Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Early risk stratification for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma integrating interim Deauville score and International Prognostic Index

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic relevance of early risk stratification in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) using interim Deauville score on positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scan and baseline International Prognostic Index (IPI). This retrospective study included 220 patients (median age, 64 years; men, 60%) diagnosed with DLBCL between 2007 and 2016 at our institution, treated with rituximab-based chemotherapy. Interim PET-CT was performed after three cycles of immuno-chemotherapy. Interim Deauville score was assessed as 4 or 5 in 49 patients (22.3%), and 94 patients (42.7%) had high-intermediate or high-risk IPI scores. In multivariate analysis, interim Deauville score (1–3 and 4–5) and baseline IPI (low/low-intermediate and high-intermediate/high) were independently associated with progression-free survival (for Deauville score, hazard ratio [HR], 1.00 vs. 2.96 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.83–4.78], P < 0.001; for IPI, HR, 1.00 vs. 4.84 [95% CI, 2.84–8.24], P < 0.001). We stratified patients into three groups: low-risk (interim Deauville scores 1–3 and low/low-intermediate IPI), intermediate-risk (Deauville scores 1–3 with high-intermediate/high IPI or Deauville scores 4–5 with low/low-intermediate IPI), and high-risk (Deauville scores 4–5 and high-intermediate/high IPI). This early risk stratification showed a strong association with progression-free survival (HR, 1.00 vs. 3.98 [95% CI 2.10–7.54] vs. 13.97 [95% CI 7.02–27.83], P < 0.001). Early risk stratification using interim Deauville score and baseline IPI predicts the risk of disease progression or death in patients with DLBCL. Our results provide guidance with interim PET-driven treatment intensification strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kwak JY (2012) Treatment of diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Korean J Intern Med 27(4):369–377. https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2012.27.4.369

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gisselbrecht C, Glass B, Mounier N, Singh Gill D, Linch DC, Trneny M, Bosly A, Ketterer N, Shpilberg O, Hagberg H, Ma D, Briere J, Moskowitz CH, Schmitz N (2010) Salvage regimens with autologous transplantation for relapsed large B-cell lymphoma in the rituximab era. J Clin Oncol 28(27):4184–4190. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.28.1618

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Stumpe KD, Urbinelli M, Steinert HC, Glanzmann C, Buck A, von Schulthess GK (1998) Whole-body positron emission tomography using fluorodeoxyglucose for staging of lymphoma: effectiveness and comparison with computed tomography. Eur J Nucl Med 25(7):721–728

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Spaepen K, Stroobants S, Dupont P, Van Steenweghen S, Thomas J, Vandenberghe P, Vanuytsel L, Bormans G, Balzarini J, De Wolf-Peeters C, Mortelmans L, Verhoef G (2001) Prognostic value of positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) after first-line chemotherapy in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: is [18F]FDG-PET a valid alternative to conventional diagnostic methods? J Clin Oncol 19(2):414–419. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2001.19.2.414

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF, Cavalli F, Schwartz LH, Zucca E, Lister TA, Alliance AL, Lymphoma G, Eastern Cooperative Oncology G, European Mantle Cell Lymphoma C, Italian Lymphoma F, European Organisation for R, Treatment of Cancer/Dutch Hemato-Oncology G, Grupo Espanol de Medula O, German High-Grade Lymphoma Study G, German Hodgkin's Study G, Japanese Lymphorra Study G, Lymphoma Study A, Group NCT, Nordic Lymphoma Study G, Southwest Oncology G, United Kingdom National Cancer Research I (2014) Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification. J Clin Oncol 32(27):3059–3068. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.54.8800

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Barrington SF, Mikhaeel NG, Kostakoglu L, Meignan M, Hutchings M, Mueller SP, Schwartz LH, Zucca E, Fisher RI, Trotman J, Hoekstra OS, Hicks RJ, O'Doherty MJ, Hustinx R, Biggi A, Cheson BD (2014) Role of imaging in the staging and response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the International Conference on Malignant Lymphomas Imaging Working Group. J Clin Oncol 32(27):3048–3058. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.53.5229

