Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 7/2017

23.02.2017 | Original Scientific Report

Derivation and Validation of a Novel Physiological Emergency Surgery Acuity Score (PESAS)

verfasst von: Naveen F. Sangji, Jordan D. Bohnen, Elie P. Ramly, George C. Velmahos, David C. Chang, Haytham M. A. Kaafarani

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 7/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

We present a novel and abbreviated Physiological Emergency Surgery Acuity Score (PESAS) that assesses the severity of disease at presentation in patients undergoing Emergency Surgery (ES).

Methods

Using the 2011 ACS-NSQIP database, we identified all patients who underwent “emergent” surgery. The following methodology was designed: (1) identification of independent predictors of 30-day mortality that are markers of acuity; (2) derivation of PESAS based on the relative impact (i.e., odds ratio) of each predictor; and (3) measurement of the c-statistic. The PESAS was validated using the 2012 ACS-NSQIP database.

Results

From 24,702 ES cases, a 15-point score was derived. This included 10 components with a range of 0 and 15 points. Its c-statistic was 0.80. Mortality gradually increased from 1.7 to 40.6 to 100% at scores of 0, 8, and 15, respectively. In the validation phase, PESAS c-statistic remained stable.

Conclusion

PESAS is a novel score that assesses the acuity of disease at presentation in ES patients and strongly correlates with postoperative mortality risk. PESAS could prove useful for preoperative counseling and for risk-adjusted benchmarking.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Gale S, Shafi S, Dombrovskiy V et al (2014) The public health burden of emergency general surgery in the United States: a 10-year analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample—2001 to 2010. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 77(2):202–208CrossRefPubMed Gale S, Shafi S, Dombrovskiy V et al (2014) The public health burden of emergency general surgery in the United States: a 10-year analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample—2001 to 2010. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 77(2):202–208CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Havens J, Peetz A, Do W et al (2015) The excess morbidity and mortality of emergency general surgery. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 78(2):306–311CrossRefPubMed Havens J, Peetz A, Do W et al (2015) The excess morbidity and mortality of emergency general surgery. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 78(2):306–311CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Ingraham A, Cohen M, Milimoria K et al (2010) Comparison of 30-day outcomes after emergency general surgery procedures: potential for targeted improvement. Surgery 148(2):217–238CrossRefPubMed Ingraham A, Cohen M, Milimoria K et al (2010) Comparison of 30-day outcomes after emergency general surgery procedures: potential for targeted improvement. Surgery 148(2):217–238CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith M, Hussain A, Xiao J et al (2013) The importance of improving the quality of emergency surgery for a regional quality collaborative. Ann Surg 257(4):596–602CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Smith M, Hussain A, Xiao J et al (2013) The importance of improving the quality of emergency surgery for a regional quality collaborative. Ann Surg 257(4):596–602CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Ingraham A, Cohen M, Raval M et al (2011) Comparison of hospital performance in emergency versus elective general surgery operations at 198 hospitals. J Am Coll Surg 212(1):20–28 (e1) CrossRefPubMed Ingraham A, Cohen M, Raval M et al (2011) Comparison of hospital performance in emergency versus elective general surgery operations at 198 hospitals. J Am Coll Surg 212(1):20–28 (e1) CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ingraham A, Cohen M, Raval M et al (2011) Effect of trauma center status on 30-day outcomes after emergency general surgery. J Am Coll Surg 212(3):277–286CrossRefPubMed Ingraham A, Cohen M, Raval M et al (2011) Effect of trauma center status on 30-day outcomes after emergency general surgery. J Am Coll Surg 212(3):277–286CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Knaus W, Zimmerman J, Wagner D et al (1981) APACHE-acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: a physiologically based classification system. Crit Care Med 9(8):591–597CrossRefPubMed Knaus W, Zimmerman J, Wagner D et al (1981) APACHE-acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: a physiologically based classification system. Crit Care Med 9(8):591–597CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ranson J, Rifkind K, Roses D et al (1974) Prognostic signs and the role of operative management in acute pancreatitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 139(1):69–81PubMed Ranson J, Rifkind K, Roses D et al (1974) Prognostic signs and the role of operative management in acute pancreatitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 139(1):69–81PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Marshall J, Cook D, Christou N et al (1995) Multiple organ dysfunction score: a reliable descriptor of a complex clinical outcome. Crit Care Med 23(10):1638–1652CrossRefPubMed Marshall J, Cook D, Christou N et al (1995) Multiple organ dysfunction score: a reliable descriptor of a complex clinical outcome. Crit Care Med 