Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 5/2015

01.05.2015 | Breast

3.0 Tesla breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with nipple discharge when mammography and ultrasound fail

verfasst von: Nóra Lubina, Ulla Schedelbeck, Anne Roth, Andreas Max Weng, Eva Geissinger, Arnd Hönig, Dietbert Hahn, Thorsten Alexander Bley

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 5/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To compare 3.0 Tesla breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with galactography for detection of benign and malignant causes of nipple discharge in patients with negative mammography and ultrasound.

Methods

We prospectively evaluated 56 breasts of 50 consecutive patients with nipple discharge who had inconspicuous mammography and ultrasound, using 3.0 Tesla breast MRI with a dedicated 16-channel breast coil, and then compared the results with galactography. Histopathological diagnoses and follow-ups were used as reference standard. Lesion size estimated on MRI was compared with the size at histopathology.

Results

Sensitivity and specificity of MRI vs. galactography for detecting pathologic findings were 95.7 % vs. 85.7 % and 69.7 % vs. 33.3 %, respectively. For the supposed concrete pathology based on MRI findings, the specificity was 67.6 % and the sensitivity 77.3 % (PPV 60.7 %, NPV 82.1 %). Eight malignant lesions were detected (14.8 %). The estimated size at breast MRI showed excellent correlation with the size at histopathology (Pearson’s correlation coefficient 0.95, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

MRI of the breast at 3.0 Tesla is an accurate imaging test and can replace galactography in the workup of nipple discharge in patients with inconspicuous mammography and ultrasound.

