Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 7/2015

01.07.2015 | Breast

Very low mammographic breast density predicts poorer outcome in patients with invasive breast cancer

verfasst von: Amro Masarwah, Päivi Auvinen, Mazen Sudah, Suvi Rautiainen, Anna Sutela, Outi Pelkonen, Sanna Oikari, Veli-Matti Kosma, Ritva Vanninen

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 7/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To examine the prognostic value of mammographic breast density (MBD) and mammographic features and their relationship with established prognostic factors in patients with invasive breast cancer.

Methods

Mammographic characteristics of 270 patients were analyzed. MBD was classified according to percentile density (<5 %, 5-10 %, 10-25 %, 25-50 %, 50-75 %, >75 %) and further categorized into very low density (VLD; <10 %), low density (LOD; <25 %) and mixed density (MID; >25 %). Mammographic features were compared with established prognostic factors and patient outcomes while correcting for possible confounders.

Results

MBD was inversely associated with tumour grade (p = 0.019). Patients with LOD breasts had worse prognoses compared to those with MID breasts (disease-free survival 74.7 % vs. 84.8 %, p = 0.048; overall survival 75.3 % vs. 90.2 %, p = 0.003). Patients with VLD breasts showed the strongest significance compared to the remaining patients, even after adjusting for age, body mass index, and menopausal status. No other mammographic feature was prognostically significant. In Cox regression analysis, VLD proved to be an independent, poor prognostic feature (hazard ratio = 3.275; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

In patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer, very low MBD proved to be an independent prognostic feature, associated with higher tumour grade and predicted worse survival even after correcting for possible confounders.

