nach oben

European Radiology

Erschienen in:

01.08.2013 | Hepatobiliary-Pancreas

Preoperative evaluation of colorectal liver metastases: comparison between gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3.0-T MRI and contrast-enhanced MDCT with histopathological correlation

verfasst von: M. Scharitzer, A. Ba-Ssalamah, H. Ringl, C. Kölblinger, T. Grünberger, M. Weber, W. Schima

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 8/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this prospective study was to compare the diagnostic performance of 64-row MDCT and gadoxetic-acid-enhanced MRI at 3.0 T in patients with colorectal liver metastases in correlation with histopathological findings.

Methods

Lesions detected at MDCT and MRI were interpreted by three blinded readers and compared with histopathological workup as the term of reference. Two subgroups of lesions were additionally evaluated: (1) metastases smaller than 10 mm and (2) lesions in patients with and without steatosis of the liver, assessed histopathologically.

Results

Surgery and histopathological workup revealed 81 colorectal liver metastases in 35 patients and diffuse metastatic involvement in 3 patients. In a lesion-by-lesion analysis, significant sensitivity differences could only be found for reader 1 (P = 0.035) and reader 3 (P = 0.003). For segment-based evaluation, MRI was more sensitive only for reader 3 (P = 0.012). The number of false-positive results ranged from 3 to 12 for MDCT and 8 to 11 for MRI evaluation. In the group of small lesions, the sensitivity differed significantly between both methods (P = 0.003). In patients with hepatic steatosis, MRI showed a trend toward better performance than MDCT, but without statistical performance.

Conclusions

The 3.0-T MRI with liver-specific contrast agents is the preferred investigation in the preoperative setting, especially for the assessment of small colorectal liver metastases.

Key Points

• Potential surgical treatment requires accurate radiological assessment of colorectal liver metastases

• Magnetic resonance imaging with gadoxetic acid is the preferred imaging investigation.

• MRI is better than multidetector CT for detecting small liver metastases.

Abdalla EK, Vauthey JN, Ellis LM et al (2004) Recurrence and outcomes following hepatic resection, radiofrequency ablation, and combined resection/ablation for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg 239:818–825, discussion 825–817PubMedCrossRef

Choti MA, Sitzmann JV, Tiburi MF et al (2002) Trends in long-term survival following liver resection for hepatic colorectal metastases. Ann Surg 235:759–766PubMedCrossRef

Fong Y, Fortner J, Sun RL, Brennan MF, Blumgart LH (1999) Clinical score for predicting recurrence after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis of 1001 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 230:309–318, discussion 318–321PubMedCrossRef

Malik HZ, Hamady ZZ, Adair R et al (2007) Prognostic influence of multiple hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 33:468–473PubMedCrossRef

Clavien PA, Petrowsky H, DeOliveira ML, Graf R (2007) Strategies for safer liver surgery and partial liver transplantation. N Engl J Med 356:1545–1559PubMedCrossRef

Tamandl D, Herberger B, Gruenberger B et al (2008) Adequate preoperative staging rarely leads to a change of intraoperative strategy in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer liver metastases. Surgery 143:648–657PubMedCrossRef

Hamm B, Staks T, Muhler A et al (1995) Phase I clinical evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA as a hepatobiliary MR contrast agent: safety, pharmacokinetics, and MR imaging. Radiology 195:785–792PubMed

Halavaara J, Breuer J, Ayuso C et al (2006) Liver tumor characterization: comparison between liver-specific gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced MRI and biphasic CT—a multicenter trial. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30:345–354PubMedCrossRef

Huppertz A, Balzer T, Blakeborough A et al (2004) Improved detection of focal liver lesions at MR imaging: multicenter comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR images with intraoperative findings. Radiology 230:266–275PubMedCrossRef

10.

Vogl TJ, Kummel S, Hammerstingl R et al (1996) Liver tumors: comparison of MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA. Radiology 200:59–67PubMed

11.

Zech CJ, Herrmann KA, Reiser MF, Schoenberg SO (2007) MR imaging in patients with suspected liver metastases: value of liver-specific contrast agent Gd-EOB-DTPA. Magn Reson Med Sci 6:43–52PubMedCrossRef

12.

