Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 6/2012

01.06.2012 | Gastrointestinal

Reassessment of CT images to improve diagnostic accuracy in patients with suspected acute appendicitis and an equivocal preoperative CT interpretation

verfasst von: Hyun Cheol Kim, Dal Mo Yang, Sang Won Kim, Seong Jin Park

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 6/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To identify CT features that discriminate individuals with and without acute appendicitis in patients with equivocal CT findings, and to assess whether knowledge of these findings improves diagnostic accuracy.

Methods

53 patients that underwent appendectomy with an indeterminate preoperative CT interpretation were selected and allocated to an acute appendicitis group or a non-appendicitis group. The 53 CT examinations were reviewed by two radiologists in consensus to identify CT findings that could aid in the discrimination of those with and without appendicitis. In addition, two additional radiologists were then requested to evaluate independently the 53 CT examinations using a 4-point scale, both before and after being informed of the potentially discriminating criteria.

Results

CT findings found to be significantly different in the two groups were; the presence of appendiceal wall enhancement, intraluminal air in appendix, a coexistent inflammatory lesion, and appendiceal wall thickening (P < 0.05). Areas under the curves of reviewers 1 and 2 significantly increased from 0.516 and 0.706 to 0.677 and 0.841, respectively, when reviewers were told which CT variables were significant (P = 0.0193 and P = 0.0397, respectively).

Conclusions

Knowledge of the identified CT findings was found to improve diagnostic accuracy for acute appendicitis in patients with equivocal CT findings.

