Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 2/2008

01.02.2008 | Cardiac

Variability of repeated coronary artery calcium measurements by 1.25-mm- and 2.5-mm-thickness images on prospective electrocardiograph-triggered 64-slice CT

verfasst von: Jun Horiguchi, Noriaki Matsuura, Hideya Yamamoto, Nobuhiko Hirai, Masao Kiguchi, Chikako Fujioka, Toshiro Kitagawa, Nobuoki Kohno, Katsuhide Ito

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 2/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

High reproducibility on coronary artery calcium scoring is a key requirement in monitoring the progression of coronary atherosclerosis. The purpose of this prospective study is to assess the reproducibility of 1.25-mm- and 2.5-mm-thickness images on prospective electrocardiograph-triggered 64-slice CT with respect to 2.5-mm-thickness images on spiral overlapping reconstruction. One hundred patients suspected of coronary artery disease were scanned twice repeatedly, both on prospective electrocardiograph-triggered step-and-shoot and retrospective electrocardiograph-gated spiral scans. Using 1.25-mm-thickness collimation, 1.25-mm- and 2.5-mm-thickness image sets on prospective scans and 2.5-mm-thickness image sets with 1.25-mm increment (overlapping) on retrospective scans were obtained. Coronary artery calcium scores, interscan variability and interobserver variability were evaluated. The mean interscan variability in coronary artery calcium measurement on 1.25-mm prospective/2.5-mm prospective/2.5-mm overlapping retrospective scans were Agatston: 10%/18%/12%, volume: 10%/12%/10% and mass: 8%/13%/11% for observer 1 and Agatston: 8%/14%/10%, volume: 7%/9%/10% and mass: 7%/10%/9% for observer 2, respectively. The mean interobserver variability was 5% to 14%. In conclusion, prospective electrocardiograph-triggered 64-slice CT using the 1.25-mm prospective scan shows the lowest variability. The 2.5-mm prospective scan on volume or mass scoring shows variability of around 10%, comparable to 2.5-mm-thickness spiral overlapping reconstruction images.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Callister TQ, Raggi P, Cooil B, Lippolis NJ, Russo DJ (1998) Effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on coronary artery disease as assessed by electron-beam computed tomography. N Engl J Med 339:1972–1978PubMedCrossRef Callister TQ, Raggi P, Cooil B, Lippolis NJ, Russo DJ (1998) Effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on coronary artery disease as assessed by electron-beam computed tomography. N Engl J Med 339:1972–1978PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Maher JE, Bielak LF, Raz JA, Sheedy PF II, Schwartz RS, Peyser PA (1999) Progression of coronary artery calcification: a pilot study. Mayo Clin Proc 74:347–355PubMedCrossRef Maher JE, Bielak LF, Raz JA, Sheedy PF II, Schwartz RS, Peyser PA (1999) Progression of coronary artery calcification: a pilot study. Mayo Clin Proc 74:347–355PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Janowitz WR, Agatston AS, Viamonte M Jr (1991) Comparison of serial quantitative evaluation of calcified coronary artery plaque by ultrafast computed tomography in persons with and without obstructive coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 68:1–6PubMedCrossRef Janowitz WR, Agatston AS, Viamonte M Jr (1991) Comparison of serial quantitative evaluation of calcified coronary artery plaque by ultrafast computed tomography in persons with and without obstructive coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 68:1–6PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Fischbach R, Heindel W (2000) Detection and quantification of coronary calcification: an update. Rofo 172:407–414PubMed Fischbach R, Heindel W (2000) Detection and quantification of coronary calcification: an update. Rofo 172:407–414PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M, Detrano R (1990) Quantification of coronary calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 15:827–832PubMedCrossRef Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M, Detrano R (1990) Quantification of coronary calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 15:827–832PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Callister TQ, Cooil B, Raya SP et al (1998) Coronary artery disease: improved reproducibility of