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Burggraaff CN, de Jong A, Hoekstra OS, Hoetjes NJ, Nievelstein RAJ, Jansma EP, Heymans MW, de Vet HCW, Zijlstra JM (2019) Predictive value of interim positron emission tomography in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 46(1):65–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4103-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fan Y, Zhang Y, Yang Z, Ying Z, Zhou N, Liu C, Song Y, Zhu J, Wang X (2017) Evaluating early interim fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography with the SUVmax-liver-based interpretation for predicting the outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma 58(9):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2016.1277384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim J, Song YS, Lee JS, Lee WW, Kim SE (2018) Risk stratification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with interim PET-CT based on different cutoff Deauville scores. Leuk Lymphoma 59(2):340–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2017.1339877

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kong Y, Qu L, Li Y, Liu D, Lv X, Han J (2016) Predictive significance of a new prognostic score for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the interim-positron emission tomography findings. Medicine (Baltimore) 95(6):e2808. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mikhaeel NG, Smith D, Dunn JT, Phillips M, Moller H, Fields PA, Wrench D, Barrington SF (2016) Combination of baseline metabolic tumour volume and early response on PET/CT improves progression-free survival prediction in DLBCL. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 43(7):1209–1219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-016-3315-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nols N, Mounier N, Bouazza S, Lhommel R, Costantini S, Vander Borght T, Vekemans MC, Sonet A, Bosly A, Michaux L, Andre M, Van Den Neste E (2014) Quantitative and qualitative analysis of metabolic response at interim positron emission tomography scan combined with International Prognostic Index is highly predictive of outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma 55(4):773–780. https://doi.org/10.3109/10428194.2013.831848

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Carr R, Fanti S, Paez D, Cerci J, Gyorke T, Redondo F, Morris TP, Meneghetti C, Auewarakul C, Nair R, Gorospe C, Chung JK, Kuzu I, Celli M, Gujral S, Padua RA, Dondi M, Group ILS (2014) Prospective international cohort study demonstrates inability of interim PET to predict treatment failure in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Nucl Med 55(12):1936–1944. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.114.145326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. de Oliveira CR, Hallack Neto A, Siqueira S, Lage LA, de Paula HM, Coutinho AM, Pereira J (2016) Interim fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET-computed tomography and cell of origin by immunohistochemistry predicts progression-free and overall survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients in the rituximab era. Nucl Med Commun 37(10):1095–1101. https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000000553

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Duhrsen U, Muller S, Hertenstein B, Thomssen H, Kotzerke J, Mesters R, Berdel WE, Franzius C, Kroschinsky F, Weckesser M, Kofahl-Krause D, Bengel FM, Durig J, Matschke J, Schmitz C, Poppel T, Ose C, Brinkmann M, La Rosee P, Freesmeyer M, Hertel A, Hoffkes HG, Behringer D, Prange-Krex G, Wilop S, Krohn T, Holzinger J, Griesshammer M, Giagounidis A, Raghavachar A, Maschmeyer G, Brink I, Bernhard H, Haberkorn U, Gaska T, Kurch L, van Assema DME, Klapper W, Hoelzer D, Geworski L, Jockel KH, Scherag A, Bockisch A, Rekowski J, Huttmann A, Investigators PT (2018) Positron emission tomography-guided therapy of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas (PETAL): A Multicenter, Randomized Phase III Trial. J Clin Oncol 36(20):2024–2034. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.76.8093

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ziepert M, Hasenclever D, Kuhnt E, Glass B, Schmitz N, Pfreundschuh M, Loeffler M (2010) Standard International prognostic index remains a valid predictor of outcome for patients with aggressive CD20+ B-cell lymphoma in the rituximab era. J Clin Oncol 28(14):2373–2380. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.26.2493

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Adams HJA, Kwee TC (2016) Proportion of false-positive lesions at interim and end-of-treatment FDG-PET in lymphoma as determined by histology: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol 85(11):1963–1970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.08.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Han YH, Lim ST, Jeong HJ, Sohn MH (2016) Clinical value of a one-stop-shop low-dose lung screening combined with (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of metastatic lung nodules from colorectal cancer. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 50(2):144–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-015-0387-4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Crump M, Neelapu SS, Farooq U, Van Den Neste E, Kuruvilla J, Westin J, Link BK, Hay A, Cerhan JR, Zhu L, Boussetta S, Feng L, Maurer MJ, Navale L, Wiezorek J, Go WY, Gisselbrecht C (2017) Outcomes in refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: results from the international SCHOLAR-1 study. Blood 130(16):1800–1808. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2017-03-769620