Key Points

Numerous patients with clinically equivocal appendicitis do not have acute appendicitis
Computed tomography (CT) helps to reduce the negative appendectomy rate
CT is not always infallible and may also demonstrate indeterminate findings
However knowledge of significant CT variables can further reduce negative appendectomy rate
An equivocal CT interpretation of appendicitis should be reassessed with this knowledge
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, McCabe CJ, Lawrason JN, Berger DL, Sacknoff R (1997) Helical CT technique for the diagnosis of appendicitis: prospective evaluation of a focused appendix CT examination. Radiology 202:139–144PubMed Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, McCabe CJ, Lawrason JN, Berger DL, Sacknoff R (1997) Helical CT technique for the diagnosis of appendicitis: prospective evaluation of a focused appendix CT examination. Radiology 202:139–144PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Birnbaum BA, Wilson SR (2000) Appendicitis at the millennium. Radiology 215:337–348PubMed Birnbaum BA, Wilson SR (2000) Appendicitis at the millennium. Radiology 215:337–348PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Poletti PA, Platon A, De Perrot T, Sarasin F, Andereggen E, Rutschmann O, Dupuis-Lozeron E, Perneger T, Gervaz P, Becker CD (2011) Acute appendicitis: prospective evaluation of a diagnostic algorithm integrating ultrasound and low-dose CT to reduce the need of standard CT. Eur Radiol 21:2558–2566PubMedCrossRef Poletti PA, Platon A, De Perrot T, Sarasin F, Andereggen E, Rutschmann O, Dupuis-Lozeron E, Perneger T, Gervaz P, Becker CD (2011) Acute appendicitis: prospective evaluation of a diagnostic algorithm integrating ultrasound and low-dose CT to reduce the need of standard CT. Eur Radiol 21:2558–2566PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat van Randen A, Laméris W, van Es HW, van Heesewijk HP, van Ramshorst B, Ten Hove W, Bouma WH, van Leeuwen MS, van Keulen EM, Bossuyt PM, Stoker J, Boermeester MA, OPTIMA Study Group (2011) A comparison of the accuracy of ultrasound and computed tomography in common diagnoses causing acute abdominal pain. Eur Radiol 21:1535–1545PubMedCrossRef van Randen A, Laméris W, van Es HW, van Heesewijk HP, van Ramshorst B, Ten Hove W, Bouma WH, van Leeuwen MS, van Keulen EM, Bossuyt PM, Stoker J, Boermeester MA, OPTIMA Study Group (2011) A comparison of the accuracy of ultrasound and computed tomography in common diagnoses causing acute abdominal pain. Eur Radiol 21:1535–1545PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Doria AS, Moineddin R, Kellenberger CJ, Epelman M, Beyene J, Schuh S, Babyn PS, Dick PT (2006) US or CT for diagnosis of appendicitis in children and adults? A meta-analysis. Radiology 241:83–94PubMedCrossRef Doria AS, Moineddin R, Kellenberger CJ, Epelman M, Beyene J, Schuh S, Babyn PS, Dick PT (2006) US or CT for diagnosis of appendicitis in children and adults? A meta-analysis. Radiology 241:83–94PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Rybkin AV, Thoeni RF (2007) Current concepts in imaging of appendicitis. Radiol Clin North Am 45:411–422PubMedCrossRef Rybkin AV, Thoeni RF (2007) Current concepts in imaging of appendicitis. Radiol Clin North Am 45:411–422PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Khayal KA, Al-Omran MA (2007) Computed tomography and ultrasonography in the diagnosis of equivocal acute appendicitis. A meta-analysis. Saudi Med J 28:173–180PubMed Al-Khayal KA, Al-Omran MA (2007) Computed tomography and ultrasonography in the diagnosis of equivocal acute appendicitis. A meta-analysis. Saudi Med J 28:173–180PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Wijetunga R, Tan BS, Rouse JC, Bigg-Wither GW, Doust BD (2001) Diagnostic accuracy of focused appendiceal CT in clinically equivocal cases of acute appendicitis. Radiology 221:747–753PubMedCrossRef Wijetunga R, Tan BS, Rouse JC, Bigg-Wither GW, Doust BD (2001) Diagnostic accuracy of focused appendiceal CT in clinically equivocal cases of acute appendicitis. Radiology 221:747–753PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Poh AC, Lin M, Teh HS, Tan AG (2004) The role of computed tomography in clinically-suspected but equivocal acute appendicitis. Singapore Med J 45:379–384PubMed Poh AC, Lin M, Teh HS, Tan AG (2004) The role of computed tomography in clinically-suspected but equivocal acute appendicitis. Singapore Med J 45:379–384PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Daly CP, Cohan RH, Francis IR, Caoili EM, Ellis JH, Nan B (2005) Incidence of acute appendicitis in patients with equivocal CT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1813–1820PubMed Daly CP, Cohan RH, Francis IR, Caoili EM, Ellis JH, Nan B (2005) Incidence of acute appendicitis in patients with equivocal CT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1813–1820PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Moteki T, Horikoshi H (2007) New CT criterion for acute appendicitis: maximum depth of intraluminal appendiceal fluid. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:1313–1319PubMedCrossRef Moteki T, Horikoshi H (2007) New CT criterion for acute appendicitis: maximum depth of intraluminal appendiceal fluid. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:1313–1319PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Moteki T, Ohya N, Horikoshi H (2010) Computed tomography criterion for the diagnosis of appendicitis without periappendiceal inflammation in children using the maximum depth of intraluminal appendiceal fluid. J Comput Assist Tomogr 34:907–914PubMedCrossRef Moteki T, Ohya N, Horikoshi H (2010) Computed tomography criterion for the diagnosis of appendicitis without periappendiceal inflammation in children using the maximum depth of intraluminal appendiceal fluid. J Comput Assist Tomogr 34:907–914PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Jang KM, Min K, Kim MJ, Koh SH, Jeon EY, Kim IG, Choi D (2010) Diagnostic performance of CT in the detection of intestinal ischemia associated with small-bowel obstruction using maximal attenuation of region of interest. