistula: predictive value of MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:403–406CrossRefPubMed Spencer JA, Chapple K, Wilson D et al (1998) Outcome after surgery for perianal fistula: predictive value of MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:403–406CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI): Operative Findings Correlation in 229 Fistula-in-Ano Patients
verfasst von
Pankaj Garg
Pratiksha Singh
Baljit Kaur
Publikationsdatum
17.01.2017
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 6/2017
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-3886-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2017

World Journal of Surgery 6/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.