23(10):1638–1652CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Zimmerman J, Karamer A, McNair D et al (2006) Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV: hospital mortality assessment for today’s critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 34(5):1297–1310CrossRefPubMed Zimmerman J, Karamer A, McNair D et al (2006) Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV: hospital mortality assessment for today’s critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 34(5):1297–1310CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong C, Khin L, Heng K et al (2004) The LRINEC (Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis) score: a tool for distinguishing necrotizing fasciitis from other soft tissue infections. Crit Care Med 32(7):1535–1541CrossRefPubMed Wong C, Khin L, Heng K et al (2004) The LRINEC (Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis) score: a tool for distinguishing necrotizing fasciitis from other soft tissue infections. Crit Care Med 32(7):1535–1541CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kwok A, Lipsitz S, Bader A et al (2011) Are targeted preoperative risk prediction tools more powerful? A test of models for emergency colon surgery in the very elderly. J Am Coll Surg 213(2):220–225CrossRefPubMed Kwok A, Lipsitz S, Bader A et al (2011) Are targeted preoperative risk prediction tools more powerful? A test of models for emergency colon surgery in the very elderly. J Am Coll Surg 213(2):220–225CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Bilimoria K, Liu Y, Paruch J et al (2013) Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am Coll Surg 217(5):833–842 (e1-3) CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bilimoria K, Liu Y, Paruch J et al (2013) Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am Coll Surg 217(5):833–842 (e1-3) CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Parikh P, Shiloach M, Choen M et al (2010) Pancreatectomy risk calculator: an ACS-NSQIP resource. HPB (Oxford) 12(7):488–497CrossRef Parikh P, Shiloach M, Choen M et al (2010) Pancreatectomy risk calculator: an ACS-NSQIP resource. HPB (Oxford) 12(7):488–497CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen M, Bilimoria K, Karl Y et al (2009) Development of an American college of surgeons national surgery quality improvement program: morbidity and mortality risk calculator for colorectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 208(6):1009–1016CrossRefPubMed Cohen M, Bilimoria K, Karl Y et al (2009) Development of an American college of surgeons national surgery quality improvement program: morbidity and mortality risk calculator for colorectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 208(6):1009–1016CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Sutton R, Bann S, Brooks M et al (2002) The surgical risk scale as an improved tool for risk-adjusted analysis in comparative surgical audit. Br J Surg 89(6):763–768CrossRefPubMed Sutton R, Bann S, Brooks M et al (2002) The surgical risk scale as an improved tool for risk-adjusted analysis in comparative surgical audit. Br J Surg 89(6):763–768CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Saklad M (1941) Grading of patients for surgical procedures. Anesthesiology 2(3):281–284CrossRef Saklad M (1941) Grading of patients for surgical procedures. Anesthesiology 2(3):281–284CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Charlson M, Pompei P, Ales K et al (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383CrossRefPubMed Charlson M, Pompei P, Ales K et al (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris D et al (1998) Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care 36(1):8–27CrossRefPubMed Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris D et al (1998) Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care 36(1):8–27CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat ACS NSQIP (2012) User guide for the 2012 ACS NSQIP participant use data file ACS NSQIP (2012) User guide for the 2012 ACS NSQIP participant use data file
21.
Zurück zum Zitat ACS NSQIP (2011) User guide for the 2011 participant use data file ACS NSQIP (2011) User guide for the 2011 participant use data file
22.
Zurück zum Zitat ACS NSQIP, Data Collection, Analysis, and Reporting ACS NSQIP, Data Collection, Analysis, and Reporting
23.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanley J, McNeil B (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143(1):29–36CrossRefPubMed Hanley J, McNeil B (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143(1):29–36CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Easterlin M, Chang D, Wilson S (2013) A practical index to predict 30-day mortality after major amputation. Ann Vasc Surg 27(7):909–917CrossRefPubMed Easterlin M, Chang D, Wilson S (2013) A practical index to predict 30-day mortality after major amputation. Ann Vasc Surg 27(7):909–917CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Sangji N, Bohnen J, Ramly E et al (2016) Derivation and validation of a novel emergency surgery acuity score (ESAS). J Trauma Acute Care Surg 81(2):213–220CrossRefPubMed Sangji N, Bohnen J, Ramly E et al (2016) Derivation and validation of a novel emergency surgery acuity score (ESAS). J Trauma Acute Care Surg 81(2):213–220CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Shah A, Haider A, Zogg C et al (2015) National estimates of predictors of outcomes for emergency general surgery. