Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 10/2012

01.10.2012 | Hepatobiliary-Pancreas

MR elastography of liver tumours: value of viscoelastic properties for tumour characterisation

verfasst von: Philippe Garteiser, Sabrina Doblas, Jean-Luc Daire, Mathilde Wagner, Helena Leitao, Valérie Vilgrain, Ralph Sinkus, Bernard E. Van Beers

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 10/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the value of the viscoelastic parameters in the characterisation of liver tumours at MR elastography.

Patients and methods

Ninety-four patients with liver tumours >1 cm prospectively underwent MR elastography using 50-Hz mechanical waves and a full three-directional motion-sensitive sequence. The model-free viscoelastic parameters (the complex shear modulus and its real and imaginary parts, i.e. the storage and loss moduli) were calculated in 72 lesions after exclusion of cystic, treated or histopathologically undetermined tumours.

Results

We observed higher absolute shear modulus and loss modulus in malignant versus benign tumours (3.38 ± 0.26 versus 2.41 ± 0.15 kPa, P < 0.01 and 2.25 ± 0.26 versus 1.05 ± 0.13 kPa, P < 0.001, respectively). Moreover, the loss modulus of hepatocellular carcinomas was significantly higher than in benign hepatocellular tumours. The storage modulus did not differ significantly between malignant and benign tumours. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of loss modulus was significantly larger than that of the absolute shear modulus and storage modulus when comparing malignant and benign lesions.

Conclusions

The increased loss modulus is a better discriminator between benign and malignant tumours than the increased storage modulus or absolute value of the shear modulus.