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mamot C, Klingbiel D, Hitz F, Renner C, Pabst T, Driessen C, Mey U, Pless M, Bargetzi M, Krasniqi F, Gigli F, Hany T, Samarin A, Biaggi C, Rusterholz C, Dirnhofer S, Zucca E, Martinelli G (2015) Final results of a prospective evaluation of the predictive value of interim positron emission tomography in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP-14 (SAKK 38/07). J Clin Oncol 33(23):2523–2529. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2014.58.9846

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chow A, Phillips M, Siew T, Cull G, Augustson B, Ward M, Joske D (2013) Prognostic nomogram for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma incorporating the International Prognostic Index with interim-positron emission tomography findings. Intern Med J 43(8):932–939. https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.12194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kwon SH, Kang DR, Kim J, Yoon JK, Lee SJ, Jeong SH, Lee HW, An YS (2016) Prognostic value of negative interim 2-[(1)(8)F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose PET/CT in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Clin Radiol 71(3):280–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2015.11.019

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Adams HJA, Kwee TC (2017) An evidence-based review on the value of interim FDG-PET in assessing response to therapy in lymphoma. Semin Oncol 44(6):404–419. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminoncol.2018.01.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mikhaeel NG, Hutchings M, Fields PA, O'Doherty MJ, Timothy AR (2005) FDG-PET after two to three cycles of chemotherapy predicts progression-free and overall survival in high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Ann Oncol 16(9):1514–1523. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdi272

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Haioun C, Itti E, Rahmouni A, Brice P, Rain JD, Belhadj K, Gaulard P, Garderet L, Lepage E, Reyes F, Meignan M (2005) [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in aggressive lymphoma: an early prognostic tool for predicting patient outcome. Blood 106(4):1376–1381. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2005-01-0272

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Casasnovas RO, Ysebaert L, Thieblemont C, Bachy E, Feugier P, Delmer A, Tricot S, Gabarre J, Andre M, Fruchart C, Mounier N, Delarue R, Meignan M, Berriolo-Riedinger A, Bardet S, Emile JF, Jais JP, Haioun C, Tilly H, Morschhauser F (2017) FDG-PET-driven consolidation strategy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: final results of a randomized phase 2 study. Blood 130(11):1315–1326. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2017-02-766691

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Jacene HA, Ishimori T, Engles JM, Leboulleux S, Stearns V, Wahl RL (2006) Effects of pegfilgrastim on normal biodistribution of 18F-FDG: preclinical and clinical studies. J Nucl Med 47(6):950–956

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Burggraaff CN, Cornelisse AC, Hoekstra OS, Lugtenburg PJ, De Keizer B, Arens AIJ, Celik F, Huijbregts JE, De Vet HCW, Zijlstra JM, Group HIW (2018) Interobserver agreement of interim and end-of-treatment (18)F-FDG PET/CT in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: impact on clinical practice and trials. J Nucl Med 59(12):1831–1836. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.118.210807

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

H.-Y.Y., S.K.Y., H.-Y.H., and J.-Y.K. contributed to the study inception and design; H.-Y.Y., S.K.Y., Y.-H.H., H.S.K., and J.-Y.K. contributed to the statistical analysis and interpretation; H.-Y.Y., S.K.Y., S.-Y.J., N.-R.L., E.-K.S., and J.-Y.K. enrolled patients into the study and collected the data; H.-Y.Y. and S.K.Y. contributed to writing the first draft of the manuscript; Y.-H.H. and H.-J.J. analyzed the PET-CT results; and all authors critically revised the manuscript and approved the submitted version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae-Yong Kwak.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants have been approved by the institutional review board (IRB) of Chonbuk National University Hospital and have been performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the IRB and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

The IRB granted a waiver of written informed consent because this study was a retrospective analysis involving no more than minimal risk for the subjects.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary materials

ESM 1

(DOCX 75 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yim, S.K., Yhim, HY., Han, YH. et al. Early risk stratification for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma integrating interim Deauville score and International Prognostic Index. Ann Hematol 98, 2739–2748 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-019-03834-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-019-03834-4

Keywords

Navigation