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:957–963PubMedCrossRef Jang KM, Min K, Kim MJ, Koh SH, Jeon EY, Kim IG, Choi D (2010) Diagnostic performance of CT in the detection of intestinal ischemia associated with small-bowel obstruction using maximal attenuation of region of interest. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:957–963PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Foley TA, Earnest F 4th, Nathan MA, Hough DM, Schiller HJ, Hoskin TL (2005) Differentiation of nonperforated from perforated appendicitis: accuracy of CT diagnosis and relationship of CT findings to length of hospital stay. Radiology 235:89–96PubMedCrossRef Foley TA, Earnest F 4th, Nathan MA, Hough DM, Schiller HJ, Hoskin TL (2005) Differentiation of nonperforated from perforated appendicitis: accuracy of CT diagnosis and relationship of CT findings to length of hospital stay. Radiology 235:89–96PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim HC, Yang DM, Jin W, Park SJ (2008) Added diagnostic value of multiplanar reformation of multidetector CT data in patients with suspected appendicitis. Radiographics 28:393–405PubMedCrossRef Kim HC, Yang DM, Jin W, Park SJ (2008) Added diagnostic value of multiplanar reformation of multidetector CT data in patients with suspected appendicitis. Radiographics 28:393–405PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi D, Park H, Lee YR, Kook SH, Kim SK, Kwag HJ, Chung EC et al (2003) The most useful findings for diagnosing acute appendicitis on contrast-enhanced helical CT. Acta Radiol 44:574–582PubMed Choi D, Park H, Lee YR, Kook SH, Kim SK, Kwag HJ, Chung EC et al (2003) The most useful findings for diagnosing acute appendicitis on contrast-enhanced helical CT. Acta Radiol 44:574–582PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Tamburrini S, Brunetti A, Brown M, Sirlin CB, Casola G (2005) CT appearance of the normal appendix in adults. Eur Radiol 15:2096–2103PubMedCrossRef Tamburrini S, Brunetti A, Brown M, Sirlin CB, Casola G (2005) CT appearance of the normal appendix in adults. Eur Radiol 15:2096–2103PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Webb EM, Wang ZJ, Coakley FV, Poder L, Westphalen AC, Yeh BM (2010) The equivocal appendix at CT: prevalence in a control population. Emerg Radiol 17:57–61PubMedCrossRef Webb EM, Wang ZJ, Coakley FV, Poder L, Westphalen AC, Yeh BM (2010) The equivocal appendix at CT: prevalence in a control population. Emerg Radiol 17:57–61PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Rettenbacher T, Hollerweger A, Macheiner P, Rettenbacher L, Frass R, Schneider B, Gritzmann N (2000) Presence or absence of gas in the appendix: additional criteria to rule out or confirm acute appendicitis–evaluation with US. Radiology 214:183–187PubMed Rettenbacher T, Hollerweger A, Macheiner P, Rettenbacher L, Frass R, Schneider B, Gritzmann N (2000) Presence or absence of gas in the appendix: additional criteria to rule out or confirm acute appendicitis–evaluation with US. Radiology 214:183–187PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA (1997) Appendiceal and peri-appendiceal air at CT: prevalence, appearance and clinical significance. Clin Radiol 52:750–754PubMedCrossRef Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA (1997) Appendiceal and peri-appendiceal air at CT: prevalence, appearance and clinical significance. Clin Radiol 52:750–754PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Yu J, Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Halvorsen RA (2005) Helical CT evaluation of acute right lower quadrant pain: part I, common mimics of appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1136–1142PubMed Yu J, Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Halvorsen RA (2005) Helical CT evaluation of acute right lower quadrant pain: part I, common mimics of appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1136–1142PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA (1997) CT diagnosis of mesenteric adenitis. Radiology 202:145–149PubMed Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA (1997) CT diagnosis of mesenteric adenitis. Radiology 202:145–149PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat van Randen A, Laméris W, van Es HW, ten Hove W, Bouma WH, van Leeuwen MS, van Keulen EM, van der Hulst VP, Henneman OD, Bossuyt PM, Boermeester MA, Stoker J (2010) Profiles of US and CT imaging features with a high probability of appendicitis. Eur Radiol 20:1657–1666PubMedCrossRef van Randen A, Laméris W, van Es HW, ten Hove W, Bouma WH, van Leeuwen MS, van Keulen EM, van der Hulst VP, Henneman OD, Bossuyt PM, Boermeester MA, Stoker J (2010) Profiles of US and CT imaging features with a high probability of appendicitis. Eur Radiol 20:1657–1666PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Weyant MJ, Eachempati SR, Maluccio MA, Rivadeneira DE, Grobmyer SR, Hydo LJ, Barie PS (2000) Interpretation of computed tomography does not correlate with laboratory or pathologic findings in surgically confirmed acute appendicitis. Surgery 128:145–152PubMedCrossRef Weyant MJ, Eachempati SR, Maluccio MA, Rivadeneira DE, Grobmyer SR, Hydo LJ, Barie PS (2000) Interpretation of computed tomography does not correlate with laboratory or pathologic findings in surgically confirmed acute appendicitis. Surgery 128:145–152PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Cobben LP, de Van Otterloo AM, Puylaert JB (2000) Spontaneously resolving appendicitis: frequency and natural history in 60 patients. Radiology 215:349–352PubMed Cobben LP, de Van Otterloo AM, Puylaert JB (2000) Spontaneously resolving appendicitis: frequency and natural history in 60 patients. Radiology 215:349–352PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Reassessment of CT images to improve diagnostic accuracy in patients with suspected acute appendicitis and an equivocal preoperative CT interpretation
verfasst von
Hyun Cheol Kim
Dal Mo Yang
Sang Won Kim
Seong Jin Park
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 6/2012
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2362-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2012

European Radiology 6/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.