Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 8/2016

11.11.2015 | Urogenital

Prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy with PI-RADS version 2 in prostate cancers: initial results

verfasst von: Sung Yoon Park, Young Taik Oh, Dae Chul Jung, Nam Hoon Cho, Young Deuk Choi, Koon Ho Rha, Sung Joon Hong

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 8/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To determine whether the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADSv2) helps predict biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer (PCa).

Methods

We included 158 patients with PCa who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radical prostatectomy (RP). Clinical (prostate-specific antigen, greatest percentage of core, and percentage of positive core number), PI-RADSv2 score on MRI, and surgical parameters (Gleason score, extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, and tumour volume) were investigated. Univariate and multivariate analyses using Cox’s proportional hazards model were performed to assess parameters predictive of BCR (two consecutive prostate specific antigens ≥0.2 ng/ml). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were analyzed.

Results

The rate of BCR was 13.3 % (21/158) after surgery (median follow-up, 25 months; range, 12–36). No subject with a PI-RADS score <4 had BCR. In univariate analysis, all parameters were significant for BCR (p < 0.05), except seminal vesicle invasion (p = 0.254). Meanwhile, PI-RADS score was the only independent parameter for BCR in multivariate analysis (p < 0.05). Two-year, BCR-free survival post-RP was significantly lower for PI-RADS ≥4 (84.7–85.5 %) than for PI-RADS <4 (100 %; p < 0.05).

Conclusion

As a preoperative imaging tool, PI-RADSv2 may be useful to predict BCR after radical prostatectomy for PCa.