Key Points

Percentile mammographic breast density was associated with patient prognosis.
Very low density proved to be an independent poor prognostic factor.
Only patients with densities <10 % displayed this difference in survival.
Mammographic breast density was inversely associated with histological tumour grade.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61:69–90PubMedCrossRef Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61:69–90PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Anothaisintawee T, Wiratkapun C, Lerdsitthichai P et al (2013) Risk factors of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asia Pac J Public Health 25:368–387PubMedCrossRef Anothaisintawee T, Wiratkapun C, Lerdsitthichai P et al (2013) Risk factors of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asia Pac J Public Health 25:368–387PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Schnitt SJ (2010) Classification and prognosis of invasive breast cancer: from morphology to molecular taxonomy. Mod Pathol 23:S60–S64PubMedCrossRef Schnitt SJ (2010) Classification and prognosis of invasive breast cancer: from morphology to molecular taxonomy. Mod Pathol 23:S60–S64PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Slamon DJ, Clark GM, Wong SG, Levin WJ, Ullrich A, McGuire WL (1987) Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. Science 235:177–182PubMedCrossRef Slamon DJ, Clark GM, Wong SG, Levin WJ, Ullrich A, McGuire WL (1987) Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. Science 235:177–182PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Rakha EA, Reis-Filho JS, Baehner F et al (2010) Breast cancer prognostic classification in the molecular era: the role of histological grade. Breast Cancer Res 12:207PubMedCentralPubMed Rakha EA, Reis-Filho JS, Baehner F et al (2010) Breast cancer prognostic classification in the molecular era: the role of histological grade. Breast Cancer Res 12:207PubMedCentralPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Veronesi U, Boyle P, Goldhirsch A, Orecchia R, Viale G (2005) Breast cancer. Lancet 365:1727–1741PubMedCrossRef Veronesi U, Boyle P, Goldhirsch A, Orecchia R, Viale G (2005) Breast cancer. Lancet 365:1727–1741PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Boyd NF, Lockwood GA, Byng JW, Tritchler DL, Yaffe MJ (1998) Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 7:1133–1144PubMed Boyd NF, Lockwood GA, Byng JW, Tritchler DL, Yaffe MJ (1998) Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 7:1133–1144PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Byng JW, Yaffe MJ, Jong RA et al (1998) Analysis of mammographic density and breast cancer risk from digitized mammograms. Radiographics 18:1587–1598PubMedCrossRef Byng JW, Yaffe MJ, Jong RA et al (1998) Analysis of mammographic density and breast cancer risk from digitized mammograms. Radiographics 18:1587–1598PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin LJ, Boyd NF (2008) Mammographic density. Potential mechanisms of breast cancer risk associated with mammographic density: hypotheses based on epidemiological evidence. Breast Cancer Res 10:201PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Martin LJ, Boyd NF (2008) Mammographic density. Potential mechanisms of breast cancer risk associated with mammographic density: hypotheses based on epidemiological evidence. Breast Cancer Res 10:201PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin LJ, Melnichouk O, Guo H et al (2010) Family history, mammographic density, and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19:456–463PubMedCrossRef Martin LJ, Melnichouk O, Guo H et al (2010) Family history, mammographic density, and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19:456–463PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolfe JN (1976) Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 126:1130–1137PubMedCrossRef Wolfe JN (1976) Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 126:1130–1137PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Tabar L, Gad A (1981) Screening for breast cancer: the Swedish trial. Radiology 138:219–222PubMedCrossRef Tabar L, Gad A (1981) Screening for breast cancer: the Swedish trial. Radiology 138:219–222PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat D'Orsi C, Mendelson E, Ikeda D et al (2003) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: ACR BI-RADS – Breast Imaging Atlas. American College of Radiology, Reston D'Orsi C, Mendelson E, Ikeda D et al (2003) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: ACR BI-RADS – Breast Imaging Atlas. American College of Radiology, Reston
14.
Zurück zum Zitat McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I (2006) Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15:1159–1169PubMedCrossRef McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I (2006) Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15:1159–1169PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Gierach GL, Ichikawa L, Kerlikowske K et al (2012) Relationship between mammographic density and breast cancer death in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst 104:1218–1227PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Gierach GL, Ichikawa L, Kerlikowske K et al (2012) Relationship between mammographic density and breast cancer death in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst 104:1218–1227PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Porter GJ, Evans AJ, Cornford EJ et al (2007) Influence of mammographic parenchymal pattern in screening-detected and interval invasive breast cancers on pathologic features, mammographic features, and patient survival. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:676–683PubMedCrossRef Porter GJ, Evans AJ, Cornford EJ et al (2007) Influence of mammographic parenchymal pattern in screening-detected and interval invasive breast cancers on pathologic features, mammographic features, and patient survival. