Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 4/2014

01.04.2014 | Chest

Image quality assessment of ultra low-dose chest CT using sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction

verfasst von: So Won Lee, Yookyung Kim, Sung Shine Shim, Jeong Kyong Lee, Seok Jeong Lee, Yon Ju Ryu, Jung Hyun Chang

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 4/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the image quality of ultra-low-dose computed tomography (ULDCT) using sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) compared to reduced dose CT (RDCT).

Methods

Eighty-one consecutive patients underwent non-enhanced ULDCT using 80 kVp and 30 mAs and contrast-enhanced RDCT using automated tube potential selection and tube current modulation. CT images were reconstructed with SAFIRE. Image noise and subjective image quality of normal structures and various pulmonary lesions were assessed.

Results

The mean effective doses were 0.29 ± 0.03 and 2.88 ± 1.11 mSv for ULDCT and RDCT, respectively. ULDCT had significantly higher noise (p < 0.001). Image quality of five normal structures was diagnostic in 91.1 % of ULDCT and 100 % of RDCT. With ULDCT, the frequencies of non-diagnostic image quality were 2.0 (1/50), 4.6 (13/280), 25.5 (14/55), and 40.0 (8/20)% for BMIs of < 20, 20–25, 25–30, and >30. In the assessment of pulmonary lesions, non-diagnostic image quality was observed for 11.2 % of all lesions, 60.9 % of decreased attenuation (significantly more frequent for upper lung lesions), and 23.5 % of ground-glass nodules.

Conclusion

ULDCT generates diagnostic images in patients with a BMI ≤25, but is of limited use for lesions with decreased attenuation, ground-glass nodules, or those located in the upper lobe.

Key Points

Iterative reconstruction enables ultra-low-dose CT (ULDCT) with very low radiation doses.
Image quality of ULDCT depends on the patient body mass index (BMI).
Selection of kVp and mAs depends on both BMI and lesion type.
• Diagnosis of pulmonary emphysema or ground-glass nodules requires higher radiation doses.
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Heyer CM, Mohr PS, Lemburg SP, Peters SA, Nicolas V (2007) Image quality and radiation exposure at pulmonary CT angiography with 100- or 120-kVp protocol: Prospective randomized study. Radiology 245:577–583. doi:10.1148/radiol.2452061919 PubMedCrossRef Heyer CM, Mohr PS, Lemburg SP, Peters SA, Nicolas V (2007) Image quality and radiation exposure at pulmonary CT angiography with 100- or 120-kVp protocol: Prospective randomized study. Radiology 245:577–583. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​2452061919 PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Silva AC, Lawder HJ, Hara A, Kujak J, Pavlicek W (2010) Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: Application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:191–199. doi:10.2214/AJR.09.2953 PubMedCrossRef Silva AC, Lawder HJ, Hara A, Kujak J, Pavlicek W (2010) Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: Application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:191–199. doi:10.​2214/​AJR.​09.​2953 PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat AAPM (2008) AAPM report no. 96: The measurement, reporting, and management of radiation dose in CT. College Park: American Association of Physicists in Medicine. AAPM (2008) AAPM report no. 96: The measurement, reporting, and management of radiation dose in CT. College Park: American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Moscariello A, Takx RA, Schoepf UJ et al (2011) Coronary CT angiography: Image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and potential for radiation dose reduction using a novel iterative image reconstruction technique-comparison with traditional filtered back projection. Eur Radiol 21:2130–2138. doi:10.1007/s00330-011-2164-9 PubMedCrossRef Moscariello A, Takx RA, Schoepf UJ et al (2011) Coronary CT angiography: Image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and potential for radiation dose reduction using a novel iterative image reconstruction technique-comparison with traditional filtered back projection. Eur Radiol 21:2130–2138. doi:10.​1007/​s00330-011-2164-9 PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Neroladaki A, Botsikas D, Boudabbous S, Becker CD, Montet X (2013) Computed tomography of the chest with model-based iterative reconstruction using a radiation exposure similar to chest X-ray examination: Preliminary observations. Eur Radiol 23:360–366. doi:10.1007/s00330-012-2627-7 PubMedCrossRef Neroladaki A, Botsikas D, Boudabbous S, Becker CD, Montet X (2013) Computed tomography of the chest with model-based iterative reconstruction using a radiation exposure similar to chest X-ray examination: Preliminary observations. Eur Radiol 23:360–366. doi:10.​1007/​s00330-012-2627-7 PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamada Y, Jinzaki M, Hosokawa T et al (2012) Dose reduction in chest CT: Comparison of the adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D, adaptive iterative dose reduction, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. Eur J Radiol 81:4185–4195. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.07.013 PubMedCrossRef Yamada Y, Jinzaki M, Hosokawa T et al (2012) Dose reduction in chest CT: Comparison of the adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D, adaptive iterative dose reduction, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. Eur J Radiol 81:4185–4195. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ejrad.​2012.​07.​013 PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Pontana F, Pagniez J, Flohr T et al (2011) Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (part 1): Evaluation of image noise reduction in 32 patients. Eur Radiol 21:627–635. doi:10.1007/s00330-010-1990-5 PubMedCrossRef Pontana F, Pagniez J, Flohr T et al (2011) Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (part 1): Evaluation of image noise reduction in 32 patients. Eur Radiol 21:627–635. doi:10.​1007/​s00330-010-1990-5 PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Karabulut N, Toru M, Gelebek V, Gulsun M, Ariyurek OM (2002) Comparison of low-dose and standard-dose helical CT in the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. Eur Radiol 12:2764–2769. doi:10.1007/s00330-002-1368-4 PubMed Karabulut N, Toru M, Gelebek V, Gulsun M, Ariyurek OM (2002) Comparison of low-dose and standard-dose helical CT in the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. Eur Radiol 12:2764–2769. doi:10.​1007/​s00330-002-1368-4 PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Gnannt R, Winklehner A, Eberli D, Knuth A, Frauenfelder T, Alkadhi H (2012) Automated tube potential selection for standard chest and abdominal CT in follow-up patients with testicular cancer: Comparison with fixed tube potential. Eur Radiol 22:1937–1945. doi:10.1007/s00330-012-2453-y PubMedCrossRef Gnannt R, Winklehner A, Eberli D, Knuth A, Frauenfelder T, Alkadhi H (2012) Automated tube potential selection for standard chest and abdominal CT in follow-up patients with testicular cancer: Comparison with fixed tube potential. Eur Radiol 22:1937–1945. doi:10.​1007/​s00330-012-2453-y PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Image quality assessment of ultra low-dose chest CT using sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction
verfasst von
So Won Lee
Yookyung Kim
Sung Shine Shim
Jeong Kyong Lee
Seok Jeong Lee
Yon Ju Ryu
Jung Hyun Chang
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 4/2014
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-3090-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2014

European Radiology 4/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.