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 78(3):482–490 (discussion 490–491) CrossRefPubMed Shah A, Haider A, Zogg C et al (2015) National estimates of predictors of outcomes for emergency general surgery. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 78(3):482–490 (discussion 490–491) CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Copeland G, Jones D, Walters M (1991) POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg 78(3):355–360CrossRefPubMed Copeland G, Jones D, Walters M (1991) POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg 78(3):355–360CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Whiteley M, Prytherch D, Higgins B et al (1996) An evaluation of the POSSUM surgical scoring system. Br J Surg 83(6):812–815CrossRefPubMed Whiteley M, Prytherch D, Higgins B et al (1996) An evaluation of the POSSUM surgical scoring system. Br J Surg 83(6):812–815CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Alvarado A (1986) A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med 15(5):557–564CrossRefPubMed Alvarado A (1986) A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med 15(5):557–564CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamath P, Wiesner R, Malinchoc M et al (2001) A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease. Hepatology 33(2):464–470CrossRefPubMed Kamath P, Wiesner R, Malinchoc M et al (2001) A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease. Hepatology 33(2):464–470CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Gawande A, Kwaan M, Rogenbogen S et al (2007) An Apgar score for surgery. J Am Coll Surg 204(2):201–208CrossRefPubMed Gawande A, Kwaan M, Rogenbogen S et al (2007) An Apgar score for surgery. J Am Coll Surg 204(2):201–208CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Meredith J, Evans G, Kilgo P et al (2002) A comparison of the abilities of nine scoring algorithms in predicting mortality. J Trauma 53(4):621–628 (discussion 628–629) CrossRefPubMed Meredith J, Evans G, Kilgo P et al (2002) A comparison of the abilities of nine scoring algorithms in predicting mortality. J Trauma 53(4):621–628 (discussion 628–629) CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Ho K, Williams T, Harasheh Y et al (2016) Using patient admission characteristics alone to predict mortality of critically ill patients: a comparison of 3 prognostic scores. J Crit Care 31(1):21–25CrossRefPubMed Ho K, Williams T, Harasheh Y et al (2016) Using patient admission characteristics alone to predict mortality of critically ill patients: a comparison of 3 prognostic scores. J Crit Care 31(1):21–25CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Neary W, Prytherch D, Foy C (2007) Comparison of different methods of risk stratification in urgent and emergency surgery. Br J Surg 94(10):1300–1305CrossRefPubMed Neary W, Prytherch D, Foy C (2007) Comparison of different methods of risk stratification in urgent and emergency surgery. Br J Surg 94(10):1300–1305CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Crandall M, Agarwal S, Muskat P et al (2014) Application of a uniform anatomic grading system to measure disease severity in eight emergency general surgical illnesses. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 77(5):705–708CrossRefPubMed Crandall M, Agarwal S, Muskat P et al (2014) Application of a uniform anatomic grading system to measure disease severity in eight emergency general surgical illnesses. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 77(5):705–708CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Savage S, Klekar C, Priest E et al (2015) Validating a new grading scale for emergency general surgery diseases. J Surg Res 196(2):264–269CrossRefPubMed Savage S, Klekar C, Priest E et al (2015) Validating a new grading scale for emergency general surgery diseases. J Surg Res 196(2):264–269CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Shafi S, Aboutanos M, Brown C et al (2014) Measuring anatomic severity of disease in emergency general surgery. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 76(3):884–887CrossRefPubMed Shafi S, Aboutanos M, Brown C et al (2014) Measuring anatomic severity of disease in emergency general surgery. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 76(3):884–887CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Shafi S, Aboutanos M, Agarwal S et al (2013) Emergency general surgery: definition and estimated burden of disease. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 74(4):1092–1097CrossRefPubMed Shafi S, Aboutanos M, Agarwal S et al (2013) Emergency general surgery: definition and estimated burden of disease. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 74(4):1092–1097CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Bernat J, Peterson L (2006) Patient-centered informed consent in surgical practice. Arch Surg 141(1):86–92CrossRefPubMed Bernat J, Peterson L (2006) Patient-centered informed consent in surgical practice. Arch Surg 141(1):86–92CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Derivation and Validation of a Novel Physiological Emergency Surgery Acuity Score (PESAS)
verfasst von
Naveen F. Sangji
Jordan D. Bohnen
Elie P. Ramly
George C. Velmahos
David C. Chang
Haytham M. A. Kaafarani
Publikationsdatum
23.02.2017
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 7/2017
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-3915-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2017

World Journal of Surgery 7/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.