Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 6/2008

01.06.2008 | Oncology

Semi-automated volumetric analysis of lymph node metastases in patients with malignant melanoma stage III/IV-A feasibility study

verfasst von: M. Fabel, H. von Tengg-Kobligk, F. L. Giesel, L. Bornemann, V. Dicken, A. Kopp-Schneider, C. Moser, S. Delorme, H.-U. Kauczor

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 6/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Therapy monitoring in oncological patient care requires accurate and reliable imaging and post-processing methods. RECIST criteria are the current standard, with inherent disadvantages. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of semi-automated volumetric analysis of lymph node metastases in patients with malignant melanoma compared to manual volumetric analysis and RECIST. Multislice CT was performed in 47 patients, covering the chest, abdomen and pelvis. In total, 227 suspicious, enlarged lymph nodes were evaluated retrospectively by two radiologists regarding diameters (RECIST), manually measured volume by placement of ROIs and semi-automated volumetric analysis. Volume (ml), quality of segmentation (++/−−) and time effort (s) were evaluated in the study. The semi-automated volumetric analysis software tool was rated acceptable to excellent in 81% of all cases (reader 1) and 79% (reader 2). Median time for the entire segmentation process and necessary corrections was shorter with the semi-automated software than by manual segmentation. Bland-Altman plots showed a significantly lower interobserver variability for semi-automated volumetric than for RECIST measurements. The study demonstrated feasibility of volumetric analysis of lymph node metastases. The software allows a fast and robust segmentation in up to 80% of all cases. Ease of use and time needed are acceptable for application in the clinical routine. Variability and interuser bias were reduced to about one third of the values found for RECIST measurements.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Herbst RS, Bajorin DF, Bleiberg H et al (2006) Clinical cancer advances 2005: major research advances in cancer treatment, prevention, and screening-a report from the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol 24:190–205PubMedCrossRef Herbst RS, Bajorin DF, Bleiberg H et al (2006) Clinical cancer advances 2005: major research advances in cancer treatment, prevention, and screening-a report from the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol 24:190–205PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, Winkler A (1981) Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 47:207–214PubMedCrossRef Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, Winkler A (1981) Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 47:207–214PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Husband JE, Schwartz LH, Spencer J et al (2004) Evaluation of the response to treatment of solid tumours-a consensus statement of the International Cancer Imaging Society. Br J Cancer 90:2256–2260PubMed Husband JE, Schwartz LH, Spencer J et al (2004) Evaluation of the response to treatment of solid tumours-a consensus statement of the International Cancer Imaging Society. Br J Cancer 90:2256–2260PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Padhani AR, Ollivier L (2001) The RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria: implications for diagnostic radiologists. Br J Radiol 74:983–986PubMed Padhani AR, Ollivier L (2001) The RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria: implications for diagnostic radiologists. Br J Radiol 74:983–986PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat James K, Eisenhauer E, Christian M et al (1999) Measuring response in solid tumors: unidimensional versus bidimensional measurement. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:523–528PubMedCrossRef James K, Eisenhauer E, Christian M et al (1999) Measuring response in solid tumors: unidimensional versus bidimensional measurement. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:523–528PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Park JO, Lee SI, Song SY et al (2003) Measuring response in solid tumors: comparison of RECIST and WHO response criteria. Jpn J Clin Oncol 33:533–537PubMedCrossRef Park JO, Lee SI, Song SY et al (2003) Measuring response in solid tumors: comparison of RECIST and WHO response criteria. Jpn J Clin Oncol 33:533–537PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Warr D, McKinney S, Tannock I (1984) Influence of measurement error on assessment of response to anticancer chemotherapy: proposal for new criteria of tumor response. J Clin Oncol 2:1040–1046PubMed Warr D, McKinney S, Tannock I (1984) Influence of measurement error on assessment of response to anticancer chemotherapy: proposal for new criteria of tumor response. J Clin Oncol 2:1040–1046PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Erasmus JJ, Gladish GW, Broemeling L et al (2003) Interobserver and intraobserver variability in measurement of non-small-cell carcinoma lung lesions: implications for assessment of tumor response. J Clin Oncol 21:2574–2582PubMedCrossRef Erasmus JJ, Gladish GW, Broemeling L et al (2003) Interobserver and intraobserver variability in measurement of non-small-cell carcinoma lung lesions: implications for assessment of tumor response. J Clin Oncol 