Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 12/2008

01.12.2008 | Breast

Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings

verfasst von: Ingvar Andersson, Debra M. Ikeda, Sophia Zackrisson, Mark Ruschin, Tony Svahn, Pontus Timberg, Anders Tingberg

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 12/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The main purpose was to compare breast cancer visibility in one-view breast tomosynthesis (BT) to cancer visibility in one- or two-view digital mammography (DM). Thirty-six patients were selected on the basis of subtle signs of breast cancer on DM. One-view BT was performed with the same compression angle as the DM image in which the finding was least/not visible. On BT, 25 projections images were acquired over an angular range of 50 degrees, with double the dose of one-view DM. Two expert breast imagers classified one- and two-view DM, and BT findings for cancer visibility and BIRADS cancer probability in a non-blinded consensus study. Forty breast cancers were found in 37 breasts. The cancers were rated more visible on BT compared to one-view and two-view DM in 22 and 11 cases, respectively, (p < 0.01 for both comparisons). Comparing one-view DM to one-view BT, 21 patients were upgraded on BIRADS classification (p < 0.01). Comparing two-view DM to one-view BT, 12 patients were upgraded on BIRADS classification (p < 0.01). The results indicate that the cancer visibility on BT is superior to DM, which suggests that BT may have a higher sensitivity for breast cancer detection.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Warren Burhenne LJ, Wood SA, D’Orsi CJ et al (2000) Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology 215:554–562PubMed Warren Burhenne LJ, Wood SA, D’Orsi CJ et al (2000) Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology 215:554–562PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA, Ernster V (1996) Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. JAMA 276:33–38PubMedCrossRef Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA, Ernster V (1996) Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. JAMA 276:33–38PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC et al (2003) Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med 138:168–175PubMed Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC et al (2003) Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med 138:168–175PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH (2002) Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 225:165–175PubMedCrossRef Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH (2002) Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 225:165–175PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Ikeda DM, Andersson I, Wattsgård C, Janzon L, Linell F (1992) Interval carcinomas in the Malmö Mammographic Screening Trial: radiographic appearance and prognostic considerations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 159:287–294PubMed Ikeda DM, Andersson I, Wattsgård C, Janzon L, Linell F (1992) Interval carcinomas in the Malmö Mammographic Screening Trial: radiographic appearance and prognostic considerations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 159:287–294PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM, O’Shaughnessy KF, Sickles EA et al (2001) Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. Radiology 219:192–202PubMed Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM, O’Shaughnessy KF, Sickles EA et al (2001) Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. Radiology 219:192–202PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bochud FO, Valley JF, Verdun FR, Hessler C, Schnyder P (1999) Estimation of the noisy component of anatomical backgrounds. Med Phys 26:1365–1370PubMedCrossRef Bochud FO, Valley JF, Verdun FR, Hessler C, Schnyder P (1999) Estimation of the noisy component of anatomical backgrounds. Med Phys 26:1365–1370PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Burgess AE, Jacobson FL, Judy PF (2001) Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise. Med Phys 28:419–437PubMedCrossRef Burgess AE, Jacobson FL, Judy PF (2001) Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise. Med Phys 28:419–437PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruschin M, Timberg P, Båth M et al (2007) Dose dependence of mass and microcalcification detection in digital mammography: free response human observer studies. Med Phys 34:400–407PubMedCrossRef Ruschin M, Timberg P, Båth M et al (2007) Dose dependence of mass and microcalcification detection in digital mammography: free response human observer studies. Med Phys 34:400–407PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hilleren DJ, Andersson IT, Lindholm K, Linell FS (1991) Invasive lobular carcinoma: mammographic findings in a 10-year experience. Radiology 178:25–26 Hilleren DJ, Andersson IT, Lindholm K, Linell FS (1991) Invasive lobular carcinoma: mammographic findings in a 10-year experience. Radiology 178:25–26
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Lewin JM, Hendrick RE, D’Orsi CJ et al (2001) Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: Results of 4,945 paired examinations. Radiology 218:873–880PubMed Lewin JM, Hendrick RE, D’Orsi CJ et al (2001) Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: Results of 4,945 paired examinations. Radiology 218:873–880PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Skaane P, Skjennald A (2004) Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program-the Oslo II study. Radiology 232:197–204PubMedCrossRef Skaane P, Skjennald A (2004) Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program-the Oslo II study. Radiology 232:197–204PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E et al (2005) Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 353:1773–1783PubMedCrossRef Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E et al (2005) Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 353:1773–1783PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Skaane P, Hofvind S, Skjennald A (2007) Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: Follow-up and final results of Oslo II study. Radiology 244:708–717PubMedCrossRef Skaane P, Hofvind S, Skjennald A (2007) Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: Follow-up and final results of Oslo II study. Radiology 244:708–717PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Niklason LT, Christian BT, Niklason LE et al (1997) Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology 205:399–406PubMed Niklason LT, Christian BT, Niklason LE et al (1997) Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology 205:399–406PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu T, Stewart A, Stanton M et al (2003) Tomographic mammography using a limited number of low-dose cone-beam projection images. Med Phys 30:365–380PubMedCrossRef Wu T, Stewart A, Stanton M et al (2003) Tomographic mammography using a limited number of low-dose cone-beam projection images. Med Phys 30:365–380PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat LO JY, Baker JA, Orman J, Mertelmeier T (2006) Breast tomosynthesis: Initial clinical experience with 100 human subjects (abs). In: Radiological Society of North America scientific assembly and annual meeting program. Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America SSG01-03, p 335 LO JY, Baker JA, Orman J, Mertelmeier T (2006) Breast tomosynthesis: Initial clinical experience with 100 human subjects (abs). In: Radiological Society of North America scientific assembly and annual meeting program. Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America SSG01-03, p 335