calcium scoring with an electron-beam CT volumetric method. Radiology 208:807–814PubMed Callister TQ, Cooil B, Raya SP et al (1998) Coronary artery disease: improved reproducibility of calcium scoring with an electron-beam CT volumetric method. Radiology 208:807–814PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoon HC, Greaser III LE, Mather R, Sinha S, McNitt-Gray MF, Goldin JG (1997) Coronary artery calcium: alternate methods for accurate and reproducible quantitation. Acad Radiol 4:666–673PubMedCrossRef Yoon HC, Greaser III LE, Mather R, Sinha S, McNitt-Gray MF, Goldin JG (1997) Coronary artery calcium: alternate methods for accurate and reproducible quantitation. Acad Radiol 4:666–673PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang SJ, Detrano BC, Secci A et al (1996) Detection of coronary calcification with electron-beam computed tomography: evaluation of interexamination reproducibility and comparison of three image-acquisition protocols. Am Heart J 132:550–558PubMedCrossRef Wang SJ, Detrano BC, Secci A et al (1996) Detection of coronary calcification with electron-beam computed tomography: evaluation of interexamination reproducibility and comparison of three image-acquisition protocols. Am Heart J 132:550–558PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Achenbach S, Ropers D, Mohlenkamp S et al (2001) Variability of repeated coronary artery calcium measurements by electron beam tomography. Am J Cardiology 87:210–213CrossRef Achenbach S, Ropers D, Mohlenkamp S et al (2001) Variability of repeated coronary artery calcium measurements by electron beam tomography. Am J Cardiology 87:210–213CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Rourke RA, Brundage BH, Froelicher VF et al (2000) American College of Cardiology/American heart association expert consensus document on electron-beam computed tomography for the diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery disease. Circulation 102:126–134PubMed O’Rourke RA, Brundage BH, Froelicher VF et al (2000) American College of Cardiology/American heart association expert consensus document on electron-beam computed tomography for the diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery disease. Circulation 102:126–134PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat McCollough CH, Ulzheimer S, Halliburton SS, White RD, Kalender WA (2003) A multi-scanner, multi-manufacture, international standard for the quantification of CAC using cardiac CT (abstr). In: Radiological society of North America scientific assembly and annual meeting program. Radiological Society of North America, Oak Brook, Ill 630–631 McCollough CH, Ulzheimer S, Halliburton SS, White RD, Kalender WA (2003) A multi-scanner, multi-manufacture, international standard for the quantification of CAC using cardiac CT (abstr). In: Radiological society of North America scientific assembly and annual meeting program. Radiological Society of North America, Oak Brook, Ill 630–631
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ohnesorge B, Flohr T, Fischbach R et al (2002) Reproducibility of coronary calcium quantification in repeat examinations with retrospectively ECG-gated multisection spiral CT. Eur Radiol 12:1532–1540PubMedCrossRef Ohnesorge B, Flohr T, Fischbach R et al (2002) Reproducibility of coronary calcium quantification in repeat examinations with retrospectively ECG-gated multisection spiral CT. Eur Radiol 12:1532–1540PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Hoe LR, De Meerleer KG, Leyman PP, Vanhoenacker PK (2003) Coronary artery calcium scoring using ECG-gated multidetector CT: effect of individually optimized image-reconstruction windows on image quality and measurement reproducibility. AJR 181:1093–1100PubMed Van Hoe LR, De Meerleer KG, Leyman PP, Vanhoenacker PK (2003) Coronary artery calcium scoring using ECG-gated multidetector CT: effect of individually optimized image-reconstruction windows on image quality and measurement reproducibility. AJR 181:1093–1100PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Daniell AL, Wong ND, Friedman JD et al (2003) Reproducibility of coronary calcium measurements from multidetector computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 41:456ACrossRef Daniell AL, Wong ND, Friedman JD et al (2003) Reproducibility of coronary calcium measurements