21:2574–2582PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Thiesse P, Ollivier L, Di Stefano-Louineau D et al (1997) Response rate accuracy in oncology trials: reasons for interobserver variability. Groupe Francais d’Immunotherapie of the Federation Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer. J Clin Oncol 15:3507–3514PubMed Thiesse P, Ollivier L, Di Stefano-Louineau D et al (1997) Response rate accuracy in oncology trials: reasons for interobserver variability. Groupe Francais d’Immunotherapie of the Federation Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer. J Clin Oncol 15:3507–3514PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwartz LH, Mazumdar M, Brown W, Smith A, Panicek DM (2003) Variability in response assessment in solid tumors: effect of number of lesions chosen for measurement. Clin Cancer Res 9:4318–4323PubMed Schwartz LH, Mazumdar M, Brown W, Smith A, Panicek DM (2003) Variability in response assessment in solid tumors: effect of number of lesions chosen for measurement. Clin Cancer Res 9:4318–4323PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Prasad SR, Jhaveri KS, Saini S, Hahn PF, Halpern EF, Sumner JE (2002) CT tumor measurement for therapeutic response assessment: comparison of unidimensional, bidimensional, and volumetric techniques initial observations. Radiology 225:416–419PubMedCrossRef Prasad SR, Jhaveri KS, Saini S, Hahn PF, Halpern EF, Sumner JE (2002) CT tumor measurement for therapeutic response assessment: comparison of unidimensional, bidimensional, and volumetric techniques initial observations. Radiology 225:416–419PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Wormanns D, Kohl G, Klotz E et al (2004) Volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules at multi-row detector CT: in vivo reproducibility. Eur Radiol 14:86–92PubMedCrossRef Wormanns D, Kohl G, Klotz E et al (2004) Volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules at multi-row detector CT: in vivo reproducibility. Eur Radiol 14:86–92PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Yankelevitz DF, Reeves AP, Kostis WJ, Zhao B, Henschke CI (2000) Small pulmonary nodules: volumetrically determined growth rates based on CT evaluation. Radiology 217:251–256PubMed Yankelevitz DF, Reeves AP, Kostis WJ, Zhao B, Henschke CI (2000) Small pulmonary nodules: volumetrically determined growth rates based on CT evaluation. Radiology 217:251–256PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Bornemann L, Dicken V, Kuhnigk JM et al (2007) OncoTREAT: a software assistant for cancer therapy monitoring. Int J Compu Assist Radiology and Surgery (Int J CARS) 1:231–242CrossRef Bornemann L, Dicken V, Kuhnigk JM et al (2007) OncoTREAT: a software assistant for cancer therapy monitoring. Int J Compu Assist Radiology and Surgery (Int J CARS) 1:231–242CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Bornemann L, Kuhnigk JM, Dicken V et al (2005) Informatics in radiology (infoRAD): new tools for computer assistance in thoracic CT part 2. Therapy monitoring of pulmonary metastases. Radiographics 25:841–848PubMedCrossRef Bornemann L, Kuhnigk JM, Dicken V et al (2005) Informatics in radiology (infoRAD): new tools for computer assistance in thoracic CT part 2. Therapy monitoring of pulmonary metastases. Radiographics 25:841–848PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMed Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bolte H, Riedel C, Jahnke T et al (2006) Reproducibility of computer-aided volumetry of artificial small pulmonary nodules in ex vivo porcine lungs. Invest Radiol 41:28–35PubMedCrossRef Bolte H, Riedel C, Jahnke T et al (2006) Reproducibility of computer-aided volumetry of artificial small pulmonary nodules in ex vivo porcine lungs. Invest Radiol 41:28–35PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Sohaib SA, Turner B, Hanson JA, Farquharson M, Oliver RT, Reznek RH (2000) CT assessment of tumour response to treatment: comparison of linear, cross-sectional and volumetric measures of tumour size. Br J Radiol 73:1178–1184PubMed Sohaib SA, Turner B, Hanson JA, Farquharson M, Oliver RT, Reznek RH (2000) CT assessment of tumour response to treatment: comparison of linear, cross-sectional and volumetric measures of tumour size. Br J Radiol 73:1178–1184PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Marten K, Auer F, Schmidt S, Kohl G, Rummeny EJ, Engelke C (2006) Inadequacy of manual measurements compared to automated CT volumetry in assessment of treatment response of pulmonary metastases using RECIST criteria. Eur Radiol 16:781–790PubMedCrossRef Marten K, Auer F, Schmidt S, Kohl G, Rummeny EJ, Engelke C (2006) Inadequacy of manual measurements compared to automated CT volumetry in assessment of treatment response of pulmonary metastases using RECIST criteria. Eur Radiol 16:781–790PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Semi-automated volumetric analysis of lymph node metastases in patients with malignant melanoma stage III/IV-A feasibility study
verfasst von
M. Fabel
H. von Tengg-Kobligk
F. L. Giesel
L. Bornemann
V. Dicken
A. Kopp-Schneider
C. Moser
S. Delorme
H.-U. Kauczor
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2008
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 6/2008
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-0866-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2008

European Radiology 6/2008 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.