Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 12/2011

01.12.2011 | Computed Tomography

Raw data-based iterative reconstruction in body CTA: evaluation of radiation dose saving potential

verfasst von: Anna Winklehner, Christoph Karlo, Gilbert Puippe, Bernhard Schmidt, Thomas Flohr, Robert Goetti, Thomas Pfammatter, Thomas Frauenfelder, Hatem Alkadhi

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 12/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate prospectively, in patients undergoing body CTA, the radiation dose saving potential of raw data-based iterative reconstruction as compared to filtered back projection (FBP).

Methods

Twenty-five patients underwent thoraco-abdominal CTA with 128-slice dual-source CT, operating both tubes at 120 kV. Full-dose (FD) images were reconstructed with FBP and were compared to half-dose (HD) images with FBP and HD-images with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE), both reconstructed using data from only one tube-detector-system. Image quality and sharpness of the aortic contour were assessed. Vessel attenuation and noise were measured, contrast-to-noise-ratio was calculated.

Results

Noise as image quality deteriorating artefact occurred in 24/25 (96%) HD-FBP but not in FD-FBP and HD-raw data-based iterative reconstruction datasets (p < 0.001). Other artefacts occurred with similar prevalence among the datasets. Sharpness of the aortic contour was higher for FD-FBP and HD-raw data-based iterative reconstruction as compared to HD-FBP (p < 0.001). Aortoiliac attenuation was similar among all datasets (p > 0.05). Lowest noise was found for HD-raw data-based iterative reconstruction (7.23HU), being 9.4% lower than that in FD-FBP (7.98HU, p < 0.05) and 30.8% lower than in HD-FBP images (10.44HU, p < 0.001). Contrast-to-noise-ratio was lower in HD-FBP (p < 0.001) and higher in HD-raw data-based iterative reconstruction (p < 0.001) as compared to FD-FBP.

Conclusion

Intra-individual comparisons of image quality of body CTA suggest that raw data-based iterative reconstruction allows for dose reduction >50% while maintaining image quality.
Key Points
Raw data-based iterative reconstruction reduces image noise and improves image quality as compared to filtered back projection
At a similar radiation dose, raw data-based iterative reconstruction improves the sharpness of vessel contours
In body CTA a dose reduction of >50% might be possible when using raw data-based iterative reconstructions, while image quality can be maintained
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Wintersperger B, Jakobs T, Herzog P et al (2005) Aorto-iliac multidetector-row CT angiography with low kV settings: improved vessel enhancement and simultaneous reduction of radiation dose. Eur Radiol 15:334–341PubMedCrossRef Wintersperger B, Jakobs T, Herzog P et al (2005) Aorto-iliac multidetector-row CT angiography with low kV settings: improved vessel enhancement and simultaneous reduction of radiation dose. Eur Radiol 15:334–341PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat McCollough CH, Bruesewitz MR, Kofler JM Jr (2006) CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options. Radiographics 26:503–512PubMedCrossRef McCollough CH, Bruesewitz MR, Kofler JM Jr (2006) CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options. Radiographics 26:503–512PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL et al (2004) Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 230:619–628PubMedCrossRef Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL et al (2004) Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 230:619–628PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Pontana F, Pagniez J, Flohr T et al (2010) Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (Part 1): evaluation of image noise reduction in 32 patients. Eur Radiol 21:627–635PubMedCrossRef Pontana F, Pagniez J, Flohr T et al (2010) Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (Part 1): evaluation of image noise reduction in 32 patients. Eur Radiol 21:627–635PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Pontana F, Duhamel A, Pagniez J et al (2010) Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (Part 2): image quality of low-dose CT examinations in 80 patients. Eur Radiol 21:636–643PubMedCrossRef Pontana F, Duhamel A, Pagniez J et al (2010) Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (Part 2): image quality of low-dose CT examinations in 80 patients. Eur Radiol 21:636–643PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Prakash P, Kalra MK, Kambadakone AK et al (2010) Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Invest Radiol 45:202–210PubMedCrossRef Prakash P, Kalra MK, Kambadakone AK et al (2010) Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Invest Radiol 45:202–210PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Sagara Y, Hara AK, Pavlicek W, Silva AC, Paden RG, Wu Q (2010) Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:713–719PubMedCrossRef Sagara Y, Hara AK, Pavlicek W, Silva AC, Paden RG, Wu Q (2010) Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:713–719PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat May MS, Wust W, Brand M et al (2011) Dose reduction in abdominal computed tomography: intraindividual comparison of image quality of full-dose standard and half-dose iterative reconstructions with dual-source computed tomography. Invest Radiol 46:465–470PubMedCrossRef May MS, Wust W, Brand M et al (2011) Dose reduction in abdominal computed tomography: intraindividual comparison of image quality of full-dose standard and half-dose iterative reconstructions with dual-source computed tomography. Invest Radiol 46:465–470PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Schindera ST, Graca P, Patak MA et al (2009) Thoracoabdominal-aortoiliac multidetector-row CT angiography at 80 and 100 kVp: assessment of image quality and radiation dose. Invest Radiol 44:650–655PubMedCrossRef Schindera ST, Graca P, Patak MA et al (2009) Thoracoabdominal-aortoiliac multidetector-row CT angiography at 80 and 100 kVp: assessment of image quality and radiation dose. Invest Radiol 44:650–655PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Macari M, Chandarana H, Schmidt B, Lee J, Lamparello P, Babb J (2006) Abdominal aortic aneurysm: can the arterial phase at CT evaluation after endovascular repair be eliminated to reduce radiation dose? Radiology 241:908–914PubMedCrossRef Macari M, Chandarana H, Schmidt B, Lee J, Lamparello P, Babb J (2006) Abdominal aortic aneurysm: can the arterial phase at CT evaluation after endovascular repair be eliminated to reduce radiation dose? Radiology 241:908–914PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Barrett HH, Swindell W (1981) Radiological imaging: the theory of image formation, detection, and processing. Academic, New York Barrett HH, Swindell W (1981) Radiological imaging: the theory of image formation, detection, and processing. Academic, New York
Metadaten
Titel
Raw data-based iterative reconstruction in body CTA: evaluation of radiation dose saving potential
verfasst von
Anna Winklehner
Christoph Karlo
Gilbert Puippe
Bernhard Schmidt
Thomas Flohr
Robert Goetti
Thomas Pfammatter
Thomas Frauenfelder
Hatem Alkadhi
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 12/2011
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2227-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2011

European Radiology 12/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.