Key Points

Breast MRI is an excellent diagnostic tool for patients with nipple discharge.
MRI of the breast reveals malignant lesions despite inconspicuous mammography and ultrasound.
MRI of the breast has greater sensitivity and specificity than galactography.
Excellent correlation of lesion size measured at MRI and histopathology was found.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Zervoudis S, Iatrakis G, Economides P, Polyzos D, Navrozoglou I (2010) Nipple discharge screening. Womens Health (Lond Engl) 6:135–151CrossRef Zervoudis S, Iatrakis G, Economides P, Polyzos D, Navrozoglou I (2010) Nipple discharge screening. Womens Health (Lond Engl) 6:135–151CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Morrogh M, Park A, Elkin EB, King TA (2010) Lessons learned from 416 cases of nipple discharge of the breast. Am J Surg 200:73–80CrossRefPubMed Morrogh M, Park A, Elkin EB, King TA (2010) Lessons learned from 416 cases of nipple discharge of the breast. Am J Surg 200:73–80CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Orel SG, Dougherty CS, Reynolds C, Czerniecki BJ, Siegelman ES, Schnall MD (2000) MR imaging in patients with nipple discharge: initial experience. Radiology 216:248–254CrossRefPubMed Orel SG, Dougherty CS, Reynolds C, Czerniecki BJ, Siegelman ES, Schnall MD (2000) MR imaging in patients with nipple discharge: initial experience. Radiology 216:248–254CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lorenzon M, Zuiani C, Linda A, Londero V, Girometti R, Bazzocchi M (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with nipple discharge: should we recommend it? Eur Radiol 21:899–907CrossRefPubMed Lorenzon M, Zuiani C, Linda A, Londero V, Girometti R, Bazzocchi M (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with nipple discharge: should we recommend it? Eur Radiol 21:899–907CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Fischer U, Kuhl CK (2013) Paradigmenwechsel in der Mammadiagnostik im Zeitalter der Mamma-MRT. Radiologie 13:245–258 Fischer U, Kuhl CK (2013) Paradigmenwechsel in der Mammadiagnostik im Zeitalter der Mamma-MRT. Radiologie 13:245–258
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Adepoju LJ, Chun J, El-Tamer M, Ditkoff BA, Schnabel F, Joseph KA (2005) The value of clinical characteristics and breast-imaging studies in predicting a histopathologic diagnosis of cancer or high-risk lesion in patients with spontaneous nipple discharge. Am J Surg 190:644–646CrossRefPubMed Adepoju LJ, Chun J, El-Tamer M, Ditkoff BA, Schnabel F, Joseph KA (2005) The value of clinical characteristics and breast-imaging studies in predicting a histopathologic diagnosis of cancer or high-risk lesion in patients with spontaneous nipple discharge. Am J Surg 190:644–646CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Son EJ, Kim EK, Kim JA, Kwak JY, Jeong J (2009) Diagnostic value of 3D fast low-angle shot dynamic MRI of breast papillomas. Yonsei Med J 50:838–844CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Son EJ, Kim EK, Kim JA, Kwak JY, Jeong J (2009) Diagnostic value of 3D fast low-angle shot dynamic MRI of breast papillomas. Yonsei Med J 50:838–844CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB et al (2007) MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet 370:485–492CrossRefPubMed Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB et al (2007) MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet 370:485–492CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhl CK (2007) Current status of breast MR imaging. Part 2. Clinical applications. Radiology 244:672–691CrossRefPubMed Kuhl CK (2007) Current status of breast MR imaging. Part 2. Clinical applications. Radiology 244:672–691CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B et al (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer 46:1296–1316CrossRefPubMed Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B et al (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer 46:1296–1316CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat American College of Radiology (2003) ACR BI-RADS breast imaging reporting and data system: breast imaging atlas, 4th edn. American College of Radiology, Reston American College of Radiology (2003) ACR BI-RADS breast imaging reporting and data system: breast imaging atlas, 4th edn. American College of Radiology, Reston
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sabel MS, Helvie MA, Breslin T et al (2012) Is duct excision still necessary for all cases of suspicious nipple discharge? Breast J 18:157–162CrossRefPubMed Sabel MS, Helvie MA, Breslin T et al (2012) Is duct excision still necessary for all cases of suspicious nipple discharge? Breast J 18:157–162CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Gray RJ, Pockaj BA, Karstaedt PJ (2007) Navigating murky waters: a modern treatment algorithm for nipple discharge. Am J Surg 194:850–854, discussion 854–855CrossRefPubMed Gray RJ, Pockaj BA, Karstaedt PJ (2007) Navigating murky waters: a modern treatment algorithm for nipple discharge. Am J Surg 194:850–854, discussion 854–855CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Morrogh M, Morris EA, Liberman L, Borgen PI, King TA (2007) The predictive value of ductography and magnetic resonance imaging in the management of nipple discharge. Ann Surg Oncol 14:3369–3377CrossRefPubMed Morrogh M, Morris EA, Liberman L, Borgen PI, King TA (2007) The predictive value of ductography and magnetic resonance imaging in the management of nipple discharge. Ann Surg Oncol 14:3369–3377CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Albrecht C, Thele F, Grunwald S et al (2013) Nipple discharge: role of ductoscopy in comparison with standard diagnostic tests. Onkologie 36:12–16CrossRefPubMed Albrecht C, Thele F, Grunwald S et al (2013) Nipple discharge: role of ductoscopy in