Key Points

No subject with PI-RADS <4 had BCR after RP
PI-RADSv2 was the only predictor of BCR in multivariate analysis
Two-year, BCR-free survival following RP was lower for PI-RADS≥4 than for PI-RADS<4
Inter-rater agreement was good for PI-RADS ≥4 or not
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Stephenson AJ, Scardino PT, Eastham JA et al (2006) Preoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:715–717PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Stephenson AJ, Scardino PT, Eastham JA et al (2006) Preoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:715–717PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Han M, Partin AW, Zahurak M, Piantadosi S, Epstein JI, Walsh PC (2003) Biochemical (prostate specific antigen) recurrence probability following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol 169:517–523PubMedCrossRef Han M, Partin AW, Zahurak M, Piantadosi S, Epstein JI, Walsh PC (2003) Biochemical (prostate specific antigen) recurrence probability following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol 169:517–523PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J et al (2014) EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: Treatment of advanced, relapsing, and castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol 65:467–479PubMedCrossRef Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J et al (2014) EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: Treatment of advanced, relapsing, and castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol 65:467–479PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Pound CR, Partin AW, Eisenberger MA, Chan DW, Pearson JD, Walsh PC (1999) Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy. JAMA 281:1591–1597PubMedCrossRef Pound CR, Partin AW, Eisenberger MA, Chan DW, Pearson JD, Walsh PC (1999) Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy. JAMA 281:1591–1597PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Boorjian SA, Thompson RH, Tollefson MK et al (2011) Long-term risk of clinical progression after biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy: the impact of time from surgery to recurrence. Eur Urol 59:893–899PubMedCrossRef Boorjian SA, Thompson RH, Tollefson MK et al (2011) Long-term risk of clinical progression after biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy: the impact of time from surgery to recurrence. Eur Urol 59:893–899PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Uchio EM, Aslan M, Wells CK, Calderone J, Concato J (2010) Impact of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer among US veterans. Arch Intern Med 170:1390–1395PubMedCrossRef Uchio EM, Aslan M, Wells CK, Calderone J, Concato J (2010) Impact of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer among US veterans. Arch Intern Med 170:1390–1395PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Fuchsjager MH, Shukla-Dave A, Hricak H et al (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 104:315–320PubMedCrossRef Fuchsjager MH, Shukla-Dave A, Hricak H et al (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 104:315–320PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Zakian KL, Hricak H, Ishill N et al (2010) An exploratory study of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy of the prostate as preoperative predictive biomarkers of biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 184:2320–2327PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Zakian KL, Hricak H, Ishill N et al (2010) An exploratory study of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy of the prostate as preoperative predictive biomarkers of biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 184:2320–2327PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Park SY, Kim CK, Park BK, Lee HM, Lee KS (2011) Prediction of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy in men with prostate cancer by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: initial results. Eur Radiol 21:1111–1118PubMedCrossRef Park SY, Kim CK, Park BK, Lee HM, Lee KS (2011) Prediction of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy in men with prostate cancer by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: initial results. Eur Radiol 21:1111–1118PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Park JJ, Kim CK, Park SY, Park BK, Lee HM, Cho SW (2014) Prostate cancer: role of pretreatment multiparametric 3-T MRI in predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202:W459–W465PubMedCrossRef Park JJ, Kim CK, Park SY, Park BK, Lee HM, Cho SW (2014) Prostate cancer: role of pretreatment multiparametric 3-T MRI in predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202:W459–W465PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Westphalen AC, Koff WJ, Coakley FV et al (2011) Prostate cancer: prediction of biochemical failure after external-beam radiation therapy--Kattan nomogram and endorectal MR imaging estimation of tumor volume. Radiology 261:477–486PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Westphalen AC, Koff WJ, Coakley FV et al (2011) Prostate cancer: prediction of biochemical failure after external-beam radiation therapy--Kattan nomogram and endorectal MR imaging estimation of tumor volume. Radiology 261:477–486PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Riaz N, Afaq A, Akin O et al (2012) Pretreatment endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging findings predict biochemical tumor control in prostate cancer patients treated with combination brachytherapy and external-beam radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 84:707–711PubMedCrossRef Riaz N, Afaq A, Akin O et al (2012) Pretreatment endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging findings predict biochemical tumor control in prostate cancer patients treated with combination brachytherapy and external-beam radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 84:707–711PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kivrak AS, Paksoy Y, Erol C, Koplay M, Ozbek S, Kara F (2013) Comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient values among different MRI platforms: a multicenter phantom study. Diagn Interv Radiol 19:433–437PubMed Kivrak AS, Paksoy Y, Erol C, Koplay M, Ozbek S, Kara F (2013) Comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient values among different MRI platforms: a multicenter phantom study. Diagn Interv Radiol 19:433–437PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Sasaki M, Yamada K, Watanabe Y et al (2008) Variability in absolute apparent diffusion coefficient values across different platforms may be substantial: a multivendor, multi-institutional comparison study. Radiology 249:624–630PubMedCrossRef Sasaki M, Yamada K, Watanabe Y et al (2008) Variability in absolute apparent diffusion coefficient values across different platforms may be substantial: a multivendor, multi-institutional comparison study. Radiology 249:624–630PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenkrantz AB, Kim S, Lim RP et al (2013) Prostate cancer localization using multiparametric MR imaging: comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) and Likert scales. Radiology 269:482–492PubMedCrossRef Rosenkrantz AB, Kim S, Lim RP et al (2013) Prostate cancer localization using multiparametric MR imaging: comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) and Likert scales. Radiology 269:482–492PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamoen EH, de Rooij M, Witjes JA, Barentsz JO, Rovers MM (2014) Use of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) for Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Diagnostic Meta-analysis. Eur Urol. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.033 PubMed Hamoen EH, de Rooij M, Witjes JA, Barentsz JO, Rovers MM (2014) Use of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) for Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Diagnostic Meta-analysis. Eur Urol. doi:10.​1016/​j.​eururo.​2014.​10.