Key Points

Magnetic Resonance elastography is a new method of assessing the liver.
Increased loss modulus is an indicator of malignancy in hepatic tumours.
Loss modulus is a better discriminator than absolute shear modulus values.
The viscoelastic properties of lesions offer promise for characterising liver tumours.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Taouli B, Losada M, Holland A, Krinsky G (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 127:S144–152PubMedCrossRef Taouli B, Losada M, Holland A, Krinsky G (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 127:S144–152PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bahirwani R, Reddy KR (2008) Review article: the evaluation of solitary liver masses. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 28:953–965PubMed Bahirwani R, Reddy KR (2008) Review article: the evaluation of solitary liver masses. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 28:953–965PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bruegel M, Holzapfel K, Gaa J et al (2008) Characterization of focal liver lesions by ADC measurements using a respiratory triggered diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar MR imaging technique. Eur Radiol 18:477–485PubMedCrossRef Bruegel M, Holzapfel K, Gaa J et al (2008) Characterization of focal liver lesions by ADC measurements using a respiratory triggered diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar MR imaging technique. Eur Radiol 18:477–485PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Silva AC, Evans JM, McCullough AE, Jatoi MA, Vargas HE, Hara AK (2009) MR imaging of hypervascular liver masses: a review of current techniques. Radiographics 29:385–402PubMedCrossRef Silva AC, Evans JM, McCullough AE, Jatoi MA, Vargas HE, Hara AK (2009) MR imaging of hypervascular liver masses: a review of current techniques. Radiographics 29:385–402PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kudo M (2010) Will Gd-EOB-MRI change the diagnostic algorithm in hepatocellular carcinoma? Oncology 78:87–93PubMedCrossRef Kudo M (2010) Will Gd-EOB-MRI change the diagnostic algorithm in hepatocellular carcinoma? Oncology 78:87–93PubMedCrossRef
6.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Muthupillai R, Lomas DJ, Rossman PJ, Greenleaf JF, Manduca A, Ehman RL (1995) Magnetic resonance elastography by direct visualization of propagating acoustic strain waves. Science 269:1854–1857PubMedCrossRef Muthupillai R, Lomas DJ, Rossman PJ, Greenleaf JF, Manduca A, Ehman RL (1995) Magnetic resonance elastography by direct visualization of propagating acoustic strain waves. Science 269:1854–1857PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Sinkus R, Tanter M, Xydeas T, Catheline S, Bercoff J, Fink M (2005) Viscoelastic shear properties of in vivo breast lesions measured by MR elastography. Magn Reson Imaging 23:159–165PubMedCrossRef Sinkus R, Tanter M, Xydeas T, Catheline S, Bercoff J, Fink M (2005) Viscoelastic shear properties of in vivo breast lesions measured by MR elastography. Magn Reson Imaging 23:159–165PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Asbach P, Klatt D, Schlosser B et al (2010) Viscoelasticity-based staging of hepatic fibrosis with multifrequency MR elastography. Radiology 257:80–86PubMedCrossRef Asbach P, Klatt D, Schlosser B et al (2010) Viscoelasticity-based staging of hepatic fibrosis with multifrequency MR elastography. Radiology 257:80–86PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Sinkus R, Lorenzen J, Schrader D, Lorenzen M, Dargatz M, Holz D (2000) High-resolution tensor MR elastography for breast tumour detection. Phys Med Biol 45:1649–1664PubMedCrossRef Sinkus R, Lorenzen J, Schrader D, Lorenzen M, Dargatz M, Holz D (2000) High-resolution tensor MR elastography for breast tumour detection. Phys Med Biol 45:1649–1664PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Huwart L, Peeters F, Sinkus R et al (2006) Liver fibrosis: non-invasive assessment with MR elastography. NMR Biomed 19:173–179PubMedCrossRef Huwart L, Peeters F, Sinkus R et al (2006) Liver fibrosis: non-invasive assessment with MR elastography. NMR Biomed 19:173–179PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Yin M, Talwalkar JA, Glaser KJ et al (2007) Assessment of hepatic fibrosis with magnetic resonance elastography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:e1202CrossRef Yin M, Talwalkar JA, Glaser KJ et al (2007) Assessment of hepatic fibrosis with magnetic resonance elastography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:e1202CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Huwart L, Sempoux C, Vicaut E et al (2008) Magnetic resonance elastography for the noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis. Gastroenterology 135:32–40PubMedCrossRef Huwart L, Sempoux C, Vicaut E et al (2008) Magnetic resonance elastography for the noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis. Gastroenterology 135:32–40PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Venkatesh SK, Yin M, Glockner JF et al (2008) MR elastography of liver tumors: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:1534–1540PubMedCrossRef Venkatesh SK, Yin M, Glockner JF et al (2008) MR elastography of liver