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Rafferty EA (2003) Breast tomosynthesis. Adv Digital Radiography: RSNA Categorical Course in Diagnostic Radiology Physics, pp 219–226 Rafferty EA (2003) Breast tomosynthesis. Adv Digital Radiography: RSNA Categorical Course in Diagnostic Radiology Physics, pp 219–226
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Varjonen M (2006) Three-dimensional (3D) digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in the early diagnosis and detection of breast cancer. Thesis, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland Varjonen M (2006) Three-dimensional (3D) digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in the early diagnosis and detection of breast cancer. Thesis, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Good WF, Abrams GS, Catullo VJ, Chough DM, Ganott MA, Hakim CM, Gur D (2008) Digital breast tomosynthesis: A pilot observer study. AJR 190:865–869PubMedCrossRef Good WF, Abrams GS, Catullo VJ, Chough DM, Ganott MA, Hakim CM, Gur D (2008) Digital breast tomosynthesis: A pilot observer study. AJR 190:865–869PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Poplack SP, Tosteson TD, Kogel CA, Nagy HM (2007) Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:616–623PubMedCrossRef Poplack SP, Tosteson TD, Kogel CA, Nagy HM (2007) Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:616–623PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore RH, Kopans DB, Rafferty EA et al (2007) Initial callback rates for conventional and digital breast tomosynthesis mammography comparison in the screening setting. (Abs). In: Radiological Society of North America scientific assembly and annual meeting program. Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America SSG01-01, p 381 Moore RH, Kopans DB, Rafferty EA et al (2007) Initial callback rates for conventional and digital breast tomosynthesis mammography comparison in the screening setting. (Abs). In: Radiological Society of North America scientific assembly and annual meeting program. Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America SSG01-01, p 381
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Bissonnette M, Hansroul M, Masson E et al (2005) Digital breast tomosynthesis using an amorphous selenium flat panel detector. Proc SPIE 5745:529–540CrossRef Bissonnette M, Hansroul M, Masson E et al (2005) Digital breast tomosynthesis using an amorphous selenium flat panel detector. Proc SPIE 5745:529–540CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Zoetelief J, Fitzgerald M, Leitz W, Säbel M (1996) European protocol on dosimetry in mammography. Publication EUR 16263 EN, Brussels, Belgium: European Commission Zoetelief J, Fitzgerald M, Leitz W, Säbel M (1996) European protocol on dosimetry in mammography. Publication EUR 16263 EN, Brussels, Belgium: European Commission
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Mertelmeier T, Orman J, Haerer W, Dudam MK (2006) Optimizing filtered backprojection reconstruction for a breast tomosynthesis device. Proc SPIE 6142:131–142 Mertelmeier T, Orman J, Haerer W, Dudam MK (2006) Optimizing filtered backprojection reconstruction for a breast tomosynthesis device. Proc SPIE 6142:131–142
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Orman J, Mertelmeier T, Haerer W (2006) Adaptation of image quality using various filter setups in the filtered backprojection approach for digital breast tomosynthesis. In: Astley SM, Brady M, Rose C, Zwiggelaar R (eds) Proceedings of the 8th international workshop on digital mammography. IWDM, Manchester, UK: Springer, Berlin, pp 175–182 Orman J, Mertelmeier T, Haerer W (2006) Adaptation of image quality using various filter setups in the filtered backprojection approach for digital breast tomosynthesis. In: Astley SM, Brady M, Rose C, Zwiggelaar R (eds) Proceedings of the 8th international workshop on digital mammography. IWDM, Manchester, UK: Springer, Berlin, pp 175–182
27.
Zurück zum Zitat “NEMA Standards Publications PS 3.14 (1998) Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM), Part 14: Grayscale Standard Display Function.,” National Electrical Manufacturers Association, 2101 L Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., 20037 “NEMA Standards Publications PS 3.14 (1998) Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM), Part 14: Grayscale Standard Display Function.,” National Electrical Manufacturers Association, 2101 L Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., 20037
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Båth M, Månsson LG (2007) Visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis: a non-parametric rank-invariant statistical method for image quality evaluation. Br J Radiol 80:169–176PubMedCrossRef Båth M, Månsson LG (2007) Visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis: a non-parametric rank-invariant statistical method for image quality evaluation. Br J Radiol 80:169–176PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Andersson I, Hildell J, Muhlow A, Pettersson H (1978) Number of projections in mammography: influence on detection of breast disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 130:349–351PubMed Andersson I, Hildell J, Muhlow A, Pettersson H (1978) Number of projections in mammography: influence on detection of breast disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 130:349–351PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings
verfasst von
Ingvar Andersson
Debra M. Ikeda
Sophia Zackrisson
Mark Ruschin
Tony Svahn
Pontus Timberg
Anders Tingberg
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2008
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 12/2008
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1076-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2008

European Radiology 12/2008 Zur Ausgabe

Musculoskeletal

Shoulder arthroplasty

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.