Kim YK, Park G, Kim CS, Yu HC, Han YM (2012) Diagnostic efficacy of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for the detection and characterisation of liver metastases: comparison with multidetector-row CT. Br J Radiol 85:539–547PubMedCrossRef

13.

Muhi A, Ichikawa T, Motosugi U et al (2011) Diagnosis of colorectal hepatic metastases: comparison of contrast-enhanced CT, contrast-enhanced US, superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MRI, and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 34:326–335PubMedCrossRef

14.

Holzapfel K, Eiber MJ, Fingerle AA, Bruegel M, Rummeny EJ, Gaa J (2012) Detection, classification, and characterization of focal liver lesions: value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging, gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging and the combination of both methods. Abdom Imaging 37:74–82PubMedCrossRef

15.

Hekimoglu K, Ustundag Y, Dusak A et al (2011) Small colorectal liver metastases: detection with SPIO-enhanced MRI in comparison with gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI and CT imaging. Eur J Radiol 77:468–472PubMedCrossRef

16.

Chang KJ, Kamel IR, Macura KJ, Bluemke DA (2008) 3.0-T MR imaging of the abdomen: comparison with 1.5T. RadioGraphics 28:1983–1998PubMedCrossRef

17.

Laghi A (2007) Multidetector CT (64 Slices) of the liver: examination techniques. Eur Radiol 17:675–683PubMedCrossRef

18.

Couinaud CC (1957) Le foie: e’tudes anatomiques et chirurgicales. Masson, Paris

19.

Blakeborough A, Ward J, Wilson D et al (1997) Hepatic lesion detection at MR imaging: a comparative study with four sequences. Radiology 203:759–765PubMed

20.

Blyth S, Blakeborough A, Peterson M, Cameron IC, Majeed AW (2008) Sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of colorectal liver metastases. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 90:25–28PubMedCrossRef

21.

Hagspiel KD, Neidl KF, Eichenberger AC, Weder W, Marincek B (1995) Detection of liver metastases: comparison of superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced and unenhanced MR imaging at 1.5T with dynamic CT, intraoperative US, and percutaneous US. Radiology 196:471–478PubMed

22.

Hammerstingl R, Huppertz A, Breuer J et al (2008) Diagnostic efficacy of gadoxetic acid (Primovist)-enhanced MRI and spiral CT for a therapeutic strategy: comparison with intraoperative and histopathologic findings in focal liver lesions. Eur Radiol 18:457–467PubMedCrossRef

23.

Kim MJ, Kim JH, Chung JJ, Park MS, Lim JS, Oh YT (2003) Focal hepatic lesions: detection and characterization with combination gadolinium- and superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 228:719–726PubMedCrossRef

24.

Muller RD, Vogel K, Neumann K et al (1999) SPIO-MR imaging versus double-phase spiral CT in detecting malignant lesions of the liver. Acta Radiol 40:628–635PubMedCrossRef

25.

Reimer P, Jahnke N, Fiebich M et al (2000) Hepatic lesion detection and characterization: value of nonenhanced MR imaging, superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging, and spiral CT-ROC analysis. Radiology 217:152–158PubMed

26.

Semelka RC, Cance WG, Marcos HB, Mauro MA (1999) Liver metastases: comparison of current MR techniques and spiral CT during arterial portography for detection in 20 surgically staged cases. Radiology 213:86–91PubMed

27.

Seneterre E, Taourel P, Bouvier Y et al (1996) Detection of hepatic metastases: ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging versus unenhanced MR imaging and CT during arterial portography. Radiology 200:785–792PubMed

28.

Niekel MC, Bipat S, Stoker J (2010) Diagnostic imaging of colorectal liver metastases with CT, MR imaging, FDG PET, and/or FDG PET/CT: a meta-analysis of prospective studies including patients who have not previously undergone treatment. Radiology 257:674–684PubMedCrossRef

29.

Bartolozzi C, Donati F, Cioni D et al (2004) Detection of colorectal liver metastases: a prospective multicenter trial comparing unenhanced MRI, MnDPDP-enhanced MRI, and spiral CT. Eur Radiol 14:14–20PubMedCrossRef

30.

Floriani I, Torri V, Rulli E et al (2010) Performance of imaging modalities in diagnosis of liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging 31:19–31PubMedCrossRef

31.