from multidetector computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 41:456ACrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Horiguchi J, Yamamoto H, Akiyama Y et al (2005) Variability of repeated coronary artery calcium measurements by 16-MDCT with retrospective reconstruction. AJR 184:1917–1923PubMed Horiguchi J, Yamamoto H, Akiyama Y et al (2005) Variability of repeated coronary artery calcium measurements by 16-MDCT with retrospective reconstruction. AJR 184:1917–1923PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ulzheimer S, Kalender WA (2003) Assessment of calcium scoring performance in cardiac computed tomography. Eur Radiol 13:484–497PubMed Ulzheimer S, Kalender WA (2003) Assessment of calcium scoring performance in cardiac computed tomography. Eur Radiol 13:484–497PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Horiguchi J, Fukuda H, Yamamoto H et al (2007) The impact of motion artifacts on the reproducibility of repeated coronary artery calcium measurements. Eur Radiol 17:81–86PubMedCrossRef Horiguchi J, Fukuda H, Yamamoto H et al (2007) The impact of motion artifacts on the reproducibility of repeated coronary artery calcium measurements. Eur Radiol 17:81–86PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Horiguchi J, Shen Y, Hirai N et al (2006) Timing on 16-slice scanner and implications for 64-slice cardiac CT: Do you start scanning immediately after breath-hold? Acad Radiol 13:173–176PubMedCrossRef Horiguchi J, Shen Y, Hirai N et al (2006) Timing on 16-slice scanner and implications for 64-slice cardiac CT: Do you start scanning immediately after breath-hold? Acad Radiol 13:173–176PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Morin RL, Gerber TC, McCollough CH (2003) Radiation dose in computed tomography of the heart. Circulation 107:917–922PubMedCrossRef Morin RL, Gerber TC, McCollough CH (2003) Radiation dose in computed tomography of the heart. Circulation 107:917–922PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Hong C, Bae KT, Pilgram TK, Suh J, Bradley D (2002) Coronary artery calcium measurement with multi-detector row CT: in vitro assessment of effect of radiation dose. Radiology 225:901–906PubMedCrossRef Hong C, Bae KT, Pilgram TK, Suh J, Bradley D (2002) Coronary artery calcium measurement with multi-detector row CT: in vitro assessment of effect of radiation dose. Radiology 225:901–906PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Callister T, Janowitz W, Raggi P (2000) Sensitivity of two electron beam tomography protocols for the detection and quantification of coronary artery calcium. AJR 175:1743–1746PubMed Callister T, Janowitz W, Raggi P (2000) Sensitivity of two electron beam tomography protocols for the detection and quantification of coronary artery calcium. AJR 175:1743–1746PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Vliegenthart R, Song B, Hofman A, Witteman JCM, Oudkerk M (2003) Coronary calcification at electron-beam CT: Effect of section thickness on calcium scoring in vitro and in vivo. Radiology 229:520–525PubMedCrossRef Vliegenthart R, Song B, Hofman A, Witteman JCM, Oudkerk M (2003) Coronary calcification at electron-beam CT: Effect of section thickness on calcium scoring in vitro and in vivo. Radiology 229:520–525PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Achenbach S, Meissner F, Ropers D et al (2001) Overlapping cross-sections significantly improve the reproducibility of coronary calcium measurements by electron beam tomography: a phantom study. JCAT 25:569–573 Achenbach S, Meissner F, Ropers D et al (2001) Overlapping cross-sections significantly improve the reproducibility of coronary calcium measurements by electron beam tomography: a phantom study. JCAT 25:569–573