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:676–683PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Olsen AH, Bihrmann K, Jensen MB, Vejborg I, Lynge E (2009) Breast density and outcome of mammography screening: a cohort study. Br J Cancer 100:1205–1208PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Olsen AH, Bihrmann K, Jensen MB, Vejborg I, Lynge E (2009) Breast density and outcome of mammography screening: a cohort study. Br J Cancer 100:1205–1208PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Sala E, Solomon L, Warren R et al (2000) Size, node status and grade of breast tumours: association with mammographic parenchymal patterns. Eur Radiol 10:157–161PubMedCrossRef Sala E, Solomon L, Warren R et al (2000) Size, node status and grade of breast tumours: association with mammographic parenchymal patterns. Eur Radiol 10:157–161PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Sala E, Warren R, McCann J, Duffy S, Luben R, Day N (2001) Mammographic parenchymal patterns and breast cancer natural history–a case-control study. Acta Oncol 40:461–465PubMedCrossRef Sala E, Warren R, McCann J, Duffy S, Luben R, Day N (2001) Mammographic parenchymal patterns and breast cancer natural history–a case-control study. Acta Oncol 40:461–465PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghosh K, Brandt KR, Sellers TA et al (2008) Association of mammographic density with the pathology of subsequent breast cancer among postmenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17:872–879PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Ghosh K, Brandt KR, Sellers TA et al (2008) Association of mammographic density with the pathology of subsequent breast cancer among postmenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17:872–879PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Chiu SY, Duffy S, Yen AM, Tabar L, Smith RA, Chen HH (2010) Effect of baseline breast density on breast cancer incidence, stage, mortality, and screening parameters: 25-year follow-up of a Swedish mammographic screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19:1219–1228PubMedCrossRef Chiu SY, Duffy S, Yen AM, Tabar L, Smith RA, Chen HH (2010) Effect of baseline breast density on breast cancer incidence, stage, mortality, and screening parameters: 25-year follow-up of a Swedish mammographic screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19:1219–1228PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Auvinen P, Tammi R, Kosma VM et al (2013) Increased hyaluronan content and stromal cell CD44 associate with HER2 positivity and poor prognosis in human breast cancer. Int J Cancer 132:531–539PubMedCrossRef Auvinen P, Tammi R, Kosma VM et al (2013) Increased hyaluronan content and stromal cell CD44 associate with HER2 positivity and poor prognosis in human breast cancer. Int J Cancer 132:531–539PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Boyd NF, Byng JW, Jong RA et al (1995) Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 87:670–675PubMedCrossRef Boyd NF, Byng JW, Jong RA et al (1995) Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 87:670–675PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Boyd NF, Jensen HM, Cooke G, Han HL (1992) Relationship between mammographic and histological risk factors for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 84:1170–1179PubMedCrossRef Boyd NF, Jensen HM, Cooke G, Han HL (1992) Relationship between mammographic and histological risk factors for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 84:1170–1179PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Senkus E, Kyriakides S, Penault-Llorca F et al (2013) Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 24:vi7–vi23PubMedCrossRef Senkus E, Kyriakides S, Penault-Llorca F et al (2013) Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 24:vi7–vi23PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldhirsch A, Winer EP, Coates AS et al (2013) Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013. Ann Oncol 24:2206–2223PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Goldhirsch A, Winer EP, Coates AS et al (2013) Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013. Ann Oncol 24:2206–2223PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Theriault RL, Carlson RW, Allred C et al (2013) Breast cancer, version 3.2013: featured updates to the NCCN guidelines. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 11:753–760, quiz 761 Theriault RL, Carlson RW, Allred C et al (2013) Breast cancer, version 3.2013: featured updates to the NCCN guidelines. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 11:753–760, quiz 761
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Murphy RA, Schairer C, Gierach GL et al (2013) Beyond breast cancer: mammographic features and mortality risk in a population of healthy women. PLoS One 8:e78722PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Murphy RA, Schairer C, Gierach GL et al (2013) Beyond breast cancer: mammographic features and mortality risk in a population of healthy women. PLoS One 8:e78722PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Sickles EA, D’Orsi CJ, Bassett LW et al (2013) ACR BI-RADS® mammography. In: ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. American College of Radiology, Reston Sickles EA, D’Orsi CJ, Bassett LW et al (2013) ACR BI-RADS® mammography. In: ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. American College of Radiology, Reston
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Price ER, Hargreaves J, Lipson JA et al (2013) The California breast density information group: a collaborative response to the issues of breast density, breast cancer risk, and breast density notification legislation. Radiology 269:887–892PubMedCrossRef Price ER, Hargreaves J, Lipson JA et al (2013) The California breast density information group: a collaborative response to the issues of breast density, breast cancer risk, and breast density notification legislation. Radiology 269:887–892PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Eriksson L, Czene K, Rosenberg LU et al (2013) Mammographic density and survival in interval breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res 15(3):R48 Eriksson L, Czene K, Rosenberg LU et al (2013) Mammographic density and survival in interval breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res 15(3):R48
Metadaten
Titel
Very low mammographic breast density predicts poorer outcome in patients with invasive breast cancer
verfasst von
Amro Masarwah
Päivi Auvinen
Mazen Sudah
Suvi Rautiainen
Anna Sutela
Outi Pelkonen
Sanna Oikari
Veli-Matti Kosma
Ritva Vanninen
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 7/2015
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3626-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2015

European Radiology 7/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.