Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 3/2014

01.03.2014 | Cardiac

320-row CT coronary angiography predicts freedom from revascularisation and acts as a gatekeeper to defer invasive angiography in stable coronary artery disease: a fractional flow reserve-correlated study

verfasst von: Brian S. Ko, Dennis T. L. Wong, James D. Cameron, Darryl P. Leong, Michael Leung, Ian T. Meredith, Nitesh Nerlekar, Paul Antonis, Marcus Crossett, John Troupis, Richard Harper, Yuvaraj Malaiapan, Sujith K. Seneviratne

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 3/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To determine the accuracy of 320-row multidetector coronary computed tomography angiography (M320-CCTA) to detect functional stenoses using fractional flow reserve (FFR) as the reference standard and to predict revascularisation in stable coronary artery disease.

Methods

One hundred and fifteen patients (230 vessels) underwent M320-CCTA and FFR assessment and were followed for 18 months. Diameter stenosis on invasive angiography (ICA) and M320-CCTA were assessed by consensus by two observers and significant stenosis was defined as ≥50 %. FFR ≤0.8 indicated functionally significant stenoses.

Results

M320-CCTA had 94 % sensitivity and 94 % negative predictive value (NPV) for FFR ≤0.8. Overall accuracy was 70 %, specificity 54 % and positive predictive value 65 %. On receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) for CCTA to predict FFR ≤0.8 was 0.74 which was comparable with ICA. The absence of a significant stenosis on M320-CCTA was associated with a 6 % revascularisation rate. M320-CCTA predicted revascularisation with an AUC of 0.71 which was comparable with ICA.

Conclusions

M320-CCTA has excellent sensitivity and NPV for functional stenoses and therefore may act as an effective gatekeeper to defer ICA and revascularisation. Like ICA, M320-CCTA lacks specificity for functional stenoses and only has moderate accuracy to predict the need for revascularisation.

