Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 8/2013

01.08.2013 | Urogenital

How to differentiate benign from malignant myometrial tumours using MR imaging

verfasst von: Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara, Sophie Dechoux, Claire Bonneau, Audrey Morel, Roman Rouzier, Marie-France Carette, Emile Daraï, Marc Bazot

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 8/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To retrospectively evaluate the ability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to differentiate malignant from benign myometrial tumours.

Methods

Fifty-one women underwent MRI before surgery for evaluation of a solitary myometrial tumour. At histopathology, there were 25 uncertain or malignant mesenchymal tumours and 26 benign leiomyomas. Conventional morphological MRI criteria were recorded in addition to b 1,000 signal intensity and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Odds ratios (OR) were calculated for each criterion. A multivariate analysis was performed to construct an interpretation model.

Results

The significant criteria for prediction of malignancy were high b 1,000 signal intensity (OR = +∞), intermediate T2-weighted signal intensity (OR = +∞), mean ADC (OR = 25.1), patient age (OR = 20.1), intra-tumoral haemorrhage (OR = 21.35), endometrial thickening (OR = 11), T2-weighted signal heterogeneity (OR = 10.2), menopausal status (OR = 9.7), heterogeneous enhancement (OR = 8) and non-myometrial origin on MRI (OR = 4.9). In the recursive partitioning model, using b 1,000 signal intensity, T2 signal intensity, mean ADC, and patient age, the model correctly classified benign and malignant tumours in 47 of the 51 cases (92.4 %).

Conclusion

We have developed an interpretation model usable in routine practice for myometrial tumours discovered at MRI including T2 signal, b 1,000 signal and ADC measurement.

Key Points

MRI is widely used to differentiate benign from malignant myometrial tumours.
By combining T2-weighted, b 1,000 and ADC features, MRI is 92.4 % accurate.
DWI may limit misdiagnoses of uterine sarcoma as benign leiomyoma.
Patient age is important when considering a solitary myometrial tumour.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Deshmukh SP, Gonsalves CF, Guglielmo FF et al (2012) Role of MR imaging of uterine leiomyomas before and after embolization. Radiographics 32:E251–E281PubMedCrossRef Deshmukh SP, Gonsalves CF, Guglielmo FF et al (2012) Role of MR imaging of uterine leiomyomas before and after embolization. Radiographics 32:E251–E281PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Gambadauro P (2012) Dealing with uterine fibroids in reproductive medicine. J Obstet Gynaecol 32:210–216PubMedCrossRef Gambadauro P (2012) Dealing with uterine fibroids in reproductive medicine. J Obstet Gynaecol 32:210–216PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Marret H, Fritel X, Ouldamer L et al (2012) Therapeutic management of uterine fibroid tumors: updated French guidelines. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 165:156–164PubMedCrossRef Marret H, Fritel X, Ouldamer L et al (2012) Therapeutic management of uterine fibroid tumors: updated French guidelines. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 165:156–164PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Gorny KR, Woodrum DA, Brown DL et al (2011) Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound of uterine leiomyomas: review of a 12-month outcome of 130 clinical patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 22:857–864PubMedCrossRef Gorny KR, Woodrum DA, Brown DL et al (2011) Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound of uterine leiomyomas: review of a 12-month outcome of 130 clinical patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 22:857–864PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu TI, Yen TC, Lai CH (2011) Clinical presentation and diagnosis of uterine sarcoma, including imaging. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 25:681–689PubMedCrossRef Wu TI, Yen TC, Lai CH (2011) Clinical presentation and diagnosis of uterine sarcoma, including imaging. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 25:681–689PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Van den Bosch T, Coosemans A, Morina M et al (2012) Screening for uterine tumours. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 26:257–266PubMedCrossRef Van den Bosch T, Coosemans A, Morina M et al (2012) Screening for uterine tumours. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 26:257–266PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Sahdev A, Sohaib SA, Jacobs I et al (2001) MR imaging of uterine sarcomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:1307–1311PubMedCrossRef Sahdev A, Sohaib SA, Jacobs I et al (2001) MR imaging of uterine sarcomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:1307–1311PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ueda H, Togashi K, Konishi I et al (1999) Unusual appearances of uterine leiomyomas: MR imaging findings and their histopathologic backgrounds. Radiographics 19 Spec No: S131-S145 Ueda H, Togashi K, Konishi I et al (1999) Unusual appearances of uterine leiomyomas: MR imaging findings and their histopathologic backgrounds. Radiographics 19 Spec No: S131-S145
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Tamai K, Koyama T, Saga T et al (2008) The utility of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for differentiating uterine sarcomas from benign leiomyomas. Eur Radiol 18:723–730PubMedCrossRef Tamai K, Koyama T, Saga T et al (2008) The utility of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for differentiating uterine sarcomas from benign leiomyomas. Eur Radiol 18:723–730PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Namimoto T, Yamashita Y, Awai K et al (2009) Combined use of T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted 3-T MR imaging for differentiating uterine sarcomas from benign leiomyomas. Eur Radiol 19:2756–2764PubMedCrossRef Namimoto T, Yamashita Y, Awai K et al (2009) Combined use of T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted 3-T MR imaging for differentiating uterine sarcomas from benign leiomyomas. Eur Radiol 19:2756–2764PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomassin-Naggara I, Cuenod CA, Darai E et al (2008) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of ovarian neoplasms: current status and future perspectives. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 16:661–72, ix Thomassin-Naggara I, Cuenod CA, Darai E et al (2008) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of ovarian neoplasms: current status and future perspectives. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 16:661–72, ix
12.
Zurück zum Zitat James KE, White RF, Kraemer HC (2005) Repeated split sample validation to assess logistic regression and recursive partitioning: an application to the prediction of cognitive impairment. Stat Med 24:3019–3035PubMedCrossRef James KE, White RF, Kraemer HC (2005) Repeated split sample validation to assess logistic regression and recursive partitioning: an application to the prediction of cognitive impairment. Stat Med 24:3019–3035PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomassin-Naggara I, Darai E, Cuenod CA et al (2009) Contribution of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for predicting benignity of complex adnexal masses. Eur Radiol 19:1544–1552PubMedCrossRef Thomassin-Naggara I, Darai E, Cuenod CA et al (2009) Contribution of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for predicting benignity of complex adnexal masses. Eur Radiol 19:1544–1552PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Murase E, Siegelman ES, Outwater EK et al (1999) Uterine leiomyomas: histopathologic features, MR imaging findings, differential diagnosis, and treatment. Radiographics 19:1179–1197PubMed Murase E, Siegelman ES, Outwater EK et al (1999) Uterine leiomyomas: histopathologic features, MR imaging findings, differential diagnosis, and treatment. Radiographics 19:1179–1197PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Pelage JP, Cazejust J, Pluot E et al (2005) Uterine fibroid vascularization and clinical relevance to uterine fibroid embolization. Radiographics 25:S99–S117PubMedCrossRef Pelage JP, Cazejust J, Pluot E et al (2005) Uterine fibroid vascularization and clinical relevance to uterine fibroid embolization. Radiographics 25:S99–S117PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
How to differentiate benign from malignant myometrial tumours using MR imaging
verfasst von
Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara
Sophie Dechoux
Claire Bonneau
Audrey Morel
Roman Rouzier
Marie-France Carette
Emile Daraï
Marc Bazot
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2013
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 8/2013
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-2819-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2013

European Radiology 8/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.