comparison with standard diagnostic tests. Onkologie 36:12–16CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Pinker K, Grabner G, Bogner W et al (2009) A combined high temporal and high spatial resolution 3 Tesla MR imaging protocol for the assessment of breast lesions: initial results. Invest Radiol 44:553–558CrossRefPubMed Pinker K, Grabner G, Bogner W et al (2009) A combined high temporal and high spatial resolution 3 Tesla MR imaging protocol for the assessment of breast lesions: initial results. Invest Radiol 44:553–558CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhl CK, Jost P, Morakkabati N, Zivanovic O, Schild HH, Gieseke J (2006) Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast at 3.0 and 1.5 T in the same patients: initial experience. Radiology 239:666–676CrossRefPubMed Kuhl CK, Jost P, Morakkabati N, Zivanovic O, Schild HH, Gieseke J (2006) Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast at 3.0 and 1.5 T in the same patients: initial experience. Radiology 239:666–676CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmitz AC, Peters NH, Veldhuis WB et al (2008) Contrast-enhanced 3.0-T breast MRI for characterization of breast lesions: increased specificity by using vascular maps. Eur Radiol 18:355–364CrossRefPubMed Schmitz AC, Peters NH, Veldhuis WB et al (2008) Contrast-enhanced 3.0-T breast MRI for characterization of breast lesions: increased specificity by using vascular maps. Eur Radiol 18:355–364CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Pinker-Domenig K, Bogner W, Gruber S et al (2012) High resolution MRI of the breast at 3 T: which BI-RADS(R) descriptors are most strongly associated with the diagnosis of breast cancer? Eur Radiol 22:322–330CrossRefPubMed Pinker-Domenig K, Bogner W, Gruber S et al (2012) High resolution MRI of the breast at 3 T: which BI-RADS(R) descriptors are most strongly associated with the diagnosis of breast cancer? Eur Radiol 22:322–330CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Elsamaloty H, Elzawawi MS, Mohammad S, Herial N (2009) Increasing accuracy of detection of breast cancer with 3-T MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1142–1148CrossRefPubMed Elsamaloty H, Elzawawi MS, Mohammad S, Herial N (2009) Increasing accuracy of detection of breast cancer with 3-T MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1142–1148CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsuoka A, Minato M, Harada M et al (2008) Comparison of 3.0- and 1.5-tesla diffusion-weighted imaging in the visibility of breast cancer. Radiat Med 26:15–20CrossRefPubMed Matsuoka A, Minato M, Harada M et al (2008) Comparison of 3.0- and 1.5-tesla diffusion-weighted imaging in the visibility of breast cancer. Radiat Med 26:15–20CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Liberman L, Mason G, Morris EA, Dershaw DD (2006) Does size matter? Positive predictive value of MRI-detected breast lesions as a function of lesion size. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:426–430CrossRefPubMed Liberman L, Mason G, Morris EA, Dershaw DD (2006) Does size matter? Positive predictive value of MRI-detected breast lesions as a function of lesion size. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:426–430CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Langer SA, Horst KC, Ikeda DM, Daniel BL, Kong CS, Dirbas FM (2005) Pathologic correlates of false positive breast magnetic resonance imaging findings: which lesions warrant biopsy? Am J Surg 190:633–640CrossRefPubMed Langer SA, Horst KC, Ikeda DM, Daniel BL, Kong CS, Dirbas FM (2005) Pathologic correlates of false positive breast magnetic resonance imaging findings: which lesions warrant biopsy? Am J Surg 190:633–640CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Schouten van der Velden AP, Schlooz-Vries MS, Boetes C, Wobbes T (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ: what is its clinical application? A review. Am J Surg 198:262–269CrossRefPubMed Schouten van der Velden AP, Schlooz-Vries MS, Boetes C, Wobbes T (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ: what is its clinical application? A review. Am J Surg 198:262–269CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Grunwald S, Heyer H, Paepke S et al (2007) Diagnostic value of ductoscopy in the diagnosis of nipple discharge and intraductal proliferations in comparison to standard methods. Onkologie 30:243–248CrossRefPubMed Grunwald S, Heyer H, Paepke S et al (2007) Diagnostic value of ductoscopy in the diagnosis of nipple discharge and intraductal proliferations in comparison to standard methods. Onkologie 30:243–248CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Sickles EA (2000) Galactography and other imaging investigations of nipple discharge. Lancet 356:1622–1623CrossRefPubMed Sickles EA (2000) Galactography and other imaging investigations of nipple discharge. Lancet 356:1622–1623CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Funovics MA, Philipp MO, Lackner B, Fuchsjaeger M, Funovics PT, Metz V (2003) Galactography: method of choice in pathologic nipple discharge? Eur Radiol 13:94–99CrossRefPubMed Funovics MA, Philipp MO, Lackner B, Fuchsjaeger M, Funovics PT, Metz V (2003) Galactography: method of choice in pathologic nipple discharge? Eur Radiol 13:94–99CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
3.0 Tesla breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with nipple discharge when mammography and ultrasound fail
verfasst von
Nóra Lubina
Ulla Schedelbeck
Anne Roth
Andreas Max Weng
Eva Geissinger
Arnd Hönig
Dietbert Hahn
Thorsten Alexander Bley
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 5/2015
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3521-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2015

European Radiology 5/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.