Key Points

Important information about the heart is provided by 320-row multidetector CT coronary angiography (M320-CCTA).
M320-CCTA accurately detects and excludes functional stenoses determined by fractional flow reserve (FFR).
Non-significant stenoses on M320-CCTA associated with fewer cardiac events and less revascularisation.
M320-CCTA may act as a gatekeeper for invasive angiography and inappropriate revascularisation.
Like ICA, M320-CCTA only has moderate accuracy to predict vessels requiring revascularisation.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Schinkel AF, Bax JJ, Geleijnse ML et al (2003) Noninvasive evaluation of ischaemic heart disease: myocardial perfusion imaging or stress echocardiography? Eur Heart J 24:789–800PubMedCrossRef Schinkel AF, Bax JJ, Geleijnse ML et al (2003) Noninvasive evaluation of ischaemic heart disease: myocardial perfusion imaging or stress echocardiography? Eur Heart J 24:789–800PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH et al (2009) Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 360:213–224PubMedCrossRef Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH et al (2009) Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 360:213–224PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B et al (2012) Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 367:991–1001PubMedCrossRef De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B et al (2012) Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 367:991–1001PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaw LJ, Hausleiter J, Achenbach S et al (2012) Coronary computed tomographic angiography as a gatekeeper to invasive diagnostic and surgical procedures: results from the multicenter CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: an International Multicenter) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 60:2103–2114PubMedCrossRef Shaw LJ, Hausleiter J, Achenbach S et al (2012) Coronary computed tomographic angiography as a gatekeeper to invasive diagnostic and surgical procedures: results from the multicenter CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: an International Multicenter) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 60:2103–2114PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat de Graaf FR, van Velzen JE, de Boer SM et al (2012) Non-invasive computed tomography coronary angiography as a gatekeeper for invasive coronary angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. doi:10.1007/s10554-012-0059-8 de Graaf FR, van Velzen JE, de Boer SM et al (2012) Non-invasive computed tomography coronary angiography as a gatekeeper for invasive coronary angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. doi:10.​1007/​s10554-012-0059-8
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Chinnaiyan KM, Raff GL, Goraya T et al (2012) Coronary computed tomography angiography after stress testing: results from a multicenter, statewide registry, ACIC (Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging Consortium). J Am Coll Cardiol 59:688–695PubMedCrossRef Chinnaiyan KM, Raff GL, Goraya T et al (2012) Coronary computed tomography angiography after stress testing: results from a multicenter, statewide registry, ACIC (Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging Consortium). J Am Coll Cardiol 59:688–695PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Sarno G, Decraemer I, Vanhoenacker PK et al (2009) On the inappropriateness of noninvasive multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to trigger coronary revascularization: a comparison with invasive angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2:550–557PubMedCrossRef Sarno G, Decraemer I, Vanhoenacker PK et al (2009) On the inappropriateness of noninvasive multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to trigger coronary revascularization: a comparison with invasive angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2:550–557PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Botman CJ, Schonberger J, Koolen S et al (2007) Does stenosis severity of native vessels influence bypass graft patency? A prospective fractional flow reserve-guided study. Ann Thorac Surg 83:2093–2097PubMedCrossRef Botman CJ, Schonberger J, Koolen S et al (2007) Does stenosis severity of native vessels influence bypass graft patency? A prospective fractional flow reserve-guided study. Ann Thorac Surg 83:2093–2097PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G et al (2007) Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:2105–2111PubMedCrossRef Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G et al (2007) Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:2105–2111PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Sianos G, Morel MA, Kappetein AP et al (2005) The SYNTAX Score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention 1:219–227PubMed Sianos G, Morel MA, Kappetein AP et al (2005) The SYNTAX Score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention 1:219–227PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F et al (2009) Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA 301:500–507PubMedCrossRef Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F et al (2009) Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA 301:500–507PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Delong ML, Duncan BD, Parker JH (1998) Parametric extension of the classical exposure-schedule theory for angle-multiplexed photorefractive recording over wide angles. Appl Opt 37:3015–3030PubMedCrossRef Delong ML, Duncan BD, Parker JH (1998) Parametric extension of the classical exposure-schedule theory for angle-multiplexed photorefractive recording over wide angles. Appl Opt 37:3015–3030PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Meijboom WB, Van Mieghem CA, van Pelt N et al (2008) Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:636–643PubMedCrossRef Meijboom WB, Van Mieghem CA, van Pelt N et al (2008) Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:636–643PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kajander S, Joutsiniemi E, Saraste M et al (2010) Cardiac positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging accurately detects anatomically and functionally significant coronary artery disease. Circulation 122:603–613PubMedCrossRef Kajander S, Joutsiniemi E, Saraste M et al (2010) Cardiac positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging accurately detects anatomically and functionally significant coronary artery disease. Circulation 122:603–613PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Koo BK, Erglis A, Doh JH et al (2011) Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:1989–1997PubMedCrossRef Koo BK, Erglis A, Doh JH et al (2011) Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:1989–1997PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bamberg F, Becker A, Schwarz F et al (2011) Detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: incremental diagnostic value of dynamic CT-based myocardial perfusion imaging. Radiology 260:689–698PubMedCrossRef