Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 8/2018

24.01.2018 | Original Scientific Report

Access to Safe, Timely, and Affordable Surgical Care in Uganda: A Stratified Randomized Evaluation of Nationwide Public Sector Surgical Capacity and Core Surgical Indicators

verfasst von: Katherine Albutt, Maria Punchak, Peter Kayima, Didacus B. Namanya, Geoffrey A. Anderson, Mark G. Shrime

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 8/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Access to safe surgery is critical to health, welfare, and economic development. In 2015, the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery recommended that all countries collect surgical indicators to lend insight into improving surgical care. No nationwide high-quality data exist for these metrics in Uganda.

Methods

A standardized quantitative hospital assessment and a semi-structured interview were administered to key stakeholders at 17 randomly selected public hospitals. Hospital walk-throughs and retrospective reviews of operative logbooks were completed.

Results

This study captured information for public hospitals serving 64.0% of Uganda’s population. On average, <25% of the population had 2 h access to a surgically capable facility. Hospitals averaged 257 beds/facilities and there were 0.2 operating rooms per 100,000 people. Annual surgical volume was 144.5 cases per 100,000 people per year. Surgical, anesthetic, and obstetrician physician workforce density was 0.3 per 100,000 people. Most hospitals reported having electricity, oxygen, and blood available more than half the time and running water available at least three quarters of the time. In total, 93.8% of facilities never had access to a CT scan. Sterile gloves, nasogastric tubes, and Foley catheters were frequently unavailable. Uniform outcome reporting does not exist, and the WHO safe surgery checklist is not utilized.

Conclusion

The Ugandan public hospital system does not meet LCoGS targets for surgical access, workforce, or surgical volume. Critical policy and programmatic developments are essential to build surgical capacity and facilitate provision of safe, timely, and affordable surgical care. Surgery must become a public health priority in Uganda and other low resource settings.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Meara JG, Leather AJM, Hagander L et al (2015) Global Surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Lancet 386:569–624CrossRefPubMed Meara JG, Leather AJM, Hagander L et al (2015) Global Surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Lancet 386:569–624CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Alkire BC, Raykar NP, Shrime MG et al (2015) Global access to surgical care: a modelling study. Lancet Glob Health 3:316–323CrossRef Alkire BC, Raykar NP, Shrime MG et al (2015) Global access to surgical care: a modelling study. Lancet Glob Health 3:316–323CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ministry of Health (2016) Annual Health Sector Performance Report 2015/2016 Ministry of Health (2016) Annual Health Sector Performance Report 2015/2016
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Dare AJ, Bleicher J, Lee KC et al (2015) Generation of national political priority for surgery: a qualitative case study of three low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet 385(Suppl):S54CrossRefPubMed Dare AJ, Bleicher J, Lee KC et al (2015) Generation of national political priority for surgery: a qualitative case study of three low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet 385(Suppl):S54CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Butler EK, Tran TM, Fuller AT, Brammell A (2016) Quantifying the pediatric surgical need in Uganda: results of a nationwide cross-sectional, household survey. Pediatr Surg Int 32:1075–1085CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Butler EK, Tran TM, Fuller AT, Brammell A (2016) Quantifying the pediatric surgical need in Uganda: results of a nationwide cross-sectional, household survey. Pediatr Surg Int 32:1075–1085CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Tran TM, Fuller AT, Butler EK et al (2017) Burden of surgical conditions in Uganda. Ann Surg 266:389–399CrossRefPubMed Tran TM, Fuller AT, Butler EK et al (2017) Burden of surgical conditions in Uganda. Ann Surg 266:389–399CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson GA, Ilcisin L, Abesiga L et al (2017) Surgical volume and postoperative mortality rate at a referral hospital in Western Uganda: measuring the Lancet commission on global surgery indicators in low-resource settings. Surgery (United States) 161:1710–1719 Anderson GA, Ilcisin L, Abesiga L et al (2017) Surgical volume and postoperative mortality rate at a referral hospital in Western Uganda: measuring the Lancet commission on global surgery indicators in low-resource settings. Surgery (United States) 161:1710–1719
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Albutt K, Namanya D, Anderson G, Kayima P (2017) Uganda. In: Johnson W, Lin Y, Mukhopadhyay S, Meara J (eds) Surgical care systems strengthening: developing national surgical, obstetric and anaesthesia plans. World Health Organization, Geneva Albutt K, Namanya D, Anderson G, Kayima P (2017) Uganda. In: Johnson W, Lin Y, Mukhopadhyay S, Meara J (eds) Surgical care systems strengthening: developing national surgical, obstetric and anaesthesia plans. World Health Organization, Geneva
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Raykar NP, Bowder AN, Liu C et al (2015) Geospatial mapping to estimate timely access to surgical care in nine low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet 385:S16CrossRefPubMed Raykar NP, Bowder AN, Liu C et al (2015) Geospatial mapping to estimate timely access to surgical care in nine low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet 385:S16CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ozgediz D, Kijjambu S, Galukande M et al (2008) Africa’s neglected surgical workforce crisis. Lancet 371:627–628CrossRefPubMed Ozgediz D, Kijjambu S, Galukande M et al (2008) Africa’s neglected surgical workforce crisis. Lancet 371:627–628CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Petroze RT, Nzayisenga A, Rusanganwa V et al (2012) Comprehensive national analysis of emergency and essential surgical capacity in Rwanda. Br J Surg 99:436–443CrossRefPubMed Petroze RT, Nzayisenga A, Rusanganwa V et al (2012) Comprehensive national analysis of emergency and essential surgical capacity in Rwanda. Br J Surg 99:436–443CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Galukande M, Kaggwa S, Sekimpi P et al (2013) Use of surgical task shifting to scale up essential surgical services: a feasibility analysis at facility level in Uganda. BMC Health Serv Res 13:292CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Galukande M, Kaggwa S, Sekimpi P et al (2013) Use of surgical task shifting to scale up essential surgical services: a feasibility analysis at facility level in Uganda. BMC Health Serv Res 13:292CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat LeBrun DG, Chackungal S, Chao TE et al (2014) Prioritizing essential surgery and safe anesthesia for the post-2015 development agenda: operative capacities of 78 district hospitals in 7 low- and middle-income countries. Surgery 155:365–373CrossRefPubMed LeBrun DG, Chackungal S, Chao TE et al (2014) Prioritizing essential surgery and safe anesthesia for the post-2015 development agenda: operative capacities of 78 district hospitals in 7 low- and middle-income countries. Surgery 155:365–373CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Raykar NP, Yorlets RR, Liu C et al (2016) The how project: understanding contextual challenges to global surgical care provision in low-resource settings. BMJ Glob Health 1:e000075CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Raykar NP, Yorlets RR, Liu C et al (2016) The how project: understanding contextual challenges to global surgical care provision in low-resource settings. BMJ Glob Health 1:e000075CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Access to Safe, Timely, and Affordable Surgical Care in Uganda: A Stratified Randomized Evaluation of Nationwide Public Sector Surgical Capacity and Core Surgical Indicators
verfasst von
Katherine Albutt
Maria Punchak
Peter Kayima
Didacus B. Namanya
Geoffrey A. Anderson
Mark G. Shrime
Publikationsdatum
24.01.2018
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 8/2018
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4485-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2018

World Journal of Surgery 8/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.