tumors: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:1534–1540PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Manduca A, Oliphant TE, Dresner MA et al (2001) Magnetic resonance elastography: non-invasive mapping of tissue elasticity. Med Image Anal 5:237–254PubMedCrossRef Manduca A, Oliphant TE, Dresner MA et al (2001) Magnetic resonance elastography: non-invasive mapping of tissue elasticity. Med Image Anal 5:237–254PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Mariappan YK, Glaser KJ, Ehman RL (2010) Magnetic resonance elastography: a review. Clin Anat 23:497–511PubMedCrossRef Mariappan YK, Glaser KJ, Ehman RL (2010) Magnetic resonance elastography: a review. Clin Anat 23:497–511PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bavu E, Gennisson JL, Couade M et al (2011) Noninvasive in vivo liver fibrosis evaluation using supersonic shear imaging: a clinical study on 113 hepatitis C virus patients. Ultrasound Med Biol 37:1361–1373PubMedCrossRef Bavu E, Gennisson JL, Couade M et al (2011) Noninvasive in vivo liver fibrosis evaluation using supersonic shear imaging: a clinical study on 113 hepatitis C virus patients. Ultrasound Med Biol 37:1361–1373PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ronot M, Bahrami S, Calderaro J et al (2011) Hepatocellular adenomas: accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and liver biopsy in subtype classification. Hepatology 53:1182–1191PubMedCrossRef Ronot M, Bahrami S, Calderaro J et al (2011) Hepatocellular adenomas: accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and liver biopsy in subtype classification. Hepatology 53:1182–1191PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Bruix J, Sherman M, Llovet JM et al (2001) Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL conference. J Hepatol 35:421–430PubMedCrossRef Bruix J, Sherman M, Llovet JM et al (2001) Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL conference. J Hepatol 35:421–430PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Bruix J, Sherman M (2011) Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology 53:1020–1022PubMedCrossRef Bruix J, Sherman M (2011) Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology 53:1020–1022PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Sinkus R, Tanter M, Catheline S et al (2005) Imaging anisotropic and viscous properties of breast tissue by magnetic resonance-elastography. Magn Reson Med 53:372–387PubMedCrossRef Sinkus R, Tanter M, Catheline S et al (2005) Imaging anisotropic and viscous properties of breast tissue by magnetic resonance-elastography. Magn Reson Med 53:372–387PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Padhani AR, Liu G, Koh DM et al (2009) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. Neoplasia 11:102–125PubMed Padhani AR, Liu G, Koh DM et al (2009) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. Neoplasia 11:102–125PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Zweig MH, Campbell G (1993) Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem 39:561–577PubMed Zweig MH, Campbell G (1993) Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem 39:561–577PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44:837–845PubMedCrossRef DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44:837–845PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat International Working Party (1995) Terminology of nodular hepatocellular lesions. Hepatology 22:983–993 International Working Party (1995) Terminology of nodular hepatocellular lesions. Hepatology 22:983–993
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Fahey BJ, Nelson RC, Bradway DP, Hsu SJ, Dumont DM, Trahey GE (2008) In vivo visualization of abdominal malignancies with acoustic radiation force elastography. Phys Med Biol 53:279–293PubMedCrossRef Fahey BJ, Nelson RC, Bradway DP, Hsu SJ, Dumont DM, Trahey GE (2008) In vivo visualization of abdominal malignancies with acoustic radiation force elastography. Phys Med Biol 53:279–293PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Cho SH, Lee JY, Han JK, Choi BI (2010) Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for the evaluation of focal solid hepatic lesions: preliminary findings. Ultrasound Med Biol 36:202–208PubMedCrossRef Cho SH, Lee JY, Han JK, Choi BI (2010) Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for the evaluation of focal solid hepatic lesions: preliminary findings. Ultrasound Med Biol 36:202–208PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Tseng Y, Fedorov E, McCaffery JM, Almo SC, Wirtz D (2001) Micromechanics and ultrastructure of actin filament networks crosslinked by human fascin: a comparison with alpha-actinin. J Mol Biol 310:351–366PubMedCrossRef Tseng Y, Fedorov E, McCaffery JM, Almo SC, Wirtz D (2001) Micromechanics and ultrastructure of actin filament networks crosslinked by human fascin: a comparison with alpha-actinin. J Mol Biol 310:351–366PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Weaver VM, Roskelley CD (1997) Extracellular matrix: the central regulator of cell and tissue homeostasis. Trends Cell Biol 7:40–42PubMedCrossRef Weaver VM, Roskelley CD (1997) Extracellular matrix: the central regulator of cell and tissue homeostasis. Trends Cell Biol 7:40–42PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Bilston LE (2002) The effect of perfusion on soft tissue mechanical properties: a computational model. