Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 6/2011

01.06.2011 | Physics

A novel approach to digital breast tomosynthesis for simultaneous acquisition of 2D and 3D images

verfasst von: Sara Vecchio, Achille Albanese, Paolo Vignoli, Angelo Taibi

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 6/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

The complexity of anatomical structure within the breast represents the ultimate limit to signal detection on a mammogram. To increase lesion conspicuity Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) has been recently proposed and several manufacturers are currently performing clinical trials. In this study we investigate the potential of DBT with variable dose distribution by using a phantom in which details of interest are within a heterogeneous background.

Methods

To compare the performance of a commercial digital mammography unit and a DBT prototype, 2D and 3D images of the breast phantom were obtained at similar dose levels.

Results

As expected, DBT showed superior performance over digital mammography. Although certain details of interest are not detectable with digital mammography, DBT can reveal their signal by reducing the complexity of tissue structures. Additionally, the potential of the central projection in variable dose DBT is similar to the standard projection obtained with digital mammography. Finally, the uniform and variable dose approaches provided almost identical reconstructed slices.

Conclusion

This preliminary investigation demonstrates that breast tomosynthesis acquired with variable dose distribution exhibits inherent 3D reconstruction advantages for structure noise removal and provides a 2D projection with a physical image quality close to that of standard mammography.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Dobbins JT, Godfrey DJ (2003) Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential. Phys Med Biol 48:R65–R106PubMedCrossRef Dobbins JT, Godfrey DJ (2003) Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential. Phys Med Biol 48:R65–R106PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Poplack SP, Tosteson TD, Kogel CA, Nagy HM (2007) Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography. Am J Roentgenol 189:616–623CrossRef Poplack SP, Tosteson TD, Kogel CA, Nagy HM (2007) Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography. Am J Roentgenol 189:616–623CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Andersson I, Ikeda DM, Zackrisson S, Ruschin M, Svahn T, Timberg P, Timberg A (2008) Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings. Eur Radiol 18:2817–2825PubMedCrossRef Andersson I, Ikeda DM, Zackrisson S, Ruschin M, Svahn T, Timberg P, Timberg A (2008) Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings. Eur Radiol 18:2817–2825PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Gennaro G, Toledano A, di Maggio C, Baldan E, Bezzon E, La Grassa M, Pescarini L, Polico I, Proietti A, Toffoli A, Muzzio PC (2009) Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study. Eur Radiol 20:1545–1553PubMedCrossRef Gennaro G, Toledano A, di Maggio C, Baldan E, Bezzon E, La Grassa M, Pescarini L, Polico I, Proietti A, Toffoli A, Muzzio PC (2009) Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study. Eur Radiol 20:1545–1553PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu T, Stewart A, Stanton M, McCauley T, Phillips W, Kopans DB, Moore RH, Eberhard JW, Opsahl-Ong B, Niklason L, Williams MB (2003) Tomographic mammography using a limited number of low-dose cone-beam projection images. Med Phys 30:365–380PubMedCrossRef Wu T, Stewart A, Stanton M, McCauley T, Phillips W, Kopans DB, Moore RH, Eberhard JW, Opsahl-Ong B, Niklason L, Williams MB (2003) Tomographic mammography using a limited number of low-dose cone-beam projection images. Med Phys 30:365–380PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Stanton M, Stewart A, Phillips W (2004) Method and system for low-dose three-dimensional imaging of a scene, United States Patent 6744848 Stanton M, Stewart A, Phillips W (2004) Method and system for low-dose three-dimensional imaging of a scene, United States Patent 6744848
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Das M, Gifford HC, O’Connor JM, Glick SJ (2009) Evaluation of a variable dose acquisition technique for microcalcification and mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis. Med Phys 36:1976–1984PubMedCrossRef Das M, Gifford HC, O’Connor JM, Glick SJ (2009) Evaluation of a variable dose acquisition technique for microcalcification and mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis. Med Phys 36:1976–1984PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhao B, Zhao W (2008) Imaging performance of an amorphous selenium digital mammography detector in a breast tomosynthesis system. Med Phys 35:1978–1987PubMedCrossRef Zhao B, Zhao W (2008) Imaging performance of an amorphous selenium digital mammography detector in a breast tomosynthesis system. Med Phys 35:1978–1987PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Chawla AS, Lo JY, Baker JA, Samei E (2009) Optimized image acquisition for breast tomosynthesis in projection and reconstruction space. Med Phys 36:4859–4869PubMedCrossRef Chawla AS, Lo JY, Baker JA, Samei E (2009) Optimized image acquisition for breast tomosynthesis in projection and reconstruction space. Med Phys 36:4859–4869PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sechopoulos I, Ghetti C (2009) Optimization of the acquisition geometry in digital tomosynthesis of the breast. Med Phys 36:1199–1207PubMedCrossRef Sechopoulos I, Ghetti C (2009) Optimization of the acquisition geometry in digital tomosynthesis of the breast. Med Phys 36:1199–1207PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat European Commission (2006) European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis, 4th edition European Commission (2006) European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis, 4th edition
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kastanis I, Arridge S, Stewart A, Gunn S, Ullberg C, Francke T (2010) 3D Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Using Total Variation Regularization, LNCS vol. 5116 Springer Heidelberg Kastanis I, Arridge S, Stewart A, Gunn S, Ullberg C, Francke T (2010) 3D Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Using Total Variation Regularization, LNCS vol. 5116 Springer Heidelberg
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Sotthivirat S, Fessler JA (2002) Image recovery using partitioned-separable paraboloidal surrogate coordinate ascent algorithms. IEEE Trans Image Process 11:306–317PubMedCrossRef Sotthivirat S, Fessler JA (2002) Image recovery using partitioned-separable paraboloidal surrogate coordinate ascent algorithms. IEEE Trans Image Process 11:306–317PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Taibi A (2009) Generalized subtraction methods in digital mammography. Eur J Radiol 72:447–453PubMedCrossRef Taibi A (2009) Generalized subtraction methods in digital mammography. Eur J Radiol 72:447–453PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Bochud FO, Valley J-F, Verdun FR, Hessler C, Schnyder P (1999) Estimation of the noisy component of anatomical backgrounds. Med Phys 26:1365–1370PubMedCrossRef Bochud FO, Valley J-F, Verdun FR, Hessler C, Schnyder P (1999) Estimation of the noisy component of anatomical backgrounds. Med Phys 26:1365–1370PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A novel approach to digital breast tomosynthesis for simultaneous acquisition of 2D and 3D images
verfasst von
Sara Vecchio
Achille Albanese
Paolo Vignoli
Angelo Taibi
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 6/2011
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-2041-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2011

European Radiology 6/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.