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Kopp AF, Ohnesorge B, Becker C et al (2002) Reproducibility and accuracy of coronary calcium measurements with multi-detector row versus electron-beam CT. Radiology 225:113–119PubMedCrossRef Kopp AF, Ohnesorge B, Becker C et al (2002) Reproducibility and accuracy of coronary calcium measurements with multi-detector row versus electron-beam CT. Radiology 225:113–119PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Mao S, Budoff MJ, Bakhsheshi H, Liu SCK (2001) Improved reproducibility of coronary artery calcium scoring by electron beam tomography with a new electrocardiographic trigger method. Invest Radiol 36:363–367PubMedCrossRef Mao S, Budoff MJ, Bakhsheshi H, Liu SCK (2001) Improved reproducibility of coronary artery calcium scoring by electron beam tomography with a new electrocardiographic trigger method. Invest Radiol 36:363–367PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldin JG, Yoon HC, Greaser III LE et al (2001) Spiral versus electron-beam CT for coronary artery calcium scoring. Radiology 221:213–221PubMedCrossRef Goldin JG, Yoon HC, Greaser III LE et al (2001) Spiral versus electron-beam CT for coronary artery calcium scoring. Radiology 221:213–221PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Muhlenbruch G, Thomas G, Wildberger JE et al (2005) Effect of varying slice thickness on coronary calcium scoring with multislice computed tomography in vitro and in vivo. Invest Radiol 40:695–699PubMedCrossRef Muhlenbruch G, Thomas G, Wildberger JE et al (2005) Effect of varying slice thickness on coronary calcium scoring with multislice computed tomography in vitro and in vivo. Invest Radiol 40:695–699PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Hong C, Becker CR, Schoepf UJ et al (2002) Coronary artery calcium: absolute quantification in nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced multidetector row CT studies. Radiology 223:474–480PubMedCrossRef Hong C, Becker CR, Schoepf UJ et al (2002) Coronary artery calcium: absolute quantification in nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced multidetector row CT studies. Radiology 223:474–480PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Mao S, Child J, Carson S et al (2003) Sensitivity to detect small coronary artery calcium lesions with varying slice thickness using electron beam tomography. Invest Radiol 38:183–187PubMedCrossRef Mao S, Child J, Carson S et al (2003) Sensitivity to detect small coronary artery calcium lesions with varying slice thickness using electron beam tomography. Invest Radiol 38:183–187PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Horiguchi J, Shen Y, Akiyama Y et al (2006) Electron beam CT versus 16-slice spiral CT: how accurately can we measure coronary artery calcium volume? Eur Radiol 16:374–380PubMedCrossRef Horiguchi J, Shen Y, Akiyama Y et al (2006) Electron beam CT versus 16-slice spiral CT: how accurately can we measure coronary artery calcium volume? Eur Radiol 16:374–380PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Mühlenbruch G, Klotz E, Wildberger JE et al (2007) The accuracy of 1- and 3-mm slices in coronary calcium scoring using multi-slice CT in vitro and in vivo. Eur Radiol 17:321–329PubMedCrossRef Mühlenbruch G, Klotz E, Wildberger JE et al (2007) The accuracy of 1- and 3-mm slices in coronary calcium scoring using multi-slice CT in vitro and in vivo. Eur Radiol 17:321–329PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Hunold P, Vogt FM, Schmermund A et al (2003) Radiation exposure during cardiac CT: Effective doses at multi-detector CT and electron-beam CT. Radiology 226:145–152PubMedCrossRef Hunold P, Vogt FM, Schmermund A et al (2003) Radiation exposure during cardiac CT: Effective doses at multi-detector CT and electron-beam CT. Radiology 226:145–152PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Bielak LF, Kaufmann RB, Moll PP, MacCollough CH, Schwartz RS, Sheedy PF II (1994) Small lesions in the heart identified at electron beam CT: calcification or noise? Radiology 192:631–636PubMed Bielak LF, Kaufmann RB, Moll PP, MacCollough CH, Schwartz RS, Sheedy PF II (1994) Small lesions in the heart identified at electron beam CT: calcification or noise? Radiology 192:631–636PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Variability of repeated coronary artery calcium measurements by 1.25-mm- and 2.5-mm-thickness images on prospective electrocardiograph-triggered 64-slice CT
verfasst von
Jun Horiguchi
Noriaki Matsuura
Hideya Yamamoto
Nobuhiko Hirai
Masao Kiguchi
Chikako Fujioka
Toshiro Kitagawa
Nobuoki Kohno
Katsuhide Ito
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2008
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 2/2008
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0734-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2008

European Radiology 2/2008 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.