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 5:283–290PubMedCrossRef Bilston LE (2002) The effect of perfusion on soft tissue mechanical properties: a computational model. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 5:283–290PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Fukumura D, Jain RK (2007) Tumor microvasculature and microenvironment: targets for anti-angiogenesis and normalization. Microvasc Res 74:72–84PubMedCrossRef Fukumura D, Jain RK (2007) Tumor microvasculature and microenvironment: targets for anti-angiogenesis and normalization. Microvasc Res 74:72–84PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Gialeli C, Theocharis AD, Karamanos NK (2011) Roles of matrix metalloproteinases in cancer progression and their pharmacological targeting. FEBS J 278:16–27PubMedCrossRef Gialeli C, Theocharis AD, Karamanos NK (2011) Roles of matrix metalloproteinases in cancer progression and their pharmacological targeting. FEBS J 278:16–27PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Siegmann KC, Xydeas T, Sinkus R, Kraemer B, Vogel U, Claussen CD (2010) Diagnostic value of MR elastography in addition to contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast-initial clinical results. Eur Radiol 20:318–325PubMedCrossRef Siegmann KC, Xydeas T, Sinkus R, Kraemer B, Vogel U, Claussen CD (2010) Diagnostic value of MR elastography in addition to contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast-initial clinical results. Eur Radiol 20:318–325PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Garteiser P, Doblas S, Daire J-L, et al (2011) Combining biomechanical and diffusion data into a composite biomarker for the determination of hepatic tumor malignancy. Proceedings of the 2011 conference of the European Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and Biology 28 Garteiser P, Doblas S, Daire J-L, et al (2011) Combining biomechanical and diffusion data into a composite biomarker for the determination of hepatic tumor malignancy. Proceedings of the 2011 conference of the European Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and Biology 28
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Mariappan YK, Rossman PJ, Glaser KJ, Manduca A, Ehman RL (2009) Magnetic resonance elastography with a phased-array acoustic driver system. Magn Reson Med 61:678–685PubMedCrossRef Mariappan YK, Rossman PJ, Glaser KJ, Manduca A, Ehman RL (2009) Magnetic resonance elastography with a phased-array acoustic driver system. Magn Reson Med 61:678–685PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Asbach P, Klatt D, Hamhaber U et al (2008) Assessment of liver viscoelasticity using multifrequency MR elastography. Magn Reson Med 60:373–379PubMedCrossRef Asbach P, Klatt D, Hamhaber U et al (2008) Assessment of liver viscoelasticity using multifrequency MR elastography. Magn Reson Med 60:373–379PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Berry GP, Bamber JC, Armstrong CG, Miller NR, Barbone PE (2006) Towards an acoustic model-based poroelastic imaging method: I. Theoretical foundation. Ultrasound Med Biol 32:547–567PubMedCrossRef Berry GP, Bamber JC, Armstrong CG, Miller NR, Barbone PE (2006) Towards an acoustic model-based poroelastic imaging method: I. Theoretical foundation. Ultrasound Med Biol 32:547–567PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Berry GP, Bamber JC, Miller NR, Barbone PE, Bush NL, Armstrong CG (2006) Towards an acoustic model-based poroelastic imaging method: II. experimental investigation. Ultrasound Med Biol 32:1869–1885PubMedCrossRef Berry GP, Bamber JC, Miller NR, Barbone PE, Bush NL, Armstrong CG (2006) Towards an acoustic model-based poroelastic imaging method: II. experimental investigation. Ultrasound Med Biol 32:1869–1885PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Klatt D, Hamhaber U, Asbach P, Braun J, Sack I (2007) Noninvasive assessment of the rheological behavior of human organs using multifrequency MR elastography: a study of brain and liver viscoelasticity. Phys Med Biol 52:7281–7294PubMedCrossRef Klatt D, Hamhaber U, Asbach P, Braun J, Sack I (2007) Noninvasive assessment of the rheological behavior of human organs using multifrequency MR elastography: a study of brain and liver viscoelasticity. Phys Med Biol 52:7281–7294PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Konofagou EE, Harrigan TP, Ophir J, Krouskop TA (2001) Poroelastography: imaging the poroelastic properties of tissues. Ultrasound Med Biol 27:1387–1397PubMedCrossRef Konofagou EE, Harrigan TP, Ophir J, Krouskop TA (2001) Poroelastography: imaging the poroelastic properties of tissues. Ultrasound Med Biol 27:1387–1397PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
MR elastography of liver tumours: value of viscoelastic properties for tumour characterisation
verfasst von
Philippe Garteiser
Sabrina Doblas
Jean-Luc Daire
Mathilde Wagner
Helena Leitao
Valérie Vilgrain
Ralph Sinkus
Bernard E. Van Beers
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 10/2012
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2474-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2012

European Radiology 10/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.