Bamberg F, Becker A, Schwarz F et al (2011) Detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: incremental diagnostic value of dynamic CT-based myocardial perfusion imaging. Radiology 260:689–698PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Min JK, Berman DS, Budoff MJ et al (2011) Rationale and design of the DeFACTO (Determination of Fractional Flow Reserve by Anatomic Computed Tomographic AngiOgraphy) study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 5:301–309PubMedCrossRef Min JK, Berman DS, Budoff MJ et al (2011) Rationale and design of the DeFACTO (Determination of Fractional Flow Reserve by Anatomic Computed Tomographic AngiOgraphy) study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 5:301–309PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Khan A, Khosa F, Nasir K, Yassin A, Clouse ME (2011) Comparison of radiation dose and image quality: 320-MDCT versus 64-MDCT coronary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:163–168PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Khan A, Khosa F, Nasir K, Yassin A, Clouse ME (2011) Comparison of radiation dose and image quality: 320-MDCT versus 64-MDCT coronary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:163–168PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin FY, Shaw LJ, Dunning AM et al (2011) Mortality risk in symptomatic patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease: a prospective 2-center study of 2,583 patients undergoing 64-detector row coronary computed tomographic angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:510–519PubMedCrossRef Lin FY, Shaw LJ, Dunning AM et al (2011) Mortality risk in symptomatic patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease: a prospective 2-center study of 2,583 patients undergoing 64-detector row coronary computed tomographic angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:510–519PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Christou MA, Siontis GC, Katritsis DG, Ioannidis JP (2007) Meta-analysis of fractional flow reserve versus quantitative coronary angiography and noninvasive imaging for evaluation of myocardial ischemia. Am J Cardiol 99:450–456PubMedCrossRef Christou MA, Siontis GC, Katritsis DG, Ioannidis JP (2007) Meta-analysis of fractional flow reserve versus quantitative coronary angiography and noninvasive imaging for evaluation of myocardial ischemia. Am J Cardiol 99:450–456PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Fischer JJ, Samady H, McPherson JA et al (2002) Comparison between visual assessment and quantitative angiography versus fractional flow reserve for native coronary narrowings of moderate severity. Am J Cardiol 90:210–215PubMedCrossRef Fischer JJ, Samady H, McPherson JA et al (2002) Comparison between visual assessment and quantitative angiography versus fractional flow reserve for native coronary narrowings of moderate severity. Am J Cardiol 90:210–215PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong DT, Ko BS, Cameron JD et al (2013) Transluminal attenuation gradient in coronary computed tomography angiography is a novel noninvasive approach to the identification of functionally significant coronary artery stenosis: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.029 Wong DT, Ko BS, Cameron JD et al (2013) Transluminal attenuation gradient in coronary computed tomography angiography is a novel noninvasive approach to the identification of functionally significant coronary artery stenosis: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jacc.​2012.​12.​029
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoon YE, Choi JH, Kim JH et al (2012) Noninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenosis using CT angiography: diagnostic value of transluminal attenuation gradient and fractional flow reserve computed from coronary CT angiography compared to invasively measured fractional flow reserve. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 5:1088–1096PubMedCrossRef Yoon YE, Choi JH, Kim JH et al (2012) Noninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenosis using CT angiography: diagnostic value of transluminal attenuation gradient and fractional flow reserve computed from coronary CT angiography compared to invasively measured fractional flow reserve. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 5:1088–1096PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Ko BS, Cameron JD, Meredith IT et al (2012) Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J 33:67–77PubMedCrossRef Ko BS, Cameron JD, Meredith IT et al (2012) Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J 33:67–77PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Ko BS, Cameron JD, Leung M et al (2012) Combined CT coronary angiography and stress myocardial perfusion imaging for hemodynamically significant stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 5:1097–1111PubMedCrossRef Ko BS, Cameron JD, Leung M et al (2012) Combined CT coronary angiography and stress myocardial perfusion imaging for hemodynamically significant stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 5:1097–1111PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Nasis A, Ko BS, Leung MC et al (2013) Diagnostic accuracy of combined coronary angiography and adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging using 320-detector computed tomography: pilot study. Eur Radiol 23:1812–1821PubMedCrossRef Nasis A, Ko BS, Leung MC et al (2013) Diagnostic accuracy of combined coronary angiography and adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging using 320-detector computed tomography: pilot study. Eur Radiol 23:1812–1821PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Legalery P, Schiele F, Seronde MF et al (2005) One-year outcome of patients submitted to routine fractional flow reserve assessment to determine the need for angioplasty. Eur Heart J 26:2623–2629PubMedCrossRef Legalery P, Schiele F, Seronde MF et al (2005) One-year outcome of patients submitted to routine fractional flow reserve assessment to determine the need for angioplasty. Eur Heart J 26:2623–2629PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Bricker JT et al (2002) ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). Circulation 106:1883–1892PubMedCrossRef Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Bricker JT et al (2002) ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). Circulation 106:1883–1892PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
320-row CT coronary angiography predicts freedom from revascularisation and acts as a gatekeeper to defer invasive angiography in stable coronary artery disease: a fractional flow reserve-correlated study
verfasst von
Brian S. Ko
Dennis T. L. Wong
James D. Cameron
Darryl P. Leong
Michael Leung
Ian T. Meredith
Nitesh Nerlekar
Paul Antonis
Marcus Crossett
John Troupis
Richard Harper
Yuvaraj Malaiapan
Sujith K. Seneviratne
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-3059-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2014

European Radiology 3/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.