Abstract
Background and purpose
An increasing number of surgical and radiological observations call Couinaud’s concept of eight liver segments into question and such inconsistencies are commonly explained with anatomical variations. This paper was intended to demonstrate that, beyond variability, another anatomical principle may allow to understand supposedly differing concepts on liver segmentation.
Materials and methods
The study was performed on 25 portal vein casts scanned by helical CT. The branches of the right and left portal vein and their corresponding territories were determined both anatomically and mathematically (MEVIS LiverAnalyzer, MEVISLab).
Results
The number of branches coming-off the right and left portal vein was never 8, but many more (mean number 20, range 9–44). Different combinations of these branches and their respective territories, carried out in this study, yielded larger entities and supposedly contradictory subdivisions (including Couinaud’s eight segments), without calling upon anatomical variability.
Conclusions
We suggest the human liver to be considered as corresponding to 1 portal venous territory at the level of the portal vein, to 2 territories at the level of the right and left branch of the portal vein, and to 20 at the level of the rami of the right and left branch. This “1-2-20-concept” is a rationale for reconciling apparent discrepancies with the eight-segment concept. On a pragmatic level, in cases in which imaging or surgical observations do not fit with Couinaud’s scheme, we propose clinicians not to autonomically conclude to the presence of an anatomical variation, but to become aware of the presence of an average of 20 (and not 8) second-order portal venous territories within the human liver.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdalla EK, Vauthey JN, Couinaud C (2002) The caudate lobe of the liver: implications of embryology and anatomy for surgery. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 11:835–848
Bismuth H (1982) Anatomical surgery and surgical anatomy of the liver. World J Surg 6:3–9
Cervone A, Sardi A, Conaway GL (2000) Intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) is essential in the management of metastatic colorectal liver lesions. Am Surg 66:611–615
Cho A, Okazumi S, Makino H et al (2004) Relation between hepatic and portal veins in the right paramedian sector: proposal for anatomical reclassification of the liver. World J Surg 28:8–12
Couinaud C (1957) Le foie. Etudes anatomiques et chirurgicales, Masson, Paris
Couinaud C (1998) Secteur dorsal du foie. Chirurgie 123:8–15
Dodd GD III (1993) An American guide to Couinaud’s numbering system. Am J Roentgenol 161:574–575
Elias H, Petty D (1952) Gross anatomy of the blood vessels and ducts within the human liver. Am J Anat 90:59–111
Fasel JHD, Selle D, Evertz CJG, Terrier F, Peitgen HO, Gailloud P (1998) Segmental anatomy of the liver: poor correlation with CT. Radiology 206:151–156
Fasel JHD (2008) Portal venous territories within the human liver: an anatomical reappraisal. Anat Rec 291:636–642
Filipponi F, Romagnoli P, Mosca F, Couinaud C (2000) The dorsal sector of human liver: embryological, anatomical and clinical relevance. Hepatogastroenterology 47:1726–1731
Fischer L, Cardenas C, Thorn M, Benner A, Grenacher L, Vetter M, Lehnert T, Klar E, Meinzer HP, Lamade W (2002) Limits of Couinaud’s liver segment classification: a quantitative computer-based three-dimensional analysis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26:962–967
Goldsmith NA, Woodburne RT (1957) The surgical anatomy pertaining to liver resection. Surg Gynecol Obstet 105:310–318
Hahn HK, Evertsz CJG, Peitgen HO, Fasel JHD (2003) Fractal properties, segmental anatomy and interdependence of the human portal and hepatic vein in 3D. Fractals 11:53–62
Hjortsjö CH (1951) The topography of the intrahepatic duct systems. Acta Anat 11:599–615
Horsfield K (1990) Diameters, generations, and orders of branches in the bronchial tree. J Appl Physiol 68:457–461
Ko S, Murakami G, Kanamura T, Sato TJ, Nakajima Y (2004) Cantlie’s plane in major variations of the primary portal vein ramification at the porta hepatis: cutting experiment using cadaveric livers. World J Surg 28:13–18
Koqure K, Kuwano H, Fujimaki N, Ishikawa H, Takada K (2002) Reproposal for Hjortsjo’s segmental anatomy of the anterior segment in human liver. Arch Surg 137:1118–1124
Makuuchi M, Hasegawa H, Yamazaki S (1985) Ultrasonically guided subsegmentectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 161:346–350
Ohashi I, Ina H, Okada Y, Yoshida T, Gomi N, Himeno Y, Hanafusa K, Shibuya H (1996) Segmental anatomy of the liver under the right diaphragmatic dome: evaluation with axial CT. Radiology 200:779–783
Platzer W, Maurer H (1966) Zur Segmenteinteilung der Leber. Acta Anat 63:8–31
Rieker O, Mildenberger P, Hintze C, Schunk K, Otto G, Thelen M (2000) Segmentanatomie der Leber in der Computertomographie: Lokalisieren wir die Läsionen richtig? (Segmental anatomy of the liver evaluated with CT: do we localize focal lesions as we should?). Fortschr Roentgenstr 172:147–152
Skandalakis JE, Skandalakis LJ, Skandalakis PN, Mirilas P (2004) Hepatic surgical anatomy. Surg Clin North Am 84:413–435
Strunk H, Stuckmann G, Textor J, Willinek W (2003) Limitations and pitfalls of Couinaud’s segmentation of the liver in transaxial imaging. Eur Radiol 13:2472–2482
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fasel, J.H.D., Majno, P.E. & Peitgen, HO. Liver segments: an anatomical rationale for explaining inconsistencies with Couinaud’s eight-segment concept. Surg Radiol Anat 32, 761–765 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-010-0626-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-010-0626-4