​033 PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoeks CM, Somford DM, van Oort IM et al (2014) Value of 3-T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance-guided biopsy for early risk restratification in active surveillance of low-risk prostate cancer: a prospective multicenter cohort study. Investig Radiol 49:165–172CrossRef Hoeks CM, Somford DM, van Oort IM et al (2014) Value of 3-T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance-guided biopsy for early risk restratification in active surveillance of low-risk prostate cancer: a prospective multicenter cohort study. Investig Radiol 49:165–172CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Roethke MC, Kuru TH, Schultze S et al (2014) Evaluation of the ESUR PI-RADS scoring system for multiparametric MRI of the prostate with targeted MR/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy at 3.0 Tesla. Eur Radiol 24:344–352PubMedCrossRef Roethke MC, Kuru TH, Schultze S et al (2014) Evaluation of the ESUR PI-RADS scoring system for multiparametric MRI of the prostate with targeted MR/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy at 3.0 Tesla. Eur Radiol 24:344–352PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Renard-Penna R, Mozer P, Cornud F et al (2015) Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System and Likert Scoring System: Multiparametric MR Imaging Validation Study to Screen Patients for Initial Biopsy. Radiology. doi:10.1148/radiol.14140184:140184 PubMed Renard-Penna R, Mozer P, Cornud F et al (2015) Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System and Likert Scoring System: Multiparametric MR Imaging Validation Study to Screen Patients for Initial Biopsy. Radiology. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​14140184:​140184 PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Vargas HA, Akin O, Franiel T et al (2011) Diffusion-weighted endorectal MR imaging at 3 T for prostate cancer: tumor detection and assessment of aggressiveness. Radiology 259:775–784PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Vargas HA, Akin O, Franiel T et al (2011) Diffusion-weighted endorectal MR imaging at 3 T for prostate cancer: tumor detection and assessment of aggressiveness. Radiology 259:775–784PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Vos EK, Litjens GJ, Kobus T et al (2013) Assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T. Eur Urol 64:448–455PubMedCrossRef Vos EK, Litjens GJ, Kobus T et al (2013) Assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T. Eur Urol 64:448–455PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Hattori S, Kosaka T, Mizuno R et al (2014) Prognostic value of preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 113:741–747PubMedCrossRef Hattori S, Kosaka T, Mizuno R et al (2014) Prognostic value of preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 113:741–747PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim JY, Kim SH, Kim YH, Lee HJ, Kim MJ, Choi MS (2014) Low-risk prostate cancer: the accuracy of multiparametric MR imaging for detection. Radiology 271:435–444PubMedCrossRef Kim JY, Kim SH, Kim YH, Lee HJ, Kim MJ, Choi MS (2014) Low-risk prostate cancer: the accuracy of multiparametric MR imaging for detection. Radiology 271:435–444PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Arumainayagam N, Ahmed HU, Moore CM et al (2013) Multiparametric MR imaging for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: a validation cohort study with transperineal template prostate mapping as the reference standard. Radiology 268:761–769PubMedCrossRef Arumainayagam N, Ahmed HU, Moore CM et al (2013) Multiparametric MR imaging for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: a validation cohort study with transperineal template prostate mapping as the reference standard. Radiology 268:761–769PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Egevad L, Granfors T, Karlberg L, Bergh A, Stattin P (2002) Prognostic value of the Gleason score in prostate cancer. BJU Int 89:538–542PubMedCrossRef Egevad L, Granfors T, Karlberg L, Bergh A, Stattin P (2002) Prognostic value of the Gleason score in prostate cancer. BJU Int 89:538–542PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Walz J, Chun FK, Klein EA et al (2009) Risk-adjusted hazard rates of biochemical recurrence for prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 55:412–419PubMedCrossRef Walz J, Chun FK, Klein EA et al (2009) Risk-adjusted hazard rates of biochemical recurrence for prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 55:412–419PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Kayat Bittencourt L, Litjens G, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, Turkbey B, Gasparetto EL, Barentsz JO (2015) Prostate Cancer: The European Society of Urogenital Radiology Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Criteria for Predicting Extraprostatic Extension by Using 3-T Multiparametric MR Imaging. Radiology. doi:10.1148/radiol.15141412:141412 PubMed Kayat Bittencourt L, Litjens G, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, Turkbey B, Gasparetto EL, Barentsz JO (2015) Prostate Cancer: The European Society of Urogenital Radiology Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Criteria for Predicting Extraprostatic Extension by Using 3-T Multiparametric MR Imaging. Radiology. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​15141412:​141412 PubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Freedland SJ, Humphreys EB, Mangold LA et al (2005) Risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. JAMA 294:433–439PubMedCrossRef Freedland SJ, Humphreys EB, Mangold LA et al (2005) Risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. JAMA 294:433–439PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Buyyounouski MK, Pickles T, Kestin LL, Allison R, Williams SG (2012) Validating the interval to biochemical failure for the identification of potentially lethal prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 30:1857–1863PubMedCrossRef Buyyounouski MK, Pickles T, Kestin LL, Allison R, Williams SG (2012) Validating the interval to biochemical failure for the identification of potentially lethal prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 30:1857–1863PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Touijer KA, Mazzola CR, Sjoberg DD, Scardino PT, Eastham JA (2014) Long-term outcomes of patients with lymph node metastasis treated with radical prostatectomy without adjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy. Eur Urol 65:20–25PubMedCrossRef Touijer KA, Mazzola CR, Sjoberg DD, Scardino PT, Eastham JA (2014) Long-term outcomes of patients with lymph node metastasis treated with radical prostatectomy without adjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy. Eur Urol 65:20–25PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat von Bodman C, Godoy G, Chade DC et al (2010) Predicting biochemical recurrence-free survival for patients with positive pelvic lymph nodes at radical prostatectomy. J Urol 184:143–148CrossRef von Bodman C, Godoy G, Chade DC et al (2010) Predicting biochemical recurrence-free survival for patients with positive pelvic lymph nodes at radical prostatectomy. J Urol 184:143–148CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Briganti A, Blute ML, Eastham JH et al (2009) Pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer. Eur Urol 55:1251–1265PubMedCrossRef Briganti A, Blute ML, Eastham JH et al (2009) Pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer. Eur Urol 55:1251–1265PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy with PI-RADS version 2 in prostate cancers: initial results
verfasst von
Sung Yoon Park
Young Taik Oh
Dae Chul Jung
Nam Hoon Cho
Young Deuk Choi
Koon Ho Rha
Sung Joon Hong
Publikationsdatum
11.11.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 8/2016
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-4077-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2016

European Radiology 8/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.