Rappeport ED, Loft A, Berthelsen AK et al (2007) Contrast-enhanced FDG-PET/CT vs. SPIO-enhanced MRI vs. FDG-PET vs. CT in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a prospective study with intraoperative confirmation. Acta Radiol 48:369–378PubMedCrossRef

32.

Dahlqvist Leinhard O, Dahlstrom N, Kihlberg J et al (2012) Quantifying differences in hepatic uptake of the liver specific contrast agents Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA: a pilot study. Eur Radiol 22:642–653PubMedCrossRef

33.

Eiber M, Fingerle AA, Brugel M, Gaa J, Rummeny EJ, Holzapfel K (2012) Detection and classification of focal liver lesions in patients with colorectal cancer: retrospective comparison of diffusion-weighted MR imaging and multi-slice CT. Eur J Radiol 81:683–691PubMedCrossRef

34.

Ward J, Robinson PJ, Guthrie JA et al (2005) Liver metastases in candidates for hepatic resection: comparison of helical CT and gadolinium- and SPIO-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 237:170–180PubMedCrossRef

35.

Kuszyk BS, Bluemke DA, Urban BA et al (1996) Portal-phase contrast-enhanced helical CT for the detection of malignant hepatic tumors: sensitivity based on comparison with intraoperative and pathologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:91–95PubMedCrossRef

36.

Numminen K, Isoniemi H, Halavaara J et al (2005) Preoperative assessment of focal liver lesions: multidetector computed tomography challenges magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Radiol 46:9–15PubMedCrossRef

37.

Valls C, Andia E, Sanchez A et al (2001) Hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: preoperative detection and assessment of resectability with helical CT. Radiology 218:55–60PubMed

38.

Vogl TJ, Schwarz W, Blume S et al (2003) Preoperative evaluation of malignant liver tumors: comparison of unenhanced and SPIO (Resovist)-enhanced MR imaging with biphasic CTAP and intraoperative US. Eur Radiol 13:262–272PubMed

39.

Shimada K, Isoda H, Hirokawa Y, Arizono S, Shibata T, Togashi K (2010) Comparison of gadolinium-EOB-DTPA-enhanced and diffusion-weighted liver MRI for detection of small hepatic metastases. Eur Radiol 20:2690–2698PubMedCrossRef

40.

Berger-Kulemann V, Schima W, Baroud S et al (2012) Gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3.0T MR imaging versus multidetector-row CT in the detection of colorectal metastases in fatty liver using intraoperative ultrasound and histopathology as a standard of reference. Eur J Surg Oncol 38:670–676PubMedCrossRef

41.

Kulemann V, Schima W, Tamandl D et al (2011) Preoperative detection of colorectal liver metastases in fatty liver: MDCT or MRI? Eur J Radiol 79:e1–e6PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Preoperative evaluation of colorectal liver metastases: comparison between gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3.0-T MRI and contrast-enhanced MDCT with histopathological correlation
verfasst von: M. Scharitzer
A. Ba-Ssalamah
H. Ringl
C. Kölblinger
T. Grünberger
M. Weber
W. Schima
Publikationsdatum: 01.08.2013
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: European Radiology / Ausgabe 8/2013
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-2824-z

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

18.04.2024 | Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin | Nachrichten

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Preoperative evaluation of colorectal liver metastases: comparison between gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3.0-T MRI and contrast-enhanced MDCT with histopathological correlation

Abstract

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Key Points

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Studie bestätigt Potenzial von KI in der Radiologie

Update Radiologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Key Points

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2013

Quantification and characterisation of coronary artery plaque volume and adverse plaque features by coronary computed tomographic angiography: a direct comparison to intravascular ultrasound

Low-dose biplanar skeletal survey versus digital skeletal survey in multiple myeloma

Computed tomography-guided interstitial high dose rate brachytherapy for centrally located liver tumours: a single institution study

Subtractionless first-pass single contrast medium dose peripheral MR angiography using two-point Dixon fat suppression

Reference levels and patient doses in interventional cardiology procedures in Greece

Association between linear measurements of corpus callosum and gait in the elderly

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Studie bestätigt Potenzial von KI in der Radiologie

Update Radiologie